ABSTRACT
Este artigo tem por objetivo compreender o processo de identificação das pessoas irregularmente demitidas da Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (CVRD) durante o governo Collor e reintegradas ao serviço público a partir de 2011, em relação à Universidade Federal de Itajubá (Unifei). Esses trabalhadores são chamados de "anistiados" pela Lei n. 8.878/94. Entende-se que o processo de identificação com a organização na qual o anistiado foi reintegrado assume um papel fundamental na construção de sua identidade. Num estudo qualitativo-descritivo, foram realizadas 21 entrevistas semiestruturadas, representação gráfica e levantamento da avaliação de desempenho, sendo que a análise dos dados foi por análise de conteúdo. Como resultados destacam-se sentimentos de gratidão em relação à Universidade, alto grau de identificação com a Universidade e com a Vale e atuação pouco efetiva na Universidade. As expectativas acerca do desempenho dos anistiados são baixas e não existe nenhum processo de gestão de seu desempenho.
This paper aims to understand the process of identifying the people irregularly dismissed from Vale do Rio Doce Company (CVRD) during the Collor government and reintegrated into the public service as of 2011, in relation to the Federal University of Itajubá (Unifei). These workers are called "amnestied" by Law 8.878/94. It is understood that the identification process with the organization in which the amnestied was reinstated assumes a fundamental role in the construction of their identity. In a qualitative-descriptive study, 21 semi-structured interviews, graphical representation and performance evaluation were conducted, and data analysis was by content analysis. As a result, stand out feelings of gratitude in relation to the University, a high degree of identification with the University and with Vale and ineffective performance at the University. Expectations about the performance of the amnestied are low and there is no process of managing their performance.
Subject(s)
Work , Organizations , Employee Performance Appraisal , Data Analysis , Jurisprudence , Occupational GroupsABSTRACT
Aim: In this study, we sought to analyze the influence of the quality of opposition on players' performance of Club Atlético de Madrid (ATM) 2016/2017. For that, the Golden Index (GI) formula was applied to identify and rank the Golden Players of ATM when playing against opponents of different quality levels. Methods: GI formula variables were collected through notational analysis and three global adjacency matrices were constructed to record all successful ball-passing actions performed. Next, the matrices were imported to SocNetV to collect the network centrality metrics. To uniformize each variable, the statistical standardization technique was applied to all variables. ATM opponents were classified into three groups: high-level (n=4), medium-level (n=2) and low-level (n=2), according to their classification in La Liga and participation in the final stage of UEFA Champions League 2016/2017. Results: Koke was considered the Golden Player playing against high-level teams, while opposing low-level opponents he was ranked as second. Against medium- and low-level teams, Antoine Griezmann was considered the Golden Player, but was not classified in the three first positions against high-level opponents. Yannick Carrasco and Filipe Luís were ranked in the second and third positions, respectively, when playing against high- and medium-level opponents. Also, Saúl Ñíguez obtained the third higher index against low-level teams. Conclusions: This study evidenced that players' individual performance is influenced by the quality of the opposition. Additionally, the GI formula proved to be a potent tool in analyzing player's performance in attacking plays in Football.(AU)
ABSTRACT
Uma das grandes preocupações dos gestores é manter bons níveis de desempenho no trabalho, de forma a garantir bons diferenciais para as organizações. As características contextuais e individuais aparecem como variáveis importantes que auxiliam as organizações a manter esses diferenciais e, com isso, patamares elevados de competitividade. Esta pesquisa se propõe a analisar a relação entre duas variáveis, identificando pontos comuns entre os construtos e a relação com o desempenho medido por meio de autoavaliações. Para a coleta dos dados foram utilizadas três escalas: a Escala de Autoavaliação de Desempenho no Trabalho (EGDT), a Escala de Clima Organizacional (ECO) e a Escala de Satisfação no Trabalho (EST). Participaram da pesquisa 152 funcionários de duas organizações, sendo a maioria homens (57%), com média de idade de 35 anos e com predominância do nível de escolaridade ensino médio completo (28%). As análises de correlação apontaram que os fatores comuns observados nas medidas de satisfação e clima organizacional não apresentam multicolinearidade (maior magnitude observada foi de r = 0, 78; p < 0, 01). Além disso, nas análises de regressão, os fatores Recompensa, Natureza do trabalho e Controle/pressão contribuíram individualmente para a explicação das duas autoavaliações (p < 0, 05). Em pesquisas futuras, sugere-se aprofundar o diagnóstico do contexto organizacional por meio de entrevistas e observações, e complementar as avaliações com indicadores organizacionais de desempenho.
One of managers' major concerns is related to maintaining good performance levels at work, to ensure differential advantage to their organizations. Contextual and individual characteristics are perceived as important variables that help organizations maintain their distinctiveness and, consequently, high levels of competitiveness. The current research aims to analyze the relationship between these two variables, identifying commonalities between the constructs and the relationship with performance measured through self-assessments. Three scales were used for data collection: the Self-Assessment of Performance at Work Scale, the Organizational Climate Scale, and the Job Satisfaction Scale. Taking part in this research were 152 employees from two organizations, mostly men (57%), with an average age of 35 years, and predominantly with a high school degree (28%). Correlation analysis showed that common factors observed in measures of satisfaction and organizational climate show no multicollinearity (largest observed magnitude was r = 0, 78; p < 0, 01). Additionally, regression analyses suggested that the dimensions Reward, Nature of the Work, and Control/Pressure individually explained the participants' two self-assessments (p < 0, 05). Future research could more fully explore the diagnosis of the organizational context through interviews and observations, and additional evaluations of organizational performance indicators.
Una de las grandes preocupaciones de los gestores es mantener buenos niveles de desempeño en el trabajo para garantizar buenos diferenciales en las organizaciones. Las características contextuales e individuales aparecen como variables importantes que auxilian a las organizaciones a mantener estos diferenciales y, con eso, niveles elevados de competitividad. La presente investigación se propone analizar la relación entre dos variables, identificando puntos en común entre los constructos y la relación con el desempeño evaluado a través de autoevaluaciones. Para colectar los datos fueron utilizadas tres escalas: Escala Autoevaluación de Desempeño en el Trabajo, Escala de Clima Organizacional y la Escala de Satisfacción en el Trabajo. Participaron de la investigación 152 funcionarios de dos organizaciones, donde la mayoría era hombres (57%) con con una edad promedio de 35 años y con un nivel educativo de secundaria completa (28%). Los analices de correlación sugieren que los factores comunes observados en las medidas de satisfacción y clima organizacional no presentan multicoliniariedad (mayor magnitud observada fue de r = 0, 78; p < 0, 01). Además, en los analices de regresión los factores Recompensa, Naturaleza del Trabajo y Control/Presión contribuyen individualmente para la explicación de las dos autoevaluaciones (p < 0, 05). En investigaciones futuras, se sugiere profundizar el diagnóstico del contexto organizacional por medio de entrevistas y observaciones complementares a las evaluaciones con indicadores organizacionales de desempeño.