ABSTRACT
Objective@#To development of ethylene glycol samples in silicone tubes, and the samples were applied to inter-laboratory comparison, through it to evaluate the detection capacity of occupational health testing laboratories.@*Methods@#Three content levels of ethylene glycol samples in silicone tubes were prepared, and the homogeneity and stability of samples were investigated, the results were statistically analyzed. A robust statistical four-point distance method was used to calculate the results submitted by each participant laboratory and the test capability of the laboratory was assessed by the z-score method.@*Results@#The statistic of the homogeneity of ethylene glycol samples in silicone tubes were less than the critical value (P>0.05) , and the samples were stable at room temperature for one month. The satisfactory rate of comparison between 204 laboratories was 88.24%.@*Conclusion@#The homogeneity and stability of the ethylene glycol samples in the silicone tubes can meet the requirements of proficiency testing and can be used for laboratory comparison. Most of the laboratories that participated in the comparison had the ability to detect ethylene glycol.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#Through inter-laboratory comparison to analysis and evaluation of the detection capacity of arsenic in the urine. @*Methods@#Urine arsenic samples were prepared with normal human urine as matrix. The homogeneity of the samples was investigated and the results were statistically analyzed by single factor analysis of variance. 2 samples were issued to each participant laboratory. A robust statistical four-point distance method was used to calculate the results submitted by each participant laboratory and the test capability of the laboratory was assessed by the z-score method. By means of method experiments and records, the reasons of dissatisfaction and the influencing factors of the results were discussed. @*Results@#The statistic of the homogeneity of urine arsenic samples was less than the critical value (P>0.05) , which showed that the arsenic in the sample was homogeneous. The satisfactory rate of comparison between 36 laboratories was 86.1%. The main reasons for dissatisfaction were the testing conditions and the quality control measures. The selection of sample pretreatment, acidity control and hydrogenation conditions was the main influencing factor for the determination of urinary arsenic by atomic fluorescence spectrometry. @*Conclusion@#The level of urinary arsenic detection in the occupational health laboratories was generally better and a few laboratories need to be improved ability of detection. It was very important to control the test conditions reasonably and strengthen the quality control measures to improve the accuracy of urine arsenic detection.