ABSTRACT
The study targeted an elective surgery of a tertiary hospital, focusing on such problems as low efficiency of surgical process, long queue time of patients and serious overtime of medical workers. Lean thinking was called into play to define the value of surgical services, and identify various wastes in the process, for improvement recommendations. In an onsite survey, such tools as value stream mapping, fishbone diagram and operation analysis were used for analysis and improvement of the process at the levels of process analysis and operation analysis. These measures have made significant improvements in surgical process time, operation room hold-up time, nursing worker hold-up time and queue of patients.
ABSTRACT
The study targeted an elective surgery of a tertiary hospital, focusing on such problems as low efficiency of surgical process, long queue time of patients and serious overtime of medical workers. Lean thinking was called into play to define the value of surgical services, and identify various wastes in the process, for improvement recommendations. In an onsite survey, such tools as value stream mapping, fishbone diagram and operation analysis were used for analysis and improvement of the process at the levels of process analysis and operation analysis. These measures have made significant improvements in surgical process time, operation room hold-up time, nursing worker hold-up time and queue of patients.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: Para competir no mercado atual de medicina laboratorial, há a necessidade de processos com elevado nível de agregação de valor aos clientes e alta flexibilidade para atender às modificações constantes nos requisitos de clientes e legais, bem como capacidade de se adaptar às modificações no ambiente competitivo. Esses desafios exigem uma adaptação global do laboratório para uma visão baseada em processos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar criticamente uma iniciativa de mapeamento e redesenho de processos desenvolvida em um laboratório clínico de grande porte. Nessa análise crítica, serão apresentados e avaliados os resultados de um projeto de redesenho realizado na área técnica da empresa, incluindo processos técnicos e de apoio. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram mapeados 37 processos técnicos, utilizando metodologia adaptada e identificando as principais desconexões e oportunidades de melhoria. Cada processo foi sequencialmente analisado e redesenhado e um plano de ação foi gerado para a implementação de cada novo processo. Resultados: Após a implementação dos novos processos redesenhados, a produtividade de pessoal técnico aumentou em mais de 30 por cento. Outro resultado importante foi obtido em termos de flexibilidade dos processos, principalmente em razão da nova estrutura de subáreas na área técnica. DISCUSSÃO: Os principais pontos críticos do projeto estiveram relacionados com a disponibilidade de recursos de tecnologia da informação (TI) e a não priorização de medições nos processos no momento inicial do projeto. CONCLUSÃO: A iniciativa de redesenho de processos, se implementada com um roteiro planejado, orientada a resultados e alinhada à estratégia da organização, pode proporcionar resultados significativos para os laboratórios clínicos.
INTRODUCTION: In order to ensure market competitiveness in laboratory medicine, there is a current demand for processes with high customer added value, high flexibility to attend fluctuating customer and legal requirements, as well as ability to adapt to changes. These challenges require global adaptation to a processbased view. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate critically an initiative of process mapping and redesigning developed in a major clinical laboratory. In this analysis, the results of the redesign project developed in the technical area are presented and evaluated, including technical and support processes METHODS: Thirty-seven technical processes were mapped by use of customized methodology, and key disconnections and improvement opportunities were identified. Each process was sequentially reviewed and redesigned. Furthermore, an action plan was outlined for the implementation of each new process. Results: After implementing new redesigned processes, staff productivity rose by over 30 percent. Another important result was obtained in terms of process flexibility, mainly due to the new subarea structure in the technical area. DISCUSSION: The main crucial points of the project were related to information technology (IT) resource availability and no prioritization of process assessment at the beginning of the project. CONCLUSION: Clinical laboratories may attain significant results with process redesign initiatives as long as these are result-oriented, aligned with the organization strategies and implemented with a planned approach.