The Comparison of Usefulness between MDCT Angiography and DSA in the Diagnosis of Intracranial Aneurysm / 의학물리

The purpose of this study was to compare the image between DSA and MDCT Angiography and to examine whether MDCT Angiography could be useful as a screening test for the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysm in patients who were diagnosed with cerebral aneurysm on DSA. Of patients who were diagnosed with cerebral aneurysm DSA at University Hospital, 194 patients who concomitantly underwent MDCT Angiography were enrolled in the current retrospective study. The methods for analyzing cerebral aneurysm were to analyze the presence of cerebral aneurysm on DSA and MDCT Angiography. In cases in which it exceeded 1, the corresponding cases were classified as narrow-neck aneurysms. In otherwise cases, they were classified as wide-neck aneurysms. Thus, a comparative analysis could be performed to ascertain if cases were narrow-neck or wide-neck aneurysms. As compared with DSA, the sensitivity of MDCT Angiography for cerebral aneurysm was measured to be 97.4%. The degree of consistency between narrow-neck and wide-neck aneurysms was 90.2% and the proportion of undetectable an at MDCT Angiography was 2.54%. mean size was 2.4 mm. It is expected that a non-invasive diagnostic modality for a screening test for cerebral aneurysm, MDCT Angiography might be a very useful regimen as compared with an invasive one, DSA.

Preoperative Evaluation of Living Renal Transplant Donors Using Helical CT Angiography: Comparison with Conventional Angiography / 대한비뇨기과학회지

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the accuracy of helical CT angiography (HCTA) in a preoperative evaluation of living renal transplant donors (LRTDs) for visualizing the renal vascular anatomy with an emphasis on identifying the number of renal arteries and the presence of small branches and venous anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Jan. 2000 to Feb. 2001, a total of 50 potential LRTDs were evaluated with conventional renal angiography (CRA) and HCTA. All candidates then underwent a donor nephrectomy. The HCTA was done according to a standard HCTA protocol. The intraoperative findings on the number of renal vessels were compared with those of the CRA and HCTA respectively. RESULTS: There was an overall agreement on the number of renal arteries and veins between the CRA findings and 3-D reconstruction of the HCTA (91%, 95%). The overall accuracies for predicting the number of renal arteries and veins relative to the intraoperetive findings were 84%, 94% for CRA and 80%, 94% for HCTA respectively. The CRA missed 8 accessory renal arteries while HCTA missed 10. In HCTA, cases with an accessory renal artery with a diameter < or =5 Fr. (1.65mm) and two cases of an early branching single vessel simulating dual arteries, were misdiagnosed. Despite the misdiagnosed cases, there was no significant intraoperative morbidity. The HCTA revealed another lesion of a renal parenchyme, the urinary collecting system and other viscera. There were no significant complications in the process of both techniques. The cost of HCTA was 48% less than the CRA plus the excretory urography (EU) for imaging the potential LRTDs. CONCLUSIONS: A HCTA appears to be as accurate as a CRA for visualizing the renal vascular anatomy in the preoperative assessment of potential LRTDs. A HCTA has the potential to be a good alternative to a CRA plus EU for assessing potential LRTDs.