Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 83(1): 10-15, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-839403

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction The performance of auditory steady state response (ASSR) in threshold testing when recorded ipsilaterally and contralaterally, as well as at low and high modulation frequencies (MFs), has not been systematically studied. Objective To verify the influences of mode of recording (ipsilateral vs. contralateral) and modulation frequency (40 Hz vs. 90 Hz) on ASSR thresholds. Methods Fifteen female and 14 male subjects (aged 18–30 years) with normal hearing bilaterally were studied. Narrow-band CE-chirp® stimuli (centerd at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) modulated at 40 and 90 Hz MFs were presented to the participants' right ear. The ASSR thresholds were then recorded at each test frequency in both ipsilateral and contralateral channels. Results Due to pronounced interaction effects between mode of recording and MF (p < 0.05 by two-way repeated measures ANOVA), mean ASSR thresholds were then compared among four conditions (ipsi-40 Hz, ipsi-90 Hz, contra-40 Hz, and contra-90 Hz) using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. At the 500 and 1000 Hz test frequencies, contra-40 Hz condition produced the lowest mean ASSR thresholds. In contrast, at high frequencies (2000 and 4000 Hz), ipsi-90 Hz condition revealed the lowest mean ASSR thresholds. At most test frequencies, contra-90 Hz produced the highest mean ASSR thresholds. Conclusions Based on the findings, the present study recommends two different protocols for an optimum threshold testing with ASSR, at least when testing young adults. This includes the use of contra-40 Hz recording mode due to its promising performance in hearing threshold estimation.


Resumo Introdução O desempenho da resposta auditiva de estado estável (RAEE) em testes de limiar com registros ipsilateral e contralateral e modulações em frequências (MFs) não tem sido sistematicamente estudado. Objetivo Verificar a influência do modo de registro (ipsilateral vs. contralateral) e da modulação em frequências (40 Hz vs. 90 Hz) nos limiares de RAEE. Método Foram estudados 15 mulheres e 14 homens (18-30 anos) com audição bilateral normal. Estímulos CE-chirp® de banda estreita (centrados em 500, 1.000, 2.000 e 4.000 Hz) modulados em 40 e 90 Hz de MF foram apresentados à orelha direita dos participantes. Em seguida, os limiares de RAEE foram registrados em cada frequência de teste nos canais ipsilateral e contralateral. Resultados Devido aos pronunciados efeitos de interação entre o modo de registro e MF (p < 0,05 por variância com dois fatores para medidas repetidas – Anova duas vias), os limiares médios de RAEE foram então comparados entre quatro condições (Ipsi-40 Hz, Ipsi-90 Hz, Contra-40 Hz e Contra-90 Hz), com o uso de variância e com um fator para medidas repetidas (Anova uma via). Nas frequências de teste de 500 e 1.000 Hz, a condição Contra-40 Hz produziu os mais baixos limiares médios de RAEE. Em contraste, em altas frequências (2.000 e 4.000 Hz), a condição Ipsi-90 Hz revelou os mais baixos limiares médios de RAEE. Na maioria das frequências de teste, a condição Contra-90 Hz produziu os mais elevados limiares médios de RAEE. Conclusões Com base nos achados do presente estudo, os autores recomendam dois protocolos diferentes para um teste de limiares ideal com RAEE, pelo menos em adultos jovens. Isso inclui o uso do modo de registro Contra-40 Hz, devido ao seu desempenho promissor nas estimativas do limiar auditivo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Reference Values
2.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery ; (24): 161-165, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-433320

ABSTRACT

Objective:To compare the time domain and the frequency domain of speech-evoked auditory brainstem response measured by stimulation of left and right ears, and to explore the difference and possible reasons of neural coding for speech from different ears in auditory brainstem.Method:Speech-ABRs to syllable /da/ of 31 healthy adults were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed on time-domain parameters, such as latencies and amplitudes of featured peaks, and frequency-domain ones, such as amplitudes of the fundamental frequency and the first formant of speech-ABRs ranging from 20-50 ms. A scoring criterion to grade the appearance of featured waves was proposed for waveform evaluation.Result:There were no significant difference for the latencies of binaural featured peaks and amplitudes of feature peaks(except peaks A and O). The waveform scores of right ear were greater than that of left ear. The amplitudes of fundamental frequency of binaural waves were both greater than that of the first formant. There was no significant difference of amplitudes of fundamental frequency and the first formant between two ears.Conclusion:The origins and distributions of speech-ABR are essentially symmetrical in brainstem in contrast with the hemisphere asymmetry of speech.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL