Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research ; (12): 257-260, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-413070

ABSTRACT

In recent years,medical colleges have generally accepted the higher education assessment(evaluation).How to put the good practices and experience we obtained during the educational assessment into the daily teaching management and achieve normalization of teaching evaluation is of great significance to continuously improving the teaching quality.It is the primary condition to establish the evaluation index system for evaluating clinical teaching quality by regular teaching assessment. In this paper,the author constructed a clinical teaching quality evaluation index system through systematic research and exploration.

2.
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research ; (12)2005.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-622903

ABSTRACT

It is necessary to pay attention to the quality of mass higher education.We should adapt the evaluation system of higher education to the needs of its managerial system reform and healthy development.The cognition of that can help us to build higher education evaluation system with Chinese characteristics,which not only fits the national condition but also reflects the general rules of this system.

3.
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research ; (12)2005.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-622902

ABSTRACT

The evaluation systems of higher education in such developed countries as USA and Japan,are perfect and systemic,and it is significant to analyze them and use the experiences for reference.

4.
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research ; (12)2002.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-622431

ABSTRACT

Internally, there is internal quality self-evaluation by the higher education institutions, and externally, there are institutional accreditation and professional accreditation by accrediting agencies. About 80 accrediting agencies take charge of such kind of accreditation respectively. They are recognized by non-governmental Council for Higher Education Accreditation, or by US Department of Education, or by both. State quality reviews of higher education are reviews for state licensure which affect private institutions and reviews for accountability which primarily affect public institutions. A multi-level wide spectrum of higher education accreditation system of United States is so clearly analyzed. Additionally, variety of ranking of higher education institutions and programs are produced through statistical analysis of questionnaires fry different commercial publishers.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL