Influencia de posición del brazo en adultos para abordaje de plexo braquial costoclavicular: estudio observacional / Influence of arm position in costoclavicular approach for brachial plexus block in adult patient: observational study

Resumen: Introducción: el bloqueo de plexo braquial con abordaje costoclavicular, ofrece ventajas como sitio de inyección único, sitio adecuado para colocación de catéter de analgesia continua. Objetivo: identificar la visibilidad de los tres cordones del plexo braquial en el espacio costoclavicular según la angulación del brazo. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo y transversal; se incluyeron 99 pacientes entre 18 a 90 años de edad, en un período de dos meses. Se describieron variables continuas, se aplicó la prueba no paramétrica de Friedman para K muestras relacionadas, una regresión lineal para confirmar la correlación entre la distancia de la piel a plexo braquial, peso e índice de masa corporal (IMC). Resultados: se encontró una menor profundidad en relación piel plexo bajo abducción del brazo a una angulación de 90o y 110o, que permite la visualización sonoanatómica del plexo braquial a nivel costoclavicular con significancia estadística. El peso es un factor independiente que determina la distancia entre la profundidad piel plexo. Conclusiones: se determinó que el abordaje del bloqueo costoclavicular ecoguiado es anatómicamente factible con elevada eficacia clínica, el cual concluye ser un sitio anatómico innovador y seguro.

Abstract: Introduction: the brachial plexus block with a costoclavicular approach offers advantages as a single injection site, being a suitable site for continuous analgesia catheter placement. Objective: to identify the visibility of the 3 brachial plexus cords in the costoclavicular space according to the angulation of the arm. Material and methods: a descriptive and cross-sectional observational study was carried out; 99 healthy patients between 18 and 90 years of age were included, in a period of two months. Continuous variables were described, the nonparametric Friedman test was applied for K related samples, a linear regression was performed to confirm the correlation between the distance from the skin to the brachial plexus, weight and body mass index (BMI). Results: a smaller depth was found in relation to the skin plexus under abduction of the arm at an angulation of 90o and 110o, which allows an adequate sonoanatomical visualization of the brachial plexus at the costoclavicular level with statistical significance. Weight is an independent factor that determine the distance between the skin plexus depth. Conclusions: it was determined that the ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block approach is anatomically feasible with greater clinical efficacy, which concludes to be an innovative and safe anatomical site.

Efectividad del bloqueo de plexo braquial con abordaje costoclavicular y factores que modifican la sonoanatomía en pacientes pediátricos / Effectiveness of brachial plexus block with costoclavicular approach and factors modifying sonoanatomy in pediatric patients

Resumen: El bloqueo de plexo braquial en pediatría se ha posicionado como una buena alternativa para procedimientos quirúrgicos de la extremidad superior, en especial a partir del advenimiento de la ultrasonografía. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del bloqueo con el abordaje costoclavicular en la población pediátrica, comparar la sonoanatomía de la ventana costoclavicular con la coracoidea y determinar si la posición del brazo impacta en la imagen ultrasonográfica. Se evaluaron un total de ocho pacientes con fracturas de miembro superior. De los ocho pacientes, cinco eran de género masculino (62.5%), tres de género femenino (37.5%) con una edad promedio de 8.8 años. Se realizó rastreo ultrasonográfico comparando la sonoanatomía del abordaje costoclavicular y coracoideos, observando mejor los cordones del plexo braquial y estructuras vasculares con el abordaje costoclavicular. Con el brazo en abducción 90 y 110o se optimizó la visualización de las estructuras neurovasculares y mejoría en la calidad del bloqueo. La dosis de ropivacaína fue de 1.5 mg/kg entre el 0.3-0.5%, con un tiempo de bloqueo motor promedio de 6.4 horas, y bloqueo sensitivo promedio de 11 horas. No se presentaron complicaciones. En conclusión, el bloqueo de plexo braquial por vía costoclavicular en la población pediátrica es una técnica segura.

Abstract: Pediatric brachial plexus block has become a good alternative for upper extremity surgical procedures, especially since the advent of ultrasonography. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the blockade with the costoclavicular approach in the pediatric population, and compare the sonoanatomy of the costoclavicular window with the coracoid one, and determinate if the position of the arm has an impact on the ultrasound image. A total of eight patients with upper limb fractures were evaluated. Of the eight patients, five were male (62.5%), three female (37.5%) with a mean age of 8.8 years. Ultrasonographic screening was performed comparing the sonoanatomy of the costoclavicular and coracoid approaches, better observing the brachial plexus cords and vascular structures with the costoclavicular approach. With the arm abducted 90 and 110o, a better visualization of the neurovascular structures and an improvement in the quality of the block was obtained. The ropivacaine dose was 1.5 mg/kg between 0.3-0.5%, with an average motor block time of 6.7 hours, and an average sensory block of 11.25 hours. There were not complications. In conclusion, the brachial plexus block via the costoclavicular approach in the pediatric population is a safe technique.

Comparison between Supraclavicular and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Patients Undergoing Forearm Surgeries.

Of the various modalities of achieving surgical anaesthesia of the forearm, brachialplexus block by injecting local anaesthetic is considered highly beneficial andpractical. Supraclavicular and infra-clavicular approaches of brachial plexus blocksprovide comprehensive anaesthesia for surgeries of the forearm. The primaryoutcome measured was the comparison of two blocks with respect to sparing of anydermatome, whereas the secondary outcomes measured were block performancetime, duration of analgesia, and complications associated with each technique.METHODSSixty adult patients of either sex belonging to the American Society ofAnesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II in the age range of 20–70 yearsscheduled to undergo surgeries of the forearm were divided into two groups:Supraclavicular (SCB group) and Infraclavicular (ICB group) of 30 each. Both theblocks were given by 30 mL of 0.375% injection Bupivacaine using a 22G, 5 cminsulated needle and nerve locator. Both the groups were compared with respect tosparing of dermatomes, block performance time, duration of analgesia andcomplications like Horner’s syndrome, vascular puncture, and pneumothorax.Statistical analysis was performed with Student unpaired t‑test and Chi‑square testand p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.RESULTSBlock performance time was similar in both the groups. Duration of analgesia wascomparable among the two groups. The incidence of incomplete radial block wassignificantly higher in ICB group as compared to SCB group (p= 0.046, S). Incidenceof Horner’s syndrome in SCB group were higher than in ICB group, but they werestatistically insignificant. (p=0.15, NS). One patient in SCB group had subclavian veinpuncture as compared to none in ICB group and was statistically insignificant.CONCLUSIONSSupraclavicular approach for brachial plexus block provides reliable andcomprehensive anaesthesia for forearm surgeries without any significantdermatomal sparing unlike infraclavicular approach. Both groups had similar blockperformance time and duration of analgesia for forearm surgeries. Even though SCBwas associated with complications like Horner’s syndrome and vascular puncture, itwas transient and statistically insignificant. Hence supraclavicular approach isconsidered to be superior to infraclavicular approach.

Brachial Plexus: Variations in Infraclavicular Part and their Significance

Introduction: Brachial plexus extends from the neck to the axilla and gives motor and sensory nerves to the upper limb. Thebrachial plexus has two parts supraclavicular and infraclavicular parts.Material and Methods: The present study was carried out on 15 adult human cadavers (15 specimens of the right and leftside of the upper limb) in the Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh. All the cadaverswere male.Observations: Of 30 cases, one specimen (3.34%) had variation in the arrangement of all cords (lateral, medial, and posterior)respective to the 3rd part of axillary artery, i.e., all three t cords lie lateral to 3rd part of axillary artery. In one case (3.34%), it wasobserved that lateral cord gave separate branch to coracobrachialis muscle. Musculocutaneous nerve passes straight downwardplaced between biceps brachii and brachialis. Musculocutaneous nerve continues as lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm. Inanother two cases (6.66%), there is communication between musculocutaneous and median nerve. Five cases (16.66%) hadvariations in the formation of median nerve. Here, median nerve was formed from three roots of two roots were originating fromlateral cord and one root from medial cord. In three cases (10%), there is higher origin of median nerve by joining of its tworoots. In one case (3.34%), there are two upper subscapularis nerves from the posterior cord. Other branches of this cord arelower subscapular, nerve to latissimus dorsi, radial, and axillary nerve which is normal in their positions.Discussion: Development of brachial plexus starts at 34th–35th day of intrauterine life and definitive adult pattern is visible by46th–48th day of intrauterine life. The growing axons are regulated by chemoattractants and chemorepulsants in a site-specificfashion. Changes in the signaling pattern between mesenchymal cells and neuronal growth cones can lead to variations.Conclusion: These variations are important for surgeons, neurosurgeons, and plastic surgeons in their respective field inknowing area of loss, loss of muscle power as well as in designing various surgeries.

The need for supplemental blocks in single versus triple injections in infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks with a medial approach: a clinical and anatomic study / Bloqueio complementar de nervos no bloqueio de plexo braquial infraclavicular com técnica medial de injeção única versus tripla: estudo anátomo-clínico

Abstract Background and objectives: To evaluate the single-injection and triple-injection techniques in infraclavicular blocks with an ultrasound-guided medial approach in terms of block success and the need for supplementary blocks. Methods: This study comprised 139 patients who were scheduled for elective or emergency upper-limb surgery. Patients who received an infraclavicular blocks with a triple-injection technique were included in Group T (n = 68). Patients who received an infraclavicular blocks with a single-injection technique were included in Group S (n = 71). The number of patients who required supplementary blocks or had complete failure, the recovery time of sensory blocks and early and late complications were noted. Results: The block success rate was 84.5% in Group S, and 94.1% in Group T without any need for supplementary nerve blocks. The blocks were supplemented with distal peripheral nerve blocks in 8 patients in Group S and in 3 patients in Group T. Following supplementation, the block success rate was 95.8% in Group S and 98.5% in Group T. These results were not statistically significant. A septum preventing the proper distribution of local anesthetic was clearly visualized in 4 patients. The discomfort rate during the block was significantly higher in Group T (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In ultrasound-guided medial-approach infraclavicular blocks, single-injection and triple-injection techniques did not differ in terms of block success rates. The need for supplementary blocks was higher in single injections than with triple injections. The presence of a fascial layer could be the reason for improper distribution of local anesthetics around the cords.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Avaliar as técnicas de injeção única e tripla no bloqueio infraclavicular, empregando-se acesso medial guiado por ultrassonografia, comparando-se o sucesso do bloqueio e a necessidade de bloqueios complementares. Método: O estudo incluiu 139 pacientes com indicação de cirurgia de membro superior eletiva ou de emergência. O Grupo T (n = 68 pacientes) recebeu bloqueio infraclavicular com técnica de injeção tripla e o Grupo S (n = 71), bloqueio infraclavicular com injeção única. Registrou-se o número de pacientes que necessitaram bloqueio complementar de nervo ou que apresentaram falha completa do bloqueio, o tempo de recuperação do bloqueio sensorial e as complicações precoces e tardias. Resultados: A taxa de sucesso do bloqueio infraclavicular, sem necessidade de bloqueio complementar de nervo, foi 84,5% e 94,1% para os Grupos S e T, respectivamente. No bloqueio infraclavicular foi necessário bloqueio de nervos periféricos distais em 8 e 3 pacientes dos Grupos S e T, respectivamente. Após a complementação, a taxa de sucesso do bloqueio foi 95,8% e 98,5% para os Grupos S e T, respectivamente. Os resultados não foram estatisticamente significantes. Imagem de septo impedindo a distribuição adequada do anestésico local foi claramente visualizada em quatro pacientes. A taxa de desconforto durante a realização do bloqueio foi estatatisticamente mais alta no Grupo T (p< 0,05). Conclusões: As técnicas de injeção única e tripla em bloqueio infraclavicular guiado por ultrasonografia com acesso medial não diferiram quanto à taxa de sucesso. A necessidade de bloqueio complementar foi maior com a técnica de injeção simples. A ocorrência de invólucro de fascia poderia justificar a distribuição inadequada do anestésico local ao redor dos fascículos do plexo.

A comparative study of supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach for central venous catheterization in neurosurgical patients

Background: Central venous cannulation is a commonly performed procedure in neurosurgical patients to maintain the hemodynamic stability in the intraoperative period. It is used for infusion of intravenous fluids, vasopressors central venous pressure monitoring and detection of air embolism. Subclavian vein is commonly performed as there are minimal effects of positioning on it. Supraclavicular approach to subclavian vein cannulation is not as frequently employed as the infraclavicular approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the supraclavicular approach versus the infraclavicular approach in terms of number of attempts, success rate of catheterization and complications associated with the procedure.Methods: About 150 patients undergoing various neurosurgical procedures were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups. 75 patients underwent right supraclavicular catheterization of subclavian vein while as 75 patients underwent right infraclavicular catheterisation of the subclavian vein. The number of attempts for cannulation, success or failure of catheterization and any complications associated with the procedure or in the postoperative period were noted in each group. The data was compared between the two groups by using Chi-square test and Student’s Independent Samples T-test.Results: The right supraclavicular vein was successfully cannulated in 90.66% while as the right infraclaviclar vein was successfully cannulated in 96% of the patients (p >0.05). Malpositioning of catheter (threaded in contralateral subclavian) was noted in 4 patients in Group S and ipsilateral internal jugular vein in 2 patients. Pneumothorax was encountered in 1 patient in the group S undergoing supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulations while as subclavian arterial puncture was seen in 4 patients who underwent infraclavicular arterial puncture.Conclusions: There was no difference in successive cannulations between right the supraclavicular and right infraclaviclar veins. The rate of complications between the two approaches was comparable.

Minimum effective volume of bupivacaine 0. 5% for ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block / Volume mínimo efetivo de bupivacaína a 0, 5% para abordagem retroclavicular guiada por ultrassom no bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular

Abstract Background and objectives: The current study aimed to determine the minimum effective volume (MEV) of bupivacaine 0.5% in 50% of patients for an ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: A total of 25 adult patients who were scheduled for upper limb surgery received an ultrasound-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block with bupivacaine 0.5%. The needle insertion point was posterior to the clavicle and the needle was advanced from cephalad to caudal. Block success was defined as a composite score of 14 at 30 min after local anesthetic (LA) injection. The minimum effective volume in 50% of patients was determined using the Dixon-Massey up-and-down staircase method. Minimum effective volume for a successful block in 95% of the patients was also calculated using logistic regression and probit transformation. Results: The minimum effective volume of bupivacaine 0.5% resulting in successful block in 50% of patients (MEV50) according to the up-and-down staircase method was found to be 9.6 mL (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.7-13.4). The calculated minimum effective volume required for a successful block in 95% of patients (MEV95) using the probit transformation and logistic regression analysis was 23.2 mL (95% CI, 18.8-36.7). Conclusions: The MEV50 of bupivacaine 0.5% for US-guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block was 9.6 mL and the calculated MEV95 was 23.2 mL. Future studies are required for infraclavicular brachial plexus block with different approaches, other LA agents and different concentrations of bupivacaine.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Determinar o volume mínimo efetivo (VE) de bupivacaína a 0,5% em 50% dos pacientes para uma abordagem retroclavicular guiada por ultrassom no bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular. Métodos: Um total de 25 pacientes adultos agendados para cirurgia do membro superior receberam abordagem retroclavicular guiada por ultrassom para o bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular com bupivacaína a 0,5%. O ponto de inserção da agulha foi posterior à clavícula e a agulha foi avançada de cefálica para caudal. O sucesso do bloqueio foi definido como um escore composto de 14 aos 30 min após a injeção do anestésico local. O VE em 50% dos pacientes foi determinado com o método de escalonamento progressivo-regressivo de Dixon-Massey. O VE para um bloqueio bem-sucedido em 95% dos pacientes também foi calculado com regressão logística e transformação probit. Resultados: O volume mínimo efetivo (VE50) de bupivacaína a 0,5% que resultou em bloqueio bem-sucedido em 50% dos pacientes, de acordo com o método de escalonamento progressivo-regressivo, foi de 9,6 ml (intervalo de confiança de 95%, IC 5,7-13,4). O cálculo do volume mínimo efetivo necessário para um bloqueio bem-sucedido em 95% dos pacientes (VE95) com a análise de transformação probit e regressão logística foi de 23,2 ml (IC 95%, 18,8-36,7). Conclusões: O VE50 de bupivacaína a 0,5% para abordagem retroclavicular guiada por US para o bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular foi de 9,6 ml e o VE95 calculado foi de 23,2 ml. Estudos futuros são necessários para o bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular com diferentes abordagens, outros anestésicos locais e diferentes concentrações de bupivacaína.

A Comparative Prospective Randomized Clinical Study Between Supraclavicular Perivascular Technique And Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade For Below Elbow Surgeries

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of supraclavicular perivascular technique and vertical infraclavicular achial plexus block, using nerve locator for below elbow surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients of ASA grade I or II of either sex undergoing below elbow surgeries (mostly orthopedic surgeries) were randomly allocated into group S and group I. Each group comprises of 40 patients. Surgery was done under Vertical Infraclavicular approach of Brachial plexus Block in Group I Supraclavicular perivascular approach of Brachial plexus block in GroupS. RESULTS: The supraclavicular perivascular technique and vertical infraclavicular achial plexus block, using nerve locator for below elbow surgeries to evaluate the Ease of technique ,Time taken for the onset of sensory and motor blockade ,Total duration of sensory and motor blockade and Occurrence of complications statistically showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Nerve locator guided Infraclavicular block of achial plexus is similar to nerve locator guided supraclavicular block in the form of ease of technique, onset and duration of sensory & motor blockade and on complication rate.

Comparison of the anesthetic effects between ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block via costoclavicular approach and ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block via coracoid approach in operations of forearm and hand / 临床麻醉学杂志

Objective To compare the effectiveness between ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block via costoclavicular approach and ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block via cora-coid approach.Methods Fifty-eight patients scheduled for forearm or hand surgery,33 males and 25 females,aged 18-70 years,ASA physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ,were selected in this study.The patients were equally randomized into two groups:the group of brachial plexus block via costoclavicular approach (group A)and group of infraclavicular brachial plexus block via coracoid approach (group B).0.5 % ropivacaine 20 ml was used for local anesthetic.The anatomic depth of brachial plexus nerve,nerve block operation time,sensory and motor blockade situation were recorded.Results Ultrasonic ima-ging showed the brachial plexus was shallower in group A (2.0±1.2)cm than in group B (3.5± 1.8)cm (P<0.05).Nerve block operation time in group A (2.0±1.5)min was less than that in group B (4.0 ± 1.5 )min (P <0.05 ).After 5 minutes and 10 minutes of the local anesthetic inj ection,the sensory blockade rate of the median nerve,the ulnar nerve,the radial nerve and the muscle cutaneous nerve in group A was higher than in group B (P<0.05).After 10 minutes of the inj ection,the motor blockade rate for the ulnar nerve,the radial nerve and the muscle cutaneous nerve was higher in group A than in group B (P<0.05).There were no dyspnea,nausea,vomiting,tinni-tus and other adverse reactions in the two groups.Conclusion The ultrasound-guided costoclaviculari brachial plexus block is more shallower than the subclavicular plexus block in the anatomic depth,and the nerve-blocked-operating time is shorter;at the same time,the former’s sensory and motor block effects is faster than the later.

Evaluation of brachial plexus fascicles involvement on infraclavicular block: unfixed cadaver study / Avaliação do envolvimento dos fascículos do plexo braquial no bloqueio por via infraclavicular: estudo em cadáveres não fixados / Evaluación de la implicación de los fascículos del plexo braquial en el bloqueo por vía infraclavicular: estudio en cadáveres no fijos

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study shows how the diffusion of the anesthetic into the sheath occurs through the axillary infraclavicular space and hence proves the efficacy of the anesthetic block of the brachial plexus, and may thereby allow a consolidation of this pathway, with fewer complications, previously attached to the anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 33 armpits of adult cadavers were analyzed and unfixed. We injected a solution of neoprene with latex dye in the infraclavicular space, based on the technique advocated by Gusmão et al., and put the corpses in refrigerators for three weeks. Subsequently, the specimens were thawed and dissected, exposing the axillary sheath along its entire length. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Was demonstrated involvement of all fasciculus of the plexus in 51.46%. In partial involvement was 30.30%, 18.24% of cases the acrylic was located outside the auxiliary sheath involving no issue. CONCLUSIONS: The results allow us to establish the infraclavicular as an effective and easy way to access plexus brachial, because the solution involved the fascicles in 81.76% partially or totally, when it was injected inside the axillary sheath. We believe that only the use of this pathway access in practice it may demonstrate the efficiency. .

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Procuramos demonstrar como ocorre a difusão do anestésico no interior da bainha axilar, quando se utiliza o bloqueio por via infraclavicular, através da fossa infraclavicular e, consequentemente, provar a eficácia dessa via, podendo, com isso, permitir uma consolidação da utilização desse acesso, com redução das complicações. MATERIAS E MÉTODO: Foram utilizadas 33 axilas de cadáveres adultos não fixados. Injetamos uma solução de neoprene látex com corante na fossa infraclavicular, baseando-se na técnica preconizada por Gusmão e col, e colocamos os cadáveres em geladeiras por três semanas. Posteriormente, as peças foram descongeladas e dissecadas, expondo a bainha axilar em toda sua extensão. RESULTADOS E DISCUSSÃO: Foi demonstrado envolvimento de todos os fascículos do plexo em 51,46%. Em 30,30% houve envolvimento parcial, e em 18,24% dos casos o acrílico foi localizado fora da bainha axilar, não envolvendo nenhum fascículo. CONCLUSÕES: Os dados obtidos permitem estabelecer a via infraclavicular como uma via eficaz e de fácil acesso ao plexo braquial, visto que a solução injetada envolveu os fascículos em 81,76% parcialmente ou totalmente, quando era injetada dentro da bainha axilar. Acreditamos que apenas a utilização desta via de acesso na prática poderá demonstrar a eficiência da mesma. .

JUSTIFICACIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Este estudio intenta demostrar cómo ocurre la difusión del anestésico en el interior de la vaina axilar, cuando se utiliza el bloqueo por vía infraclavicular a través de la fosa infraclavicular, y al mismo tiempo, probar la eficacia de esa vía, pudiendo así permitir una consolidación de la utilización de ese acceso con reducción de las complicaciones. MATERIALES Y MÉTODO: Fueron utilizadas 33 axilas de cadáveres adultos no fijadas. Inyectamos una solución de neopreno látex con colorante en la fosa infraclavicular, con la técnica preconizada por Gusmão et al., y colocamos los cadáveres en frigoríficos durante 3 semanas. Posteriormente, las piezas fueron descongeladas y disecadas, exponiendo la vaina axilar en toda su extensión. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN: Quedó demostrada la implicación de todos los fascículos del plexo en un 51,46%. En un 30,30% hubo una participación parcial, y en un 18,24% de los casos el acrílico fue ubicado fuera de la vaina axilar sin la participación de ningún fascículo. CONCLUSIONES: Los datos obtenidos permiten establecer la vía infraclavicular como una vía eficaz y de fácil acceso al plexo braquial, visto que la solución inyectada tuvo la participación de los fascículos en un 81,76% parcial o totalmente, cuando se inyectaba dentro de la vaina axilar. Creemos que solamente con la utilización de esta vía de acceso en la práctica podrá quedar demostrada su eficacia. .

A comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexus using neurostimulation / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: A prospective, double blind study was performed to compare the clinical effect of vertical infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator for upper limb surgery. METHODS: One hundred patients receiving upper limb surgery under infraclavicular or supraclavicular brachial plexus block were enrolled in this study. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed using the vertical technique with 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine. The supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed using the plumb bob technique with 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine. The block performance-related pain was evaluated. This study observed which nerve type was stimulated, and scored the sensory and motor block. The quality of the block was assessed intra-operatively. The duration of the sensory and motor block as well as the complications were assessed. The patient's satisfaction with the anesthetic technique was assessed after surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the block performance-related pain, frequency of the stimulated nerve type, evolution of sensory and motor block quality, or the success of the block. There were no significant differences in the duration of the sensory and motor block. There was a significant difference in the incidence of Horner's syndrome. Two patients had a pneumothorax in the supraclavicular approach. There were no significant differences in the patient's satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Both infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block had similar effects. The infraclavicular approach may be preferred to the supraclavicular approach when considering the complications.

Comparison of vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine for upper limb surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective, double blind study to compare the clinical effect of vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block produced by 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine for upper limb surgery. METHODS: We included 60 patients receiving upper limb surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed via the vertical technique with 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine. We observed which nerve type was stimulated and scored the sensory and motor block. The quality of block was assessed intraoperatively. The duration of sensory and motor block and complications were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in frequencies of stimulated nerve type, evolution of sensory and motor block quality, or success of block. There were no significant difference in duration of sensory block, but duration of motor block was prolonged after 0.5% levobupivacaine. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine had similar effects in the vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

A clinical comparison of vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block using 0.75% or 0.5% ropivacaine for upper limb surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective, double blind study to compare the clinical effect of vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block produced by 0.75% vs 0.5% ropivacaine for upper limb surgery. METHODS: We included 80 patients receiving upper limb surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed via the vertical technique with 30 ml of 0.75% or 0.5% ropivacaine. By observation, we determined nerve type was stimulated and scored the level of sensory block and motor block. The quality of blocks was assessed intra-operatively. The duration of sensory block and motor block and their complications were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the frequency of stimulated nerve type, evolution of sensory and motor block quality, or success of block. There were no significant differences in the duration of sensory block and motor block. Vascular puncture was noted in 1 patient in the 0.75% ropivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: Both the 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine had similar effects in the vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Phrenic nerve palsy following coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block / 대한마취과학회지

Various methods of infraclavicular brachial plexus block have been introduced in the past, of which Wilson's coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block, a more lateral approach, consequently thought to be easier and safer. While only a few cases of transient ipsilateral phrenic nerve palsy after infraclavicular brachial plexus block have been reported, we describe a rare case of phrenic nerve palsy after Wilson's coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Usefulness of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a comparison with nerve stimulation method / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Recently, ultrasound guidance in clinical procedures including brachial plexus block has gained popularity. This method has been considered to be an efficient and a useful method with real-time visualization. Many reports have showed the usefulness of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block. We evaluated the usefulness of ultrasound guidance in infraclavicular brachial plexus block compared with nerve stimulation. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups of US group (ultrasound-guided block) and NS group (nerve stimulation). Blocks were performed with mepivacaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000 (total volume 40 ml). Block execution time, onset time, success rate, patient's discomfort and complications were measured and statistically evaluated for the comparison. RESULTS: Block execution time were 88.3 +/- 48.1 sec in US group and 172.7 +/- 103.1 sec in group NS, respectively (P = 0.017). Onset time were 16.0 +/- 6.9 min and 17.7 +/- 7.8 min (P = 0.434). Success rates were 93.3% and 80.0% (P = 0.283). Patient's discomfort was not significantly different. Pain in patients with fractured arm was significantly lower in US group (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block is useful with less time consumption and less discomfort in patients with fracture of arm. Success rate and onset time were acceptable.

Lateral Third Infraclavicular Implantation of the Vagal Nerve Stimulation Generator Through Axillary Incision

OBJECTIVE: This report describes the clinical study of the surgical method of lateral third infraclavicular implantation of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) generator through the axillary wrinkle incision. METHODS: In a retrospective study, the data for 20 patients with medically intractable epilepsy treated by this approach were examined. The mean age was 31.4 years (range : 14-50), and the mean follow-up period was 12.15 months (range : 4-21 months). The male to female ratio was 2.3 : 1. The subcutaneous pocket for the generator was located in the lateral third infraclavicular area through the axillary wrinkle. Our method was a modification of the standard VNS generator implantation in the mid-infraclavicular pocket through anterior axillary incision. RESULTS: There were the excellent or good cosmetic satisfaction in 95% of the cases and fair in 5%. The generator was located outside the lung field in 15%, periphery of the lung field in 45%, and crossed over the lung field in 40%. Discomfort from shoulder motion occurred transiently in 35% of cases. Other complications were minimal. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the lateral third infraclavicular apporach will offers cosmetic benefits and reduction of obscuration of the lung field without serious complications. Thus, this technique provides an attractive alternative among the surgical techniques for the vagal nerve stimulation.

Gasless Video-assisted Endoscopic Thyroidectomy via the Infraclavicular Approach:Report of 34 Cases / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and advantages of gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via the infraclavicular approach.Methods A single 2-to 4-cm infraclavicular incision was made at the ipsilateral side under local anesthesia.The subplastysmal plane was dissected up to the anterior neck to build a gasless space by mechanical method.Afterwards,by using ultrasonic scalpel,thyroidectomy was performed.Results The procedure was completed in 34 cases with a mean operation time of(120?30) min and mean blood loss of(20?12) ml.After the surgery,3 patients developed subcutaneous fluid and 1 patient had incisional infection,all of the 4 patients were cured by conservative therapy.The 34 cases were followed up for 1 to 30 months with a mean of 18.5 months,during the period,none of them had recurrence.Conclusions Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via the infraclavicular approach is a simple and safe method with good cosmetic outcomes.

Relaciones anatómicas de la vena subclavia en un grupo de recién nacidos con puntos de orientación óseos para su mejor punción con técnica infraclavicular y supraclavicular

Introducción. Objetivo: corroborar de manera objetiva las diferencias anatómicas existentes en el trayecto de la vena subclavia en un grupo de recién nacidos para describir la mejor técnica de punción subclavia en este grupo de edad. Material y métodos. Estudio quirúrgico-radiológico, descriptivo, prolectivo, midiendo distancias de la vena subclavia con relación a la clavícula y la articulación esterno-clavicular. Resultados. El punto donde cruza la vena a la clavícula es más lateral respecto a lo reportado en la literatura. La profundidad de la vena respecto a la clavícula es de 3.2 mm para el lado izquierdo (2-5) y de 2.0 mm para el lado derecho, el ángulo ascendente que sigue la vena es en promedio de 38° del lado izquierdo y de 34° del lado derecho. El punto más alto de la vena sobre la articulación es de 9 mm del lado izquierdo y 7 mm del lado derecho. Los ángulos en la porción descendente de la vena subclavia son en promedio de 27° del lado izquierdo y de 81° del lado derecho. Conclusiones. Se propone una técnica de punción de la vena subclavia tanto con técnica supra como infraclavicular en recién nacidos, basada en los hallazgos anatómicos.

Introduction. To correlate in an objective manner the anatomical differences of the subclavian vein in newborns for a better approach to it's puncture. Material and methods. A descriptive, surgical and pathological study in cadavers measuring the subclavian vein related to the clavicle and the sterno-clavicular joint. Results. The specific point where the subclavian vein cross the clavicle is lateral than the 1 reported in literature. The deepness of the vein with respect to the clavicle is 3.2 mm for the left side and 2 mm for the right, the ascending angle of the vein is 38° on the left and 34° on the right side. The highest point of the vein over the joint is 9 mm on the left and 7 mm on the right side. The descending angles of the vein are 27° on the left and 81° on the right side in average. Conclusions. We propose, based on our results, a puncture technique for the subclavian vein in newborns either with the supra or infraclavicular technique.

Continuous Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Using Retrograde Insertion of an Epidural Catheter with Stylet through the Axilla / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) has many merits compared to other approaches. However, due to complications and the discomfort felt by patients during the procedure, it has not gained much in popularity. We assumed that the neurovascular sheath is one compartment and placed the catheter deeply into the sheath, as used in the infraclavicular approach, through the axilla. METHODS: Patients scheduled for surgery were paired according to their diagnoses and sites of surgery. Thirty-two patients were randomly chosen and divided into two groups. Selander's continuous axillary BPB was performed in the axillary group. In the infraclavicular group, we inserted an epidural catheter with a stylet deeper into the site just medial to the coracoid process using a C-arm and nerve stimulator. RESULTS: In the infraclavicular group, sensory and motor block of the musculocutaneous nerve and the quality of BPB was superior to those of the axillary group (P < 0.05). The average depth of the catheter from the skin was 14 +/-1.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infraclavicular BPB can cause no more discomfort as Selander's continuous axillary approach. Furthermore, it may improve the quality of block and reduce the amount of local anesthetic used.