Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 81(5): 533-540, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-766282

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Mucosal leishmaniosis (ML) is a severe clinical form of leishmaniosis. Complex factors related to the parasite and the host are attributed to the development of mucosal lesions. Leishmania RNA virus 1 (LRV1) can disrupt immune response, and may be the main determinant of severity of the disease; it should be investigated. OBJECTIVE: To study the existence of clinical differences between patients with ML with endosymbiosis by LRV1 and. those without it. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study with clinical evaluation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of Leishmania, species classification, and search of LRV1 was performed. Only patients with confirmed diagnosis of ML by positive PCR and with nasal mucosa injuries were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Out of 37 patients, 30 (81.1%) were diagnosed with Leishmania braziliensis, five (13.5%) with Leishmania guyanensis, and two (5.4%) with mixed infection of L. braziliensis and L. guyanensis. LVR1 virus was present in 26 (70.3%) of the cases. CONCLUSION: Correlation between clinical phenotype and presence of LRV1 was not observed, although the frequency of the virus is two-fold higher in mucosal lesions than that found in the literature on skin lesions in the same geographical area.


RESUMO Introdução: A leishmaniose de mucosa (LM) é uma forma clínica grave da leishmaniose. Fatores complexos ligados ao parasita e ao hospedeiro são atribuídos ao desenvolvimento das lesões de mucosa. Leishmania RNA Vírus 1 (LRV1) pode subverter a resposta imune, podendo ser o principal determinante da gravidade da doença e deve ser pesquisado. Objetivo: Estudar a existência de diferenças clínicas entre pacientes portadores de LM com endosimbiose por LRV1 e as que não possuem. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo de coorte histórica com corte transversal com avaliação clínica, detecção da Leishmania por técnica de PCR, classificação da espécie e pesquisa de LRV1. Foram incluídos na análise da pesquisa somente os pacientes com diagnóstico confirmado de LM com PCR positivo, com lesão de mucosa nasal. Resultados: Dos 37 pacientes, 30 (81,1%) foram diagnosticados com L. braziliensis, 5 (13,5%) com L. guyanensis e 2 (5,4%) com infecção mista de L. braziliensis e L. guyanensis. O vírus LVR1 estava presente em 26 casos (70,3%). Conclusão: A correlação entre o fenótipo clínico e a presença do LRV1 não foi constatada, porém a frequência do vírus é duas vezes maior em lesão de mucosa do que encontrado em trabalho, da mesma região, sobre lesão cutânea.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Leishmania/virology , Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous/virology , Leishmaniavirus/genetics , Nasal Mucosa/parasitology , RNA Viruses/genetics , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Leishmania/classification , Leishmaniasis, Mucocutaneous/genetics , Phenotype , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Experimental & Molecular Medicine ; : 145-156, 2004.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-37854

ABSTRACT

In this study, Leishmania RNA virus 1-4 (LRV1-4) particles purified from host Leishmania guyanensis promastigotes were examined for capsid endoribonuclease. Temperature optimum for the endoribonulease activity was found to be at 37degrees C to 42degrees C and the activity was specifically inhibited by the aminoglycoside antibiotics, neomycin, kanamycin, and hygromycin and by 100 mM levels of NaCl or KCl. To determine the catalytic domain of the capsid endoribonuclease activity, three point-mutation at cysteine residues at C47S (P1), C128/ 133S (P2), and C194R (P3) were prepared and each gene was constructed into baculoviruses and expressed in Sf9 insect cells. LRV1-4 capsid N- terminus (N2 and N3) and C-terminus (C1 and C2) deletion mutants (Cadd et al., 1994) were also examined by in vitro RNA cleavage assay. The results showed that the capsid mutants; C1, C2, N3, P1, and P2 were capable of forming proper virus-like particles (VLPs) and they all possessed the specific endoribonuclease activity. However, two assembly-defective capsid mutants, N2 (N- terminus 24-amino acids deletion) and P3 mutants, did not retain the specific endoribonuclease activity. Taken together, the results suggest that at least 24 amino acids from the N-terminal region and C194 residue in LRV1-4 capsid protein are functionally important for LRV1-4 viral assembly and the capsid endoribonuclease activity may be dependent upon the properly assembled LRV1-4 virus particles.


Subject(s)
Animals , Amino Acid Substitution , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Baculoviridae , Capsid/enzymology , Cell Line , Cysteine/genetics , Endoribonucleases/antagonists & inhibitors , Enzyme Activation/drug effects , Hot Temperature , Insecta , Leishmania guyanensis/virology , RNA/chemistry , RNA Viruses/enzymology , Recombinant Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Substrate Specificity/genetics , Transduction, Genetic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL