ABSTRACT
The accuracy of joint line tenderness in the diagnosis of meniscal tears was assessed in 129 knees. Arthroscopy was performed in each case to establish the diagnosis. The diagnosis was correct in 100 knees (77.5%) and incorrect in 29 (22.5%). A preoperative diagnosis of a medial meniscal tear was made in 63 knees and confirmed in 46 (73%) at arthroscopy. There were 46 true-positive, 17 false-positive, four false-negative and 62 true-negative results for the medial side. A lateral meniscal tear was suspected in 45 knees and confirmed in 39 (86.7%). Thus, 39 true-positive, six false-positive, two false-negative, and 82 true-negative interpretations were found. In this study, joint line tenderness as a test for lateral meniscal tears was accurate (93%), sensitive (95%), and specific (93%), but for medial tears the rates were lower.
La precisión del dolor en la línea de la articulación a la hora de hacer el diagnóstico del desgarro meniscal fue evaluada en 129 rodillas. En cada uno de los casos se realizó una artroscopia a fin de determinar el diagnóstico. El diagnóstico fue correcto en 100 rodillas (77.5%) e incorrecto en 29 (22.5%). Se llevó a cabo un diagnóstico preoperatorio del desgarramiento meniscal medial en 63 rodillas, confirmado en 46 (73%) por artroscopia. Hubo 46 resultados verdadero-positivos, 17 falsopositivos, 4 falso-negativos y 62 verdadero-negativos para el lado medial. Se sospechó un desgarro meniscal lateral en 45 rodillas, y se confirmó en 39 (86.7%). Por consiguiente, se hallaron 39 interpretaciones verdadero-positivas, 6 falso-positivas, 2 falso-negativas, y 82 verdadero-negativas. En este estudio, el dolor en la línea de la articulación como prueba para el desgarro meniscal lateral fue preciso (93%), sensible (95%), y específico (93%), pero para el desgarro medial los índices fueron más bajos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Physical Examination , Menisci, Tibial/injuries , Knee Injuries/diagnosis , Arthroscopy , Diagnosis, Differential , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical findings of a complete radial rupture of the meniscal root ligament of the medial meniscus posterior horn. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April, 2004 to December, 2004, nineteen patients (mean age, 56.5 years old) who were diagnosed with a medial root ligament rupture of the medial meniscus posterior horn during an arthroscopic treatment were enrolled in this study. The clinical findings, physical examinations, and the radiological and arthroscopic findings were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirteen out of the nineteen cases had tenderness of the knee without specific trauma. The preoperative physical examination revealed posteromedial joint line tenderness in fifteen cases. A medial joint line protrusion with direct tenderness was observed in six cases (31.5%) and a positive McMurray test was observed in seventeen cases (89.5%). MRI was carried out in sixteen patients. All sixteen patients were diagnosed with a rupture of the meniscal root ligament using the author's diagnostic MRI criteria. CONCLUSION: Non-traumatic pain and posteromedial joint line tenderness in patients in their sixth decade are indications of a rupture of the meniscal root ligament of the medial meniscus posterior horn. Confirmation using MRI and arthroscopy is important for making a diagnosis.