ABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of the formulas, including Haigis, SRK/T, Holladay 1, and Holladay 2, in predicting the diopter of the intraocular lens implanted in high myopia cataract patients.METHODS: Prospective study. A total of 168 cases(168 eyes)of age-related cataract with an axial length(AL)≥26 mm who were treated in our hospital from August 2017 to November 2021 were selected. According to the preoperative AL measured by IOL Master 700, the patients were divided into five groups, including 37 cases(37 eyes)in group A with 26 mm≤AL<27 mm, 34 cases(34 eyes)in group B with 27 mm≤AL<28 mm, 42 cases(42 eyes)in group C with 28 mm≤AL<29 mm, 28 cases(28 eyes)in group D with 29 mm≤AL<30 mm, and 27 patients(27 eyes)in group E with AL ≥ 30 mm. Subjective refraction was performed at 3 mo postoperatively, and the mean numerical error(MNE)and mean absolute error(MAE)of each formula for predicting diopters were calculated.RESULTS: The MNE and MAE of the Haigis and Holladay 2 formulas were relatively less in each group, and MNE and MAE did not significantly increase with the growth of the axial length. However, the MAE and MNE of the SRK/T and Holladay 1 formulas significantly increased with the growth of the axial length, with the MNE and MAE of the Holladay 1 formula increasing more significantly in groups C, D, and E.CONCLUSION: For patients with age-related cataract, with an axial length of ≥26 mm, the accuracy of predicting the diopter of the intraocular lens using the Haigis and Holladay 2 formulas were higher.
ABSTRACT
AIM:To compare the differences, correlations and consistency of IOL Master 700 or Lenstar LS900 in preoperative ocular biometry and the accuracy of intraocular lens(IOL)degree calculation of cataract patients with high myopia.METHODS: Retrospective study. A total of 136 cases(136 eyes)of high myopia and cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification at the ophthalmology department of Army Medical Center of PLA from March 2021 to March 2023 were collected, with a mean age of 57.38±8.08 years. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on axial length(AL): 41 eyes in group A(26 mm≤ AL ≤28 mm), 43 eyes in group B(28 mm< AL ≤30 mm)and 52 eyes in group C(AL >30 mm). AL, mean keratometry(Km), anterior chamber depth(ACD), lens thickness(LT)and white-to-white(WTW)were preoperatively measured by two instruments, respectively. Barrett Universal II formula was used to calculate the IOL degrees of all patients, the appropriate reserved diopter was decided individually, and the prediction error(PE)and absolute error(AE)of the two instruments were compared.RESULTS:The AL and ACD of patients in the three groups measured by Lenstar LS900 were higher than the AL measurd by IOL Master 700(all P<0.05), with a difference of AL measured by the two devices: group C>group B>group A. However, there was no statistical significance in LT, Km, and WTW measured by the two instruments(all P>0.05). All biometric parameters measured by the two devices were positively correlated(all r>0.9, P<0.05), and consistent(95% LoA of all groups were narrow). There was no statistically significant difference in AE calculated by the two devices(P>0.05), but the IOL Master 700 calculated a smaller PE than Lenstar LS900(P<0.05), with lower percentage of hyperopic shift in IOL Master 700.CONCLUSION:In cataract patients with high myopia, AL measured by Lenstar LS900 is longer than that by IOL Master 700, and the differences of AL increase along with the growth of AL. Both devices have a good prediction for IOL calculation, but IOL Master 700 has less refractive error, lower percentage of hyperopic shift, and greater clinical advantages IOL Master 700.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To observe the changes in the Chang-Warning chord(CW chord)before and after cataract surgery using the IOL Master 700 and predict the CW chord using an artificial intelligence prediction model and preoperative measurement data.METHODS: The analysis was conducted on the preoperative and postoperative IOL Master 700 measurements of 304 cataract patients. This included astigmatism vector value, average keratometry, axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, corneal central thickness, white-to-white, the position of the Purkinje reflex I image relative to the corneal center and pupil center, and the CW chord. A prediction model based on the SVR algorithm and the BP neural network algorithm was established to predict the postoperative CW chord using the preoperative CW chord and ocular biological parameters.RESULTS: The X component of the CW chord showed a slight shift in the temporal direction in both the left and right eyes after cataract surgery, while the Y component changed little. The SVR model, using the preoperative CW chord and other preoperative biometric parameters as input data, was able to predict the X and Y components of the CW chord more accurately than the BP neural network.CONCLUSION: The CW chord can be directly measured with a coaxial fixation light using various biometers, corneal topographers, or tomographers. The use of the SVR algorithm can accurately predict the postoperative CW chord before cataract surgery.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the difference and consistency of corneal refractive power and astigmatism measured by CASIA2 and IOL Master 700 in patients with age-related cataract.METHODS: Retrospective study. A total of 153 patients(232 eyes)with age-related cataract admitted to Daping hospital from November to December 2021 were selected. The flat keratometry(Kf), steep keratometry(Ks), mean keratometry(Km), degree and axis of astigmatism(vector representation J0 and J45)of the anterior, posterior surfaces together with the total cornea from cataract patients were measured by CASIA2 and IOL Master 700, respectively. The difference, correlation and consistency of the two instruments were analyzed.RESULTS:There was no significant difference in J45 values of posterior corneal surface measured by CASIA2 and IOL Master 700(-0.006±0.038D vs. -0.005±0.044D, P>0.05), but there were significant differences in other parameters(all P<0.05). All parameters measured by the two instruments were significantly positive correlated(all r/rs>0.7, P<0.001); Bland-Altman analysis showed that the refractive power and astigmatism of the anterior cornea surface measured by the two facilities were in good consistency, while the refractive power of the posterior surface and the whole cornea showed poor consistency.CONCLUSION: CASIA2 and IOL Master 700 showed little differences and good consistency in the refractive power and astigmatism of the anterior, posterior and total corneal surface in cataract patients, which seems interchangeable. However, the refractive power of the posterior surface and the whole cornea has significant differences and poor consistency, which should not be interchange casually.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) power using Galilei G6 and to determine the agreement of its measurements with those of IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 500. Methods: Hundred mature cataract eyes were examined twice with Galilei G6 and the results were compared with those of other two devices. Axial length (AL), minimum (K1), maximum (K2), and mean keratometry, anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white (WTW) diameter, lens thickness (LT), and the calculated IOL power were the studied parameters. The correlation coefficient, within-subject standard deviation (Sw), Bland–Altman method, and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used for statistical analysis. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was above 0.9 for all indices, and the LoA ranged from a minimum of 0.08 mm for AL to a maximum of 0.50 D for K1. Sw also ranged between a minimum of 0.02 for AL, ACD, and WTW and a maximum of 0.13 for K1. In the Galilei G6–IOL Master 700 pair, the narrowest and widest LoA were calculated for AL (0.07 mm) and K2 (0.49 D), respectively. In the Galilei G6–IOL Master 500 pair, the narrowest and widest widths of LoA were calculated for AL (0.17 mm) and K2 (0.92 D), respectively. In the first pair, the LoA of IOL power (0.57 D) were the best for Haigis formula and in the second pair, the best agreement (LoA: 0.35 D) was observed for Holladay-1. Conclusion: Galilei G6 provided repeatable biometric measurements. The agreement between biometry and IOL power calculation was better in the Galilei G6–IOL Master 700 pair compared to the Galilei G6–IOL Master 500
ABSTRACT
AIM:To evaluate the accuracy of A-ultrasound combined with corneal topography measurement in clinical application by analyzing the ocular-related biometric parameters and refractive error and comparing with those of IOL Master 700 in cataract patients. METHODS: A prospective study. Clinical data were collected from 113 patients(122 eyes)who underwent phacoemulsification in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from July 2020 to July 2021. The axial length(AL), anterior chamber depth(ACD), lens thickness(LT)and corneal curvature(Km)were measured respectively by IOL Master 700 and A-ultrasound combined with corneal topography measurement and the 3mo after the surgery of the refractive error was analyzed.RESULTS: There were differences in AL(24.09±1.65, 23.81±1.62mm), ACD(3.11±0.42, 2.97±0.43mm)and Km(44.12±1.59, 44.06±1.54D)measured by IOL Master 700 and A-ultrasound combined with corneal topography(P<0.05), while there was no difference in LT(4.34±0.46, 4.30±0.59mm)(P>0.05). The postoperative mean absolute refractive error(MAE)of intraocular lens(IOL)diopter calculation formulas with different measurement methods was significantly different(P<0.001). The Barrett Universal II formula MAE of the IOL Master 700 measuring instrument was different from the Holladay I, Haigis and SRK/T formulas(P<0.01), at the same time, compared with the A-ultrasound combined with corneal topography calculation formula SRK/T and Barrett Universal II formula, they were also different(P<0.01). However, there was no difference among the Holladay Ⅰ, Haigis, SRK/T formula MAE which come from the IOL Master 700 measuring instrument and the A-ultrasound combined with corneal topography calculation formula SRK/T formula(P>0.05). In addition, the Barrett Universal II formula of the IOL Master 700 measuring instrument has the smallest median absolute refractive error(MedAE)(0.260D), and the A-ultrasound combined with corneal topography calculation formula Barrett Universal II formula MedAE is the largest(0.765D).CONCLUSION: The values of AL, ACD and Km measured by A-ultrasound combined with corneal topography were smaller than those of IOL Master 700. When the SRK/T formula was used to calculate the IOL diopter, the results of the two group were similar. However, when using the Barrett Universal Ⅱ formula, the refractive error of the A-ultrasound combined with corneal topography group was large, resulting in hyperopia drift.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To investigate the difference and consistency among iTrace, IOL Master 700 and Pentacam HR in measuring corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery.<p>METHODS: Across-sectional study. From May 2020 to May 2021, a total of 149 cataract patients(181 eyes)were collected in our hospital. Presurgery, steep keratometry(Ks), flat keratometry(Kf), mean keratometry(Km), astigmatism magnitude(Cyl), and steep astigmatic axis values measured by the three instruments of the iTrace, IOL Master 700 and the Pentacam HR. The difference and consistency of the measurement indexes of the three instruments were analyzed.<p>RESULTS: Statistical differences existed in Ks, Kf, Km among the three instruments(<i>F</i>=4.912, 3.514, 4.873, all <i>P</i><0.05)and there was no difference in Cyl and Axis(<i>F</i>=0.523, 0.128, all <i>P</i>>0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed the outcomes revealed that the Ks and Kf measured by iTrace and the other two instruments have poor consistency, and the consistency of Cyl and Axis was good. But the difference of Axis is not clinically acceptable. There were no statistically differences between the iTrace and the other two devices among the low astigmatism(50 eyes), moderate astigmatism(34 eyes)and high astigmatism(18 eyes)groups(all <i>P</i>>0.05). <p>CONCLUSION: In the preoperative measurement of cataract patients except for the good consistency of astigmatism, the iTrace, IOL Master 700 and Pentacam HR showed different Ks and Kf, and the Axis difference exceeded the clinically acceptable range, especially in the highly astigmatism group. The measurement of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery should be evaluated by multiple measurement methods and make comprehensive planning for the surgical plan.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Comparar las mediciones biométricas realizadas con el IOL Master 700 y el Pentacam AXL en pacientes miopes con cirugía fotoablativa previa. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal en 103 ojos de 103 pacientes miopes con cirugía fotoablativa previa, atendidos en el período de enero 2019 a enero 2020, en el Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología "Ramón Pando Ferrer". Las variables estudiadas fueron: edad, sexo, equivalente esférico y características biométricas posoperatorias (longitud axial, profundidad de la cámara anterior y queratometrías), así como su relación, aportadas automáticamente por el IOL master 700 y el pentacam AXL para evitar los factores dependientes del operador, tres meses después de la cirugía. El análisis estadístico se realizó con la prueba t para datos pareados, utilizando una significación del 95 por ciento. Resultados: La edad promedio fue de 25,72 ± 4,26 años. Se analizaron 53 ojos derechos y 50 izquierdos, todos tratados con láser de superficie. El equivalente esférico medio fue de -0,06 ± 0,34 dioptrías y el tiempo entre la cirugía y los exámenes fue de 6,32 ± 3,56 meses. No hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p > 0,05) entre la longitud axial y la profundidad de la cámara anterior; mientras que sí la hubo (p < 0,01) con las queratometrías obtenidas con el IOL Master 700, en comparación con los del pentacam AXL. Conclusión: En pacientes miopes con cirugía fotoablativa previa, el IOL Master 700 y el pentacam AXL proveen mediciones biométricas similares, como la longitud axial y la profundidad de la cámara anterior, no así con la queratometría, la cual es diferente(AU)
Objective: Compare the biometric measurements taken with IOL Master 700 and Pentacam AXL in myopic patients with previous photoablative surgery. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted of 103 eyes of 103 myopic patients undergoing photoablative surgery at Ramón Pando Ferrer Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology from January 2019 to January 2020. The variables analyzed were age, sex, spherical equivalent and preoperative biometric characteristics (axial length, anterior chamber depth and keratometries) and the relationship to one another, automatically supplied by IOL Master 700 and Pentacam AXL to avoid operator-dependent factors. The analysis was performed three months after surgery. Statistical analysis was based on the paired Student's t-test with a significance level of 95 percent. Results: Mean age was 25.72 ± 4.26 years. Fifty-three right eyes and 50 left eyes were studied, all of them treated with surface laser. Mean spherical equivalent was -0.06 ± 0.34 diopters; the time elapsed between surgery and the tests was 6.32 ± 3.56 months. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between axial length and anterior chamber depth, but statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) were observed between the keratometries obtained with IOL Master 700 and Pentacam AXL. Conclusion: IOL Master 700 and Pentacam AXL provide similar biometric measurements for axial length and anterior chamber depth in myopic patients with previous photoablative surgery, but keratometric measurements are different(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Corneal Pachymetry/methods , Lasers , Myopia/etiology , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
@#AIM:To compare the difference, correlation and consistency of corneal biological parameters measured by IOL Master 700 and Pentacam before cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation in different age groups.<p>METHODS: Cross-sectional study. A total of 87 cataract patients(162 eyes)in Weifang Eye Hospital from February to September 2020 were collected, including 44 males(80 eyes)and 43 females(82 eyes)(age 61.2±9.87 years). The patients were divided into four groups: group A \〖17 cases(32 eyes), 40-50 years old\〗, group B \〖25 cases(47 eyes), 51-60 years old\〗, group C \〖28 cases(53 eyes), 61-70 years old\〗, and group D \〖17 cases(30 eyes), 71-80 years old\〗. The preoperative corneal biological parameters of cataract patients were measured by IOL Master 700 and Pentacam, and the flat axis corneal curvature(K1), steep axis corneal curvature(K2), mean corneal curvature(Km), corneal astigmatism, anterior chamber depth(ACD)and central corneal thickness(CCT)were recorded. The difference and correlation of measurement results between two kinds of biometric instruments in different age groups were analyzed. <p>RESULTS: Except for the corneal astigmatism in group C and K1 and corneal astigmatism in group D, there were significant differences between the two instruments(<i>t</i>=2.746, -2.582, 2.637, all <i>P</i><0.05), but there was no significant difference in other parameters among the four groups. Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a good correlation between the two instruments in measuring the parameters of the four groups of patients. The results of Bland-Altman analysis showed that there was a good consistency between IOL Master 700 and Pentacam in measuring K1, K2, Km, corneal astigmatism, ACD and CCT in the four groups.<p>CONCLUSION:There was no significant difference between IOL Master 700 and Pentacam in the measurement of corneal biological parameters in cataract patients aged 40-60 years, but there was significant difference in astigmatism between 61-70 years old, astigmatism and K1 value in 71-80 years old patients. Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a good correlation between the two instruments. Generally speaking, the consistency of the two kinds of examination equipment is good, and the corneal astigmatism and corneal curvature should be selected by comprehensive analysis of the data.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To compare the consistency of IOL Master 700 with IOL Master 500 and A-mode ultrasound for biological measurements, and evaluate the measurements of IOL Master 700 in preoperative examinations of cataract patients. <p>METHODS:In this prospective study, a total of 52 patients(100 eyes)diagnosed as age-related cataract were selected at the Nanjing Medical University Eye Hospital. All the patients were examined in turn by IOL Master 700, IOL Master 500 and A-mode ultrasound. Measurements by these three instruments were compared for axial length(AL), corneal curvature(Km), central anterior chamber depth(ACD), white-to-white(W-W)and pupil diameter(P). The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman. <p>RESULTS: The detection rates of AL and ACD with IOL Master 700, IOL Master 500 and A-mode ultrasound were 98%, 87%, 99% and 100%, 99%, 99%; respectively. The detection of Km with IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 500 were 100%, 99%. The detection of W-W and P were both 99%. Among them, 24 eyes had high myopia, posterior scleral grape swelling and axial length ≥26mm. The detection of AL with IOL Master 700, IOL Master 500 and A-mode ultrasound were 96%, 79%, 96%. There was a significant difference in AL and ACD between three instruments(<i>F</i>=11.58, <i>P</i>=0.03; <i>F</i>=12.46, <i>P</i>=0.02). There were no significant differences in Km, W-W and P parameters among three instruments(all <i>P</i>>0.05). The average difference between three instruments for AL measurement: IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 500 was 0.05±0.12mm, IOL Master 700 and A-mode ultrasound was 0.16±0.14mm; The average difference between three instruments for AL measurement in axial length≥26mm: IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 500 was 0.17±0.16mm, IOL Master 700 and A-mode ultrasound was 0.55±0.22mm. The Pearson's correlation analysis showed that there was a high correlation between the measured results of each equipment. The consistency of AL results using Bland-Altman analysis showed there was good consistency in the range of 95% consistency.<p>CONCLUSION: There was high consistency in ocular biological measurements between three instruments in cataract eyes. However, the detection rate of IOL Master 700 in AL was higher than that of IOL Master 500, and the accuracy of the IOL Master 700 measurement was higher in the AL measurement in high myopia with posterior staphyloma. Compared with traditional examination equipment, IOL Master 700 has better penetration and accuracy to provide more accurate measurement parameters.
ABSTRACT
@#In recent years, ocular biometers based on swept-source optical coherence tomography(SS-OCT)technology have emerged in ophthalmic practice. Compared with the earlier ocular biometers such as the partially coherent interference(PCI)based ones, the SS-OCT based devices have a higher signal-to-noise ratio, greater swept light wavelength, better tissue penetration, faster scanning speed, and better axial length(AL)detection rate for cataract patients. This review aims to summarize the advances of a widely used SS-OCT based device-IOL Master 700 in cataract.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To study the reliability of Pentacam, OCT, Tomey OA-2000, IOL Master700, and A ultrasound pachymetry in the measurement of central corneal thickness(CCT)in myopic eyes. <p>METHODS: CCTs of 56 myopic patients(112 eyes)were measured using Pentacam, RTVue OCT, Tomey OA-2000, IOL Master 700, and A ultrasound pachymetry(NIDEK US-500). The difference, correlation, and consistency were statistically analyzed using average values taken from the five devices and the measured values produced by each device. <p>RESULTS: CCTs of 112 eyes were determined using Pentacam(530.17±25.08)μm, OCT(519.79±26.90)μm, Tomey OA-2000(521.75±26.51)μm, IOL Master 700(519.53±28.15)μm, and A ultrasound pachymetry(542.23±26.88)μm. The average value across all five devices was 526.69±26.08μm. The results of root mean square error(RMSE)and theil inequality coefficient(TIC)showed that the degree of deviation from the average of the values measured using Pentacam was the smallest. The other four devices were, from least deviation to most, Tomey OA-2000, OCT, IOL Master 700, and A ultrasound pachymetry. Typical correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficients between the measured values of Pentacam, OCT, Tomey OA-2000, IOL Master 700, and A ultrasound pachymetry and the average values were <i>ρ</i>=0.957, <i>P</i>=0.950, <i>P</i>=0.953, <i>P</i>=0.930, and <i>ρ</i>=0.949, respectively. The results of correlation coefficient showed that Pentacam and Tomey OA-2000 had the closest correlation with the average value. The other three were, in order of closest to furthest correlation, OCT, A ultrasound pachymetry and IOL master 700. The results also showed that the measurements of Pentacam and Tomey OA-2000 were more reliable, which was consistent with the clinical situation. The results of Bland-Altman analysis showed that the five groups of measurements were closely consistent with the average values, and the CCT measurements of Pentacam and Tomey OA-2000 were the most consistent with the average values.<p>CONCLUSION: Among the five instruments, Pentacam and Tomey OA-2000 produced results that were closest to the average value in CCT measurement, with the best correlation and consistency. Their measurement methods are more objective and safer than A-scan, so they may provide better reference data for clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biological measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer IOL Master 700 in healthy eyes. <p>METHODS: A diagnostic test study of 103 healthy subjects was implemented. The right eyes were selected for measurements. Ocular biological parameters including axial length(AL), anterior chamber depth(ACD), anterior aqueous depth(AQD), keratometry readings(K), central corneal thickness(CCT), lens thickness(LT), white-to-white corneal diameter(WTW)and pupil diameter(PD)were measured using IOL Master 700 by two experienced examiners. One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility for the measurements by IOL Master 700. <p>RESULTS: Regarding repeatability, the test-retest repeatability(TRT)for AL, mean K(Km), K1, K2, ACD, AQD, LT, CCT, WTW and PD obtained by the two examiners were 0.018(0.017)mm, 0.215(0.270)D, 0.325(0.334)D, 0.303(0.366)D, 0.049(0.041)mm, 0.048(0.042)mm, 0.058(0.047)mm, 6.168(5.779)μm, 0.395(0.406)mm, and 1.097(1.099)mm, respectively; the relative coefficient of variation(CoV)for all measured parameters but the PD were ≤1.219%; the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)for all measured parameters were ≥0.815. Regarding reproducibility, the TRT for AL, Km, K1, K2, ACD, AQD, LT, CCT, WTW, and PD obtained were 0.018 mm, 0.240 D, 0.329 D, 0.337 D, 0.048 mm, 0.048mm, 0.055mm, 6.396μm, 0.420mm, and 1.144mm, respectively; the ICC for all measured parameters was ≥0.900; the CoV for all measured parameters were ≤1.263% CoV, except for the PD(8.750%). In addition, the ICC of AL measurement for both repeatability and reproducibility were 1.000. <p>CONCLUSION: With the exception of pupil diameter, IOL Master 700 demonstrates excellent repeatability and reproducibility in ocular biological measurements for healthy eyes, especially in measurement of axial length.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biological measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer IOL Master 700 in healthy eyes. <p>METHODS: A diagnostic test study of 103 healthy subjects was implemented. The right eyes were selected for measurements. Ocular biological parameters including axial length(AL), anterior chamber depth(ACD), anterior aqueous depth(AQD), keratometry readings(K), central corneal thickness(CCT), lens thickness(LT), white-to-white corneal diameter(WTW)and pupil diameter(PD)were measured using IOL Master 700 by two experienced examiners. One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility for the measurements by IOL Master 700. <p>RESULTS: Regarding repeatability, the test-retest repeatability(TRT)for AL, mean K(Km), K1, K2, ACD, AQD, LT, CCT, WTW and PD obtained by the two examiners were 0.018(0.017)mm, 0.215(0.270)D, 0.325(0.334)D, 0.303(0.366)D, 0.049(0.041)mm, 0.048(0.042)mm, 0.058(0.047)mm, 6.168(5.779)μm, 0.395(0.406)mm, and 1.097(1.099)mm, respectively; the relative coefficient of variation(CoV)for all measured parameters but the PD were ≤1.219%; the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)for all measured parameters were ≥0.815. Regarding reproducibility, the TRT for AL, Km, K1, K2, ACD, AQD, LT, CCT, WTW, and PD obtained were 0.018 mm, 0.240 D, 0.329 D, 0.337 D, 0.048 mm, 0.048mm, 0.055mm, 6.396μm, 0.420mm, and 1.144mm, respectively; the ICC for all measured parameters was ≥0.900; the CoV for all measured parameters were ≤1.263% CoV, except for the PD(8.750%). In addition, the ICC of AL measurement for both repeatability and reproducibility were 1.000. <p>CONCLUSION: With the exception of pupil diameter, IOL Master 700 demonstrates excellent repeatability and reproducibility in ocular biological measurements for healthy eyes, especially in measurement of axial length.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the new swept-source optical coherence tomography based IOL Master 700 to both the partial coherence interferometry based IOL Master 500 and ultrasound A-scan in terms of the ocular biometry and the prediction of postoperative refractive outcomes. METHODS: A total 67 eyes of 55 patients who received cataract surgery were included in our study. The axial length, anterior chamber depth, and keratometry were measured using IOL Master 700, IOL Master 500, and A-scan. The predictive errors, which are the differences between predictive refraction and post-operative refraction 1 month after surgery, were also compared. RESULTS: Axial length measurements were not successful in 5 eyes measured using IOL Master 700 and in 12 eyes measured using IOL Master 500. The mean absolute postoperative refraction predictive errors were 0.63 ± 0.50 diopters, 0.66 ± 0.51 diopters, and 0.62 ± 0.51 diopters for IOL Master 700, IOL Master 500, and A-scan, respectively, and these values exhibited no statistically significant differences. The mean axial lengths were 24.25 ± 2.41 mm, 24.24 ± 2.40 mm, and 24.22 ± 2.39 mm; the mean anterior chamber depths were 3.09 ± 0.39 mm, 3.17 ± 0.39 mm, and 3.15 ± 0.46 mm; and the mean keratometry values were 44.12 ± 1.82 diopters, 44.57 ± 2.10 diopters, and 43.98 ± 1.84 diopters for the IOL Master 700, IOL Master 500, and A-scan groups, respectively. None of these parameters showed statistically significant differences between the three groups. Regarding pair-wise comparison, there were significant differences between the IOL Master 700 and the other devices. CONCLUSIONS: The ocular biometric measurements measured using IOL Master 700, IOL Master 500, and A-scan showed no significant differences. However, IOL Master 700 demonstrated a superior ability to successfully take biometric measurements compared to IOL Master 500. Therefore, IOL Master 700 is capable of measuring ocular biometry for cataract surgery in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anterior Chamber , Biometry , Cataract , Interferometry , Lenses, Intraocular , Tomography, Optical Coherence , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare ultrasound pachymetry (USP) with a more recently adopted device, the intra ocular lens (IOL) master 700, which are both used to measure central corneal thickness. METHODS: The central corneal thickness was measured in 24 eyes of 12 glaucoma patients and in 83 eyes of 42 normal patients. First, the IOL master 700 was used to measure the central corneal thickness, followed by measurements taken using USP later. The results were analyzed using a paired t-test. We analyzed the agreement and the correlations between the two test devices by using Bland-Altman plots and the Pearson correlation test. To evaluate the reproducibility, measurements with the IOL master 700 were taken twice for a few normal patients within a small time interval. RESULTS: Via the IOL master 700, the thickness of the central cornea showed a high reproducibility and repeatability, demonstrating 2.7 ± 1.7 µm for the test-retest variability, 6.78% for the coefficient of variation, and 0.997 for the intraclass correlation value. The mean measurements using USP and the IOL master 700 are 554.4 ± 37.4 µm and 551.1 ± 37.1 µm, respectively, showing that the IOL master 700 measured significantly smaller values than USP with a p-value < 0.001. The deviations between the two methods are scattered throughout the 95% confidence interval. According to the Pearson correlation test, the measured values of the two test devices were found to have a highly positive correlation (r = 0.977, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the central corneal thickness (CCT) measured via the IOL master was significantly thinner than that of USP, and the two test devices had a high correlation and good agreement. The CCT value measured via the IOL master 700 also exhibited high reproducibility.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cornea , Glaucoma , Tomography, Optical Coherence , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
Purpose: To assess the repeatability and agreement of a new swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer (IOL Master® 700, Carl Zeiss Meditec), an optical low coherence reflectometer (Lenstar LS 900®, Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland), a dual scheimpflug ray tracing biometer (Galilei G6®, Ziemer, Switzerland) and a partial coherence interferometer, AL scan® (Nidek Co. Ltd., Japan) to measure the keratometry (K), astigmatism (AST), axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white (WTW) in cataractous eyes in a Cross-sectional study. Methods: 50 eyes of 50 consecutive patients scheduled for cataract surgery were included. Three consecutive scans were performed using the 4 biometers by a single operator. Within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest repeatability and coefficient of variation for assessing repeatability were assessed. Bland-Altman plots for the agreement between the mean measurements of each machine were examined. Results: The mean age of patients was 60.2 ± 10.6 years. Dropouts for AL measurement were significantly higher in AL scan® and Galilei G6® compared to IOL Master® 700. There was good agreement between IOL Master® 700 and Lenstar LS 900® for AL and keratometry (P < 0.5). High variability was seen between the 4 machines for AST and WTW. Conclusion: The new SS-OCT biometer showed valid measurements, good repeatability and good agreement with the optical low coherence reflectometry biometer. The new long range SS-OCT biometer was better than the other three devices in acquiring AL measurements in denser cataracts due to better penetration.