Angiotomografía renal en el donante vivo y su correlación con la ablación quirúrgica / Computed tomography renal angiography of living donors and its correlation with surgery

Objetivos: Determinar la precisión de la angiotomografía renal (ATR) en la evaluación del sistema arterial y las variantes anatómicas en el donante vivo, con la correlación con su ablación quirúrgica. Materiales y métodos: Se evaluaron retrospectivamente los pacientes sometidos a nefrectomía laparoscópica como donantes vivos renales y sus ATR, entre 2014 y 2016 en nuestra Institución. Se utilizó análisis estadístico descriptivo para presentar los resultados. En la ATR se evaluaron: número de arterias renales principales, presencia y número de arterias polares y alteraciones del calibre de la arteria renal. Resultados: Se incluyeron 21 pacientes sometidos a nefrectomía laparoscópica como donantes vivos, 10 mujeres y 11 hombres (entre 23 y 61 años). En todos los casos se realizó la ablación del riñón izquierdo. De los 21 pacientes analizados, 15 no presentaron variantes anatómicas ni alteraciones del calibre en la ATR (una arteria renal principal, sin polares). Estos mismos hallazgos se certificaron en la ablación. En un caso, la ATR observó doble arteria renal principal con el mismo hallazgo quirúrgico; y en tres casos la ATR reconoció una única arteria polar, las cuales se corroboraron en la ablación. En estos 19 casos se demostró correlación entre la ATR y la ablación, con una precisión del 90,4% En los 2 casos restantes, hubo discrepancias. Conclusión: El conocimiento detallado del sistema arterial es necesario para la planificación quirúrgica de la nefrectomía laparoscópica del donante vivo renal. La angiotomografía renal constituye el método de elección para su evaluación, demostrando muy buena correlación entre sus hallazgos y los de la ablación.

Objective: To determine the accuracy of computed tomography renal angiography (CTRA) in the assessment and diagnosis of arterial vascular anatomy of the kidney and its variations in living kidney donors, with its correlation in harvesting kidneys. Materials and methods: Patients who had undergone laparoscopic nephrectomy as living kidney donors and their CTRA were retrospectively evaluated between 2014 and 2016 in our institution. Results are presented using statistical descriptive analysis. The following were assessed in the CTRA report: number of main renal arteries, presence and number of accessory polar arteries, and anomalies related to renal artery calibre. Results: Of the 21 patients that had undergone laparoscopic nephrectomy as living donors, there were 10 female and 11 male donors (age range 23 - 61 years). Renal harvesting included left kidney in all cases. In 15 cases, no anatomical variations or arterial renal dilations were found in computed tomography renal angiography (CTRA): (one main renal artery, without accessories arteries). The same findings were certified during the surgery. In one case CTRA showed a double renal artery, and the same finding occurred in the surgical harvesting; and three cases in which one single polar accessory artery was certified at surgery. An overall accuracy of 90.4% for CTRA was obtained in 19 cases. In the remaining 2 cases, a discrepancy was found. Conclusion: Detailed knowledge of the renal arterial anatomy is important for the preoperative evaluation of the laparoscopic nephrectomy in living renal donors. Computed tomography renal angiography (CTRA) is the technique of choice for these patients, as it demonstrates a high correlation between tomography findings and surgery harvesting.

CT Angiography for Living Kidney Donors: Accuracy, Cause of Misinterpretation and Prevalence of Variation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the use of multi-detector row CT (MDCT) to predict vascular anatomy in living kidney donors and to reveal the prevalence of vascular variations in a Korean population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 153 living kidney donors that had undergone preoperative CT and nephrectomy, either with open or laparoscopic surgery, were selected retrospectively. The initial CT results were compared with the surgical findings and repeated review sessions of CT scans were performed to determine the causes of mismatches in discordant cases. RESULTS: The accuracy of CT angiography was 95% to predict the number of renal vessels. Four arteries and two veins were missed during the initial CT interpretation due to perception errors (for two arteries and two veins) and technical limitations (two arteries). The prevalence of multiple renal arteries and veins, early branching of a renal artery and late confluence of a renal vein were 31%, 5%, 12%, 17%, respectively. The circumaortic renal vein and the bilateral inferior vena cava were found in two cases each (1.3%). One case (0.7%) each of a retroaortic renal vein and a supradiaphragmatic originated renal artery were found. CONCLUSION: MDCT provides a reliable method to evaluate the vascular anatomy and variations of living kidney donors.

El estudio del donador vivo para trasplante renal / Evaluation of the living kidney donor

Currently, due to the deficit of cadaveric tissues available for transplantation and due to the long waiting list for a kidney transplant, there is a clear tendency towards living donor kidney transplantations. Most donors are genetically related. Living donation should be considered a gift of extraordinary value, and should be made easy whenever a suitable donor is available. Worldwide, the number of patients on the waiting lists for a kidney transplantation has increased, in the last decades. Renal transplantation with living donor kidneys, is currently considered the best treatment for patients with end stage renal failure, due to the improved short and long term survival benefits over dialysis treatment. Since considerable difference exist between countries in the evaluation and selection criteria for kidney donors, especially in selected patients such as older donors and those with associated comorbid conditions, it is necessary to discuss and establish minimal selection criteria for this cases. A common trend includes a complete clinical record, laboratory and radiologic evaluation which are described in detail in this paper. We also discuss the increasing acceptance of older kidney donors as well as the acceptance of individuals with comorbidities (such as obesity, hipertensión, hyperglucemia, lithiasis and cancer) that were previously considered as not eligible for kidney donation.

Actualmente, por la falta de órganos para trasplante renal provenientes de cadáveres, y debido al largo tiempo de espera por un riñón, existe una tendencia a realizar trasplantes renales utilizando riñones procedentes de donadores vivos. La mayoría de los donadores son familiares del receptor. La donación de órganos debe considerarse como un regalo con un valor extraordinario y debe facilitarse a los candidatos a donación. En todo el mundo se ha observado un aumento en el número de personas en la lista de espera para un trasplante renal. El trasplante renal de donador vivo se considera actualmente como el mejor método de tratamiento en pacientes con insuficiencia renal terminal, debido a que ofrece la mayor supervivencia a corto y largo plazos. En vista de que existen diferencias significativas en los criterios de selección y evaluación de donadores renales, en especial en un grupo selecto de pacientes añosos o con enfermedades asociadas, es indispensable establecer criterios mínimos de selección. Todos los donadores deberán contar con una historia clínica completa y exámenes de laboratorio y gabinete que permitan su evaluación integral. Estos estudios se describen con detalle en este artículo. También se discuten los criterios para donadores renales con ciertas comorbilidades (obesos, hipertensos, hiperglucémicos, con litiasis y neoplasias) que previamente se descartaban como candidatos para donación.