ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effect on correcting calcium and phosphate metabolic disorder and the impact on quality of life in uremia patients between on -line hemodiafiltration and high -flux hemodialysis.Methods 90 patients with uremia,digital watches were randomly divided into QL -HDF group and HFHD group,Ca2 +,P3 +, serum parathyroid hormone(PTH)level were measured before and after dialysis blood.The survival quality of patients were evaluated by the KDQOL -SFTM1.3 scale.The incidence of adverse reactions were collected.The similarities and differences of two groups were compared.Results The comparison of Ca2 + levels in the two groups before and after dialysis showed no significant difference(P >0.05);Of the QL -HDF group after treatment,P3 + was (1.82 ± 0.19)mmol/L,PTH was (401.6 ±16.7)pg/L,which were significantly lower than those of QL -HDF group[P3 +(2.14 ±0.22)mmol/L,PTH(425.0 ±17.2)pg/L](t =24.256,21.059,all P 0.05 );6 cases of adverse reactions was in the QL -HDF group (13.33%),14 cases of adverse reactions was in the HFHD group(31.11%),there was significant difference between the two groups(χ2 =5.361,P <0.05).Conclusion The two methods can improve the metabolic disorders of calcium and phosphorus in patients with uremia,and QL -HDF showed stronger ability to remove the ability,and the quality of life is higher,it is worth promoting in clinical practice.