ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze and compare the clinical indicators and the liver failure-related prognostic score of patients with amanita phalloides poisoning with different prognoses, and to explore potential prognostic indicators.Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinical data of 52 patients with amanita phalloides poisoning admitted to the department of emergency of Xijing Hospital Affiliated to Air Force Medical University from September 2016 to September 2021 were collected, including general information (gender, age), clinical indicators at admission [mean arterial pressure (MAP), total bilirubin (TBil), aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), albumin (ALB), serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatine kinase (CK), D-dimer, fibrinogen degradation product (FDP), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin activity (PTA), international normalized ratio (INR), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT)], liver failure-related prognostic score [sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), chronic liver failure (CLIF)-SOFA score, European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure-organ failure (CLIF-C OF)], and 28-day outcome. The clinical indicators and liver failure-related prognostic scores of the patients with different prognoses were compared. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to determine the prognostic value of statistically significant indicators between different prognosis of patients with amanita poisoning.Results:A total of 45 patients were enrolled, of which 38 survived and 7 died within 28 days. The coagulation indicators including PT, APTT, INR, and liver failure-related prognostic scores including SOFA score, CLIF-SOFA score, and CLIF-C OF score in the patients of death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group [PT (s): 69.59±15.94 vs. 25.99±4.64, APTT (s): 83.44±17.82 vs. 42.64±3.79, INR: 6.13±1.47 vs. 2.07±0.33, SOFA score: 11.57±1.38 vs. 6.03±0.77, CLIF-SOFA score: 9.86±2.17 vs. 5.55±0.67, CLIF-C OF score: 11.71±0.97 vs. 8.37±0.35], and PLT was significantly lowered (×10 9/L: 80.57±29.65 vs. 169.60±11.80, all P < 0.05). ROC curves showed that coagulation indicators including PT, APTT, INR, PLT, and liver failure-related prognostic scores including SOFA score and CLIF-C OF score were associated with the prognosis of patients with amanita phalloides poisoning, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of > 0.75. The sensitivity of the clinical indicators was above 85%, and the AUC and specificity of INR were the highest, which were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 0.74-1.00] and 83.0%, respectively; meanwhile, the sensitivity of the liver failure-related prognostic scores was 100%, and the AUC and specificity of the CLIF-C OF score were the highest, which were 0.86 (95% CI was 0.74-0.99) and 66.0%, respectively. Conclusion:INR and CLIF-C OF score can be used to evaluate the poor prognosis of patients with amanita phalloides poisoning.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of donor risk index (DRI) on the early prognosis of liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Methods Clinical data of 159 ACLF recipients undergoing liver transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. According to the calculation formula of DRI, all recipients were divided into DRI < 1.65 group (n=96) and DRI≥1.65 group (n=63). Based on the Chronic Liver Failure Consortium acute-on-chronic liver failure score (CLIF-C ACLFs), all recipients were divided into CLIF-C ACLFs < 48 group (n=78) and CLIF-C ACLFs≥48 group (n=81). The early prognosis indexes including the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the length of postoperative hospital stay of the recipients in each group were observed after liver transplantation. The 90 dsurvival rate of the recipients after liver transplantation was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The risk factors affecting the early prognosis of ACLF recipients after liver transplantation were analyzed by Cox's hazards regression model. Results The length of ICU stay and the length of postoperative hospital stay did not significantly differ between the DRI < 1.65 group and DRI≥1.65 group (both P > 0.05). The length of postoperative hospital stay did not significantly differ between the CLIF-C ACLFs < 48 group and CLIF-C ACLFs≥48 group (P > 0.05). The length of ICU stay in the CLIF-C ACLFs < 48 group was 4 (3-14) d, significantly shorter than 7 (1-33) d in the CLIF-C ACLFs≥48 group (P < 0.05). The CLIF-C ACLFs was a risk factor of the early prognosis of ACLF recipients after liver transplantation (P < 0.05). The postoperative 90 d survival rate did not significantly differ between the DRI < 1.65 group and DRI≥1.65 group (P > 0.05). The postoperative 90 d survival rate in the CLIF-C ACLFs < 48 group was 94%, significantly higher than 79% in the CLIF-C ACLFs≥48 group (P < 0.05). Conclusions The early prognosis of ACLF recipients after liver transplantation is correlated with the severity of the disease rather than the DRI. Liver transplantation should be performed early and promptly.