ABSTRACT
Resumo Após 13 anos da publicação da Política Nacional da Saúde Integral da População Negra (PNSIPN), o preenchimento do quesito raça/cor na identificação de pacientes permanece um desafio. Autores têm se debruçado sobre a necessidade de integrar os conhecimentos da ciência da implementação às políticas públicas. O objetivo deste artigo é descrever e analisar a implementação da coleta do quesito raça/cor feito pelos profissionais responsáveis pelo registro dos pacientes num hospital universitário do município de São Paulo. Estudo exploratório e descritivo, estruturado a partir de três constructos do Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): intervenção, cenário interno e características dos indivíduos. Resultados: a maioria dos registros do quesito raça/cor na instituição observada é feita por heteroidentificação. A partir dos constructos do CFIR, são identificados aspectos apontados como obstáculos ou facilitadores. A implementação da coleta do quesito raça/cor por autodeclaração, como previsto na PNSIPN e na Portaria 344/2017, ainda é incipiente e depende de mudanças, sobretudo organizacionais, que favoreçam sua efetivação.
Abstract Thirteen years after the publication of the National Policy for the Comprehensive Health of the Black Population (PNSIPN, Política Nacional da Saúde Integral da População Negra), filling out the race/skin color question in the patient identification form remains a challenge. Authors have focused on the need to integrate knowledge from the science of implementation into public policies. The aim of this article is to describe and analyze the implementation of the collection of the race/skin color item carried out by the professionals responsible for the registration of patients at a university hospital in the city of São Paulo. This was an exploratory and descriptive study, structured from three constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): intervention, internal scenario and characteristics of individuals. Most records of race/skin color in the observed institution are made by heteroidentification. Based on the CFIR constructs, aspects identified as obstacles and facilitators are identified. The implementation of the collection of the race/skin color item by self-declaration, as provided for in the PNSIPN and in Ordinance n. 344/2017, is still incipient and depends mainly on organizational changes, which can favor its effectiveness.
ABSTRACT
Contemporary health research has come under close scrutiny, exposing alarming fl aws in the reporting of research. The reporting guidelines can aid in identifi cation of poorly reported studies and can bring transparency to health research. The guidelines also help journal editors, peer reviewers, funding agencies, and readers to better discern health research. Reporting guidelines encourage accurate and thorough reporting of fundamental aspects of health research so that the results of studies can be replicated by others. Reporting guidelines are potent tools to improve the practice of research and in reducing reporting bias. For the present review, both electronic and manual literature search was carried out. Electronic databases like PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCO host, and Science Direct were searched for extracting relevant articles. Various key words and their combinations were used for literature search like reporting guidelines, checklist, research, publishing standards, study design, medicine, and dentistry. The search results were scrutinized for relevance to the topic and only full text articles in English were incorporated. Various reporting guidelines were identifi ed and grouped under headings based on study design. This review article attempts to highlight the various reporting guidelines in literature relating to health research, its potential applications, and its limitations.
ABSTRACT
Health research oriented to solve the most relevant sanitary problems in Chile must be encouraged. In 2001, the National Health Research Fund (FONIS) was created by the National Research Council of the Ministry of Health and the National Scientifc Research Commission, to stimulate relevant health research that contributes to develop health care policies. In 2008 an experts meeting proposed eighty research areas. These areas were grouped in twelve thematic containers. Each of these containers were classifed as having maximal, intermediate or minimal priority. The seven most important containers were grouped in three areas. Among the latter, two were selected. One is evaluation of the Ministry programs and, within this area, with the following priorities in decreasing importance: primary prevention, health care priorities, and diseases included in the Explicit Guarantees plan. The second area corresponds to diseases with high prevalence, incidence, costs or impact, including the following priorities in diminishing importance: mental health, diseases of high prevalence and problems with social impact.