ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the appropriateness of hospitalization days at a tertiary hospital in 2014 by means of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol ( AEP ) , and to analyze the causes of inappropriate stays. Methods Medical records of inpatients admitted at a tertiary hospital in 2014 were randomly selected. AEP( US version) was used to evaluate the appropriateness of every hospitalization day, while the causes of inappropriate hospitalization day were also analyzed. Results A total of 1 641 days of stay from 148 medical records were reviewed, and 129 days of stay (7. 9%) were seen as inappropriate. Two major factors for inappropriate stays were waiting for surgery and waiting for test, roughly 89. 1% of the inappropriate hospitalization days. The proportion of inappropriate hospital stays reduced to 4. 8% after adjustment of two-day weekend. Inappropriate hospital stays mostly appeared during the second day to the eighth day after admission(93. 8%). Logistic analysis results showed that with concomitant symptoms, preoperative waiting days > 5 days, high level surgery, non-emergency admission were significantly associated with appropriateness of hospital stays (P<0. 05). Conclusions The rate of inappropriate stays will be reduced and the quality of medical services will be improved if comprehensive measures could be carried out according to the causes of inappropriate stays.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical application value of modified CURB-65 score for assessing severity of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in emergency patients.Methods During the period from May 2011 to May 2012,198 emergency patients with CAP enrolled in this study were evaluated by CURB-65 score and modified CURB-65 score,respectively.Based on the severity of CAP,patients were divided into mild pneumonia group (Group A,n =107) and severe pneumonia group (Group B,n =91).The clinical status and biomarkers (the white blood cell count,procalcitonin,pneumonia severity index,hospitalization days,and hospitalization expenses) were recorded and compared with t test.Group B was divided into survived-subgroup (n =62) and death-subgroup (n =29).The differences in CURB-65 score and modified CURB-65 scere between the two groups were compared with t test.The correlation of CURB-65 score and modified CURB-65 score with procalcitonin,pneumonia severity index,hospitalization days,and hospitalization expenses were determined with Pearson rank correlation method.Results The procalcitonin,pneumonia severity index,hospitalization days,hospitalization expenses,modified CURB-65 score and CURB-65 score in Group B were significantly higher than those in Group A [(3.70 ± 0.83) vs.(1.27±0.24),t=28.91,P＜0.01; (121.33±16.74) vs.(73.79±9.21),t=25.23,P＜0.01;(25.79±10.13) vs.(14.85 ±6.83),t=9.02,P＜0.01; (22.71 ±3.84) vs.(9.83 ±1.24),t=32.76,P＜0.01; (3.69±1.03) vs.(3.32±1.06),t=2.48,P＜0.05; (4.21±1.13) vs.(3.41±0.96),t =5.39,P＜0.01],while no significant difference was observed in the white blood cell count between GroupA and B (17.58 ±5.99 vs.16.86±4.41,t =0.97,P＞0.05).For Group B,the modified CURB-65 score of death-subgroup was significantly higher than that of survived-subgroup [(4.75± ± 1.17) vs.(4.01 ± 1.09),t =2.95,P ＜ 0.01],whilc no significant difference was observed in the CURB-65 score between the death-subgroup and survived-subgroup (4.01 ± 1.15 vs.3.58 ±0.97,t =1.86,P ＞ 0.05).The CURB-65 score positive correlated with the procalcitonin (r =-0.803,P =0.025),and had no obvious correlation with the pneumonia severity index,hospitalization days,and hospitalization expenses (r=0.621,P=0.320; r=0.701,P=0.231; r=0.675,P=0.256); The modified CURB-65 score significantly positively correlated with the procalcitonin,pneumonia severity index,hospitalization days,and hospitalization expenses (r =0.951,P =0.003 ; r =0.965,P =0.002 ; r =0.947,P =0.004 ; r =0.961,P =0.002).Conclusions Compared with the CURB-65 score,the modified CURB-65 score is more efficient in evaluating the severity and prognoses of CAP for emergency patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of the two methods of delivery,hands-on vs.handspoised,on maternal and neonatal outcomes and health service utility during vaginal delivery.Methods 218 primiparous pregnant women admitted from January to May 2013 were randomly assigned to the control group,who adopted two hands-on or traditional method (108 cases) and the intervention group who chose hand-poised method (110 cases).The delivery outcomes and medical resource utilization were compared between two groups.Results The rate of perineal trauma,postpartum hemorrhage and edema was significantly lower in the intervention group compared with that of the control group.No significant difference in neonatal outcome was observed between the two groups.The second stage duration of the intervention group was longer but the whole hospital duration and costs was significantly lower than those of the control group.Conclusions Our data suggest that a policy of hands-poised care is a safe and effective birthing alternative and could improve delivery outcome and reduce hospitalization days and costs.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of multi-disciplinary management for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with clipping surgery. Methods 123 subjects admitted to hospital in April 2005 to March 2007 and received traditional management were named as the control group.62 subjects in the control group who admitted to neurology department first and then transferred to neurosurgery when diagnosed as aSAH by DSA were named as the transfer group. 61 subjects who admitted to neurosurgery directly and diagnosed as aSAH by DSA were named as the surgery group. 101 subjects who received multidisciplinary management from April 2007 to March 2009 were named as the experimental group. The waiting time before DSA, waiting time before surgery, hospital stay and hospitalization costs were compared between the three groups. Results Compared with the transfer group and the surgery group, the experimental group was lower in waiting time before DSA, waiting time before surgery, hospital stay and hospitalization costs, but there is no significant difference between the three groups in postoperative neurological function score and incidence rate of complications. The mortality rate was not significantly higher in the experimental group than the transfer group, but was significantly lower than the surgery group. Conclusions Multi-disciplinary management can reduce the "inappropriate hospital stay" of aSAH patients for early surgery. It can reduce the average hospital stay, hospital cost, in order to reduce the burden on families and society.