ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the therapeutic effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) on patients with pulmonary edema caused by seawater drowning.Methods:A retrospective analysis method was used. Based on the Utstein database of emergency drowning in the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, the clinical data of patients with seawater drowning pulmonary edema admitted to the emergency medicine department of the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022 were collected. The patients were divided into NPPV group and HFNC group according to different ventilation methods. The general data, endotracheal intubation rate in 7 days, arterial blood gas analysis indexes [arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO 2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO 2)] and hemodynamic indexes (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, blood lactic acid) before and after treatment, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU), oxygen therapy comfort of the two groups were compared. Results:A total of 54 patients were enrolled, including 21 patients in the NPPV group and 33 patients in the HFNC group. There were no significant differences in gender, age, state of consciousness and other general information between the two groups. Compared with NPPV group, the rate of endotracheal intubation in HFNC group within 7 days was significantly lower [24.2% (8/33) vs. 33.3% (7/21), P < 0.05]. Before treatment, there were no significant differences in arterial blood gas analysis and hemodynamics between the two groups. After treatment, the above indexes in both groups were significantly improved compared with those before treatment, and PaO 2, SaO 2, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure in HFNC group were significantly higher than those in NPPV group [PaO 2 (mmHg, 1 mmHg≈0.133kPa): 93.56±6.37 vs. 82.14±6.25, SaO 2: 1.02±0.09 vs. 0.95±0.11, systolic blood pressure (mmHg): 117.37±8.43 vs. 110.42±8.38, diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): 79.43±7.61 vs. 72.21±4.32, mean arterial pressure (mmHg): 92.34±6.32 vs. 85.12±5.38], PaCO 2, heart rate and blood lactic acid were significantly lower than those in NPPV group [PaCO 2 (mmHg) : 34.26±5.63 vs. 37.24±6.22, heart rate (times/min): 73.38±7.56 vs. 86.25±5.41, blood lactic acid (mmol/L): 1.38±0.36 vs. 2.25±1.14], and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). In addition, the length of ICU stay in HFNC group was significantly shorter than that in NPPV group (days: 13.30±2.38 vs. 16.27±4.26), and the comfort rate of oxygen therapy was significantly higher than that in NPPV group [66.7% (22/33) vs. 42.8% (9/21)], with statistical significance (all P < 0.05). Conclusion:HFNC can improve the oxygenation of patients with pulmonary edema caused by seawater drowning, improve hemodynamics, reduce the rate of tracheal intubation, shorten the length of ICU stay, and improve the comfort of oxygen therapy, which has certain clinical application value.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy(HFNC)and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with typeⅡrespiratory failure during acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD).Methods A total of 84 patients with AECOPD combined with typeⅡrespiratory failure admitted to the department of internal medicine of Beijing Sijiqing Hospital from September 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the study objects.The patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 42 cases in each group.Both groups were given conventional treatment,the observation group was given HFNC,and the control group was given non-invasive mechanical ventilation.The difference of clinical efficacy between the two groups was compared,and the changes of heart rate(HR),respiratory rate(RR),arterial blood gas analysis index,lung function before and 7 days after treatment,complications and tracheal intubation rate,mortality were observed in the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group[88.10%(37/42)vs.69.05%(29/42),P＜0.05].Before treatment,HR,RR,arterial blood gas analysis indexes[arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2),arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2),arterial oxygen saturation(SaO2),pH value],pulmonary function indexes[forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1),forced vital capacity(FVC),FEV1/FVC]of the two groups were no statistically significant.After treatment,HR,RR and PaCO2 were significantly lower than before treatment,while PaO2,SaO2,pH,FEV1,FVC and FEV1/FVC were significantly higher than before treatment.After treatment,HR,RR and PaCO2 in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group[HR(bpm):90.14±5.66 vs.93.57±4.77,RR(times/min):21.90±4.88 vs.22.45±4.31,PaCO2(mmHg,1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa):60.02±5.93 vs.62.83±6.29],PaO2,SaO2,pH,FEV1,FVC,FEV1/FVC were significantly higher than the control group[PaO2(mmHg):80.70±7.81 vs.76.21±8.23,SaO2:0.94±0.04 vs.0.92±0.04,pH value:7.36±0.05 vs.7.32±0.06,FEV1(L):1.73±0.41 vs.1.53±0.35,FVC(L):2.80±0.48 vs.2.57±0.43,FEV1/FVC:(61.98±5.67)%vs.(59.14±5.34)%,all P＜0.05].The incidence of complications such as of dry throat[4.8%(2/42)vs.19.0%(8/42)],facial compression injury[0%(0/42)vs.14.3%(6/42)],abdominal distension[9.5%(4/42)vs.26.2%(11/42)]in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(all P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the rate of tracheal intubation and mortality between the observation group and the control group[11.90%(5/42)vs.26.19%(11/42)and 4.76%(2/42)vs.7.14%(3/42),both P＞0.05].Conclusion HFNC is effective in treating AECOPD patients with typeⅡrespiratory failure,with fewer complications and high safety.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the predictive efficacy of a nomogram in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) undergoing treatment with a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC).Methods:We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with AHRF who received HFNC treatment. Data on complications, vital signs on the first day after enrollment, use of vasoactive drugs, Glasgow Coma Scale scores, and clinical respiratory parameters (respiratory rate, pulse oximetry oxygen saturation, and fraction of inspired oxygen) were meticulously recorded. The risk ratio for HFNC failure was computed using an online calculator.Results:Overall, 62 patients were included, of which 29 (46.77%) experienced HFNC failure. No significant differences were observed in age, sex, body mass index, complications, or sequential organ failure assessment scores between the two groups. However, compared with those who responded positively to HFNC treatment, individuals experiencing HFNC failure demonstrated a significant increase in acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ scores [ (15.15±5.01)score vs. (21.00±5.76)score; P<0.001 ]. Furthermore, HFNC treatment failure was associated with significantly higher ICU mortality rates [0 vs. 34.48%(10/29), P<0.01] and in-hospital mortality rates [3.03%(1/33) vs. 37.93%(11/29), P<0.01], as well as a marked prolongation of ICU stay [6(4,10)d vs. 11(6,17)d, P=0.012]. In the failure group, the nomogram-derived risk ratio was 0.80±0.18, which was significantly higher than that in the success group (0.65±0.18; P=0.009). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram for predicting HFNC failure was 0.76, with a sensitivity of 54.8% and a specificity of 93.6%. Conclusion:The nomogram, along with the online calculator, offers a straightforward and effective means for assessing the risk of treatment failure in patients with AHRF undergoing HFNC therapy.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To construct a predict model based on ultrasomics parameters that can identify moderate acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients at risk of non-invasive respiratory strategies(NIRS) failure and evaluate its value.Methods:This is a prospective observational trial.The patients with moderate acute respiratory failure (100 mmHg≤PaO 2/FiO 2≤200 mmHg) in intensive care unit(ICU) ,emergency and respiratory ward of Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University from Oct 2020 to Jan 2023 were included, NIRS failure is defined as death or intubation while on therapy.At admission time and 24 h after treatment vital signs,biological and ultrasound parameters were determined.The study subjects were randomly ( random number) divided into a development group (70%) and a validation group (30%).Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed.The treatment failure prediction models were constructed according to ultrasonic parameters combined with clinical parameters.The models were also validated by ROC curves, calibration curves, NRI index and decision curve analysis (DCA).The nomograms were drawn. Results:A total of 193 patients were included in the study, 137 were allocated to the development group, and 56 to the validation group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. NIRS failed in 112 (58%) of 193 patients..Univariate analysis revealed that PaO 2/FiO 2, DE at the time of admission and 24 h in the failure group were found to be statistically lower than the success group, RV/LV was higher (all P<0.05). RR, LUS at 24 h in the failure group were higher and ROX index was lower (all P<0.01). In addition, more patients in the failure group received vasopressors ( P= 0.001). Use of vasopressors( OR=4.709, P=0.012), RR( OR=1.254, P=0.035), LUS( OR=1.250, P=0.037), RV/LV( OR=1.057, P=0.008), PaO 2/FiO 2 ( OR=0.950, P=0.001), DE ( OR=0.107, P=0.001) in the development group were independent risk factors for NIRS failure.ROC analysis revealed that model B achieved a larger area under curve (AUC) than model A in the development group, with their AUC values of 0.928 and 0.872 ( P=0.009), AUC of model A and model B in the validation group were 0.867 and 0.932 respectively ( P=0.07).Two prediction models showed a good degree of calibration (all P>0.05). NRI analysis showed significant improvement in the predictive power of model B ( P<0.01). DCA showed that the model B had a good net benefit between the threshold probabilities of 0-80%. Conclusions:Ultrasomics parameters combined with Clinical parameters can effectively predict NIRS failure in moderate acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) with moderate typeⅡ respiratory failure, to clarify the feasibility of HFNC in the treatment of AECOPD, and to explore the influencing factors of HFNC failure.Methods:This study was a randomized controlled trial of non-inferiority. Patients with AECOPD with moderate type Ⅱ respiratory failure [arterial blood gas pH 7.25-7.35, partial pressure of arterial blood carbon dioxide (PaCO 2)> 50 mmHg] admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from January 2018 to December 2021 were randomly assigned to the HFNC group and NIV group to receive respiratory support. The primary endpoint was the treatment failure rate. The secondary endpoints were blood gas analysis and vital signs at 1 h, 12 h, and 48 h, total duration of respiratory support, 28-day mortality, comfort score, ICU length of stay, and total length of stay. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the failure factors of HFNC treatment. Results:Totally 228 patients were randomly divided into two groups, 108 patients in the HFNC group and 110 patients in the NIV group. The treatment failure rate was 29.6% in the HFNC group and 25.5% in the NIV group. The risk difference of failure rate between the two groups was 4.18% (95% CI: -8.27%~16.48%, P=0.490), which was lower than the non-inferiority value of 9%. The most common causes of failure in the HFNC group were carbon dioxide retention and aggravation of respiratory distress, and the most common causes of failure in the NIV group were treatment intolerance and aggravation of respiratory distress. Treatment intolerance in the HFNC group was significantly lower than that in the NIV group (-29.02%, 95% CI -49.52%~-7.49%; P=0.004). After 1 h of treatment, the pH in both groups increased significantly, PaCO 2 decreased significantly and the oxygenation index increased significantly compared with baseline (all P < 0.05). PaCO 2 in both groups decreased gradually at 1 h, 12 h and 48 h after treatment, and the pH gradually increased. The average number of daily airway care interventions and the incidence of nasal and facial lesions in the HFNC group were significantly lower than those in the NIV group ( P < 0.05), while the comfort score in the HFNC group was significantly higher than that in the NIV group ( P=0.021). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the total duration of respiratory support, dyspnea score, ICU length of stay, total length of stay and 28-day mortality (all P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ score (≥15), family NIV, history of cerebrovascular accident, PaCO 2 (≥60 mmHg) and respiratory rate (≥32 times/min) at 1 h were independent predictors of HFNC failure. Conclusions:HFNC is not inferior to NIV in the treatment of AECOPD complicated with moderate type Ⅱ respiratory failure. HFNC is an ideal choice of respiratory support for patients with NIV intolerance, but clinical application should pay attention to the influencing factors of its treatment failure.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the effects of different initial flow rates of humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on weaning outcomes and comfort level among ICU patients with difficult weaning.Methods:A total of 99 ICU patients with difficult weaning received at Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital ICU from June 2019 to June 2021 were enrolled in the present study, they were assigned to 40 L/min group, 50 L/min group and 60 L/min group according to the random number table method, with 33 cases in each group. The weaning outcomes among three groups were compared, the degree of dryness of oral/nasal cavity, throat pain as well as vital signs and blood gas indexes were also compared before extubation and 30 min after the first humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) oxygen therapy.Results:There was no significant difference in length of stay in ICU and hospital, re-intubation within 7 days, the mortality within 28 days in ICU and the hospital among three groups ( P>0.05). The weaning success rate were 78.8% (24/33) and 77.4% (23/31) in 50 L/min group and 60 L/min, higher than in the 40 L/min group 53.1% (17/32), the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=4.78, 4.09, both P<0.05). After oxygen therapy, the scores of dryness of oral/nasal cavity and throat pain in the 40 L/min group, 50 L/min group and 60 L/min group were (3.16 ± 0.77), (2.94 ± 0.80) and (3.27 ± 0.92), (3.09 ± 0.77), and (4.10 ± 1.01), (3.97 ± 1.40), the differences were statistically significant ( F=5.21, 9.26, both P<0.05), and the differences between 50 L/min group and 40 L/min group and 60 L/min group were statistically significant ( t values were 2.62-3.99, all P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in vital signs and blood gas indexes among the three groups before extubation and after oxygen therapy ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for the ICU patients with difficult weaning, oxygen flow with 50L/min can not only effectively promote weaning success rate but also improve patients′ respiratory comfort level.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the application value of ROX index in evaluating the effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) on patients diagnosed with respiratory failure, and to find a simpler and more effective method to observe the efficacy of HFNC.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients who were admitted to department of critical care medicine of the Tianjin Third Central Hospital from April 2020 to August 2022, diagnosed with type Ⅰ respiratory failure, and treated with HFNC after failure of conventional oxygen therapy were enrolled. Oxygenation index (PaO 2/FiO 2), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2), gas flow rate at the initial time of admission, and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO 2), FiO 2 and respiratory rate (RR) at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours of HFNC were collected, and ROX index was calculated. The patients with symptoms and PaO 2/FiO 2 improved after HFNC treatment and without higher respiratory support lately were defined as HFNC success, while other patients with symptoms worsening and needing follow-up non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or invasive positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) were defined as HFNC failure. The tendency of changes in the ROX index at each time point was observed. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted to obtain the optimum cut-off value of ROX index for predicting HFNC outcome and the optimal monitoring time point for HFNC. Results:A total of 142 patients were eventually enrolled, among whom 96 patients (67.61%) were in treated with HFNC successfully, while 46 patients (32.39%) were recorded as HFNC failure (39 patients and 7 patients received NIPPV or IPPV, respectively), with an overall intubation rate of 4.93% (7/142). Compared with the HFNC success group, the HFNC failure group had lower PaO 2/FiO 2 [mmHg (1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 208.8±37.3 vs. 235.7±48.3, P < 0.01] and higher initial gas flow rate (L/min: 46.4±3.9 vs. 42.3±4.9, P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in gender, age, primary diagnosis, severity of disease, hemoglobin (Hb), C-reactive protein (CRP), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) between the two groups. In the HFNC failure group, there were 12 patients (26.09%) received progressive oxygen therapy within 12 hours of HFNC, of which 3 patients (6.52%) occurred within 6 hours, while the other 9 patients (19.57%) occurred after 6 hours. The initial ROX index was not statistically significant between the two groups. Both groups showed a continuous increasing ROX index with longer treatment duration of HFNC, and the ROX index at all of the time points of the HFNC failure group was significantly lower than that of the HFNC success group with statistically significant difference (2 hours: 9.39±2.85 vs. 10.91±3.51, 4 hours: 8.62±2.29 vs. 11.40±3.18, 6 hours: 7.62±1.65 vs. 11.85±3.45, 8 hours: 7.79±1.59 vs. 11.62±3.10, 10 hours: 7.97±1.62 vs. 12.44±2.75, 12 hours: 8.84±2.51 vs. 12.45±3.03, all P < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of ROX index assessing the effect of HFNC at the time of treating 6, 8 and 10 hours were better than 2, 4 and 12 hours (0.890, 0.903, 0.930 vs. 0.585, 0.738 and 0.829), indicating that the ROX index could determine the efficacy at the early stage of HFNC (within 6 hours). When the optimum cut-off value of ROX index was 8.78, the sensitivity was 90.6%, and the specificity was 76.5%. Conclusion:The ROX index at 6 hours of HFNC has a certain predictive value for the efficacy of HFNC with an optimum cut-off value of 8.78, which can provide clinical health care personnel a method for observing the efficacy of HFNC, and guide the correct selection of oxygen therapy modality at an early stage and timely adjustment of oxygen therapy strategy.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen inhalation (HFNC) versus conventional nasal cannula oxygen inhalation on hypoxemia after complex ventral hernia surgery in elderly patients.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 80 elderly patients with hypoxemia after complex ventral hernia surgery who were admitted to Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University from January 2021 to June 2022 were collected. There were 44 males and 36 females, aged (74±7)years. Of the 80 patients, 40 cases undergoing HFNC were allocated into HFNC group, and 40 cases undergoing conventional nasal cannula oxygen inhalation were allocated into conventional group, respectively. Observation indicators: (1) postoperative blood gas analysis; (2) postoperative complications. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M( Q1, Q3), and comparison between groups was conducted using the rank sum test. Count data were represented as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Repeated measurement data were analyzed using the repeated ANOVA. Results:(1) Postoperative blood gas analysis. Before surgery and at 12 hours, 24 hours, 3 days after surgery, the partial pressure of blood oxygen was (13.5±2.3)kPa, (13.4±3.2)kPa, (13.8±2.3)kPa, (13.7±2.0)kPa for the HFNC group, and (12.7±2.1)kPa, (12.9±2.4)kPa, (12.3±2.5)kPa, (13.9±2.1) kPa for the conventional group. The partial pressure of carbon dioxide was (5.6±0.7)kPa, (5.0±0.6)kPa, (4.7±0.6)kPa, (4.9±0.6)kPa for the HFNC group, and (5.6±0.6)kPa, (4.4±0.8)kPa, (5.0±4.8)kPa, (5.1±1.1)kPa for the conventional group. The saturation of blood oxygen was 97.8%±2.2%, 98.1%±2.1%, 98.9%±1.8%, 99.2%±2.0% for the HFNC group, and 97.8%±3.1%, 97.8%±2.1%, 99.0%±1.5%, 98.8%±2.0% for the conventional group. The oxygenation index was 259±28, 300±45, 352±46, 353±57 for the HFNC group, and 262±29, 297±54, 304±63, 345±53 for the conventional group, respectively. There was a significant difference in the interven-tion effect of partial pressure of blood oxygen between the two groups ( Fgroup=4.09, P<0.05) and no significant difference in the time effect or interaction effect ( Ftime=2.37, Finteraction=1.71, P>0.05). There were significant differences in the time effect and interaction effect of partial pressure of carbon dioxide between the two groups ( Ftime=7.23, Finteraction=13.21, P<0.05) and no significant difference in the intervention effect ( Fgroup=1.02, P>0.05). There was a significant difference in the time effect of saturation of blood oxygen between the two groups ( Ftime=5.54, P<0.05) and no significant difference in the intervention effect or interaction effect ( Fgroup=1.78, Finteraction=0.46, P>0.05). There were signifi-cant differences in the intervention effect, time effect, interaction effect of oxygenation index between the two groups ( Fgroup=8.21, Ftime=42.07, Finteraction=3.49, P<0.05). (2) Postoperative complications. The time in intensive care unit and cases with pulmonary infection were 3(3,3)days and 3 for the HFNC group, versus 6(5,7)days and 10 for the conventional group, showing significant differences between the two groups ( Z=27.50, χ2=4.50, P<0.05). Cases with atelectasis and endotrachead intubation were 0 and 1 for the HFNC group, versus 4 and 7 for the conventional group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no death in either group. Conclusion:Humidified high flow oxygen inhalation has certain advantages over conventional nasal cannula oxygen inhalation in improving partial pressure of blood oxygen and oxygenation index after complex ventral hernia surgery in elderly patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe the effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and mild hypercapnia, and to evaluate the early predictive ability of physiological parameters in these patients.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-Ⅳ (MIMIC-Ⅳ) updated in September 2020 and the data of adult patients with COPD and mild hypercapnia [45 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) < arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2)≤ 60 mmHg] from 2008 to 2019 were collected. These patients were assigned to the HFNC group or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) group according to whether they received HFNC or NIV. Baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), simplified acute physiology scoreⅡ (SAPSⅡ), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and physiological parameters were collected. A propensity score matching was conducted according to the baseline data of the HFNC group patients. The 48-hour and 28-day intubation rates, 28-day mortality, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, the length of hospital stay, and the changes in physiological parameters within 48 hours after treatment were compared between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn and the ratio of heart rate over pulse oxygen saturation (HR/SpO 2) and ROX index [SpO 2 / (inhaled oxygen concentration, FiO 2×respiratory rate, RR)] were analyzed to predict the 24-hour and 48-hour intubation rates. Results:A total of 524 520 inpatient records were screened and 153 patients were included, while 37 patients in the HFNC group and 116 patients in NIV group. There were 31 patients in the HFNC group and 84 patients in the NIV group remained after propensity score matching according to the baseline data. There were no significant differences in the baseline data of gender, age, BMI, SAPSⅡ, CCI score, physiological parameters and prognosis data except the length of ICU stay. The length of ICU stay in HFNC group was significant longer than that of the NIV group [days: 4.6 (3.1, 10.0) vs. 3.1 (1.6, 5.8), P < 0.05]. HR and RR at 40- 48 hours were significantly lower than those at 0-8 hours after treatment only in the HFNC group [HR (bpm): 84.1±12.2 vs. 91.1±16.4, RR (times/min): 19.8±4.9 vs. 21.6±4.1, both P < 0.05]. Both in the HFNC group and NIV group the pH increased (7.42±0.08 vs. 7.36±0.05 and 7.41±0.06 vs. 7.36±0.05, both P < 0.05) and PaCO 2 decreased significantly [mmHg: 46.3 (39.5, 51.0) vs. 49.8 (45.5, 54.0) and 46.0 (40.5, 51.5) vs. 49.5 (45.5, 55.3), both P < 0.05]. The HR, PaO 2 were higher in the HFNC group than those in the HFNC group at 40-48 hours after treatment [HR (bpm): 91.1±15.4 vs. 84.1±12.2, PaO 2 (mmHg): 99.5 (86.0, 132.3) vs. 85.8 (76.5, 118.0), both P < 0.05], PaO 2/FiO 2 were lower in the HFNC group than that in the HFNC group at 40-48 hours after treatment [mmHg: 223.8 (216.5, 285.0) vs. 278.0 (212.3, 306.0), P < 0.05]. Both HR/SpO 2 and ROX index at 4 hours after treatment had predictive value for 24-hour and 48-hour intubation in the HFNC group. The areas under ROC curve (AUC) of HR/SpO 2 at 4 hours after treatment in the HFNC group were larger than those of ROX index for predicting 24-hour and 48-hour intubation (24-hour: 0.649 vs. 0.574, 48-hour: 0.692 vs. 0.581, both P < 0.01); the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 4 hours HR/SpO 2 and for ROX index predicting 24 hours and 48 hours intubation were 0.497-0.780, 0.567-0.799, 0.450-0.694 and 0.454-0.716, respectively. The high sensitivity of HR/SpO 2 and ROX index in predicting 24-hour and 48-hour intubation were 84.6%, 92.9%, 88.2% and 94.4%, respectively, and the low specificity were 52.3%, 23.7%, 54.7% and 29.6%, respectively. Conclusions:HFNC can be used in COPD patients with mild hypercapnia, but it cannot replace NIV. The accuracy of ROX index at 4 hours after HFNC treatment in predicting intubation in COPD patients with mild hypercapnia is poor.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe the application effect of high-flow nasal canula oxygen therapy (HFNC) after extubation in patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU).Methods:A prospective study was conducted. From January 2018 to June 2020, 163 MV patients admitted to Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College were enrolled, and they were divided into HFNC group (82 cases) and traditional oxygen therapy group (81 cases) according to the oxygen therapy model. The patients included in the study were given conventional treatment according to their condition. In the HFNC group, oxygen was inhaled by a nasal high-flow humidification therapy instrument. The gas flow was gradually increased from 35 L/min to 60 L/min according to the patient's tolerance, and the temperature was set at 34-37 ℃. The fraction of inspiration oxygen (FiO 2) was set according to the patient's pulse oxygen saturation (SpO 2) and SpO 2 was maintained at 0.95-0.98. A disposable oxygen mask or nasal cannula was used to inhale oxygen in the traditional oxygen therapy group, and the oxygen flow was 5-8 L/min, maintaining the patient's SpO 2 at 0.95-0.98. The differences in MV duration before extubation, total MV duration, intubation time, reintubation time, extubation failure rate, ICU mortality, ICU stay, and in-hospital stay were compared between the two groups, and weaning failure were analyzed. Results:There was no significant differences in MV duration before extubation (days: 4.33±3.83 vs. 4.15±3.03), tracheal intubation duration (days: 4.34±1.87 vs. 4.20±3.35), ICU mortality [4.9% (4/82) vs. 3.7% (3/81)] and in-hospital stay [days: 28.93 (15.00, 32.00) vs. 27.69 (15.00, 38.00)] between HFNC group and traditional oxygen therapy group (all P > 0.05). The total MV duration in the HFNC group (days: 4.48±2.43 vs. 5.67±3.84) and ICU stay [days: 6.57 (4.00, 7.00) vs. 7.74 (5.00, 9.00)] were significantly shorter than those in the traditional oxygen therapy group, the reintubation duration of the HFNC group was significantly longer than that of the traditional oxygen therapy group (hours: 35.75±10.15 vs. 19.92±13.12), and the weaning failure rate was significantly lower than that of the traditional oxygen therapy group [4.9% (4/82) vs. 16.0% (13/81), all P < 0.05]. Among the reasons for weaning failure traditional oxygen therapy group had lower ability of airway secretion clearance than that of the HFNC group [8.64% (7/81) vs. 0% (0/82), P < 0.05], there was no statistically differences in the morbidity of heart failure, respiratory muscle weakness, hypoxemia, and change of consciousness between the two groups. Conclusion:For MV patients in the ICU, the sequential application of HFNC after extubation can reduce the rate of weaning failure and the incidence of adverse events, shorten the length of ICU stay.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe the effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) on the prognosis of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) accompanied with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods:A retrospective study was conducted in Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology when authors worked as medical team members for treating COVID-19. COVID-19 patients with pulse oxygen saturation/fraction of inspiration oxygen (SpO 2/FiO 2, S/F) ratio < 235, managed by medical teams [using S/F ratio instead of oxygenation index (PaO 2/FiO 2) to diagnose ARDS] from February to April 2020 were included. The patients were divided into NIPPV group and HFNC group according to their oxygen therapy modes. Clinical data of patients were collected, including general characteristics, respiratory rate (RR), fraction of FiO 2, SpO 2, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), S/F ratio in the first 72 hours, lymphocyte count (LYM), percentage of lymphocyte (LYM%) and white blood cell count (WBC) at admission and discharge or death, the duration of dyspnea before NIPPV and HFNC, and the length from onset to admission. The differences of intubation rate, all-cause mortality, S/F ratio and RR were analyzed, and single factor analysis and generalized estimation equation (GEE) were used to analyze the risk factors affecting S/F ratio. Results:Among the 41 patients, the proportion of males was high (68.3%, 28 cases), the median age was 68 (58-74) years old, 28 cases had complications (68.3%), and 34 cases had multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS, 82.9%). Compared with HFNC group, the proportion of complications in NIPPV group was higher [87.5% (21/24) vs. 41.2% (7/17), P < 0.05], and the value of LYM% was lower [5.3% (3.4%-7.8%) vs. 10.0% (3.9%-19.7%), P < 0.05], the need of blood purification was also significantly lower [0% (0/24) vs. 29.4% (5/17), P < 0.05]. The S/F ratio of NIPPV group gradually increased after 2 hours treatment and RR gradually decreased with over time, S/F ratio decreased and RR increased in HFNC group compared with baseline, but there was no significant difference in S/F ratio between the two groups at each time point. RR in NIPPV group was significantly higher than that in HFNC group after 2 hours treatment [time/min: 30 (27-33) vs. 24 (21-27), P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in rate need intubation and hospital mortality between NIPPV group and HFNC group [66.7% (16/24) vs. 70.6% (12/17), 58.3% (14/24) vs. 52.9% (9/17), both P > 0.05]. Analysis of the factors affecting the S/Fratio in the course of oxygen therapy showed that the oxygen therapy mode and the course of illness at admission were the factors affecting the S/F ratio of patients [ β values were -15.827, 1.202, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were -29.102 to -2.552 and 0.247-2.156, P values were 0.019 and 0.014, respectively]. Conclusion:Compared with HFNC, NIPPV doesn't significantly reduce the intubation rate and mortality of patients with COVID-19 accompanied with ARDS, but it significantly increases the S/F ratio of those patients.
ABSTRACT
@#BACKGROUND: We sought to demonstrate the superiority of a targeted therapy strategy involving high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNCO2) therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) using lung ultrasound score (LUS) in comparison with standard care among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who undergo successful weaning to decrease the incidence of extubation failure at both 48 hours and seven days. METHODS: During the study period, 98 patients were enrolled in the study, including 49 in the control group and 49 in the treatment group. Patients in the control group and patients with an LUS score <14 points (at low risk of extubation failure) in the treatment group were extubated and received standard preventive care without NIV or HFNCO2. Patients with an LUS score ≥14 points (at high risk of extubation failure) in the treatment group were extubated with a second review of the therapeutic optimization to identify and address any persisting risk factors for postextubation respiratory distress; patients received HFNCO2 therapy combined with sessions of preventive NIV (4-8 hours per day for 4-8 sessions total) for the first 48 hours after extubation. RESULTS: In the control group, 13 patients had the LUS scores ≥14 points, while 36 patients had scores <14 points. In the treatment group, 16 patients had the LUS scores ≥14 points, while 33 patients had scores <14 points. Among patients with the LUS score ≥14 points, the extubation failure rate within 48 hours was 30.8% in the control group and 12.5% in the treatment group, constituting a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conversely, among patients with an LUS score <14 points, 13.9% in the control group and 9.1% in the treatment group experienced extubation failure (P=0.61). The length of ICU stay (9.4±3.1 days vs. 7.2±2.4 days) was significantly different and the re-intubation rate (at 48 hours: 18.4% vs. 10.2%; seven days: 22.4% vs. 12.2%) significantly varied between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate (6.1% vs. 8.2%) between the control and treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk adults being weaned from mechanical ventilation and assessed by LUS, the NIV+HFNCO2 protocol does not lessen the mortality rate but reduce the length of ICU stay, the rate of extubation failure at both 48 hours and seven days.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury complicated with acute respiratory failure (ARF).Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in EICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from May 2016 to January 2018.One hundred sixty-eight consecutive patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury complicated with ARF,who did not respond to conventional oxygen therapy,were assigned to the HFNC or NPPV treatment group sequenced by the random number table.The baseline clinical characteristics of randomized participants and respiratory frequency (RR),PaCO2,mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1,12,24,48 h after treatment were evaluated.Comfortable scale,tracheal intubation rate within 28 d,duration of mechanical ventilation,length of stay in ICU and mortality rate were compared as well.Results There was no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics,such as sex,age.between the two groups (P＞0.05).RR and PaCO2 were lower in the HFNC group at all time point.In addition,the HFNC group had significantly lower PaCO2 than the NPPV group at 24 and 48 h after treatment (P＜0.01);Oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) was improved in both groups,and the HFNC group had superior oxygenation index than the NPPV group at 12,24,48 h after treatment (P＜0.01).Furthermore,the HFNC group had better comfort scale (6.93±0.71 vs 4.29±0.93,P＜0.01),shorter length of stay in ICU and duration of mechanical ventilation compared to the NPPV group (P＜0.01).There was no significant differences in tracheal intubation rate and mortality rate between the two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusions In addition to the superior efficacy in improving respiratory function and shortening length of stay in ICU,HFNC was well tolerated by patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury complicated with ARF,and could be recommended in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the effect of heated humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) on patients with post-stroke systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Methods Totally 78 patients with post-stroke SIRS were selected in the department of neurology of Wuxi People's Hospital and were randomly divided into HFNC group (n=40) and conventional therapy group (n = 38). The neurological impairment score (NIHSS) , APACHE-Ⅱ, clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) , C-reactive protein (CRP) of the 2 groups were recorded before and after the treatment. At the same time, modified Rankin score (mRS) of the two groups were also recorded. Results There was no significant difference in terms of morality and the number of patients with mechanical ventilation in the 2 groups. The 7-day APACHE Ⅱ, 7-day CPIS, 7-day SIRS cure rate, 14-day NIHSS and mRS of 3 months in HFNC group were higher than those in the conventional therapy group (P < 0.05).There was no significant difference in 7-day CRP, 14-day CRP and 14-day CPIS between HFNC group and conventional oxygen therapy group (P> 0.05). Conclusions HFNC can improve lung infection of patients with SIRS thus improve the recovery rate of SIRS. At the same time, it can improve the recovery of the neurological deficit and prognosis in acute stroke.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) on the clinical efficacy and diaphragm function of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods The patients with mild to moderate AECOPD (clinical classification Ⅰ-Ⅱ) admitted to Huxi Hospital Affiliated to Jining Medical College from January to October in 2018 were enrolled. The patients were divided into HFNC treatment group and routine oxygen therapy control group (each n = 37) by randomly number table method. The two groups were given bronchiectasis drugs, corticosteroids, expectorant, anti-infection treatment, at the same time, the HFNC treatment group was given HFNC with the initial flow rate of 40 L/min. The routine oxygen therapy control group was given low flow oxygen, and the initial flow rate was 3 L/min. General data such as gender, age, clinical grade, acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) score were recorded. Bedside ultrasound was used to measure the diaphragmatic excursions during quiet breathing (DEq), diaphragmatic excursions during deep breathing (DEd), and diaphragmatic shallow fast breathing index (D-RSBI) before and 2, 24 and 48 hours after treatment in both groups and compared, meanwhile, arterial blood gas analysis was performed, and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were recorded. Results Two patients in the HFNC treatment group withdrew from the study because they could not tolerate HFNC, while other patients were enrolled in the analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in gender, age, proportion of AECOPDⅡ grade or APACHEⅡscore between the two groups, indicating that the general data of the two groups were comparable and balanced. There was no statistically significant difference in DEq, DEd, D-RSBI, PaO2 or PaCO2 before treatment between the two groups. After treatment, DEp in both groups was decreased gradually with time, it was decreased earlier in the HFNC treatment group, and it showed significant difference as compared with that before treatment at 2 hours after treatment (mm: 18.3±3.1 vs. 20.1±4.2, P < 0.01), and it was significantly lower than that in the routine oxygen therapy control group (mm: 18.3±3.1 vs. 20.3±3.7, P < 0.05); DEd was gradually increased in both groups, it was significantly increased in the HFNC treatment group, and it was significantly higher than that in the routine oxygen therapy control group at 24 hours and 48 hours after treatment (mm: 55.2±7.6 vs. 50.8±9.2 at 24 hours, 59.4±7.7 vs. 53.6±9.1 at 48 hours, both P < 0.05); D-RSBI was decreased gradually in both groups, it was decreased earlier and more significant in the HFNC treatment group, and it was significantly lower than that in routine oxygen therapy control group at 24 hours and 48 hours after treatment (times·min-1·mm-1: 0.41±0.13 vs. 0.51±0.20 at 24 hours, 0.31±0.12 vs. 0.43±0.17 at 48 hours, both P < 0.05). After treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in PaO2 or PaCO2 between the two groups. Conclusion HFNC can effectively relieve diaphragm fatigue in patients with mild to moderate AECOPD, but it had no effect on carbon dioxide retention.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the characteristics and failure risk factors of sequential high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) after weaning from invasive ventilation. Methods The patients who received sequential HFNC after weaning from invasive ventilation admitted to surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of Peking University People's Hospital from June 1st 2016 to May 31st 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical variables, respiratory therapy parameters, respiratory variables, cardiac variables and outcomes were reviewed and analyzed. Treatment characteristics of HFNC after weaning was analyzed. Patients were divided into HFNC success group and HFNC failure group according to the failure of HFNC, and the differences between the two groups were compared. The independent risk factors of HFNC treatment failure were analyzed by Logistic regression analysis. The value of predictive treatment failure of risk factors and regression models were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results A total of 99 patients were included, 61 men, and the median age was 67.0 (57.0, 76.0) years old. The medianinitial HFNC flow was 50 (50, 60) L/min, and inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) was 0.50 (0.40, 0.60). Eighteen patients experienced HFNC failure (18.2%). Compared with the HFNC success group, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in the HFNC failure group was higher [4 (3, 5) vs. 2 (1, 3), P < 0.01], B type natriuretic peptide (BNP) before HFNC therapy were significant higher [ng/L: 647.2 (399.2, 1 331.3) vs. 127.2 (55.2, 369.5), P < 0.01], and respiratory frequency (RR) and heart rate (HR) were significant faster, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significant higher, oxygen index (PaO2/FiO2) was significant lower after 30 minutes HFNC treatment [RR (times/min): 26 (22, 28) vs. 19 (17, 21), HR (bpm): 105 (97, 107) vs. 85 (77, 90), MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 104.3 (101.7, 110.7) vs. 92.3 (88.3, 97.7), PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg): 207.3 (185.8, 402.8) vs. 320.2 (226.2, 361.5), all P < 0.05]. It was shown by multiple Logistic regression analysis that the SOFA score [odds ratio (OR) = 2.818, P = 0.022, β = 1.036], BNP before HFNC treatment (OR = 1.002, P = 0.033, β = 0.002) and HR after HFNC treatment 30 minutes (OR = 1.140, P = 0.032, β = 0.131) were independent risk factors for HFNC treatment failure. It was shown by ROC curve that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the prediction of HFNC failure was 0.840, 0.859, 0.860 and 0.962 for SOFA, BNP before HFNC treatment, HR after HFNC treatment 30 minutes, and regression model, all had good forecast values (all P < 0.01). Conclusions HFNC is one of the commonly used oxygen therapy methods in the ICU, but not all patients who are treated as a sequential therapy after invasive mechanical ventilation weaning can benefit from it. SOFA score, BNP before HFNC treatment and HR after 30 minutes HFNC treatment were independent risk factors of HFNC failure. Each independent risk factor and regression model can predict the success of HFNC treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the efficacy of high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute-moderate type Ⅱ respiratory failure,and to explore the feasibility of HFNC in the treatment of COPD with respiratory failure.Methods Patients diagnosed with COPD with acute moderate type Ⅱ respiratory failure (Arterial blood gas pH 7.25-7.35,PaCO2＞ 50 mmHg) admitted to the ICUs from April 2017 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.All patients who were treated with HFNC within the first 4 hours after the admission to the ICUs,and continued for more than 2 hours and for at least 4 hours within the first 24 hours were included in the HFNC group.Those treated with NIV in the same conditions were included in the NIV group.The end point was the failure rates of treatment (changing to respiratory support method in another group or invasive ventilation) and 28-day mortality.Results Eighty-two patients (39 in the HFNC group and 43 in the NIV group) were enrolled.The HFNC group had a treatment failure rate of 28.2％,which was lower than that of the NIV group (39.5％).However,Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups (Log Rank test 1.228,P=0.268).The 28-day mortality rate in HFNC group was 15.4％,which was no different from 14％ in NIV group (Log Rank test 0.049,P=0.824).The number of airway care interventions within the first 24 hours was significantly lower in the HFNC group than in the NIV group [5 (3～8) vs.11 (7～15)],whereas the duration of respiratory support within the first 24 hours was significantly longer in the HFNC group than in the NIV group [16 (9～22) hours vs.8 (4～11) hours] (all P＜0.05).The incidence of nasal facial lesions in the NIV group was 20.9％,significantly higher than that of HFNC group (5.1％,P ＜0.05).Conclusion For COPD with acute moderate type Ⅱ respiratory failure,HFNC has similar therapeutic effects as NIV.HFNC has better therapeutic tolerance and is a new potential respiratory support method for clinical treatment of COPD with respiratory failure.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: High-flow nasal cannula is an oxygenation therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure. There are, some questions about this technique which answer is needed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed all patients that require high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy admitted to a polyvalent intensive care unit of a university tertiary hospital. We select those patients who require the therapy as initial support for their acute respiratory failure. We analyzed the mortality and connection to mechanical ventilation (V.M.) rate. We performed a global analysis and then a sub analysis for underlying pathology. Our objective is to describe which pathology has the best results with this treatment. Patients who require therapy to support scheduled extubation, heart failure, pulmonary thromboembolism, thoracic trauma and decreased level of consciousness were excluded. RESULTS: We analysed a total of 128 patients. 76 Men, Mean age 57.4 years, APACHE II 19; SOFA 8.2; SAPS II 55.2; Mean income 13.3 days; Patients required the therapy an average of 2.8 days. 65 patients required connection to M.V. after HFNC therapy. Those patients who were intubated in the first 48 hours had a mortality rate of 45% while those in which the therapy was delayed more than 48 hours had a mortality rate of 56% (P = 0.3). Patients were divided according to their underline pathology. Acute respiratory failure: Extra pulmonary or intra pulmonary (Pneumonia in immunosuppressed and Pneumonia in immuno competent). In the first group, connection to MV was required in 54% of the cases, with a mortality rate of 54% in those intubated in the first 48 hours vs 40% later. In the group of pneumonia in immunosuppressed patients, M.V. was required in the 60.5% of the cases with a mortality rate of 75% in those intubated in the first 48 hours vs 71% posteriorly. In the group Pneumonia in immuno competent, M.V. was required in 42% of the cases with a mortality rate of 10% in the ones intubated the first 48 hours vs 50% later. Statistically significant differences were observed regarding the need of M.V connection according to base pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Results of HFNC oxygen therapy do not appear to be different in pulmonary or extrapulmonary respiratory failure. The severity of the patient ilness is related to the need of mechanical ventilation and mortality rate. The patient who benefits the most from the early identification of the failure of this therapy, is the one who presents acute respiratory failure due to pneumonia in immunocompetent patient.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La oxigenoterapia de alto flujo es una técnica de oxigenación en los pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. Existen, algunas preguntas acerca de esta técnica que necesitan respuesta. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Analizamos todos los pacientes que requieren oxigenoterapia de alto flujo ingresados en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos polivalente de un hospital terciario universitario. Seleccionamos aquellos pacientes que requieren la terapia como soporte inicial de su insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. Analizamos la mortalidad y conexión a ventilación mecánica (V.M.). Realizamos un análisis global y posteriormente un subanálisis por patología subyacente. Nuestro objetivo es describir en que patología presenta mejores resultados. Se excluyen los pacientes que requieren la terapia como apoyo a la extubación programada, insuficiencia cardiaca, tromboembolismo pulmonar, trauma torácico y disminución del nivel de conciencia. RESULTADOS: Analizamos un total de 128 pacientes. Setenta y seis varones, edad media 57,4 años, APACHE II 19; SOFA 8,2; SAPS II 55,2; días de ingreso medio 13,3; Los pacientes requieren la terapia una media de 2,8 días. Sesenta y cinco pacientes requieren conexión a V.M. tras uso de esta terapia. Aquellos pacientes que son intubados en las primeras 48 horas presentan una mortalidad de 45%, mientras que aquellos en los que la terapia se alarga más de 48 horas la mortalidad es del 56% (p = 0,3). Se divide a los pacientes según su patología de base. Insuficiencia respiratoria de causa: Extrapulmonar, neumonía en inmunodeprimido y neumonía en inmuno competente. En el primer grupo se objetiva conexión a V.M en un 54% de los casos, con una mortalidad del 54% en aquellos intubados en las primeras 48 horas vs 40% posteriormente. En el grupo neumonía en inmunodeprimido se requiere V.M en el 60,5% con una mortalidad del 75% en aquellos intubados en las primeras 48 horas vs 71% posteriormente. En el grupo neumonía en inmunocompetente objetivamos conexión a V.M. en el 42% con una mortalidad del 10% en los intubados las primeras 48 horas vs 50% posteriormente. Se objetivan diferencias estadísticamente significativas respecto a necesidad de conexión a V.M. según patología de base. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados de la terapia de alto flujo no parece ser diferente en la insuficiencia respiratoria de causa pulmonar o extrapulmonar. La gravedad del enfermo se relaciona con la necesidad de ventilación mecánica y mortalidad. El paciente que más se beneficia de la rápida identificación del fracaso de esta terapia es el que presenta insuficiencia respiratoria por neumonía en paciente inmunocompetente.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Pneumonia/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index , Acute Disease , Retrospective Studies , Immunocompromised Host , Cannula , Immunocompetence , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical value of humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HHFNC) oxygen therapy for acute hypoxic respiratory failure.Methods Totally 37 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure were enrolled who entered ICU from January 2016 to June 2016 and randomly divided into FM group (n=l8) and HHFNC group (n=19).The values of blood gas analysis were recorded as before treatment,1 h and 5 h after therapy,respectively.Results 1 h and 5 h after therapy,both groups had significant increase in pa(O2) compared to before treatment (P＜0.05).Meanwhile,HHFNC group had higher level ofpa(O2) in comparison to FM group (P＜0.05).Conclusion HHFNC oxygen therapy has a therapeutic effect on acute hypoxic respiratory failure which helps to correct hypoxemia and improve subject feeling of comfort.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical value of humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HHFNC) oxygen therapy for acute hypoxic respiratory failure.Methods Totally 37 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure were enrolled who entered ICU from January 2016 to June 2016 and randomly divided into FM group (n=l8) and HHFNC group (n=19).The values of blood gas analysis were recorded as before treatment,1 h and 5 h after therapy,respectively.Results 1 h and 5 h after therapy,both groups had significant increase in pa(O2) compared to before treatment (P＜0.05).Meanwhile,HHFNC group had higher level ofpa(O2) in comparison to FM group (P＜0.05).Conclusion HHFNC oxygen therapy has a therapeutic effect on acute hypoxic respiratory failure which helps to correct hypoxemia and improve subject feeling of comfort.