ABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose is to study the correlation between dry eye and refractive errors in young adults using noninvasive Keratograph. Methods: In this cross sectional study, a total of 126 participants in the age range of 19� years and who were free of ocular surface disease, were recruited from King Saud University Campus. Refraction was defined by the spherical equivalent (SE) as the following: 49 emmetropic eyes (�50 SE), 48 myopic eyes (??0.75 SE and above), and 31 hyperopic eyes (>+0.75 SE). All participants underwent full ophthalmic examinations assessing their refractive status and dryness level including noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT) and tear meniscus height using Keratograph 4. Results: The prevalence of dry eye was 24.6%, 36.5%, and 17.4% in emmetropes, myopes, and hypermetropes, respectively. NIBUT has a negative correlation with hyperopia and a positive correlation with myopia with a significant reduction in the average NIBUT in myopes and hypermetropes in comparison to emmetropes. Conclusion: The current results succeeded to demonstrate a correlation between refractive errors and dryness level.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of non-invasive tear film break-up time and identify its relationships with dry eye parameters. METHODS: A total of 100 participants (50 with dry eye, and 50 in the control group) were enrolled prospectively. Non-invasive keratograph first (NIKf-BUT) and average (NIKav-BUT) break-up times were evaluated 2 times using Keratograph 4 (Oculus, Wetzler, Germany), and then tear film break-up time with fluorescein (FBUT) was measured. The correlation analyses were performed between non-invasive parameters (NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT) and FBUT. Intra-observer agreements of NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve technique was used to evaluate the non-invasive method in the diagnosis of dry eye. RESULTS: The correlation analyses revealed positive correlation between NIKav-BUT and FBUT in both groups (dry eye; r = 0.66, p < 0.001 and control group; r = 0.77, p < 0.001). The ICCs of NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT were 0.72 and 0.94 in the dry eye, respectively, and 0.70 and 0.91 in the control group. NIKav-BUT was not different from FBUT in either group. The areas under the ROC curves of NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT were 0.917 and 0.980, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The high ICCs verified the repeatability of NIKf-BUT and NIKav-BUT. NIKav-BUT showed no difference from FBUT and positive correlation with FBUT. NIK-BUT showed high diagnostic power and can be considered a new parameter to evaluate dry eye syndrome.