Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Educ. med. super ; 33(2): e1678, abr.-jun. 2019.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1089900

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Las carreras del área de la salud se caracterizan por tener una rigurosa base científica, que les aporta los fundamentos indispensables para que los futuros profesionales desarrollen investigaciones, especializaciones o profundizaciones en algún área determinada. El presente trabajo incorpora un foro virtual de participación libre y voluntaria para los estudiantes de la asignatura Diagnóstico Integrado de la carrera de Odontología, mediante un grupo cerrado de Facebook. Objetivo: Evaluar el progreso de la transferencia de aprendizajes y las estrategias cognitivas y metacognitivas en los estudiantes de Odontología de la Universidad de Concepción, con la aplicación de la metodología de análisis de caso clínico mediante foro virtual. Métodos: Se trabajó con la metodología análisis de caso clínico para mejorar la transferencia del aprendizaje y se empleó una metodología mixta: cualitativa con análisis de contenido mediante grupos focales, y cuantitativa con método cuasi experimental de pre- y postest del Cuestionario para la Evaluación de Estrategias de Aprendizaje de los Estudiantes Universitarios. Participaron 68 estudiantes que cursaron la asignatura Diagnóstico Integrado en 2017 y que manifestaron su decisión de participar voluntariamente de manera escrita. Resultados: Mejoró la transferencia de aprendizajes en todos los estudiantes. Aquellos que participaron más en el foro obtuvieron mejor rendimiento en la asignatura. Todos reconocieron que resultó un aprendizaje significativo para su futuro desempeño profesional. El conocimiento declarativo y la consciencia aumentaron su media y porcentaje para las opciones positivas. En cambio, el conocimiento procedimental, el control y la autopoiesis disminuyeron su media, y aumentó el porcentaje para las opciones negativas y la indecisión. Conclusiones: La metodología desarrollada constituyó un acierto porque aumentó la transferencia de aprendizajes(AU)


Introduction: Health majors are characterized by having a rigorous scientific base, which provides them with the essential foundations for future professionals to develop research, specializations or deepening in a given area. The present work incorporates a virtual forum of free and voluntary participation for the students of the subject Integrated Diagnosis of the dental medicine major, through a closed Facebook group. Objective: To assess the progress of learning transfer of the cognitive and metacognitive strategies in the students of dental medicine from University of Concepción, with the application of the clinical case analysis methodology in a virtual forum. Method: The clinical case analysis methodology was used to improve learning transfer. A mixed methodology was used: qualitative with content analysis through focus groups and quantitative with quasi-experimental method of pre- and post-test with the Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Learning Strategies of University Students. Sixty-eight students participated who took the Integrated Diagnosis course in 2017 and who expressed their decision to participate voluntarily through writing. Results: Learning transfer improved in all students. Those who participated more in the forum obtained better performance in the subject. All of them recognized that it was significant learning for their future professional performance. Declarative knowledge and awareness increased their mean and percentage values for positive options. In contrast, procedural knowledge, control and autopoiesis decreased their mean values, while the percentage values increased for negative options and indecision. Conclusions: The methodology developed was a success because it increased learning transfer(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Students, Dental , Focus Groups , Methodology as a Subject , Learning
2.
Rev. bras. educ. méd ; 43(1,supl.1): 615-622, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1057584

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective to evaluate the effectiveness of the 3D virtual anatomical table as a complementary resource to the learning of the hepatobiliary anatomy by undergraduate medical students. Method A randomized controlled study comparing the anatomical learning of hepatobiliary structures, supported by a real model versus a virtual model, both three-dimensional (3D), by undergraduate medical students. The students' perception of the resources used to teach anatomy was also evaluated. The students were submitted to a pre-test and to two evaluations after the interventions were applied. Results Overall, both the 3D virtual anatomical table and the real liver increased students' knowledge of the hepatobiliary anatomy in relation to their previous knowledge (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively for second and third evaluations). In the longitudinal comparison between the pre-test and the second evaluation (hepatobiliary anatomy and Couinaud's segmentation), this increase was significantly higher in the group allocated to the real liver (p = 0.002); in the comparison of the pre-test with the third evaluation (inclusion of adjacent organs in the anatomical table or in the real liver), the increase in knowledge was significantly higher in the group allocated to the anatomical table (p = 0.04). The perception of participants' satisfaction regarding the learning resources was considered very good, with a minimum percentage of satisfaction of 80%. Conclusion the 3D virtual anatomical table provided more hepatobiliary anatomy knowledge than a real liver for undergraduate medical students, in comparison to their previous knowledge about these structures. In the cross-sectional comparison of the post-instruction evaluations, there was no difference between the two interventions. Moreover, the 3D platform had a positive impact on the level of satisfaction of study participants. This study shows that the 3D virtual anatomical table has the potential to improve both medical students' understanding and interest in anatomy. It is recommended, however, that future protocols such as this be carried out with larger samples and exploring other anatomical structures.


RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a eficácia da mesa anatômica virtual 3D como recurso complementar ao aprendizado da anatomia hepatobiliar por estudantes de graduação em Medicina. Metodologia Trata-se de estudo randomizado e controlado que comparou a aprendizagem anatômica de estruturas hepatobiliares, apoiada por um modelo real versus por um modelo virtual, ambos tridimensionais (3D), por parte de estudantes de medicina. Avaliou-se também a percepção dos estudantes quanto aos recursos utilizados para o ensino da anatomia. Os alunos foram submetidos a um pré-teste e a duas avaliações após a aplicação das intervenções. Resultados Globalmente, tanto a mesa anatômica virtual 3D quanto o fígado real aumentaram o conhecimento dos estudantes sobre a anatomia hepatobiliar em relação ao conhecimento prévio deles (p = 0,001 e p = 0,01, respectivamente para a segunda e terceira avaliação). Na comparação longitudinal entre o pré-teste e a segunda avaliação (anatomia hepatobiliar e segmentação de Couinaud), esse aumento foi significantemente maior no grupo alocado para o fígado real (p = 0,002); já na comparação do pré-teste com a terceira avaliação (inclusão de órgãos anexos na mesa anatômica ou no fígado real), o aumento do conhecimento foi significantemente maior no grupo alocado para a mesa anatômica (p = 0,04). A percepção de satisfação dos participantes quanto aos recursos de aprendizagem foi considerada muito boa, com percentual mínimo de satisfação de 80%. Conclusão A mesa anatômica virtual 3D forneceu mais conhecimento de anatomia hepatobiliar que um fígado real para estudantes de medicina, em relação ao conhecimento prévio deles sobre essas estruturas. Na comparação transversal das avaliações pós-instrução, não houve diferença entre as duas intervenções. Além disso, a plataforma 3D teve um impacto positivo no nível de satisfação dos participantes do estudo. Este estudo mostra que a mesa anatômica virtual 3D tem potencial para melhorar tanto a compreensão quanto o interesse dos estudantes de medicina pela anatomia. Recomenda-se, no entanto, que futuros protocolos como este sejam realizados com amostras maiores e explorando outras estruturas anatômicas.

3.
Educ. med. super ; 32(4): 143-183, oct.-dic. 2018. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-989759

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Un obstáculo al cual se enfrenta el estudiante de Odontología es la dificultad para interrelacionar los conocimientos que han aprendido de manera parcelada durante los dos primeros años de estudio, dificultando la transferencia de aprendizajes para reconocer la multicausalidad de factores presentes al momento de tratar al paciente de manera integral. La evidencia científica señala que una forma de lograrlo es que el estudiante posea estrategias cognitivas y metacognitivas que le permitan un aprendizaje significativo. Objetivo: Determinar el nivel de estrategias cognitivas y metacognitivas presentes en los alumnos de Odontología de la Universidad de Concepción. Método: Metodología mixta; de tipo descriptivo y transversal. Un enfoque cualitativo mediante entrevistas semiestructuradas y cuantitativo mediante la aplicación del Cuestionario para la Evaluación de Estrategias de Aprendizaje de los Estudiantes universitarios (CEVEAPEU). Participaron 117 estudiantes que cursaron el tercer año entre el 2016 y 2017. Resultados : En lo cualitativo, los estudiantes destacaron varios aspectos positivos en la asignatura. No obstante, señalan la necesidad de incorporar herramientas que incentiven su participación y curiosidad, además de aumentar las oportunidades para integrar lo aprendido. Refirieron que utilizan una amplia variedad de estrategias de aprendizaje. Ello evidenció un aprendizaje significativo receptivo que no fomenta la transferencia de aprendizajes. En lo cuantitativo, existió una alta dispersión en las respuestas, tanto para estrategias cognitivas como metacognitivas, asimismo se evidenció una moda de 4 (de acuerdo) para la mayoría de las preguntas. Se demostró que los estudiantes no aseguran un alto nivel de adherencia a las aseveraciones planteadas. Conclusiones: Los estudiantes refirieron que utilizan una amplia variedad de estrategias de aprendizaje, sin embargo, no las adaptan cuando la situación de aprendizaje es más compleja. Los estudiantes no evidenciaron un alto nivel de adherencia a las aseveraciones planteadas en el CEVEAPEU. Por tanto, se logra un aprendizaje significativo receptivo que no fomenta la transferencia de aprendizajes(AU)


Introduction: One obstacle faced by the student of Dental Medicine is the difficulty to interrelate the knowledge they have learned separately during the first two years of study, making it difficult to transfer learning to recognize the multi-causality of factors present at the time of providing comprehensive treatment to the patient. Scientific evidence show that one way to achieve this is for the student to possess cognitive and metacognitive strategies that allow significant learning. Objective: To determine the level of cognitive and metacognitive strategies present in the dental students of Universidad de Concepción. Methods: Mixed methodology, of descriptive and cross-sectional type. A qualitative approach through semi-structured interviews, and quantitative approach through the application of the Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Learning Strategies of University Students (CEVEAPEU). 117 students participated who attended the third academic year between 2016 and 2017. Results: Qualitatively speaking, the students highlighted several positive aspects in the subject; however, they point out the need to incorporate tools that encourage their participation and curiosity, as well as increasing opportunities to integrate what they have learned. They reported that they use a wide variety of learning strategies. This showed a significant receptive learning that does not encourage the transfer of learning types. Quantitatively speaking, there was a high dispersion in the answers, both for cognitive and metacognitive strategies, as well as a trend of 4 (agreed) for most questions. The students were shown not to ensure a high level of adherence to their stated assertions. Conclusions: the students reported that they use a wide variety of learning strategies, but they do not adapt them when the learning situation is more complex. It was shown that students do not ensure a high level of adherence to the assertions made in the CEVEAPEU. Therefore, receptive significant learning is achieved that (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Students, Dental , Transfer, Psychology , Education, Dental/methods , Learning , Chile , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies
4.
Psicol. reflex. crit ; 28(1): 1-10, Jan-Mar/2015. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-736159

ABSTRACT

Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar as características psicométricas da escala "Estratégias para Aplicação no Trabalho do Aprendido em Treinamento" por meio da teoria de resposta ao item. Com um banco de dados secundário composto por 1241 participantes, foram calibrados dezoito itens, por meio do uso do modelo de resposta gradual. Dez itens pertencem à subescala Estratégias Comportamentais e oito à subescala Estratégias Cognitivo-afetivas. Os resultados sugerem que ambas as subescalas apresentaram boa acuracidade nos seus intervalos especialmente válidos, com nível de informação de moderado a alto. O instrumento apresenta evidências de validade de construto adequadas. Pode ser utilizado em pesquisas futuras, notadamente no campo da psicologia organizacional e do trabalho.


This study aimed to analyze the psychometric features of the "Strategies for Implementation at Work of Learning at Training" scale through the Item Response Theory. With a secondary database composed of 1,241 participants, eighteen items were calibrated by using the gradual response model. Ten items belong to the Behavioral Strategies subscale and eight to the Cognitive-affective Strategies subscale. The results suggest good accuracy for both subscales, especially in their valid ranges, with an informational level from moderate to high. The instrument shows appropriate evidence of construct validity. It may be used in future research, especially in the field of organizational and work psychology.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Psychometrics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Mentoring , Work
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL