ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze relevant factors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia residual or recurrence after loop electri‐cal excision procedure(LEEP) .Methods We observed the patients who were histopathologically confirmed CIN and treated with LEEP in our hospital from January 2006 to September 2012 ,and investigated the postoperative residual and recurrence .Then we an‐alysed relevant factors of residual or recurrence .Results (1)After at least 2 years of follow‐up ,26 cases showed residual or recur‐rence(the residual rate was 0 .97% and the recurrence rate was 4 .08% ) .(2)Overall severity of residual or recurrence had been re‐duced ,but the severity and recurrence of preoperative severity was positively correlated(r=0 .354 0 ,P<0 .05) .(3)Age ,smoking , preoperative high‐risk HPV load ,post‐operative the same type of HPV continuous infection ,endocervical involvement ,lesions in‐vo1ving quadrants ,and post‐operative TCT results between the recurrence group and non‐recurrence group were statistically signifi‐cant different(P<0 .05) .Conclusion CIN residual or recurrence after LEEP might be affected by many factors ,and the treatment should be individualized .
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We have retrospectively assessed the incidence and outcome of women diagnosed during a hospital-based cytology screening program with "atypical squamous cells (ASC)" and followed-up with loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP). METHODS: We analyzed 173,947 cases of cervical smears' follow-up cytology and histology findings. Previous or archival cytology with LEEP results were retrieved for 390 women with ASC of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and 112 with ASC, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H). RESULTS: On the follow-up cytology, of the 390 women initially diagnosed with ASC-US, 130 (33.3%) had no follow-up records of smears before LEEP; smears of 18 (4.6%) were negative for cytologic abnormalities, 193 (49.5%) were ASC-US, 24 (6.2%) were ASC-H, 111 (28.5%) were low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL), and 44 (11.4%) were high grade SIL. LEEP findings in these 390 women showed that 183 (46.9%) were negative, 73 (18.7%) were graded as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, 25 (6.4%) as CIN 2, 102 (26.2%) as CIN 3, and 7 (1.8%) had carcinoma. LEEP was performed in 112 women initially diagnosed with ASC-H; 36 (32.1%) were negative, 4 (3.6%) were graded as CIN 1, 7 (6.3%) as CIN 2, 60 (53.6%) as CIN 3, and 5 (4.5%) with carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ASC-H smears were at increased risk of SIL or carcnoma compared with patients with ASC-US. Careful follow-up is required in ASC patients.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Cervix Uteri , Follow-Up Studies , Incidence , Mass Screening , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of transcervical resection(TCRC) and loop electrical excision procedure(LEEP) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic cervicitis.MethodsFrom January 2003 to July 2006,totally 520 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic cervicitis were randomly divided into two groups to receive TCRC or LEEP.ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss in the TCRC group was significantly less than that in the LEEP group [(4.2?1.3) ml vs(10.1?4.5) ml,t=-20.310,P=0.000].Whereas,no significantly differences were found in the drainage and bleeding time and cure rates between the two groups [(15.9? 3.7) d vs(16.2? 3.3) d,t=-0.976,P=0.330;and 95.2%(236/248) vs 93.2%(235/252),?2=0.832,P=0.362].ConclusionsBoth TCRC and LEEP are effective for chronic cervicitis.TCRC is superior to LEEP in the surgical outcomes;however the latter is easier to perform than TCRC.