ABSTRACT
Objective To compare 12-month follow-up clinical outcome of an early to a delayed intervention in the management of high-risk non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients. Methods 758 consecutive high-risk NSTE-ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary artery intervention(PCI)were enrolled between Jauary 2015 and December 2015 in Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital. They were divided into 2 groups according to diff erent intervention time, the early PCI group(within 24 h after diagnosis,n=185)and the delayed group (more than 24 h after diagnosis, n=573).The baseline clinical data, angiographic features, data related to PCI, the 12-month follow-up major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were analyzed retrospectively. MACE were defi ned as all-cause death and recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction. Results Primary endpoint status after 12-month follow-up were collected in 711 of 758 initially enrolled patients. Incidence of MACE was 14.5% in the early and 11.2% in the delayed PCI group(χ2=1.289,P=0.256). No signifi cant diff erences were found in the occurrence of the individual components of all-cause death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Mean hospital stay were(7.6±3.1)d in the early and (10.7±3.8)d in the delayed PCI group(t=2.489,P=0.014). Mean medical expenses in RMB were(48.5±13.5) thousand yuan in the early and(52.8±16.4)thousand yuan in the delayed PCI group(t=2.132,P=0.038). Conclusions After 12-month follow-up,no diff erence in incidence of MACE was seen between early and delayed invasive strategy,but with shorter hospital stay and reduced medical expenses.
ABSTRACT
Resumen: Objetivo: Revisar la evidencia existente sobre el papel de la trombólisis prehospitalaria en los pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST) como parte de una estrategia de vanguardia para reducir el tiempo de reperfusión miocárdica y, con ello, mejorar la supervivencia y la función. Métodos: Se utilizó la técnica de exploración-reducción-evaluación-análisis y síntesis de estudios relacionados, con una visión general de las recomendaciones actuales, de los datos de ensayos clínicos controlados y de los registros nacionales e internacionales sobre las diferentes estrategias de reperfusión para el IAMCEST. En total, se examinaron 186 referencias sobre trombólisis prehospitalaria, 130 referencias en tiempos puerta-tratamiento, 139 referencias en la gestión de IAMCEST y los registros nacionales e internacionales, así como 135 referencias en intervención coronaria percutánea primaria y de rescate en IAMCEST. Finalmente se retuvieron las 48 referencias que se consideraron más relevantes e informativas. Conclusión: El factor "tiempo" es esencial en el éxito de la reperfusión temprana en el IAMCEST sobre todo si se toma en cuenta la trombólisis prehospitalaria. La intervención coronaria percutánea primaria está sujeta a su factibilidad antes de 120 min del inicio de los síntomas. En nuestro medio, al igual que en el ámbito internacional, la trombólisis continúa siendo una estrategia con gran alcance en las expectativas de vida y función de los pacientes. Los sistemas de telecomunicación deben incorporarse en tiempo real a las necesidades prioritarias de enfermedades catastróficas como el IAMCEST, donde la vida es dependiente del tiempo.
Abstract: Objective: To review the existing evidence on the role of prehospital thrombolysis in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) as part of a strategy of cutting edge to reduce the time of coronary reperfusion and as a consequence improves both the survival and function. Methods: We used the technique of exploration-reduction-evaluation-analysis and synthesis of related studies, with an overview of current recommendations, data from controlled clinical trials and from the national and international registries about the different strategies for STEMI reperfusion. In total, we examined 186 references on prehospital thrombolysis, 130 references in times door-treatment, 139 references in STEMI management and national and international registries as well as 135 references on rescue and primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. Finally the 48 references that were more relevant and informative were retained. Conclusion: The "time" factor is crucial in the success of early reperfusion in STEMI especially if thrombolysis is applied correctly during the prehospital time. The primary percutaneous coronary intervention is contingent upon its feasibility before 120 min from the onset of symptoms. In our midst to internationally, thrombolysis continues to be a strategy with great impact on their expectations of life and function of patients. Telecommunication systems should be incorporate in real time to the priority needs of catastrophic diseases such as STEMI where life is depending on time.
Subject(s)
Humans , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy , Early Medical Intervention , Emergency Medical Services , Mexico , Myocardial Reperfusion , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , RegistriesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to compare the prognoses of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes who were treated with invasive or conservative treatment strategies. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of studies of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes to assess the benefits of an invasive strategy vs. a conservative strategy for short- and long-term survival. We searched PubMed for studies published from 1990 to November 2012 that investigated the effects of an invasive vs. conservative strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. The following search terms were used: “non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction”, “unstable angina”, “acute coronary syndromes”, “invasive strategy”, and “conservative strategy”. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: Seven published studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled analyses show that an invasive strategy decreased the risk of death (risk ratio [0.839] [95% confidence interval {0.648-1.086}; I 2, 86.46%] compared to a conservative strategy over a 30-day-period. Furthermore, invasive treatment also decreased patient mortality (risk ratio [0.276] [95% confidence interval {0.259-0.294}; I 2, 94.58%]) compared to a conservative strategy for one year. CONCLUSION: In non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, an invasive strategy is comparable to a conservative strategy for decreasing short- and long-term mortality rates. .
Subject(s)
Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Angina, Unstable/therapy , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Angiography , Electrocardiography , Myocardial Revascularization , Prognosis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The value of coronary reperfusion resulting from Thrombolysis and/or coronary angioplasty in patients with evolving myocardial infarction has been rigorously evaluated and improved left venticular function and short-term survival rates have been demonstrated consistently in controlled studies. Benefits from delayed coronary angioplasty at 7-10 days after onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without thrombolysis remains unclear. In order to assess the effect of delayed reperfusion in infarct-related artery(IRA), we analyzed the restenosis rate of IRA after successful coronary angioplasty and the change of left ventricular function at late follow-up angiogram. METHOD: Coronary angioplasty in 69 lesions of 55 patients(M/F:48/7, mean age 53 years) with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) were performed at 7-10 days after onset of AMI and follow-up coronary angiogram (25 lesions of 20 pts) with left ventriculogram were obtained at means 5.1 months(range 4-6 months) after angioplasty. Restenosis rate of dilated infaret-related arteries and the changes of left ventricular function after angioplasty were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall procedural success rate of delayed elective coronary angioplasty in patients with AMI was 86% with a higher success rate in subtotally occluded vessel(98%) than in the occluded IRA(64%). Complications included acute closure after large dissection in 1(1.6%) and on -hospital mortality due to cardiogenic shock in 1(1.8%). Angiographically restenosis rate of IRA was 65% at mean 5.1 months follow-up, which was relatively higher than that after non-IRA angioplasty in AMI(25%) and in patients with angina(24%). Left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly from 47.2+/-12.7% to 58.8+/-8.6%(P<0.05) at follow-up. Patients who had a patent IRA at follow-up had a restenotic IRA at follow-up had no statistically significant improvement in EF(table 3). Patients with a left anterior descending artery(LAD) lesion had lower mean immediate EFs than patients with right coronary artery lesion, however the degree of improvement in EF at follow-up was more significant in patients with LAD lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed elective angioplasty of IRA at 7-10 days after onset of AMI was relatively safe and had comparable procedural success rate. Higher restenosis rate(65%) of IRA at follow-up appeared to be related, at least on part, to the endothelial dysfunction after ischemic-reperfusion injury and clinically unstable status. Left ventricular function improved significantly after angioplasty at follow-up. Recovery of left ventricular function might be reated to whether or not the IRA had an angiographically restenosis at follow-up.