ABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: El objetivo final de la terapia endodóntica es la eliminación de microorganismos en el interior del conducto radicular. Algunas bacterias pueden sobrevivir a esta terapia; entre las comúnmente detectadas en fallas endodónticas se encuentra el E. faecalis. Los cementos biocerámicos se presentan como una alternativa eiciente en la terapia de endodoncia debido a su capacidad de sellado y sus propiedades antimicrobianas. Métodos: Estudio experimental in vitro, en el que se sembró la bacteria (E. faecalis) en una caja de Petri, se tomaron de 5 a 10 cepas y se disolvieron en caldo de Mueller Hinton, para luego depositar el inóculo más el cemento en diferentes concentraciones en una placa de 96 pozos y medir el nivel de absorbancia de cada muestra en un espectrofotómetro. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizaron las pruebas no paramétricas de Mann-Whitney y Kruskal Wallis. Resultados: Al comparar de dos en dos los datos obtenidos no se obtuvieron datos estadísticamente signiicativos, pero al comparar las diferentes concentraciones de ambos cementos se obtuvo que el cemento de Grossman al 2 % tiene mayor efecto antimicrobiano. Conclusión: No hay diferencia significativa en la actividad antimicrobiana del MTA Fillapex® y el cemento de Grossman contra el E. faecalis, pero al comparar el cemento de Grossman al 2 %, este tiene mayor efecto antimicrobiano en comparación con el mismo cemento a diversas concentraciones.
ABSTRACT Introduction: the ultimate aim of the root canal therapy is elimination or reduction of microorganisms in the root canal system. Although some bacteria can survive this therapy, among bacteria commonly detected in endodontic failure is E. faecalis. The bioceramic sealers are presented as an efficient alternative due its sealing capacity and antimicrobial properties. Methods: the research was experimental in vitro, where the bacteria (E. faecalis) was planted in a box perti, were taken from 5 to 10 strains and dissolved in broth Mueller Hinton then deposit inoculum more sealer at different concentrations in a 96 well plate and measuring the level of absorbance of each sample in a spectrophotometer. For statistical analysis, non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal Wallis were used. Results: when comparing two at the data no statistically significant data were obtained, but when comparing different concentrations of both sealers was obtained Grossman sealers 2% has greater antimicrobial effect. Conclusion: There is not significant difference in the antimicrobial activity of MTA Fillapex and Grossman cement against E. faecalis, but when comparing Grossman cement to 2%, this has a higher antimicrobial effect compared to the same cement at various concentrations.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Proper apical seal plays an important role in the success of root canal treatment. The most common cause of failure of root canal therapy is known as the lack of adequate apical seal. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the apical microleakage of MTA Fillapex, AH26, and Endofill sealers using dye penetration method. Material and Methods: In this in vitro study, 72 single-rooted extracted human teeth were selected. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups of 20 and two positive and negative control groups of 6. The canals were prepared by step-back technique and then filled with gutta-percha and one of the sealers mentioned. In the positive control group, the canals were filled with gutta-percha without sealer, and in the negative control group, the canals were prepared but not filled. The teeth were immersed in 2% methylene blue dye for 72 hours. The teeth were then cut longitudinally and the level of dye penetration was measured under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by SPSS ver. 19 software, ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests. Results: The mean level of dye penetration in the Endofill test group was significantly higher than that in the AH26 and MTA Fillapex test groups. While, the observed difference between AH26 and MTA Fillapex groups was not statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that AH26 and MTA Fillapex sealers did not show any significant difference in apical seal properties. However, their sealing strength was significantly greater than Endofill sealer. (AU)
Objetivo: O selamento apical adequado desempenha um papel importante no sucesso do tratamento do canal radicular. A causa mais comum de falha da terapia endodôntica é conhecida como falta de selamento apical adequado. O objetivo deste estudo in vitro foi comparar a microinfiltração apical dos cimentos MTA Fillapex, AH26 e Endofill usando o método de penetração de corantes. Materiais e métodos: Neste estudo in vitro, 72 dentes humanos unirradiculares extraídos foram selecionados. Os dentes foram divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos experimentais de 20 e dois grupos controle, positivo e negative, de 6. Os canais foram preparados pela técnica escalonada e preenchidos com guta-percha e um dos cimentos mencionados. No grupo controle positivo, os canais foram preenchidos com guta-percha sem cimento, e no grupo controle negativo, os canais foram preparados, mas não preenchidos. Os dentes foram imersos em corante azul de metileno a 2% por 72 horas. Os dentes foram então cortados longitudinalmente e o nível de penetração do corante foi medido sob um estereomicroscópio. Os dados foram analisados pelo software SPSS ver. 19 e pelos testes ANOVA e post-hoc de Bonferroni. Resultados: O nível médio de penetração do corante no grupo de teste Endofill foi significativamente maior do que nos grupos de teste AH26 e MTA Fillapex. Enquanto, a diferença observada entre os grupos AH26 e MTA Fillapex não foi estatisticamente significante (p <0,05). Conclusão: Os resultados deste estudo mostraram que os cimentos AH26 e MTA Fillapex não apresentaram diferença significativa nas propriedades do selamento apical. No entanto, suas forças de vedação foram significativamente maiores que a do cimento Endofill. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Cements , Dental LeakageABSTRACT
Background: Sealers are universally used along with gutta-percha to obturate the root canals in three dimensions. Push-out bond strength is considered appropriate to measure the adhesion capacity of sealers. Aim: To compare the bond strength of recently introduced bioceramic sealer with commonly used sealers and to evaluate the effect of plunger: base orifice size ratio on push-out bond strength. Methods:One hundred mandibular premolars with single canals were decoronated and instrumented up to master apical file F3 Protaper. Specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=25) based on the sealer used: Group 1-EndoSequence BC Sealer, Group 2-MTA FillApex sealer, Group3-Apexit Plus sealer & Group 4-AH Plus sealer and obturated using cold lateral compaction technique. After two weeks, 1±0.1mm thick slice of each radicular third of specimens was subjected to push-out testing with modified and standardised plunger: base orifice size ratio for each slice and bond strength calculated. Subsequently the slices were observed under stereomicroscope for failure mode analysis. Results: Results showed that AH Plus sealer had the highest overall bond strength followed by EndoSequence BC sealer and MTA FillApex while as Apexit Plus had lowest bond strength. Bond strength of all sealers reduced from coronal to apical direction except in EndoSequence BC sealer which showed better strength in critical apical third. Higher bond strength values were obtained due to modified relation of plunger with base orifice size. Conclusion: Bond strength of all sealers tested except EndoSequence BC reduces in apical direction and is impacted by plunger: base orifice size ratio.
ABSTRACT
Introdução: O MTA é um importante material de uso na odontologia, com boas propriedades biológicas. As respostas experimentais aos cimentos endodônticos que utilizam este composto no selamento e preenchimento do sistema de canais radiculares, aliados a uma boa instrumentação e limpeza, podem ser importantes no processo de reparo periapical. Objetivo: Avaliar in vitro a profundidade de penetração de dois diferentes cimentos endodônticos nos túbulos dentinários e a infiltração bacteriana em obturações com os cimentos AH Plus e MTA Fillapex. Material e método: 34 pré-molares monorradiculados humanos foram selecionados, suas coroas removidas e suas raízes padronizadas em 16 mm, a seguir foram, então, divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos de 15 espécimes e instrumentados com o sistema rotatório Pro Taper. Um grupo foi obturado com o cimento AH Plus (Grupo AH) e outro com MTA Fillapex (Grupo FI). Nestes grupos, avaliaram-se a infiltração coronária de bactérias para Enterococcus Faecalis e a profundidade de penetração nos túbulos dentinários. Para a aferição da infiltração bacteriana, usou-se o teste exato de Fisher; para a penetração intratubular, usou-se o teste-t. Resultado: Para a infiltração bacteriana, considerando o número de amostras infiltradas para AH e MTA Fillapex, houve diferença estatística significativa (p=0,0341). Na avaliação da penetração intratubular, a diferença entre os dois grupos de cimentos foi considerada estatisticamente significativa (p=0,0006). Conclusão: Ambos os cimentos apresentaram infiltração bacteriana, sendo que o MTA Fillapex teve pior desempenho. A capacidade de penetração nos túbulos dentinários do AH Plus foi significativamente maior que a do MTA Fillapex.
Introduction: The MTA is an important use in dentistry material with good biological properties. The experimental responses to sealers using this compound in the sealing and filling of the root canal system, combined with a good instrumentation and cleaning, may be important in the periapical healing process. Objective: To evaluate in vitro penetration depth of two different sealers in dentinal tubules and bacterial infiltration in fillings with AH Plus and MTA Fillapex cements. Material and method: 34 premolars human monorradiculados were selected, their removed and their standardized root crowns in 16mm, after then randomly divided into two groups of 15 specimens, and instrumented with rotary system Pro Taper. One group was obturated with cement AH Plus (group HA) and another MTA Fillapex (FI Group). These groups are evaluated for coronary infiltration of bacteria Enterococcus faecalis and the depth of penetration in the dentinal tubules. For the measurement of bacterial infiltration used Fisher's exact test for Intratubular penetration we used the t-test. Result: For bacterial infiltration, considering the number of infiltrated samples AH and MTA Fillapex, there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0341). In the evaluation of intratubular penetration, the difference between the two groups of cement was statistically significant (p = 0.0006). Conclusion: Both cements showed bacterial infiltration and the MTA Fillapex had worse performance, capabilities to enter the dentinal tubules AH Plus was significantly higher than the MTA Fillapex.
Subject(s)
Humans , Root Canal Obturation , Root Canal Therapy , Root Canal Therapy/instrumentation , Bicuspid , In Vitro Techniques , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Dental Cements , Tooth Root , Enterococcus faecalis , Crowns , Dental Leakage , EndodonticsABSTRACT
Abstract The aim of the present study was to verify the long-term cytotoxic effects of the MTA Fillapex and to compare them with AH Plus. Dissolution rate and pH were also evaluated. Human osteoblast cells were incubated with elutes of fresh specimens from AH Plus and MTA Fillapex, and with elutes of the same specimens for 4 successive weeks. Elute's pH was evaluated at each time point. A multiparametric cell viability assay was performed. For dissolution rate, ISO methodology was used. The results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, complemented with the Tukey post-test (p<0.05). No significant difference was found among the materials when fresh mixed (p>0.05). After 1 week, AH Plus became non-cytotoxic on all three evaluated parameters. Conversely, MTA Fillapex remained severely and mildly cytotoxic over the entire experimental period (p<0.05). The dissolution rate of AH Plus was significantly lower than MTA Fillapex at all time points (p>0.05). The pH of AH Plus was significantly lower than MTA Fillapex at the second and third week (p<0.05). In the other tested time points no statistical difference was observed. In conclusion, MTA Fillapex remained cytotoxic after 4 weeks and its cytotoxicity may be related to the high dissolution rate of this material.
Resumo O objetivo do presente estudo foi verificar os efeitos citotóxicos de longo prazo da MTA Fillapex e comparar com os do AH Plus. Solubilidade e pH também foram avaliados. Osteoblastos humanos foram incubados com elutos de amostras frescas de AH Plus e MTA Fillapex, e com elutos dos mesmos espécimes pelas 4 semanas seguintes. O pH foi avaliado a cada semana. Um ensaio multiparamétrico de viabilidade celular foi realizado. Para solubilidade foi utilizada metodologia ISO. Os resultados foram analisados por ANOVA, complementada com o pós-teste de Tukey (p<0,05). Nenhuma diferença significativa foi encontrada entre os materiais frescos quando avaliados em relação a citotoxicidade (p>0,05). Depois de uma semana, o AH Plus tornou-se não-citotóxico em todos os três parâmetros avaliados. Por outro lado, MTA Fillapex permaneceu citotóxico durante todo o período experimental (p<0,05). A solubilidade do AH Plus foi significativamente menor do MTA Fillapex para todos os períodos avaliados (p>0,05). O pH da AH Plus foi significativamente menor do que o MTA Fillapex na segunda e na terceira semana (p<0,05). Nos outros períodos testados não houve diferença estatística. Em conclusão, o MTA Fillapex permaneceu citotóxico após 4 semanas e a sua citotoxicidade pode estar relacionada à elevada solubilidade deste material.
Subject(s)
Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Osteoblasts/drug effects , Root Canal Filling Materials , Cells, Cultured , SolubilityABSTRACT
Crown discoloration can be induced by root canal sealer remnants following root canal treatment. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate chromatic alterations in human tooth crowns induced by a Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-based sealer (MTA Fillapex®) and a commonly used ZnOE-based sealer (Roth-811). The tested null hypothesis was that the application of the materials did not induce clinically perceptible crown discoloration (Ho: CIE color difference ΔE<3.7). Material and Methods: Forty five fully developed, intact, mandibular third molars were sectioned 1 mm below the cemento-enamel junction. The pulp chambers were chemomechanically debrided via the cervical access. The specimens were randomly assigned into three groups Group 1: MTA Fillapex, Group 2: Roth 811, Group 3: Negative control (unfilled) and immersed in individually marked vials containing distilled water up to the cervix (37±1°C). The spectral reflectance lines were recorded by utilizing a UV-VIS spectrophotometer equipped with integration sphere in the visual spectrum at baseline, 1 week, 1 and 3 months after material placement. Data were transformed into values of the CIE L*a*b* color system and the corresponding ΔE values were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way mixed ANOVA models, at p=0.05 level of significance. Results: A statistically significant increase in a* and b* chromatic parameters of the MTA Fillapex Group was measured. However, ΔE values did not exceed the human eye perceptibility threshold (set at ΔE<3.7) during the experimental period (ΔEt3=2.88). In Roth-811 Group, a statistically significant decrease in L* and a statistically significant increase in a* and b* chromatic parameters was measured, during all observation periods. Resultant ΔE values exceeded the human eye perceptibility threshold after 1 week (ΔEt1=5.65). Conclusions: Application of MTA Fillapex in tooth crowns resulted in minimal color alterations, while Roth 811 induced severe discoloration, in vitro. It could be suggested that, in terms of aesthetics, the use of MTA Fillapex appears to be favorable.