ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) position of the center of resistance of 4 mandibular anterior teeth, 6 mandibular anterior teeth, and the complete mandibular dentition by using 3D finite-element analysis. METHODS: Finite-element models included the complete mandibular dentition, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone. The crowns of teeth in each group were fixed with buccal and lingual arch wires and lingual splint wires to minimize individual tooth movement and to evenly disperse the forces onto the teeth. Each group of teeth was subdivided into 0.5-mm intervals horizontally and vertically, and a force of 200 g was applied on each group. The center of resistance was defined as the point where the applied force induced parallel movement. RESULTS: The center of resistance of the 4 mandibular anterior teeth group was 13.0 mm apical and 6.0 mm posterior, that of the 6 mandibular anterior teeth group was 13.5 mm apical and 8.5 mm posterior, and that of the complete mandibular dentition group was 13.5 mm apical and 25.0 mm posterior to the incisal edge of the mandibular central incisors. CONCLUSIONS: Finite-element analysis was useful in determining the 3D position of the center of resistance of the 4 mandibular anterior teeth group, 6 mandibular anterior teeth group, and complete mandibular dentition group.
Subject(s)
Crowns , Dentition , Incisor , Periodontal Ligament , Splints , Tooth , Tooth Movement TechniquesABSTRACT
Objective The aim of our work is to characterize individual normal occlusions to establish appropriate treatment standards for different vertical facial types. Methods A total of 30 patients with near-normal occlusion were grouped into high-angle group (eight cases), medium-angle group (12 cases), and low-angle group (10 cases) according to vertical facial skeletal type. Invivo5 software was used and digital imaging and communications in medicine data were rebuilt to measure the ∠L1/MP, ∠L6/MP, axis corner of L6, cant of occlusion plane, Balkwill angle, and Bonwill triangle of each group. Results Among the groups, the low-angle group had the smallest ∠L6/MP (P<0.05) and largest cant of occlusion. No significant difference was observed among the three groups with regard to the other parameters (P>0.05). Conclusion Patients with low-angle vertical facial skeletal type requires a modified treatment standard. In this group, the treatment standard must ensure that the cant of occlusion plane is more parallel to the Frankfurt horizontal plane compared with those of the other groups, and the axis of L6 is tilted distally relative to the mandibular plane.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate immediate changes in the mandibular dentition after maxillary molar distalization using headgear in non-growing patients. Sixteen patients (mean age, 18.9 ± 2.0 years) with Class II molar relationship and crowding were included in the present study. To correct the molar relationship, headgear was used for maxillary molar distalization. Cone-beam computed tomography-generated half-cephalograms (CG Cephs) and dental casts were used to evaluate dental changes for each subject before and immediately after molar distalization using headgear. The mean duration that subjects wore the headgear was 6.3 months. CG Cephs showed that the first maxillary molars were distalized 4.2 ± 1.6 mm with 9.7°± 6.1° of distal angulation. The intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths of the mandible increased after maxillary molar distalization. The present study's results suggest that maxillary molar distalization using headgear induces a spontaneous response in the untreated mandibular dentition of non-growing patients.