Effects of the epiretinal membrane on the outcomes of intravitreal dexamethasone implantation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion / Os efeitos de uma membrana epirretiniana nos resultados da implantação de dexametasona intravítrea para edema macular secundário à oclusão de ramo da veia retiniana

ABSTRACT Purpose: To investigate the effects of epiretinal membrane formation on the clinical outcomes of intravitreal dexamethasone implantation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Methods: This retrospective interventional case series includes the treatment of naive patients with macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion who underwent intravitreal dexamethasone implantation. The patients were divided into two groups as follows: Group 1 (n=25), comprised of patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion without epiretinal membrane, and Group 2 (n=16), comprised of patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with an epiretinal membrane. Corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness, and central macular volume values were measured before and after treatment. The clinical outcomes of the groups were compared. Results: Mean age and male-to-female ratio were similar between the two groups (p>0.05, for both). The baseline and final corrected visual acuity values, central macular thickness, and central macular volumes of the groups were similar (p>0.05, for all). All the parameters were significantly improved after intravitreal dexamethasone implantation treatment (p<0.001, for all). The changes in central macular thickness and volume were also similar (p>0.05, for both). The mean number of intravitreal dexamethasone implantations was 2.1 ± 1.0 (range, 1-4) in Group 1 and 3.0 ± 1.2 (range, 1-5) in Group 2 (p=0.043). Conclusion: Epiretinal membrane formation had no effects on the baseline and final clinical parameters, including corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness and volume. The only parameter affected by the presence of epiretinal membrane formation is the number of intravitreal dexamethasone implantations, a greater number of which is needed for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with an epiretinal membrane.

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar os efeitos da formação de uma membrana epirretiniana nos resultados clínicos da implantação intravítrea de dexametasona para edema macular secundário à oclusão de um ramo da veia retiniana. Métodos: Esta série retrospectiva de casos intervencionais inclui o tratamento de indivíduos com edema macular secundário à oclusão não isquêmica de um ramo da veia retiniana, sem tratamento prévio e que foram submetidos a implantação intravítrea de dexametasona. Os indivíduos foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo 1 (n=25), composto por indivíduos com edema macular secundário à oclusão de um ramo da veia retiniana sem a presença de uma membrana epirretiniana, e Grupo 2 (n=16), composto por indivíduos com edema macular secundário à oclusão de um ramo da veia retiniana com a presença de uma membrana epirretiniana. Os valores da acuidade visual corrigida, espessura macular central e volume macular central foram obtidos antes e após o tratamento. Os resultados clínicos dos grupos foram comparados. Resultados: A média de idade e a proporção entre homens e mulheres foram semelhantes nos dois grupos (p>0,05 para ambos os valores). Os valores iniciais e finais da acuidade visual corrigida, espessura macular central e volume macular central foram semelhantes nos dois grupos (p>0,05 para todos os valores). Todos os parâmetros melhoraram significativamente após o tratamento com implante de dexametasona intravítrea (p<0,001 para todos os parâmetros) e as alterações na espessura macular central e no volume macular central também foram semelhantes (p>0,05 para ambos os valores). O número médio de implantações intravítreas de dexametasona foi 2,1 ± 1,0 (faixa de 1-4) no Grupo 1 e 3,0 ± 1,2 (faixa de 1-5) no Grupo 2 (p=0,043). Conclusão: A formação de uma membrana epirretiniana não tem efeitos sobre os parâmetros clínicos iniciais e finais, incluindo a acuidade visual corrigida, a espessura macular central e o volume macular central. O único parâmetro afetado pela formação de uma membrana epirretiniana é o número de implantações intravítreas de dexametasona, sendo necessário um número maior de implantações em casos de edema macular secundário à oclusão de um ramo da veia retiniana com a presença de uma membrana epirretiniana.

Incidence of macular edema and its related factors after cataract surgery in diabetics with and without diabetic retinopathy / 中华眼底病杂志

Objective To observe and analyze the incidence ofmacular edema and its related factors after cataract surgery in diabetics with and without diabetic retinopathy.Methods A retrospective study.The data of 90 diabetics including 45 cases with diabetic retinopathy (DR group) and 45 cases without DR (diabetics group) and an equal number of non-diabetic matched controls (control group) who underwent phacoemulcification and intraocular lens implantation were collected.Patients with macular edema before the surgery were excluded.Main outcome measurements included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield mean thickness (CSMT).Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to measure the distance from the inner limiting membrane to the pigment epithelium of the central macular with diameter of 1 mm,which was used as the CSMT.There were no significant differences in BCVA and CSMT among three groups preoperatively (F=1.300,1.329;P=0.280,0.273).The BCVA and CSMT before and after the surgery in all three groups were compared.macular edema was defined as an increase of CSMT on OCT ＞ 30％ from preoperative baseline.The incidence of macular edema of three groups after the surgery were compared and analyzed.The correlation between postoperative BCVA and CSMT,and the correlation between diabetes mellitus,DR and macular edema after surgery were analyzed by Logistic regression analysis.Results After the surgery,compared with control and diabetics group,the BCVA in DR group decreased and the CSMT increased significantly and the differences were statistically significant (P＜ 0.05).However,between control and diabetics group,the differences in BCVA and CSMT after the surgery were not statistically significant (P＞0.05).The incidences ofmacular edema in DR group (15.6％ and 13.3％) 1 month and 3 months postoperatively were significantly more than that in control group (2.2％ and 2.2％) and non-DR diabetics group (4.4％ and 2.2％),and the differences were statistically significant (x2=6.696,6.644;P=0.035,0.036).Logistic regression analysis showed that the postoperative BCVA was correlated with CSMT (r=0.444,P=0.000),diabetics was not correlated with postoperative macular edema (r=7.231,P=0.999) and DR was correlated with macular edema after surgery (r=0.378,P=0.008).The diabetic retinopathy might correlated to macular edema after surgery.Conclusions The incidence of macular edema after cataract surgery in patients with DR was significantly higher than that in patients without DR.There is no correlation between diabetics and postoperative macular edema,and DR is correlated with macular edema after surgery.

Dexamethasone 0. 7 mg implants in the management of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema / Implante de 0, 7 mg de dexametasona no tratamento do edema macular cistóide do pseudofácico

ABSTRACT Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) is a common complication following cataract surgery. Although majority of patients with PCME remain asymptomatic, it remains an important cause of vision loss after cataract surgery. The pathogenesis of PCME remains unclear, but most authors agree that inflammation plays a major role in its development. There is no standard algorithm for treatment procedures for PCME. A biodegradable 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implant can be used to deliver medication into the posterior segment of eyes. This drug acts on all inflammatory mediators and has been approved for the treatment of macular abnormalities secondary to retinal vein occlusion and for non-infectious posterior uveitis. In this case series, we report six patients who presented with PCME and were treated with a 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implant. Favorable anatomical outcomes were demonstrated by spectral domain-optical coherence tomography images.

RESUMO O edema macular cistóide do pseudofácico (PCME) é uma frequente complicação no acompanhamento pós-operatório da cirurgia de catarata. Embora a maioria dos pacientes apresente-se sem sintomas, PCME ainda permanece como importante causa de baixa visão após facectomia. Sua patogênese ainda permanece obscura, porém, autores sugerem que fatores que promovem maior inflamação possuem papel fundamental em sua origem. Não há um algoritmo padrão no manejo do PCME. O implante biodegradável de dexametasona 0,7 mg surgiu como possível arma terapêutica, após aplicação intra-vítrea. Essa droga consegue agir sobre mediadores inflamatórios, além de já ter sido aprovada no tratamento do edema de macula secundário à oclusões venosas da retina, e uveítes posteriores de origem não infecciosa. Na seguinte série de casos, relatamos a evolução de 6 pacientes com PCME, submetidos a terapia com implante de dexametasona 0,7 mg. A melhora anatômica foi documentada com imagens de SD OCT.

Serous retinal detachment in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion / Descolamento seroso de retina em pacientes com edema macular secundário à oclusão de ramo da veia retiniana

ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) to assess the influence of serous retinal detachment (SRD) in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: Sixty-one eyes with BRVO from 61 patients with ME were analyzed and divided into two groups according to the spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings of SRD and cystoid macular edema (CME). All patients underwent complete ophthalmic examinations and OCT measurements (Cirrus, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA). Patients with marked retinal hemorrhage, diabetic retinopathy, previous laser photocoagulation, and/or intravitreal injection were excluded. Results: The mean age of included patients (37 males, 24 females) was 65.4 ± 11.4 (53-77) years. There were 21 patients with SRD and 40 patients with CME. All of the 21 patients with SRD had CME. VA was significantly worse in the SRD group compared with the CME (non-SRD) group (0.82 ± 0.34 logMAR vs 0.64 ± 0.38 logMAR; P=0.005). Conversely, CMT was significantly greater in the SRD group than in the CME group (465 ± 115 µ vs 387 ± 85 µ; P=0.00004). Conclusion: SRD may be associated with decreased VA. The prognosis of patients with BRVO and SRD requires further investigation.

RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a acuidade visual (VA) e espessura macular central (CMT) para avaliar a influência do descolamento seroso da retina (SRD) em olhos com edema macular (ME) secundário a oclusão de ramo da veia da retina (BRVO). Método: Sessenta e um olhos de 61 pacientes com oclusão de ramo da veia da retina e edema macular foram analisados e divididos em dois grupos, de acordo com os achados na a tomografia de coerência óptica por domínio espectral (OCT), de edema macular cistóide (CME) e descolamento seroso da retina. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a exame oftalmológico completo e exame de tomografia de coerência óptica (Cirrus, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA). Os pacientes com hemorragia acentuada da retina, retinopatia diabética, fotocoagulação a laser e/ou injeção intravítrea prévia foram excluídos. Resultados: A idade média dos pacientes (37 homens, 24 mulheres) foi de 65,4 ± 11,4 (53-77) anos. Havia 21 pacientes com SRD e 40 pacientes com edema macular cistóide. Todos os 21 pacientes com SRD também apresentaram edema macular cistóide. VA foi significativamente pior no grupo SRD do que no grupo edema macular cistóide (non-SRD) (0,82 ± 0,34 vs 0,64 ± 0,38 logMAR, p=0,005). Por outro lado, a espessura macular central foi significativamente maior no grupo descolamento seroso da retina do que no grupo edema macular cistóide (465 ± 115 µ vs 387 ± 85 µ, p=0,00004). Conclusão: Observou-se que o descolamento seroso da retina em si pode estar relacionado à diminuição de acuidade visual. Os prognósticos dos pacientes com oclusão de ramo da veia da retina e descolamento seroso da retina precisam ser adequadamente investigados.

Treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to chronic non-infectious intermediate uveitis with an intraocular dexamethasone implant / Tratamento do edema macular cistóide secundário à uveíte intermediária não infecciosa com implante intraocular de dexametasona

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the use of a slow-release dexamethasone 0.7-mg intravitreal implant for cystoid macular edema (CME) secondary to intermediate uveitis and refractory to systemic steroids. Methods: A retrospective study of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular inflammation, intraocular pressure (IOP), fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), inflammation, and adverse reactions of five patients (women, mean age of 35 years) with cystoid macular edema treated with a dexamethasone implant. Patients were evaluated in seven visits until the 150th day after the implant. Results: Four patients had bilateral pars planitis and one had bilateral intermediate uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Six dexamethasone devices were implanted, under topical anesthesia (one each in six eyes, five patients). The mean follow-up time was 5 months. The best-corrected visual acuity improved in all eyes that received an implant, with five having improvements of two or more lines. Optical coherence tomography showed thinning of the macula in all eyes treated, and we saw a correlation between the best-corrected visual acuity and retinal thinning. No serious adverse events occurred and no significant increase in intraocular pressure was observed. Conclusions: Slow-release dexamethasone intravitreal implants can effectively treat CME secondary to intermediate uveitis and refractory to systemic steroids. .

RESUMO Objetivos: Avaliar o implante intravítreo de liberação lenta de dexametasona 0,7 mg no tratamento do edema macular cistóide (EMC) secundário à uveíte intermediária refratária a corticosteroides orais. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo da acuidade visual melhor corrigida, inflamação intraocular, pressão intraocular (PIO), retinografia, tomografia de coerência óptica (OCT), inflamação e reações adversas de cinco pacientes (mulheres, idade média 35 anos) com o edema macular cistóide tratado com implante de dexametasona. Pacientes foram avaliados em 7 consultas até o 150o dia pós implante. Rsultados: Quatro pacientes apresentaram parsplanite bilateral e um, uveíte intermediária bilateral associada à artrite idiopática juvenil. Seis implantes foram inseridos sob anestesia tópica. O tempo médio de acompanhamento foi de 5 meses. A acuidade visual melhorou em todos os olhos. A tomografia de coerência óptica mostrou afinamento da mácula em todos os olhos e houve correlação entre a acuidade visual e a retina mais fina. Não ocorreu evento adverso grave. Não ocorreu aumento significativo na pressão intraocular. Conclusão: O implante intravítreo é eficaz no tratamento do edema macular cistóide secundário a uveíte intermediária refratária a esteróides sistêmicos. .

Edema cistoide de mácula pós-LASIK tratado com ranibizumabe / Macular edema post-LASIK treated with ranibizumab

Os autores relatam o caso de uma paciente que desenvolveu edema cistóide de mácula pós-cirurgia para correção de miopia pelo método LASIK. Foi submetida a tratamento com injeções intravítrea de ranibizumabe e apresentou resultado visual satisfatório.

The authors report the case of a patient who developed cystoid macular edema after surgery for myopia by LASIK method. She was treated with intravitreal injections of ranibizumab and presented satisfactory visual result.

Vitreous condition of the eye with diabetic macular edema / 中华眼底病杂志

Objective To investigate the relationship between the posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and the diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods A total of 169 eyes with DME which were diagnosed by funduscopy,fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were retrospectively analysed. PVD and partial PVD were detected by OCT and biomicroscopy. The characterizations of OCT images of DME were analysed. Results In 169 eyes, 156 (92.3%) had no PVD with the average thickness of fovea of 297 ?m; 11 (6.5%) had complete PVD with the average thickness of fovea of 229 ?m; 2 (1.2%) had partial PVD with the average thickness of fovea of 347 ?m. Conclusions Only a few PVD were found in DME eyes, so traction of PVD may not be the main cause of DME.