ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the impact of baseline quantification of hepatitis B core antibody (qHBcAb) on prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF).Methods:A total of 91 HBV-ACLF patients (HBV-ACLF group), who admitted to Wuxi No.5 People′s Hospital from July 1, 2019 to December 30, 2021, were included in this study. Fifty chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients (CHB group) and 50 chronic HBV carriers (HBV carrier group) were enrolled as controls. Baseline clinical data such as qHBcAb, blood routine examination biochemical, and coagulation indices, HBsAg, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HBV DNA levels were recorded and analyzed retrospectively. The HBV-ACLF, HBsAg and HBV-DNA data were converted logarithmically. Patients were followed-up for 90 days. Cox regression was used to analyze the correlation between HBV-ACLF and survival outcome; survival rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of baseline qHBcAb for the prognosis in patients with HBV-ACLF.Results:The baseline qHBcAb level in HBV-ACLF patients was (4.83±0.42) IU/ml, which was significantly higher than that in the CHB group [(4.59±0.54) IU/ml] and chronic HBV carrier group [(3.86±0.74) IU/ml] (all P<0.05). At the end of 90 days follow-up, 46 patients (50.55%) survived, and 45 patients (49.45%) died in the HBV-ACLF group. The baseline qHBcAb level was significantly higher in the survival group [(4.93±0.22) IU/ml] than in the death group [(4.70±0.52) IU/ml, P<0.01]. Significant differences were also found in the alpha fetoprotein, international normalized ratio, prothrombin activity, antithrombin Ⅲ activity, platelet, end-stage liver disease model score and hepatic encephalopathy complication between the two groups ( P<0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that the baseline qHBcAb was an independent risk factor affecting the 90-day survival of HBV-ACLF patients [hazard ratio=0.027,95% confidence interval ( CI) 0.001-0.696, P<0.05]. The area under the ROC curve of baseline qHBcAb level for predicting the 90-day survival outcome of HBV-ACLF patients was 0.639 (95% CI 0.525-0.752, P<0.05), with a cut-off value of 4.89 IU/ml. The cumulative survival rate of patients with baseline qHBcAb≥4.89 IU/ml was higher than that of patients with baseline qHBcAb<4.89 IU/ml ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Higher baseline qHBcAb level is associated with favorable outcome of HBV-ACLF patients and baseline qHBcAb may be used as a new biomarker to predict the clinical outcome of HBV-ACLF patients. HBV-ACLF patients with serum qHBcAb lower than 4.89 IU/ml face increased risk of short-term death.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Although hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)–negative, hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)–negative patients are not considered to be at risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV)–related hepatitis, the actual risk remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of HBV-related hepatitis in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc–negative patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) or malignant lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 271 HBsAg-negative patients (161 anti-HBc–negative and 110 anti-HBc–positive at the time of ASCT) who received ASCT for MM or lymphoma. The risk of HBV-related hepatitis was analyzed according to the presence of anti-HBc. HBV serology results at the time of ASCT were compared with those at the time of diagnosis of MM or lymphoma. RESULTS: Three patients (two anti-HBc–negative MMs and one anti-HBc–positive MM) developed HBV-related hepatitis after ASCT. The rate of HBV-related hepatitis did not differ among patients with or without anti-HBc status (p=0.843). HBV-related hepatitis more frequently occurred in MM patients than in lymphoma patients (p=0.041). Overall, 9.1% of patients (16.7% with MM and 5.4% with lymphoma) who were HBsAg–negative and anti-HBc–positive at the time of diagnosis had lost anti-HBc positivity during chemotherapy prior to ASCT. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc–negative patients at the time of ASCT for MM or lymphoma still might be at a risk for HBV-related hepatitis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Diagnosis , Drug Therapy , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis , Lymphoma , Multiple Myeloma , Retrospective Studies , Stem Cell Transplantation , Stem CellsABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of application of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive donor liver in adult liver transplantation. Methods Clinical efficacy of 28 recipients with liver diseases induced by virus B hepatitis (hepatitis B) undergoing liver transplantation using HBsAg-positive donor liver from July 2012 to October 2015 was retrospectively analyzed. Clinical prognosis and postoperative complications of the recipients were summarized. The changing features of serum levels of HBsAg and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA was investigated. Results After liver transplantation, 28 recipients were orally administered with entecavir to prevent the recurrence of hepatitis B. During perioperative period, 2 recipients died from sepsis and acute heart failure. During postoperative follow-up, 2 cases died from the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (liver cancer). The remaining 24 patients were followed up for 12-26 months. Throughout the follow-up, 24 recipients were positive for serum HBsAg. After treatment, the titre of HBV DNA was significantly declined to <1×102 copies/mL at postoperative 12 months. No graft dysfunction induced by hepatitis B recurrence occurred in 24 recipients alive. Conclusions As a marginal donor liver, HBsAg-positive liver graft is safe for liver transplantation in the recipients with hepatitis B-related liver diseases. Postoperatively, anti-HBV treatment should be strengthened and intimate follow-up should be delivered.
ABSTRACT
Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) targets viral core protein and is produced in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and seroconversion occurs in the early stage of infection and often lasts for a lifetime. Qualitative detection of anti-HBc has been used in clinical practice for many years, while the clinical significance of its quantitative level remains unclear. A novel anti-HBc immunoassay based on double-antigen sandwich ELISA has been developed in recent years and lays a foundation for illustrating the change in the quantitative level of anti-HBc (qAnti-HBc) in HBV infection and its clinical significance. Several recent studies have revealed that qAnti-HBc is associated with the degree of hepatitis activity and response to pharmacotherapy and may become an important basis for selecting antiviral drugs, optimizing therapeutic regimen, and predicting treatment outcome.
ABSTRACT
Background & objectives: Safe blood and blood products should be offered to all patients in need for blood transfusion. The objectives of the present study were to establish prevalence estimates for hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections as a foundation for safe blood transfusion in rural Vietnam, and to check the accuracy of the laboratory analysis used for hepatitis testing of blood donors in Vietnam. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in two rural communities in Quang Tri, Vietnam. A total of 1,200 blood samples collected from potential blood donors were tested by an enzyme immunoassay technique (EIA) for detection of hepatitis surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), and antibodies to hepatitis C antigen (anti-HCV). The EIA test outcome was validated by a chemiluminescent micro particle immunoassay technique (CMIA). Results: The prevalence of HBsAg and anti-HBc in the study population was 11.4 per cent (95% CI 9.6 - 13.2) and 51.7 per cent (95% CI 48.8 - 54.5), respectively, the prevalences being higher in males than females. The prevalence of anti-HCV was 0.17 per cent. The test agreement between the EIA and CMIA techniques was high both for HBsAg detection (κ = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83 - 0.99) and for anti-HBc detection (κ = 0.89; 95% CI 0.81 - 0.97). Compared to CMIA results, the positive and negative predictive values of the EIA tests were found to be 94.9 per cent (95% CI 87.5 - 98.6) and 97.5 per cent (95% CI 86.8 - 99.9) for HBsAg, and 92.4 per cent (95% CI 84.2 - 97.2) and 100 per cent (95% CI 91.2 - 100) for anti-HBc. Interpretation & conclusions: The study shows that hepatitis B virus infection is endemic in rural areas of Vietnam and that almost half of the population is or has been infected. Hepatitis C infection is rare, but false negative test results cannot be ruled out. Also, the results indicate that the EIA performance in blood donor screening in Vietnam may be sub-optimal, missing 2.5 per cent of hepatitis B virus carriers and falsely excluding more than 7 per cent of blood donors. As the prevalence of hepatitis B infection is high, occult hepatitis B infection may represent a threat to safe blood transfusion. Therefore, nucleic acid amplification testing for HBV should be considered for blood donor screening in Vietnam.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The exclusion of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors from liver transplants (LTs) due to the risk of transmitting hepatitis B virus (HBV) does not appear to be practical in Korea, where hepatitis B is endemic. This study assessed the risk of de novo HBV infection in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative LT recipients receiving a liver from HBcAb-positive donors. METHODS: Of 341 adult living donor LTs conducted at our institution between March 2001 and September 2008, 176 donors (51.6%) were HBcAb-positive, and 26 HBcAb-positive grafts were transplanted to HBsAg-negative recipients. The median follow-up time after LT was 41.9 months. RESULTS: Without anti-HBV prophylaxis, 2 out of 26 (7.7%) HBsAg-negative recipients who received grafts from HBcAb-positive donors developed de novo HBV infection 20 and 85 months after LT. These patients had been negative for all HBV serologic markers before transplantation. In both cases, there were no abnormalities in liver function tests upon diagnosis of de novo HBV infection. CONCLUSIONS: De novo HBV infection from HBcAb-positive donors after LT does not appear to be of great concern in terms of the number of cases in Korea because high risk patients who are HBV-negative comprise only a small proportion of the recipients. However, HBV-naive LT recipients still carry the risk of developing de novo HBV infection as in non-HBV endemic areas.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatitis , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens , Hepatitis B virus , Korea , Liver , Liver Function Tests , Liver Transplantation , Living Donors , Tissue Donors , TransplantsABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of lamivudine in preventing liver damages and HBV DNA reactivation in anti-HBc positive lymphoma patients after chemotherapy.Methods Seventy-nine lymphoma patients who were negative in HBsAg and positive in anti-HBc were enrolled and were divided into lamivudine group (n=37) and control group (n=42).Both groups received chemotherapy.Liver damages and HBV reactivation were observed, and the data were analyzed with software SPSS 13.0.Results In lamivudine group, liver damages Ⅰ or Ⅱ was observed in 11 patients (11/37, 29.7%), and liver damages Ⅲ or Ⅳ was observed in 2 (2/37, 5.4%); two patients (2/37, 5.4%) developed HBV reactivation, and both of them had HBV YMDD mutations.In control group, 19 (19/42, 45.2%) patients experienced liver damages Ⅰ or Ⅱ, 7 (7/42, 16.7%) experienced liver damages Ⅲ or Ⅳ; 12 (12/42, 28.6%) patients experienced HBV reactivation, the differences between the two groups were of statistical significance (χ2=79.0, 8.7 and 79.0, P ＜ 0.05 or ＜ 0.01).Conclusion Lamivudine can reduce liver damages and HBV reactivation in HBsAg negative and anti-HBc positive patients with lymphoma during chemotherapy.
ABSTRACT
The growing shortage of organs for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has led to an expanded donor pool with the use of marginal grafts. Recipients who receive liver grafts from HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc positive donors have an increased risk of developing de novo hepatitis B infection. This review covers several issues in liver transplantation using hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors: (1) the mechanism of de novo hepatitis B infection, (2) high risk groups, (3) prophylactic regimens and (4) clinical significance and a proposal for patients in Korea.
Subject(s)
Humans , Hepatitis , Hepatitis B , Korea , Liver , Liver Transplantation , Tissue Donors , TransplantsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the first experience of using tests of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) for the selection of blood donors in a tertiary hospital blood center in Korea. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2007, the data of all eligible donors according to the Korean Blood Regulation Law were analyzed. Anti-HBc testing was performed in all donors, but anti-HBs was tested only in anti-HBc seropositive donors. Anti-HBs negative but anti-HBc positive donors were regarded as ineligible for blood donation. Cost for donor testing was calculated based on Korean health insurance payment schedule from 2005 to 2007. RESULTS: The seroprevalence of anti-HBc in blood donors was 23.2% (162/699) and increased with increasing age. The proportion of ineligible donors for blood collection was 2.7% (19/699) of total donors and 11.6% (19/162) of anti-HBc seropositive donors. The cost of testing for anti-HBc and anti-HBs was estimated to be about 40% of the total screening cost. CONCLUSIONS: Although additional donor screening tests for anti-HBc and anti-HBs requires increased cost and relatively small number of donors are additionally excluded by these tests, they are considered to be helpful for the safety of blood products, because our blood center has characteristics with small number of donors and relatively high percentage of donors in the age group of thirties and older.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Age Factors , Blood Banks , Blood Donors , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis B Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis B Core Antigens/immunology , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/immunology , Korea , Laboratories, Hospital , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Serologic Tests/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Korea, the number of patients enrolled in liver transplantation registry exceeds the supply of cadaveric donor. This donor shortage leads to living donor liver transplantation(LDLT). Due to wide prevalence of hepatitis B in Korea, many healthy donors for LDLT shows hepatitis B surface antigen-negative[HBsAg(-)] and core antibody-positive [HBcAb(+)]. However, the risk of using graft livers from HBsAg(-) and HBcAb(+) donors has not been clearly defined. The aim of this study is to identify the safety of using HBcAb(+) donor and the effectiveness of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin(HBIG) in non-hepatitis B virus induced cirrhotic recipients. METHODS: From December 1994 to July 1998, 59 patients underwent living donor liver transplantation at the Asan Medical Center. Among them, 35 cases were non-hepatitis B virus induced cirrhotic recipients. Of these 35 recipients, 14 patients received liver graft from HBsAg(-) and HBcAb(+) donors and prophylactic passive immunoprophylaxis with HBIG. RESULTS: Eleven cases remained HBsAg(-) with HBIG immunoprophylaxis. Three of 14 recipients who were HBsAg(-) converted to HBsAg(+) serologically after receiving HBcAb(+) donor liver. All of these 3 cases did not receive HBIG therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Passive immunoprophylaxis with HBIG may prevent non-hepatitis B induced cirrhotic recipients from converting to HBsAg(+) status by using HBcAb(+) donor. Our experience suggests that HBcAb(+) donors can be accepted as potential donors in living donor liver transplantation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cadaver , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis , Herpesvirus 1, Cercopithecine , Korea , Liver Transplantation , Liver , Living Donors , Prevalence , Tissue Donors , TransplantsABSTRACT
To investigate the association between hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) and infection of hepatitis B virus(HBV) and hepatitis C virus(HCV) in an HBV endemic area , a case-control study of 254 patients with HCC and of 1,270 age and sex matched health control subjects was done. Among the 254 HCC patients 166(65.4%) were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg), 49(19.3%) were positive for HCV antibody(anti-HCV Ab). The crude odd ratio of patients with HBsAg was 36.1(95% CI :22.4-58.2) and with anti-HCV Ab was 9.0(95% CI :5.5-14.6). In an analysis, which HBsAg(-), HBcAb(-), anti-HCV Ab(-) group was chosen as referent group, odd ratio of HBsAg(+) group was 14.4(95% CI: 7.2-28.9) and of anti- HCV Ab(+) was 10.7(95% CI: 2.9-40.0). Odd ratio of anti-HCV Ab(+), HBsAg(+) group and anti-HCV Ab(+), HBsAg(-), HBcAb(+) group for HCC were elevated to 27.3(95% CI : 9.0-82.9) , 15.9(95% CI:7.1-35.8) respectly. The odd ratio of anti-HCV Ab(-), HBsAg(-), HBcAb(+) group was 2.4(95% CI : 1.1-5.0). These result suggested that HBV and HCV were associated with HCC. In HBV endemic area patients with HBcAb alone should be considered risk group for HCC.