Treatment of Retrohepatic Caval Injury using Total Hepatic Vascular Isolation and Venovenous Bypass / 한국간담췌외과학회지

Retrohepatic caval injuries are a difficult problem to surgeons as its mortality approaching 50~80%. Several bypass techniques was advocated to reduce operative bleeding and to improve the prognosis of the traumatized patients. We successfully managed a case of retro hepatic caval injury using venovenous bypass and total hepatic vascular isolation. A 28 year old female patients was admitted to Cheju Medical Center injured in a traffic accident. At exploration, a retrohepatic caval injury was suspected. So patient was emergently transferred to Seoul National University Hospital, after gauze packing. On arrival, vital signs were stable. Reexploration was undertaken. There was gush out of blood from retrohepatic space. After clamping suprahepatic and infrahepatic vena cava, venovenous bypass was introduced to left axillary vein and left femoral vein using Biomedicus pump. Systemic heparinization was not used. Avulsion between vena cava and common trunk of left and middle hepatic veins was repaired and left hepatectomy was done. Gauze packing was done due to ongoing oozing by coagulopathy from massive transfusion. Total venovenous bypass time was 30 min. On 10th operative day, reexploration was undertaken to assure hemostasis and to remove packed gauze. On 54th postoperative day patient discharged without any morbidity.

Hipervolemia mais tríplice oclusão vascular no tratamento da lesão traumática da veia cava retro-hepática e veias hepáticas / Hypervolemia and triple vessel occlusion in the treatment of traumatic retrohepatic vena and hepatic vein injuries

BACKGROUND: Liver vascular isolation is essential for the treatment of the retrohepatic vena cava and hepatic veins. Triple vessel occlusion (TVO - occlusion of the portal triad, the inferior vena cava above the renal veins and within the pericardium) is the easiest isolation method for the surgeon. Unfortunately, this technique cannot be applied to hypovolemic and/or shock (cardiac arrest) patients as it compromises venous return. OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to demonstrate that in the above mentioned patients, establishing a previous hypervolemic state allows the safe use of TVO. METHODS: The method includes efficient injury tamponade with aggressive fluid replacement until normal blood volume is reached (resuscitation). Normal blood volume is recognized by a return of arterial blood pressure to normal levels, inferior vena cava filling and an increase in aortic wall tension. Following this procedure, hypervolemia is obtained by the rapid additional infusion of 1.500 to 2.000 ml of fluids. TVO in this situation does not alter the heart rhythm and maintains a clear operative field which is essential for hepatotomy, venorrhaphy and or venous ligation. RESULTS: Three patients were successfully operated.