Resección fría sin clips / Cold resection with no clip placement

Cold resection of colonic polyps is an important tool that reduces the incidence of colon cancer. Cold loop polypectomy is a safe and effective technique in colonic lesions smaller than 10 mm and cold mucosectomy with submucosal injection is a growing technique for the resection of non-pedunculated lesions between 10 and 19 mm. Post polypectomy bleeding is an infrequent complication in cold resection, but its recognition is key to reduce the impact of its consequences. The use of hemostatic clips is one of the methods preferred by endoscopists for the management of immediate post polypectomy bleeding, however its usefulness in the prevention of late bleeding is uncertain. In recent years, both meta-analysis and cost- effectiveness studies have concluded that the use of hemoclips does not reduce the incidence of late post-polypectomy bleeding, so their use should be reserved only for high-risk patients.

La resección fría de pólipos colónicos es una importante herramienta que reduce la incidencia de cáncer de colon. La polipectomía con asa fría es una técnica segura y efectiva en lesiones colónicas menores de 10 mm y la mucosectomía fría con inyección submucosa es una técnica en auge para la resección de lesiones no pediculadas entre 10 a 19 mm. El sangrado pospolipectomía es una complicación infrecuente en la resección fría, pero su reconocimiento es clave para disminuir el impacto de sus consecuencias. El uso de clips hemostáticos es uno de los método preferidos por los endoscopistas para el manejo del sangrado inmediato pospolipectomía, no obstante su utilidad en la prevención del sangrado tardío es incierto. En los últimos años, tanto metaanálisis como estudios de costo efectividad concluyen que el uso de hemoclips no reduce la incidencia de sangrado tardío pospolipectomía por lo que su uso debería reservarse sólo a pacientes de alto riesgo.

Comparison of domestic and imported hemostatic clips in preventing delayed post-polypectomy bleeding after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To compare the efficacy of domestic and imported hemostatic clips in preventing delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps ≥ 10 mm.Methods:Clinical data of 789 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps (polyp diameter ≥10 mm) in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2018 to December 2019 were collected. The patients were divided into DPPB group ( n=15) and non-DPPB group ( n=774). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the influential factors for DPPB. The patients using one type of hemostatic clip were divided into the domestic hemostatic clip group ( n=499) and the imported hemostatic clip group ( n=208). The efficacy of hemostatic clips in preventing DPPB in the two groups was compared. Results:Among the 789 patients undergoing endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps, 1.9% (15/789) suffered from DPPB. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pedunculated polyp was an independent risk factor for DPPB ( OR=6.621, 95% CI: 2.278-19.241, P=0.001), and closure of mucosal defect was an independent protective factor for DPPB ( OR=0.169,95% CI: 0.050-0.570, P=0.004). Regardless of physician experience, there was no significant difference between the domestic and imported hemostatic clip group in preventing DPPB after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps ≥10 mm [experienced physicians: 1.8% (7/385) VS 0.6% (1/175), χ2=1.314, P=0.445; common physicians: 2.6% (3/114) VS 3.0% (1/33), χ2=0.010, P>0.999]. The domestic hemostatic clip group paid for less medical expenses than the imported hemostatic clip group (experienced physicians: 1 433.51±889.02 yuan VS 3 033.97±1 686.87 yuan, t<0.001 , P<0.001; common physicians: 1 181.58±815.29 yuan VS 3 303.46±1 690.43 yuan, t<0.001 ,P<0.001). Conclusion:Pedunculated polyp is an independent risk factor for DPPB after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyp larger than 10 mm, and clipping can significantly reduce the risk for DPPB. There is no significant difference in the prevention of DPPB between domestic and imported clips, but domestic clips compared with imported clips yield less medical burden, which are suitable for promotion to primary hospitals and major clinical centers.