ABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the changes of optic disc parameters, peripapillary retinal nerve fibers layer(pRNFL)thickness and macular ganglion cell layer(mGCL)thickness among patients with early diabetes retinopathy and healthy controls by Cirrus HD-optical coherence tomography(OCT).METHODS: In this cross-sectional comparative study, 45 non-diabetic retinopathy(NDR), 52 mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy(NPDR), 55 moderate NPDR with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)and 64 age-matched healthy controls were included. The fasting blood glucose(FBG), duration of diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin(HbA1c)and past history of the patients were collected in detail. Optic disc parameters(i.e., binocular RNFL thickness symmetry percentage, rim area, optic disc area, cup-to-disc ratio, cup volume), pRNFL thickness and mGCL thickness were measured by Cirrus HD-OCT. The comparison of different groups was performed by one-way analysis of variance.RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the binocular RNFL thickness symmetry percentage and rim area were significantly decreased, while the average C/D and vertical C/D were significantly increased in the NDR group, mild NPDR group and moderate NPDR group(all P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the peripapillary RNFL thicknesses(superior, temporal, inferior, nasal)and macular GCL thickness(average, minimum, superior, supero-temporal, infero-temporal, inferior, supero-nasal, and infero-nasal)became thinner in the NDR group, mild NPDR group, and moderate NPDR group(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION: Patients with early DR have significantly decreased binocular RNFL thickness asymmetry, rim area, pRNFL and mGCL thickness, while they have significantly increased cup-to-disc ratio when compared to healthy controls. The results support the statement that DM causes inner retinal neurodegenerative changes even in T2DM patients without overt microangiopathy.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To measure the parameters of optic disc and macula by spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in healthy controls and patients with mild or moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and to analyze the related influencing factors. Methods: Forty patients (40 eyes) with mild or moderate POAG who were admitted to our department from Sep. 2015 to Aug. 2018 were enrolled, including 20 patients aged 20-39 years old and 20 patients aged 60-79 years old. Contemporaneous 40 healthy controls (40 eyes) were also included (20 aged 20-39 years old and 20 aged 60-79 years old). All subjects received comprehensive ophthalmic examination. SD-OCT was used to measure the thickness of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), the thickness of macular average ganglion cell layer combined with the inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL), the macular minimum GCL-IPL thickness, and the average thickness of the macular cube. Results: The average and minimum GCL-IPL thickness decreased significantly with age in both healthy control and POAG groups (P0.05). The mean, superior, inferior and temporal thicknesses of pRNFL in the POAG group (both 20-39 years old and 60-79 years old subgroups) were significantly thinner than those in the healthy control group (P0.05). And no significant difference was found in the nasal thickness of pRNFL between POAG group and healthy control group of the same age (P>0.05). Conclusion: The pRNFL thickness measured by SD-OCT is related to POAG, and it can be used as a detection index for early diagnosis of POAG.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze and compare the subfoveal choroidal thickness and macular ganglion cell layer (MGCL) thickness in hyperopia anisometropic amblyopic children between the amblyopic eyes and the fellow eyes. Methods: The subfoveal choroidal thickness and the MGCL thickness were measured by enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) in 63 hyperopic anisometropic amblyopic children. The value of subfoveal choroidal thickness and the MGCL thickness were compared between the amblyopic eyes and the fellow eyes. The average thickness of the eyes between the different types was compared using the paired t test. Results: Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness was (321.83±12.74) μm and (316.78±18.76) μm respectively in amblyopic and fellow eyes (P=0.182). Mean MGCL thickness was (83.78±4.81) μm in amblyopic eyes and (83.26±4.17) μm in the fellow eyes (P=0.223). Conclusion: Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness and MGCL thickness were not statistically significant between hyperopic anisometropic amblyopic eyes and normal fellow eyes.
ABSTRACT
Objective· To analyze and compare the subfoveal choroidal thickness and macular ganglion cell layer (MGCL) thickness in hyperopia anisometropic amblyopic children between the amblyopic eyes and the fellow eyes.Methods · The subfoveal choroidal thickness and the MGCL thickness were measured by enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) in 63 hyperopic anisometropic amblyopic children.The value of subfoveal choroidal thickness and the MGCL thickness were compared between the amblyopic eyes and the fellow eyes.The average thickness of the eyes between the different types was compared using the paired t test.Results· Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness was (321.83±12.74) μm and (316.78±18.76) μm respectively in amblyopic and fellow eyes (P 0.182).Mean MGCL thickness was (83.78±4.81) μm in amblyopic eyes and (83.26±4.17) μm in the fellow eyes (P=0.223).Conclusion· Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness and MGCL thickness were not statistically significant between hyperopic anisometropic amblyopic eyes and normal fellow eyes.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine whether retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), macula and macular ganglion cell layer (mGCL)-inner plexiform layer (IPL) thickness differ in the amblyopic and normal fellow eyes of unilateral amblyopic patients using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS: 80 patients with 160 eyes were included in this study; the distribution of patients was 17 patients with strabismic amblyopia, 17 patients with strabismic non-amblyopia, 23 patients with anisometropic amblyopia, and 23 patients with anisometropic non-amblyopia. Macular, RNFL, and mGCL-IPL thickness were obtained by SD-OCT, and the interocular thickness differences of each group were analyzed. After treatment, the changes of OCT parameters were evaluated in amblyopic patients. RESULTS: Average macular, average RNFL, and average mGCL-IPL thickness of amblyopic eyes were thicker than for normal fellow eyes in amblyopic patients (40 patients total; p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). In 23 patients with anisometropic amblyopia, average macular, average RNFL, and average mGCL-IPL thickness of amblyopic eyes were thicker than the normal fellow eye (p = 0.008, p < 0.001, p = 0.002). In the 17 patients with strabismic amblyopia, average macular and average RNFL thickness of amblyopic eyes were thicker than the normal fellow eye (p=0.016, p < 0.006, respectively). No interocular thickness differences were observed in the control groups. Interocular differences between amblyopic and normal eyes remained unchanged after the amblyopic eyes were treated. CONCLUSIONS: Average RNFL and average mGCL-IPL thickness of amblyopic eyes were thicker than normal fellow eyes, but no differences were observed for macular in amblyopic patients. There was no change in the OCT parameter in amblyopic eyes after treatment.
Subject(s)
Humans , Amblyopia , Ganglion Cysts , Nerve Fibers , Retinaldehyde , Tomography, Optical CoherenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is exceedingly difficult to differentiate benign multiple sclerosis (BMS) from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) based on clinical characteristics, neuroimaging, and cerebrospinal fluid tests. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows quantification of retinal structures, such as the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, at the optic disc and the ganglion cell layer (GCL) at the macula, on a micrometer scale. It can also be used to trace minor alterations and the progression of neurodegeneration, help predict BMS, and influence the choice of therapy. To utilize OCT to detect the extent of changes of the optic disk and macular microstructure in patients with BMS and RRMS compared to healthy controls (HCs), with special focus on changes related to the presence/absence of optic neuritis (ON). METHODS: Spectral-domain OCT was applied to examine eyes from 36 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), comprising 11 with BMS and 25 with RRMS, and 34 HCs. RESULTS: The RNFL and GCL were significantly thinner in eyes previously affected by ON, irrespective of the type of MS (i.e., BMS or RRMS), than in HCs. Significant thinning of the GCL was also observed in non-ON RRMS (and not non-ON BMS) compared to HCs. Correspondingly, a significant association between disease duration and thinning rates of the RNFL and GCL was observed only in non-ON RRMS (-0.54+/-0.24 and -0.43+/-0.21 microm/year, mean+/-SE; p<0.05 for both), and not in non-ON BMS (-0.11+/-0.27 and -0.24+/-0.24 microm/year). CONCLUSIONS: The RNFL and GCL were thinner in both ON- and non-ON MS, but the change was more pronounced in ON MS, irrespective of the MS subtype studied herein. GCL thinning and the thinning rate of both the GCL and RNFL were less pronounced in non-ON BMS than in non-ON RRMS. These findings may help to predict the course of BMS.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cerebrospinal Fluid , Ganglion Cysts , Multiple Sclerosis , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Nerve Fibers , Neuroimaging , Optic Disk , Optic Neuritis , Retinaldehyde , Tomography, Optical CoherenceABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomical difference between the dominant and nondominant eyes in healthy, young adults by measuring macular, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (PRNFL), and macular ganglion cell layer (MGCL) thicknesses. METHODS: Two hundred healthy adults were recruited and assessed for ocular dominance using 'a hole in the card test'. PRNFL, macular and MGCL thicknesses of both eyes were measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences for average thicknesses of MGCL in each of the six areas between the dominant and nondominant eyes. No difference was observed between temporal, inferior, average PRNFL thickness and macular thickness in dominant and nondominant eyes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no intraocular anatomical difference between the dominant and nondominant eyes in healthy, young adults.