ABSTRACT
Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy has become one of the therapeutic measures for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which has been proven to bring both minimally invasive and survival benefits to patients from both surgical and oncological perspectives. More than 80% of HCC patients in China are complicated with cirrhosis, and the liver reserve function is impaired. Tumors often grow across liver segments or involve multiple segments. However, the application of tradi-tional laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy is limited due to the large volume of liver resection, which is prone to lead to postoperative liver failure. Based on the bio-oncological characteristics of HCC and the limitations of traditional laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy, the concept and practice of laparoscopic limited anatomical hepatectomy (LLAH) came into being. LLAH, also known as hepatic parenchyma-preserving anatomical hepatectomy, is based on the tumor lesion as the center, the portal territory with tumor as the reference plane, and anatomical relationship between tumor location and the sub-hepatic segment or hepatic segment as the principle to remove the tumor and its subsegment or hepatic segmental portal territory. Its core concept is to maximize the preser-vation of functional liver parenchyma on the premise of ensuring oncological resection. The main surgical procedures of LLAH include anatomical subsegmental resection, segmentectomy and combined subsegmental/segmental resection with preservation of liver parenchyma. Its main indica-tion is small or micro hepatocellular carcinoma located between subsegments/segments. Navigation technologies such as three-dimensional visualization, laparo-scopic ultrasound, and indocyanine green fusion fluorescence are used to achieve anatomical hepatectomy with tumor and its oncolo-gical safety margin as the center through the splicing and combination of multiple subsegments/segments. The purpose of resection of the liver tissue in the portal territory with tumor and preser-vation of the functional liver structure and volume are achieved to the maximum extent after LLAH. At present, LLAH for HCC is still in the exploratory stage, and its long-term oncology results need to be further studied. However, with technological progress and concept update, LLAH will surely become the core method for minimally invasive and precise treatment of HCC. Combined with related researches at at home and abroad, the authors describe the concept and development, theoretical and technical supports, oncological safety and development trends of LLAH.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the effect of extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) of the Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ and Ⅳ.Methods The clinical data of 73 patients with HCCA of the Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ and Ⅳ treated in our department from January,2008 to June,2016 were analyzed retrospectively.The extended hepatectomy group of patients consisted of 29 patients who underwent hepatectomy with half or more than half of the liver removed or/and combined with hepatic caudate lobectomy.The limited hepatectomy group consisted of 44 patients who underwent non-anatomical hepatectomy around the hepatic hilar region.Results Compared with the limited hepatectomy group,patients in the extended hepatectomy group had significantly longer operations with significantly more intraoperative blood loss.However,the complication rate was significantly lower than that of the limited hepatectomy group.There was no perioperative death in the extended hepatectomy group,while 3 perioperative deaths occurred in the limited hepatectomy group.The R0 resection rate was 93.1％ (27 of 29) for the extended hepatectomy group,while it was 54.6％ (24 of 44) for the limited hepatectomy group (P＜0.05).The 1-,3-and 5-year survival rates or the extended hepatectomy group were 81.4％,51.4％ and 19.3％,respectively while the corresponding rates for the limited hepatectomy group were 70.5％,24.4％ and 8.7％,respectively (P＜0.05).Conclusions After adequate preoperative radiological assessments on tumor resectability,and the residual liver volumes,with preoperative biliary drainage to improve liver function,extended hepatectomy effectively increased R0 resection and survival rates with improved prognosis for patients with HCCA of Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ and Ⅳ.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) of Bismuth-Cor-lette typesⅢandⅣ(the longitudinal invasion degree along the biliary system is the main criteria). Methods:The clinical data of 61 patients with HCCA of Bismuth-Corlette types III and IV admitted in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the First Affiliated Hos-pital of Bengbu Medical College from January 2008 to May 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Among the 61 cases, 22 underwent hepatectomy with half or over half of the liver removed or hepatic caudate lobectomy (regarded as the extended hepatectomy group), whereas 39 cases underwent irregular hepatectomy on the hepatic hilar region (regarded as the limited hepatectomy group). Results:Compared with those in the limited hepatectomy group, the patients in the extended hepatectomy group underwent longer duration of operation and experienced more bleeding during the procedure. The complication incidence rate for the extended hepatectomy group was lower than that for the limited hepatectomy group. No patient died during the perioperative period in the extended hepa-tectomy group, whereas two patients died in the limited hepatectomy group. Moreover, R0 resection was performed on 21 cases in the extended hepatectomy group, with a resection rate of (21/22) 95.5%, and on 20 cases in the limited hepatectomy group (P<0.05), with a resection rate of (20/39) 51.3%. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 77.27%, 36.36%, and 13.64%, respectively, in the extended hepatectomy group, and 69.23%, 20.51%, and 1.64%, respectively, in the limited hepatectomy group (P<0.05). Conclusion:Extended hepatectomy for patients with HCCA of Bismuth-Corlette typesⅢandⅣcould effectively increase the resection rates of R0 and the survival rate. Meanwhile, the prognosis of patients could be improved.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Though major hepatic resections including hemihepatectomy, trisectionectomy, and central bisectionectomy are most commonly employed for small (<5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), limited hepatic resection is indicated in some HCC patients with impaired liver function, poor physical condition, or tumors peripherally located. We compared the clinicopathological features and long-term survival between the patients who underwent major resection and limited resection. METHODS: From January 1998 to May 2007, 223 patients who underwent hepatic resection for small HCC were enrolled. 123 patients underwent limited resection and 100 patients underwent major resection. Clinocopathologic features, overall, and disease-free survival were compared between both groups. RESULTS: The limited resection group had lower mean serum albumin levels (3.86+/-0.41 vs. 4.11+/-3.61, P<0.0001) and higher mean ICG R15 (12.66+/-0.87 vs. 7.51+/-4.33, P<0.0001). Patients with esophageal varix and liver cirrhosis were more common in the limited resection group (34.1% and 73.1% versus 9% and 45% respectively). Morbidity and mortality were not different in both groups. Overall 1-, 3-, 5-year survivals in both limited resection and major resection groups were 89.4%, 77.3%, 43.8% and 87.8%, 76.5%, 62.1% respectively (P=0.161) and 1-, 3-, 5-year disease free survivals were 80.2%, 50.2%, 38.6% and 79.9%, 63.2%, 50.4% respectively (P=0.10). CONCLUSION: Despite indifference of overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates between limited and major resection groups, careful follow up is essential to detect late recurrence in the limited resection group, since limited resection tends to have more frequent recurrence, especially 2 years after surgery.