ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) and Intertan intramedullary nail fixation by closed reduction in the treatment of AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 31-A3.3 intertrochanteric fracture with incomplete lateral wall. Methods: The clinical data of 54 patients with AO/OTA type 31-A3.3 intertrochanteric fracture who met the selection criteria and were admitted between January 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgical methods, the patients were divided into group A (24 cases with lateral wall reconstruction by MIPPO combined with PFNA internal fixation) and group B (30 cases with Intertan intramedullary nail fixation by closed reduction only). There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in terms of gender, age, side of injury, cause of injury, and combined medical diseases. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to weight-bearing, fracture healing time, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The tip apex distance (TAD) was measured at 2 days, 2 months, and 1 year after operation. At 12 months after operation, the hip joint function was evaluated according to Harris scoring standard, and the rate of conformity (Harris score were more than 70) was calculated. Results: The wounds of the two groups healed by first intention, without infection, skin deformity, and other incision complications. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of group A were significantly more than those of group B, and the time to weight-bearing and fracture healing were significantly shorter than those of group B ( P0.05). There was 1 case of infection, 1 case of screw withdrawal, 2 cases of screw removal, and 1 case of bone nonunion in group B, the incidence of complications was 16.7%; there was only 1 case of screw withdrawal combined with screw blade withdrawal in group A, the incidence of complications was 4.2%; there was no significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=2.109, P=0.146). At 12 months after operation, the Harris scores of pain, function, malunion, range of motion, and total score in group A were significantly better than those in group B ( P<0.05). The rate of conformity of group A was 95.83% (23/24) and 76.67% (23/30) in group B, and the difference between the two groups was significant ( χ2=3.881, P=0.049). Conclusion: For the AO/OTA type 31-A3.3 intertrochanteric fracture with incomplete lateral wall, compared with the closed reduction Intertan intramedullary nail fixation, the incidence of internal fixation failure after MIPPO reconstruction with lateral wall combined with PFNA fixation was lower, the time to weight-bearing was earlier, and the postoperative function was better.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTan nail in the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods Totally 102 elderly patients (≥65 years old) with A2. 2., A2. 3 and A3 type unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients were divided into PFNA group (n = 48., with a mean age of [75. 6±6. 7] years) and InterTan group (n = 54, with a mean age of [75. 3±6. 6] years) according to the surgical method. During follow-up, the Harris hip score was recorded at the last outpatient review, and the survival information of patients was obtained by telephone interview and census register database. Results There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics of patients between the two groups. The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy time and bleeding volume of patients in the InterTan group were significantly higher than those in the PFNA group (P0. 05). Screw cut-out occurred in 4 patients in the PFNA group, and the hospital death occurred in 3 (2.9%) patients in the two groups. There was no significant difference in the healing time and Harris hip score between the two groups during follow-up (P>0. 05). The median survival time of patients in the PFNA group and the InterTan group was 33. 9 and 27. 4 months, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0. 05). Conclusion PFNA and InterTan nail have similar therapeutic effect on elderly patients with unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures. PFNA is better in improving operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy time and intraoperative bleeding volume, but has the risk of screw cutting-out.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) with intertrochanteric antegrade nail (InterTAN) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Methods:A retrospective study of 62 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures who received two operation methods from Sep 2014 to May 2016 was done. There were 28 patients in PFNA group, and 34 patients in InterTAN group. The operation time, blood loss in operation, hospitalization time, healing time, and Harris hip joint functional score were compared and analyzed. Results:Operation time and the amount of intraoperative blood loss in PFNA group were less than that in InterTAN group. Hospitalization time,fracture healing time and Harris hip joint functional score after ten months had no significant difference between the two groups. And 59 cases in total were followed up with an average of 11.5 months (from 9 to 16 months) . In PFNA group, 27 patients were followed up, and one patient was lost to follow up, who died because of chronic renal insufficiency. The rest 26 patients all achieved bony union (including one case of hip versus) . At follow-up 9 months, hip joint function was excellent in 18 cases, good in 6, fair in 2, bad in 1, and the excellent-good rate was 88.9%. In InterTAN group,32 patients were followed up,and two cases were lost to follow up. In followed-up cases, there was one patient who was no healing of fracture. After hip arthroplasty, this patient got recovery. The hip joint function was excellent in 21 cases, good in 7, fair in 3, and bad in 1. The differences between the two groups were not statisticaly significant. Conclusion:Both PFNA and InterTAN can treat intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly with good result,but PFNA has obvious advantages over InterTAN on less hemorrhage and operation time.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the TRIGEN™ INTERTAN nail (InterTAN) could show better clinical outcome compared to the proximal femoral nail antirotation 2 (PFNA2) for treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2009 and December 2013, 164 patients with intertrochanteric fractures who met our inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Evaluation variables, including operation time, blood loss during the operation, incidence of perioperative complications, clinical results at the last follow-up, and radiographic findings were assessed for comparison of the 2 implants. RESULTS: Intraoperative lateral wall fracture was significantly higher in the PFNA2 group (p<0.05) and tip apex distance was significantly higher in the InterTAN group (p<0.05). Sliding of the proximal fragment at the last follow-up was significantly higher in the PFNA2 group. However, there was no significant difference in union rate, time to union, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes at the last follow-up between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Based on these data, clinical outcomes at the last follow-up were equivalent between InterTAN and PFNA2.
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Fractures , Incidence , Postoperative ComplicationsABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of InterTAN (IT) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.Methods From July 2008 to November 2011,the patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated by IT (IT group,21 patients) and DHS (DHS group,35 patients).The intraoperative data (operative time,intraoperative blood loss,incision length and hospitalization period),postoperative complications (wound infection,lower limb deep venous thrombosis,bedsore,urinary tract infection and pneumonia) and fracture healing (fracture healing time,femoral neck crispation,coxa vara and Harris scores) were compared.Results IT group was superior to DHS group in operative time,intraoperative blood loss,incision length and hospitalization period [(62.16 ± 15.26) min vs.(85.78 ± 19.50) min,(237.73 ± 108.51) ml vs.(490.87 ± 127.90) ml,(10.20 ±2.02) cm vs.(19.83 ± 2.98) cm and (10.23 ±5.52) d vs.(15.58 ±5.32) d,P ＜0.01].However,there was no significant difference in postoperative complications (P ＞ 0.05).There was significant difference between IT group and DHS group in femoral neck crispation,coxa vara [9.52％ (2/21)vs.28.57％ (10/35),14.29％ (3/21)vs.31.43％ (11/35),P ＜ 0.01].There was no significant difference in fracture healing time and Harris scores (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Compared with DHS,IT has extensive application,shorter surgical time and reliable fixation effect.Therefore,IT is suitable to femoral intertrochanteric fractures.