Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Rev. Soc. Colomb. Oftalmol ; 47(4): 340-349, 2014. tab. graf.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-965360

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados visuales del implante de lente trifocal AT LISA® tri 839MP en pacientes con cataratas o presbicia. Métodos: reporte de serie de casos de 14 pacientes (24 ojos) en los que se realizó facoemulsificacion del cristalino e implante del lente trifocal AT LISA® tri 839MP. Resultado: en un periodo promedio de 6,3 meses se evaluó la visión la cercana y lejana con promedios de visión logMar sin corrección de 0,004 y 0,008 respectivamente y para la visión intermedia el promedio logMar fue 0,02; con 100% de los pacientes con independencia de gafas Los fenómenos visuales como halos estuvieron presentes en 8,4% de los ojos. Conclusiones: el lente evaluado produce excelentes resultados visuales en función visual lejos, intermedia y cerca con gran satisfacción del paciente.


Objective: to evaluate visual results in trifocal lens implant AT LISA tri 839MP® in patients with cataracts and presbyopia. Methods: this case series report comprised 14 patients (24 eyes) who had lens phacoemulsification and implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP® trifocal lens. Results: during an average period of 6.3 months, mean values of 0,004 and 0,008 logMar were obtained respectively for uncorrected near and distance vision and the average intermediate vision was assessed with logMAR scale at 0,02 ;100% of patients have independence of spectacles. Visual phenomena as halos were presented in 8.4 % of eyes. Conclusions: the evaluated lens produces excellent visual results in far, intermediate and near visual acuity, with great patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures , Cataract/therapy , Eye Diseases/therapy , Lens, Crystalline/surgery
2.
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society ; : 1199-1207, 2013.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-197758

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of the OptiVis(TM) Multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and compare the clinical outcome between OptiVis(TM) and AcrySof(R) ReSTOR(R) D1. METHODS: We reviewed 20 eyes of 11 patients implanted with OptiVis(TM) and 20 eyes of 10 patients implanted with AcrySof(R) ReSTOR(R) D1. The clinical outcomes of the 2 IOLs were evaluated 1 and 2 months postoperatively and consisted of distant, intermediate, and near visual acuity, depth of focus, contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberration, patient satisfaction, decentration and IOL tilt. RESULTS: Intermediate vision was better in the OptiVis(TM) group. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups with respect to distant vision, near vision and wavefront aberration, contrast sensitivity, decentration and IOL tilt. Depth of focus was deeper in the OptiVis(TM) group at the intermediate visual acuity zone. There were no statistically significant result differences between postoperative 1 and 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: The OptiVis(TM) multifocal IOL provided satisfactory visual acuity at distance, near, and intermediate with no apparent reduction in contrast sensitivity. The IOL can be effective for improving patient satisfaction after cataract surgery as well as correcting presbyopia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cataract , Contrast Sensitivity , Eye , Lenses, Intraocular , Patient Satisfaction , Presbyopia , Vision, Ocular , Visual Acuity
3.
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society ; : 396-402, 2012.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-176658

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate near, intermediate, and distant vision, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with Acri.LISA aspheric diffractive multifocal IOL. METHODS: Forty eyes of 20 patients received phacoemulsification and implantation of Acri.LISA IOL. Visual acuity was measured postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberration, and visual function via questionnaire were measured at postoperative 1 month. RESULTS: Uncorrected near, intermediate, and distanct visual acuity at 1 month were 0.09 +/- 0.14, 0.29 +/- 0.17 and 0.11 +/- 0.12, respectively. At 6 months, similar visual acuity results were measured. Total and higher-order wavefront aberration values were 0.66 +/- 0.29 and 0.24 +/- 0.08, respectively. Photopic contrast sensitivity at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree were 1.38 +/- 0.32, 1.73 +/- 0.24, 1.75 +/- 0.21, 1.33 +/- 0.18, and 0.77 +/- 23, respectively, and mesopic contrast sensitivity values were 1.37 +/- 0.27, 1.72 +/- 0.16, 1.63 +/- 0.14, 1.01 +/- 0.19, and 0.50 +/- 0.22. Total subjective visual function score was 3,127 +/- 354, near work was 244 +/- 36, distance work was 256 +/- 21, and night driving was 221 +/- 42. CONCLUSIONS: The Acri.LISA 366D multifocal IOL can be effective for improving patient satisfaction after cataract surgery as well as for presbyopia correction.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cataract , Contrast Sensitivity , Eye , Lenses, Intraocular , Patient Satisfaction , Phacoemulsification , Presbyopia , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vision, Ocular , Visual Acuity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL