ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the cause of misdiagnosis of neck, shoulder, waist, and leg pain caused by bone metastases and to improve the outpatient diagnosis rate.Methods:Five misdiagnosed cases of bone metastases who were admitted to the Traditional Chinese Medicine Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University from January 2019 to July 2020 were included in this study. Their clinical manifestations, diagnosis results (outside hospital diagnosis and outpatient diagnosis), and imaging manifestations were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Five cases of bone metastases were misdiagnosed to have cervical spondylosis, lumbar disc herniation, femoral head necrosis, femoral shaft fracture, and ankle sprain. Accelerated red blood cell sedimentation rate and increased C-reactive protein level were found in all five cases. Bone metastases were confirmed by X-ray, CT, and MRI examination results. All of them had warning signs for bone metastasis: age > 50 years, history of a tumor, unexplained weight loss, general malaise, neck, shoulder, waist, and leg pain without an obvious cause, sudden worsening of pain, night pain, resting pain, pain on direct palpation, no obvious improvements in these symptoms after symptomatic treatment for 1 month, disease development not conforming to the general law of cervical spondylosis, lumbar disc herniation, femoral head necrosis, femoral shaft fracture, and ankle sprain, increases in red blood cell sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and alkaline phosphatase levels, which are not consistent with the symptoms of cervical spondylosis, lumbar disc herniation, femoral head necrosis, femoral shaft fracture, and ankle sprain, and slight external force leading to fractures.Conclusion:Further tests and imaging examinations should be performed according to warning signs. Clinical schemes of malignant bone tumors suitable for general practitioners can easily, economically, and effectively identify malignant bone tumors.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the efficacy of Tuina combined hot compress in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).Methods:A total of 90 patients with LDH low back and leg pain in Shijiazhuang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from January 2019 to June 2020 were divided into two groups, 45 in each group. The control group was treated with Aceclofenac Sustained-release Tablets and Mecobalamin, and the observation group was treated with Tuina combined hot compress. Both groups were treated for 1 month and followed up 6 months. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain. The Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) was used to evaluate the recovery of lumbar function, and the improvement of daily activities of patients after treatment was evaluated. The conduction velocity of tibial nerve motor conduction velocity (TNMCV) and common peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity (CPNMCV) were measured by electromyography. The clinical effect was evaluated.Results:After 6 months of follow-up, the response rate of the observation group was 51.1% (23/45) and that of the control group was 28.9% (13/45) ( χ2=3.98, P=0.046). The VAS score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group ( t=11.26, P<0.01). The ODI scores at 1 month after treatment and 6 months after follow-up were significantly lower than those in the control group ( t values were 7.19, 18.30, respectively, all Ps<0.001). The observation group 1 month after CPNMCV treatment and 6 months of follow-up ( t=2.08, 1.99), 1 month after TNMCV treatment and 6 months of follow-up ( t values were 2.46, 2.12, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the control group ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Tuina combined with hot compress can improve the nerve conduction velocity of lower limbs, relieve the symptoms of low back and leg pain in patients after LDH operation.
ABSTRACT
As a clinical diagnosis and treatment of low back pain,straight leg raising test has been used most commonly more than 100 years.It is simple and practical,and has a high clinical value.As a very mature orthopedic special examination,straight leg raising test progress in non-orthopedic applications more often than orthopedic aspects.Of course,the most important thing is the diagnosis of low back pain,followed by the treatment of low back pain,and then can be used as a respiratory and circulatory aspect of diagnosis and treatment options.This article elaborated the principle of straight leg raising test and the clinical research progress in order to give the clinician some guidance.
ABSTRACT
Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value of high-resolution CT reconstruction techniques on the same slice in hypertrophy of transverse process of the fifth lumbar vertebra (HTPL5V), and to provide a basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Materials and Methods Twenty-two cases of clinically diagnosed HTPL5V and 20 normal adults were examined with GE LightSpeed 16-slice spiral CT (36 cases) and Philips iCT 256-slice (6 cases). L5 transverse process and the fifth lumber nerve were reconstructed and observed on the workstations. Results In 22 cases of HTPL5V, there were 26 pseudarthrosis formation and 2 sides with L5 transverse process touching the sacral ala. In 28 sides the iffth lumber nerve traveled through false foramina of the HTPL5V including 6 cases of bilateral compression and 16 cases of unilateral compression. In 21 cases, the nerve was compressed by hyperosteogeny on 27 sides (96.4%) and 1 side due to stenosis (3.6%). On 25 sides (89.3%) the compressed nerves were curved in shaper. There was bulging and/or herniated lumbar disc on 9 sides in 7 cases (32.1%). Conclusion High-resolution CT reconstruction techniques can demonstrate the iffth lumbar nerve of HTPL5V and provide evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the concordance of MRI diagnosis for patients suspected of lumbar disk herniation by using Kappa statistic.Methods One hundred patients(48 males and 52 females)with lumbosaeral radicular pain,aged from 17 to 86(average 61).All patients underwent fast spin-echo T1 and T2 weighted imaging on a 3.0 T MR scanner and spine surface coil.Two radiologists(doctor A and doctor B)evaluated the lumbar disks from L3-4,L4-5.and L5-S1 in 50 out of the 100 patients independently.The presence of a bulging disk or a herniation was reported.Images were interpreted twice:once before and once after disclosure of clinical information.And disks of 52 patients out of the 100 samples were interpreted by the two radiologists independently without clinical information as well.The Kappa statistics was employed to assess the concordance of each radiologist's diagnoses as well as the observer variation of the two radiologists.Results Diagnoses before and after disclosure to clinical information were concordant in 114 disks for doctor A and in 109 for doctor B.respectively.Diagnoses before and after disclosure to clinical information were not concordant in 36 disks for doctor A and in 41 disks for doctor B,respectively.The Kappa values were 0.60±0.06 and 0.57±0.06 for doctor A and doctor B,respectively.The concordance was moderate.After disclosure to elinical information.the numbers of reported bulging disks increased significantly.by 10 and 31 for doctor A and doctor B,respectively.Without clinical information,the diagnoses of the two radiologists were concordant in 77 disks,while not concordant in 79 disks.The interobserver agreement was poor(Kappa=0.24±0.06).The diffcrence on diagenoses made between with and without clinical information mainly happened on the differential diagnosis of normal disks and bulging disks.The different,diagnoses made between with and without clinical information were on 20 disks and on 30 disks for doctor A and doctor B,respectively;that accounted for 55.6%(20/36)and 73.2%(30/41)of total variation respectively.The diagnostic difference between the 2 doctors happened mainly on differentiation of bulging disks and normal disks,which happened in 56 disks,aceountiong for 70.9%(56/79)of total variation.Conclusion Variation on diagnoses of the same radiologist or between tworadiologists was mainly caused by disagreement on bulging disks.