Morbidity and mortality associated with loop ileostomy closure procedures in a reference service in coloproctology in Recife, Pernambuco / Morbimortalidade associada aos procedimentos de fechamento de ileostomia em alça em um serviço de referência em coloproctologia em Recife, Pernambuco (PE)

Objective: To evaluate the morbidity and mortality related to the surgical procedure of loop ileostomy closure, in a reference service in coloproctology, as well as possible variables that may be related to a higher frequency of complications. Methods: A retrospective study evaluated 66 procedures of loop ileostomy closure, performed between December 2005 and December 2017, at the coloproctology service of Barão de Lucena Hospital, in Recife, Brazil. Results: There were complications in 20 (30.3%) patients, 11 of whom were classified as grade I (Clavien-Dindo), and 9 of whom were classified as grade II to V. In 7.6% of the cases, one or more surgical reassessments were required. Mortality was 1.5%. There was no statistical relevance in the correlation of the studied variables with the occurrence of complications. Conclusion: Loop ileostomy closure presents an important morbidity, reaching more than 30%, although mortality is low. The analyzed variables did not show significant statistics for a higher occurrence of complications. (AU)

Objetivo: Avaliar a morbimortalidade relacionada ao procedimento cirúrgico de fechamento ileostomia em alça, em um serviço de referência em coloproctologia, bem como possíveis variáveis que possam se relacionar com uma maior frequência de complicações. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo, com análise de prontuários de 66 procedimentos de fechamento de ileostomia em alça, realizados entre dezembro de 2005 e dezembro de 2017, no serviço de coloproctologia do Hospital Barão de Lucena, em Recife, PE. Resultados: Houve complicações em 20 (30,3%) pacientes, sendo 11 delas classificadas como grau I (Clavien-Dindo) e 9 classificadas de grau II a V. Em 7,6% dos casos, houve necessidade de uma oumais reabordagens cirúrgicas. Amortalidade foi de 1,5%. Não houve relevância estatística na correlação das variáveis estudadas com a ocorrência de complicações. Conclusão: O procedimento cirúrgico de fechamento de ileostomia apresenta morbidade importante, podendo chegar a mais de 30%, embora a mortalidade seja baixa. As variáveis analisadas não demonstraram significância estatística para maior ocorrência de complicações. (AU)

Routine barium enema prior to closure of defunctioning ileostomy is not necessary / 대한외과학회지

PURPOSE: The use of barium enemas to confirm the anastomotic integrity prior to ileostomy closure is still controversial. The purpose of the study was to determine the utility of routine contrast enema prior to ileostomy closure and its impact on patient management in patients with a low pelvic anastomosis. METHODS: One hundred forty-five patients had a temporary loop ileostomy constructed to protect a low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. All patients were evaluated by physical examination, proctoscopy, and barium enema prior to ileostomy closure. RESULTS: The median time from ileostomy creation to closure was 8 months. Five (3.5%) of the 144 patients were found to have clinically relevant strictures at the colorectal anastomosis on routine barium enema. One patient (0.7%) showed anastomotic leak on their barium enema. Overall, 141 patients (97.9%) had an uncomplicated postoperative course. Postoperative complication occurred in three patients (2.1%). None of them showed abnormal barium enema finding, which suggested that routine contrast enema examination did not predict postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: Routine barium enema evaluation of low pelvic anastomoses before loop ileostomy closure did not provide any additional information for postoperative colorectal anastomotic complication.

The Complications of Stoma Take-down

PURPOSE: The study aimed to investigate the complications accompanying stoma take-down and to elucidate the significant factors associated with complications. METHODS: We recruited 341 patients who underwent stoma take-down in our hospital between January 2000 and December 2005. Data on various complications during this procedure, i.e., wound infection, prolonged ileus, and anastomotic leakage, were collected with respect to patient- and operation-associated parameters. RESULTS: Complications of stoma take-down developed in 72 (21.1%) patients: 53 (20.3%) patients in a loop ileosotmy, 10 (21.3%) patients in a loop colostomy, and 9 (27.3%) patients in a Hartmann colostomy, The overall complication rate was significantly associated with the urgency of the primary operation (elective vs. emergent, 17.8% vs. 29%, P=0.017), and with the operation time ( 80 min, 16.5% vs. 29.3%, P=0.005). Among the complications, ileus developed in 46 (13.5%) patients, wound infection in 17 (5.0%) patients, and anastomotic leakage in 5 (1.5%) patients. Wound infection was related to the type of stoma between a loop ileostomy and a Hartmann colostomy (3.5% vs. 12.1%; P=0.014), but no other factors were associated with other complications. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in overall complications in relation to urgency of the primary operation and the operation time, but there was no statistical difference in complications between a loop ileostomy and a loop colostomy take- down groups. The significance of these factors appears to be reduced with accurate surgical technique and patient care.

Is Barium Enema Prior to Ileostomy Closure Necessary?

PURPOSE: A barium enema is frequently performed to check for healing prior to ileostomy closure, but there have been reports that ileostomy closure without a contrast study is safe in selected patients. The aim of this study was to assess the necessity of a routine barium enema prior to ileostomy closure. METHODS: Between January 1994 and June 2005, 51 patients with a temporary loop ileostomy who had a barium enema prior to ileostomy closure at Chonbuk National University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were divided into 2 groups, the protective ileostomy group and the ileostomy-after-leakage group. To examine the necessity of a routine barium enema prior to ileostomy closure, we assessed whether the barium enema results changed management and whether there were pelvic sepsis and obstructive symptoms following ileostomy closure. RESULTS: In the protective ileostomy group (n=39), the barium enema was performed after a mean of 59 days (range: 27~151 days). There were no abnormal findings at the barium enema, no schedule changes, no pelvic sepsis, and no obstructive symptoms following ileostomy closure. In the ileostomy-after-leakage group (n=12), the barium enema was performed after a mean of 54 days (range: 30~82 days). In 2 patients, with barium enemas at 33 days and 36 days, an anastomotic leakage was found, and ileostomy closure was delayed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a protective ileostomy, a barium enema prior to ileostomy closure is unnecessary, but in patients with an ileostomy after leakage, barium enema should be considered.

Clinical Analysis of Complications in Abdominal Stoma Surgery

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to review the complications associated with ileostomy, colostomy construction and subsequent closure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients with ileostomy and colostomy closure from August 1, 1995 to June 30, 1999. RESULTS: The complications of stoma construction occurred in 15 patients (20.3%) among 74 patients: skin problem in 10 cases, prolapse in 4 cases, and stoma necrosis, retraction and stenosis in 1 case, respectively. Factors such as age, underlying pathology, type of stoma did not contribute to the complications of stoma construction. Complications of stoma closure occured in 15 patients (20.3%): wound problem in 9 cases, enterocolitis in 4 cases and anastomotic leakage in 2 cases. With respect to stoma closure, only old age was associated with increased morbidity (P<0.05), rather than method of closure, time interval to closure, or type of stoma. Mean operation time for simple closure was 122.2 minutes and 204 minutes for resection and anastomosis. The mean hospital stay was 9.6 days for simple closure and 13 days for resection and anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity associated with stoma construction and subsequent closure was appreciable. There were no specific risk factors influencing the complications of ileostomy or colostomy construction, but old age increased morbidity after closure.