ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is a technique to determine the pressure pattern which is a function of esophageal musculature and integrity of LES. The indications for HREM evaluation include evaluation of nonobstructive dysphagia, symptoms of regurgitation and noncardiac or atypical chest pain unexplained by endoscopic evaluation To analyse profile of esophageal motility disorders in patient presenting with refractoryAIM: gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), dysphagia and atypical chest pain in tertiary care centre in Western India METHODS: We enrolled patient presented with refractory GERD, dysphagia and atypical chest pain from Jan 2020 to March 2022 at Department of gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical College & R, Jaipur. Upper GI endoscopy and high-resolution esophageal manometry was done in all patients Ineffective esophageal peristalsis,RESULTS: achalasia cardia, hypercontractile esophagus, fragmented peristalsis and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction were common diagnosis made by high resolution esophageal manometry In our study ineffectiveConclusion: esophageal motility most common and achalasia cardia second most common diagnosis identified on esophageal manometry
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the role of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) in non-erosive acid reflux related diseases, and the influence of the fourth edition Chicago classification (CC v4.0) on the diagnosis of IEM.Methods:From January 2018 to January 2020, 63 patients with acid reflux related symptoms who underwent gastroscopy and showed no abnormal changes in esophageal mucosa or structure, and underwent high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring in the Department of Gastroenterology of Beijing Friendship Hospital were included in the case-control study. According to the HRM results, the third edition Chicago classification standard (CC v3.0) and CC v4.0 were used to divided patients into IEM group and normal dynamic group. The HRM results, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring results and final diagnosis of the two groups under the two editions of Chicago classification standard were mainly compared and analyzed.Results:Among the 63 patients, there were 14 cases of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD), 19 cases of reflux hypersensitivity (RH), and 30 cases of functional heartburn (FH). When using CC v3.0, there were 20 cases in the IEM group, including 9 cases of NERD, 5 cases of RH and 6 cases of FH, and 43 cases in the normal dynamic group, including 5 cases of NERD, 14 cases of RH and 24 cases of FH. When using CC v4.0, there were 16 cases in the IEM group, including 7 cases of NERD, 4 cases of RH and 5 cases of FH, and 47 cases in the normal dynamic group, including 7 cases of NERD, 15 cases of RH and 25 cases of FH. When using CC v3.0, compared with the normal dynamic group, the acid exposure time (AET) of the IEM group was significantly higher [3.45 (1.55, 6.40)% VS 1.20 (0.40, 2.30)%, Z=-2.940, P=0.003], the DeMeester score was also significantly higher [13.8 (5.8, 21.4) VS 5.3 (2.9, 10.0), Z=-2.851, P=0.004], the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) [10.15 (7.52, 13.65) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) VS 15.40 (11.20, 21.60) mmHg, Z=-3.241, P=0.001], 4-second integrated relaxation pressure (4sIRP) (3.79±0.57 mmHg VS 6.05±0.50 mmHg, t=2.727, P=0.008), and distal contraction integral (DCI) [334.65 (208.25, 438.92) mmHg·s·cm VS 1 258.70 (919.00, 1 750.10) mmHg·s·cm, Z=-6.305, P<0.001] were significantly lower than those of the normal dynamic group. When using CC v4.0, AET and Demeester scores in the IEM group were also significantly higher than those in the normal dynamic group (both P<0.05), and LESP, 4sIRP and DCI were also significantly lower than those in the normal dynamic group (all P<0.05). In addition, upper esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly lower than that in normal dynamic group [34.60 (21.50, 48.05) mmHg VS 49.67 (36.75, 61.10) mmHg, Z=-2.140, P=0.032]. Conclusion:IEM is associated with impaired anti-reflux barrier function and esophageal acid exposure in patients with non-erosive acid reflux related diseases. Compared with CC v3.0, CC v4.0 can reduce the heterogeneity of IEM patients to some extent.
ABSTRACT
Background : Studies showed that esophageal body dysmotility is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), however, their interactions are still unclear. Aims: To explore the influence of proportion of ineffective swallows on esophageal motility and gastroesophageal reflux in esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). Methods: Patients who completed esophageal HRM and 24 h esophageal impedanee-pH monitoring and were identified as normal esophageal motility or mild dysmotility from March 2018 to December 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were recruited retrospectively. According to the times of ineffective swallows in 10 warm water swallows in HRM, these patients were allocated into four groups; Group A (0 times), Group B (1-4 times), Group C (5-7 times), Group D (8-10 times). The parameters of esophageal HRM and 24 h esophageal impedance-pH monitoring were analyzed, and the value of ineffective swallows for assistant diagnosis of pathological acid reflux was assessed. Results: A total of 142 patients were included. There were no significant differences in abnormal manometric parameters between the four groups (all P > 0. 05). In Group D, the number of weak and non-peristalsis were increased, while the mean and maximum value of distal contractile integral (DCI) were decreased as compared with those in Group A and Group B (all P 70 % might be most significant, and to a certain extent, can predicts pathological acid reflux.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To clarify the correlation between the clinical characteristics, esophageal motility features and esophageal acid exposure in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).@*Methods@#From January 2016 to March 2018, at Peking University First Hospital, 22 IEM patients diagnosed by esophagus high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24 individuals with normal HRM results were enrolled. Clinical features, parameters of esophageal HRM and results of esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring of IEM patients and the individuals with normal HRM results were compared. According to the median distal contraction integral (DCI) of ten swallows, the IEM patients were divided into mild-IEM group (DCI 250-450 mmHg·s·cm (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)) (14 cases) and severe-IEM group (DCI<250 mmHg·s·cm) (eight cases). The clinical features and esophageal motility were compared between normal HRM group, mild-IEM group and severe-IEM group. T test, chi-square test and one-way analysis of various were used for statistical analysis.@*Results@#The age of IEM group was older than that of normal HRM group ((64.5±11.2) years vs. (50.3±18.2) years), and the difference was statistically significant (t=-3.135, P=0.003). The lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) of IEM group was lower than that of normal HRM group ((17.0±6.8) mmHg vs. (22.3±7.2) mmHg), and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.516, P=0.016). There were 15 cases in normal HRM group and 14 patients in IEM group who underwent esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring and there were five and two patients with abnormal acid exposure time (AET) in normal HRM group and IEM group, respectively. The length of proximal esophageal body (PEB) pressure zone of severe-IEM group was shorter than those of normal HRM group and mild-IEM group ((2.8±1.5) cm vs.(4.2±0.7) cm and (4.6±0.9) cm), and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.397 and 3.432, P=0.044 and 0.003). The integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and LESP of normal HRM group were both higher than those of mild-IEM group ((9.3±2.9) mmHg vs. (7.2±3.3) mmHg, (22.3±7.2) mmHg vs. (15.4±7.1) mmHg), and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.148 and 2.843, P=0.038 and 0.007). There were six and eight patients in mild-IEM group and severe-IEM group who underwent esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring, respectively, and two patients in mild-IEM had abnormal AET.@*Conclusions@#The LESP of IEM patients is low. The clinical features and AET of IEM patients are not associated with the severity of IEM. In patients with severe IEM, the proximal and distal esophageal contractility is weakened, and the length of PEB pressure zone is shortened.
ABSTRACT
Objective To clarify the correlation between the clinical characteristics,esophageal motility features and esophageal acid exposure in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Methods From January 2016 to March 2018,at Peking University First Hospital,22 IEM patients diagnosed by esophagus high-resolution manometry (HRM ) and 24 individuals with normal HRM results were enrolled. Clinical features,parameters of esophageal HRM and results of esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring of IEM patients and the individuals with normal HRM results were compared. According to the median distal contraction integral (DCI)of ten swallows,the IEM patients were divided into mild-IEM group (DCI 250 - 450 mmHg · s · cm (1 mmHg = 0. 133 kPa))(14 cases)and severe-IEM group (DCI < 250 mmHg·s·cm)(eight cases). The clinical features and esophageal motility were compared between normal HRM group,mild-IEM group and severe-IEM group. T test,chi-square test and one-way analysis of various were used for statistical analysis. Results The age of IEM group was older than that of normal HRM group ((64. 5 ± 11. 2)years vs. (50. 3 ± 18. 2)years),and the difference was statistically significant (t = - 3. 135,P = 0. 003). The lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP)of IEM group was lower than that of normal HRM group ((17. 0 ± 6. 8)mmHg vs. (22. 3 ± 7. 2)mmHg),and the difference was statistically significant (t = 2. 516,P = 0. 016). There were 15 cases in normal HRM group and 14 patients in IEM group who underwent esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring and there were five and two patients with abnormal acid exposure time (AET)in normal HRM group and IEM group,respectively. The length of proximal esophageal body (PEB)pressure zone of severe-IEM group was shorter than those of normal HRM group and mild-IEM group ((2. 8 ± 1. 5 )cm vs. (4. 2 ± 0. 7 )cm and (4. 6 ± 0. 9)cm),and the differences were statistically significant (t = 2. 397 and 3. 432,P = 0. 044 and 0. 003). The integrated relaxation pressure (IRP)and LESP of normal HRM group were both higher than those of mild-IEM group ((9. 3 ± 2. 9 )mmHg vs. (7. 2 ± 3. 3 )mmHg,(22. 3 ± 7. 2 )mmHg vs. (15. 4 ± 7. 1)mmHg),and the differences were statistically significant (t = 2. 148 and 2. 843,P = 0. 038 and 0. 007). There were six and eight patients in mild-IEM group and severe-IEM group who underwent esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring,respectively,and two patients in mild-IEM had abnormal AET. Conclusions The LESP of IEM patients is low. The clinical features and AET of IEM patients are not associated with the severity of IEM. In patients with severe IEM,the proximal and distal esophageal contractility is weakened,and the length of PEB pressure zone is shortened.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common cause of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). Currently available data reveal a weak relationship between NCCP and dysmotility. Moreover, it is unclear why some refluxes are perceived as heartburn and others as NCCP. We aimed to evaluate the role of the reflux pattern and the esophageal motility in patients with NCCP. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with NCCP (Group 1) and 50 only typical GERD symptoms (Group 2) were included and underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. RESULTS: Impaired peristalsis was found in 60% of patients with NCCP and in 24% of patients with typical symptoms (P < 0.05). In patients belonging to Group 1, the majority of reflux episodes associated with chest pain were acid and mixed. The proportion of mixed refluxes was higher than that in Group 2. In Group 1, the reflux clearing time at 5, 9, and 15 cm, measured in reflux episodes associated to NCCP was longer than in reflux episodes associated to typical symptoms (mean ± 95% CI: 27.2 ± 5.6, 23.3 ± 4.4, and 14.6 ± 2.3 seconds vs 18.3 ± 3.5, 13.3 ± 2.2, and 11.1 ± 1.8 seconds; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of gas in the refluxate seems to be associated with NCCP. The impaired motility observed in NCCP patients may play a relevant role in delaying reflux clearing, hence increasing the time of contact between refluxate and esophageal mucosa.
Subject(s)
Humans , Chest Pain , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Heartburn , Manometry , Mucous Membrane , Peristalsis , ThoraxABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the relationships among distal contractile integral (DCI), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM)and gastroesophageal reflux through high resolution manometry (HRM)in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Methods A total of 69 patients with GERD were enrolled.All patients received HRM and 24 hour pH and impedance monitoring examination. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between DCI,number of invalid swallowing and DeMeester score.All the patients were divided into three groups according to the number of invalid swallowing in 10 times of 5 mL liquid swallowing test.Patients with 5 to 10 invalid swallowing was in IEM group (n=21),one to four was in abnormal motility group (n=19),and zero was in normal motility group (n=29).The t test was performed for comparison of average DCI,average DCI of residual effective swallowing,DeMeester score,acid reflux time,bolus exposure time and proximal reflux times among the three groups.Results Among the 69 patients with GERD,there was negative correlation between DCI and DeMeester score (r=-0.363,P =0.003)in 10 times of 5 mL liquid swallowing test;the number of invalid swallowing was positively correlated with DeMeester score (r=0.374,P =0.002). The mean DCI in 10 times of 5 mL liquid swallowing of normal motility group,abnormal motility group and IEM group was (1 458.96±545 .10),(986.48 ±577.50)and (288.50 ±167.25 )mmHg·s·cm, respectively,and that of IEM group was lower than normal motility group and abnormal motility group (t =-11 .42 and -2.12,both P <0.05).The average DCI of residual effective swallowing of normal motility group,abnormal motility group and IEM group was (1 458.96 ± 545 .10 ),(1 187.90 ± 669.40)and (450.78 ±350.73 )mmHg ·s ·cm,respectively,and that of IEM group was also lower than normal motility group and abnormal motility group (t = -8.05 and -5 .27,both P <0.01 ).The DeMeester score of IEM group (15 .42±8.79)was higher than that of normal motility group (6.34±3.45),and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.43,P <0.05).The acid reflux time and bolus exposure time of IEM group were (54.93 ± 37.07 )min and (0.64 ±0.49 )%,respectively,which were longer than abnormal motility group ((37.37±22.66)min,(0.52 ±0.24)%)and normal motility group ((21 .22 ± 13.98)min,(0.39 ±0.14)%),and the differences were statistically significant (t =2.36,2.17,2.60 and 2.54,all P <0.05).The total number of reflux of IEM group and abnormal motility group were 67.10± 32.94 and 57.26±38.90,which were both more than that of normal motility group (44.61 ±23.84),and the differences were statistically significant (t =2.48 and 2.17,both P <0.05 ).Conclusions DCI and the number of invalid swallowing can predict reflux condition of GERD patients in a certain degree.The contraction strength of esophageal body was the weakest and esophageal clearance was the worst in IEM group.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between ineffective esophageal motility (IEM)and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).MethodsA total of 90 GERD patients were enrolled in our study,including 62 patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) and 28 with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD).All the patients underwent gastroscopy,24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and esophageal manometry.ResultsIn the RE group 30 (48.4％) patients were diagnosed as having IEM,which was significantly higher than the NERD group (6 patients,21.4％ ) (P＜0.05).Positive esophageal acid exposure was more often seen in patients with IEM than in those with normal esophageal motility (91.7％ v.s.57.2％,P ＜0.01 ).The values of total percentage of time with pH ＜4,percentage of reflux time in supine position,long-duration episodes ( ＞5 min) and the longest reflux time and DeMeester score were significantly higher in the IEM cases than those in the normal esophageal motility cases ( P ＜ 0.01 ),so was the values of number of reflux episodes (P ＜ 0.05).ConclusionIEM is the most common esophageal dysmotility in patients with GERD and closely related to distal esophageal acid exposure and RE.
ABSTRACT
Objective To determine the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary interstitial fibrosis (IPIF). Methods From December 2006 to January 2008, 24 consecutive patients with IPIF admitted to Beijing Chaoyang Hospital underwent 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and esophageal manometry. Meanwhile, 23 patients with diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) (excluding IPIF) admired to the hospital in the same period served as a control group. Comparison of the prevalence of pathologic esophageal acid exposure GERD symptoms, and ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) between the two groups was made. In this study, nocturnal acid exposure is defined as acid reflux episodes occurring from 10pro to 6am. Results (1) 16 out of the 24 (66. 7%) patients with IPIF were demonstrated to have pathologic esophageal acid exposure; the prevalence of GERD in IPIF patients was significantly higher than that in other DPLD patients, whose prevalence was 26. 1% (P<0.05); (2) 87.5% patients with IPIF and GERD (GERD-IPIF) had nocturnal acid exposure episodes; (3) only 37.5% of the GERD-IPIF patients was found to have typical GERD symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation; (4) The prevalence of IEM was similar in IPIF and other DPLD patients, being 42.9% and 39. 1% respectively (P >0. 05). Conclusions IPIF patients have higher prevalence of GERD and most of them usually do not show typical reflux symptoms. It is hereby suggested that IPIF patients should be screened with pH monitoring for GERD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a distinct manometric entity characterized by a hypocontractile esophagus. Recently, IEM replaced the nonspecific esophageal motility disorder (NEMD), and its associations with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and respiratory symptoms are well known. We evaluated the relationship of IEM with GERD, and the diagnostic value of IEM for GERD. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed recent 3-year (Jan. 1998-Sep. 2002) datas of esophageal manometry, acid perfusion test and simultaneous 24 hr-ambulatory pH-metry with manometry studies in 270 consecutive patients with esophageal and/or GERD symptoms. The prevalence of IEM in GERD group and non-GERD group, and the variables of pH-metry and manometry among esophageal motility disorders were compared. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of IEM, esophageal symptom, and acid perfusion test for GERD were calculated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in IEM prevalence rate between GERD group and non-GERD group. In addition, there was no significant difference in GERD prevalence rate and esophageal acid clearance in variety of motility disorder groups. Total percent time of pH <4 in IEM group did not show any difference when compared with other groups except in the achalasia group. In regard of diagnostic value to detect GERD, all positive results showed high specificity (97%) in IEM with esophageal symptom and positive acid perfusion test. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of IEM using esophageal manometry in patients with various esophageal symptoms does not strongly suggest on association with GERD. However, IEM with concomitant esophageal symptoms and positive acid perfusion test has diagnostic values for GERD.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , English Abstract , Esophageal Motility Disorders/complications , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Manometry , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Failed or hypotensive peristalsis, two of the diagnostic criteria for NEMD, correlates with impaired anterograde propulsion and retrograde escape of esophageal contents. The aim of this study was to evaluate esophageal acid clearance (EAC) in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). METHODS: Of 252 patients performing esophageal manometry and ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, 51 patients with normal motility and acid reflux and 40 patients with IEM and acid reflux were included. RESULTS: The amplitude of peristaltic waves in the proximal and distal esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter pressure was lower significantly in patients with IEM than those with normal motility. Percentage of time of pH<4 in total, upright, and supine period and number of reflux episodes was not different in both. Supine EAC was significantly increased in patients with IEM when compared to those with normal motility. Upright EAC was not different in both. CONCLUSION: We concluded supine EAC is increased in patients with IEM. Since IEM is frequently associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a more intensive therapy must be needed. We propose IEM can be as a specific entity of primary esophageal motility disorder, especially in patients with GERD.
Subject(s)
Humans , Esophageal Motility Disorders , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower , Esophagus , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Manometry , Peristalsis , United NationsABSTRACT
Objective To explore the potential role of ineffective esophageal motility(IEM) in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD).Methods The esophageal manometry and ambulatory pH monitoring findings from patients with GERD were analyzed to identify the prevalence of IEM in patients with GERD.And comparison of esophageal acid exposure,esophageal acid clearance (EAC) and endoscopic esophagitis in GERD patients with IEM were made.Results Of 86 patients with GERD,59 (68.6%) were found to have nonspecific esophageal motility disorder (NEMD);55 of the 59 (93.2%)patients with NEMD met the diagnostic criteria for IEM.The overall incidence of IEM in GERD patients was 63.95%.Patients with IEM demonstrated significant increase in total,upright and recumbent mean percentage of time of pH
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the type and prevalence of esophageal motility abnormality in patients with respiratory symptom.And to investigate the effect and clinical significance of ineffective esophageal motility(IEM)in the pathogenesis of GERD with respiratory symptom.Methods In the thirty-four GERD patients with respiratory symptoms of asthma,chronic cough,complaint of laryngeal pharynges,the esophageal manometry and 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring were performed by Multiple Functional Gastrointestinal Motility Monitor made by MMS,Holland.The peristaltic velocity,amplitude and duration of esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter(LES)pressure was detected.Computer software was used to analyze pH monitoring result,including the percentage of pH0.05)between GERD patients with respiratory symptom group and normal control group.In the group of GERD patients with respiratory symptom,main abnormal esophageal motility type was IEM,the prevalance of IEM(41.2%)being significantly higher than that in group of typical reflux symptom GERD(18.5%)and normal control group(0).In 34 GERD patients with respiratory symptom,24 hour esophageal pH monitoring result of IEM group and normal esophageal motility group was analyzed:the total percentage of pH