Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection ; (12): 209-215, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-993075

ABSTRACT

Objective:To calculate the single-event dose-averaged specific energy of particles delivered in spherical domains based on the track structure model and using triple integration, and to investigate the influence of the domain shape on the key model parameters of microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) and its corresponding physical significance.Methods:The domains are assumed to be cylinders and spheres, respectively. With α 0, domain radius, rd, and nucleus radius, Rn, as undetermined coefficients, the nuclear charge numbers, kinetic energies and their corresponding LETs of three kinds of charged particles ( 3He, 12C, 20Ne) as independent variables, D10 as dependent variable, the mean value of squared residuals, J2, between the D10 calculated values and D10 experimental values as the optimization objective, the final fitting values of the above undetermined coefficients of human salivary gland (HSG) cells and Chinese hamster lung (V79) cells obtained after iteration by the robust least square method are the optimal model parameter values of MKM. Results:For HSG cells, cylindrical domain: α 0=0.073/Gy, rd=0.29 μm, Rn=4.1 μm, J2=0.039 7 Gy 2; spherical domain: α 0=0.023/Gy, rd=0.29 μm, Rn=4.4 μm, J2=0.039 3 Gy 2; For V79 cells, cylindrical domain: α 0=0.114/Gy, rd=0.25 μm, Rn=3.8 μm, J2=0.097 4 Gy 2; spherical domain: α 0=0.095/Gy, rd=0.26 μm, Rn=4.1 μm, J2=0.096 9 Gy 2. Conclusions:For the same type of cells, cylindrical and spherical domains were selected respectively, and there are significant differences in MKM parameters obtained by fitting. The fitting values of the domain radius, rd of the two shapes of domains show no significant difference, while the fitting values of α0 of spherical domains are smaller than those of cylindrical domains, the fitting values of nucleus radius, Rn, of spherical domain are larger than those of cylindrical domains, closer to the nucleus radius observed by fluorescence microscopy. In the low LET (<20 keV/μm) region, D10 calculated according to the parameters of the two different shapes of domains are different, so the selection of the domain shape will cause differences in the relative biological effectiveness(RBE) calculation of proton in the region near Bragg peak.

2.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection ; (12): 265-270, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-910305

ABSTRACT

Objective:To assess proton biological dose with using two kinds of relative biological effect models and to compare them with traditional clinical proton biological dose ( Dose1.1). Methods:Based on Particle simulation tools(TOPAS), physical dose, LET d and LET t were calculated in water phantom and two anthropomorphic phantoms (brain and prostate tumors) respectively. Then DoseLET d and DoseLET t were calculated according to different relative biological effect models, an RBE was 1.1 in traditional clinical proton biological dose calculation. Three kinds of biological doses were compared in the water phantom. To quantify the differences between three method in anthropomorphic phantoms, three points ( D1, D2, D3) were selected according to the physical dose to compare the biological dose. Results:DoseLET d and DoseLET t in water phantom showed the same trend with water depth and both of them were higher than Dose1.1 at the end of proton beam range. The maximal difference between DoseLET d and DoseLET t in the anthropomorphic phantoms was 10.08 cGy, where the relative difference was less than 5%. When DoseLET d and DoseLET t were compared with Dose1.1, the maximal differences in brain tumor target were 71.97 cGy and 61.91 cGy respectively, where the relative differences were less than 25%. The maximal differences in prostate tumor target were 25.95 and 19.96 cGy respectively, where the relative differences were less than 12%. However, the differences outside the target were very small, where the maximal differences in brain and prostate tumors were 5.99 cGy and 9.92 cGy respectively, and the relative differences were less than 5%. Conclusions:Biological doses calculated by two method are of little difference in both water and anthropomorphic phantoms, however, large differences were observed when they were compared with the traditional clinical proton biological dose especially in the high dose area.

3.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection ; (12): 531-535, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-422442

ABSTRACT

Objective To establish the dose-effect curves of chromosome aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes induced by different LET rays,including 60Co γ-rays,252Cf neutrons,14MeV neutrons and 12C heavy ions at low doses,respectively,in order to assess radiation-induced damages after occupational and accidental exposure.Methods Heparinized whole blood samples were irradiated with the various radiation devices and doses ranged from 0 to 1 Gy with the interval of 0.25 Gy.Conventional chromosome culture method was applied with adding colchicines at the beginning and chromosome specimens were prepared after 48 h incubation.The Metafer scanning system was used for automatical finder of chromosome metaphases.The mathematic models were fitted according to aberration data obtained.Results At the dose range of 0 - 1 Gy,the math models of dic + r were linear for 60 Co γrays and linear-quadratics for 252 Cf neutrons,14 MeV neutrons and 12 C heavy ions.The models of ace were linear-quadratic for 60Co γ-rays and 12C heavy ion beams,and linear for 252Cf and 14 MeV neutrons.The models of total aberrations were linear-quadratic for all types of radiation.Conclusions High LET rays have higher biological effects in inducing chromosome aberrations yields compared with low LET rays.Moreover,the severity of damage is 252Cf > 14 MeV neutrons > 12C heavy ions > 60Co γ-rays in turn.Therefore,in the range of low doses,the dic + r may be a better target of radiation damage for high LET radiation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL