Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
The Korean Journal of Pain ; : 123-128, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-23574

ABSTRACT

Phantom limb pain is a phenomenon in which patients experience pain in a part of the body that no longer exists. In several treatment modalities, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been introduced for the management of intractable post-amputation pain. A 46-year-old male patient complained of severe ankle and foot pain, following above-the-knee amputation surgery on the right side amputation surgery three years earlier. Despite undergoing treatment with multiple modalities for pain management involving numerous oral and intravenous medications, nerve blocks, and pulsed radiofrequency (RF) treatment, the effect duration was temporary and the decreases in the patient's pain score were not acceptable. Even the use of SCS did not provide completely satisfactory pain management. However, the trial lead positioning in the cauda equina was able to stimulate the site of the severe pain, and the patient's pain score was dramatically decreased. We report a case of successful pain management with spinal cauda equina stimulation following the failure of SCS in the treatment of intractable phantom limb pain.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Amputation, Surgical , Ankle , Cauda Equina , Foot , Nerve Block , Pain Management , Phantom Limb , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Spinal Cord
2.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 854-858, 1999.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-40839

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidural adhesion can cause pain from compression and irritation of nerves. But a simple injection into the lumbar epidural space usually goes into the area of least resistance and cannot deliver the medication to the target area. Thus, the adhesiolysis of the affected area is sometimes mandatory. We performed an adhesiolysis, irrigating with normal saline, and targeted an injection of a local anesthetic and steroid mixture to the epidural space, using a flexible catheter-secured epiduroscopic unit in 15 patients with low back pain, and assessed the pain score changes. METHODS: With the patient in the prone position, the epidural space was entered with a 17-gauge Tuohy needle. A guide-wire was inserted through the needle and advanced under fluoroscopic guidance to the level of the suspected pathology. A catheter was then advanced over the guide-wire. After the removal of the guide-wire, an adapter was then attached to the proximal end of the catheter, and its side arm was connected to a syringe containing normal saline flush. The 0.9 mm diameter fiberoptic scope was introduced into the catheter via the adaptor, and a video camera was then attached. Gentle irrigation of normal saline less than 50 ml distended the epidural space. The catheter and fiberoptic scope were advanced to the adhesion area and adhesiolysis was done by moving the tip of the steering catheter. Assuming that original NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) before the procedure was 10, we asked the NRS at 1, 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks after the epiduroscope. RESULTS: NRS at 1, 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks after the epiduroscope showed significant decrease of both low back pain and radiating pain, compared with the original pain (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The flexible catheter-secured epiduroscopic unit proved to be painless, safe, and more simple, than an operation, it is, thus, a practical method for pain relief using adhesiolysis and irrigation of epidural space under the direct visualization of the epidural space in patients with low back and lower extremity pain.


Subject(s)
Humans , Arm , Catheters , Epidural Space , Low Back Pain , Lower Extremity , Needles , Pathology , Prone Position , Syringes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL