Evaluation of the treatment effect on sinus elevation and implant restoration in cases with odontogenic maxillary sinusitis after tooth extraction / 口腔疾病防治

Objective@#To investigate the clinical effects of sinus elevation surgery and implant restorationdue to insufficient bone massafter tooth extraction in patients with odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) and to provide a reference for use in clinical practice.@*Methods@#This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee, and informed consent was obtained from the patients. Forty-five teeth were extracted from patients with OMS in the maxillary posterior area (the study group). Sinus elevation and implantation were performed due to insufficient bone height in the implant area 6-8 months after tooth extraction in the study group. Forty-eight teeth were extracted from patients without "OMS" in the maxillary posterior area (the control group), and sinus elevation and implantation were performed due to insufficient bone height in the implant area 6-8 months after tooth extraction inthe control group. In the study group, 13 cases of discontinuous maxillary sinus floor bone and residual alveolar bone height of the maxillary sinus floor less than 4 mm were addressed with lateral wall sinus elevation, and the other 32 cases were addressed with crest-approach sinus elevation. In the control group, 8 cases of residual alveolar bone height less than 4 mm in the maxillary sinus floor were addressed with lateral wall sinus,and the other 40 cases were addressed with crest approach sinus elevation. Restorations were placed 6 to 8 months after surgery. The patients were followed up 21 days, 3 months, and 8 months after implantation and every 6 months after the placement of the restorations. The sinus bone gain (SBG), apical bone height (ABL) and marginal bone loss (MBL) were statistically analyzed 24 months after the restoration.@*Results@#The average preoperative mucosal thickness in the 45 patients in the study group was (1.556 ± 0.693) mm, which was significantly larger than that in the control group (1.229 ± 0.425) mm (P<0.001). There were no perforations in either group. Twenty-four months after restoration, there was no significant difference in the SBG, ABH or MBL between the two groups (P>0.05).@*Conclusion@#After the extraction of teeth from patients with OMS, the inflammation of the maxillary sinus decreased, and the bone height and density in the edentulous area were restored to a certain degree. The effects of sinus floor lifting surgery and implant restoration do not differ between patients with and without OMS.

Esthetic patient satisfaction, marginal bone loss and peri-implant tissue success in esthetic zone: systematic review / Satisfação estética do paciente, perda óssea marginal e sucesso do tecido peri-implantar na zona estética: revisão sistemática

Increased patient demands for highly esthetic implant superstructure in the anterior esthetic zone has increased in the last decades. Moreover, the absence of periodontal ligament in implant supported prosthesis causes forces to be transferred without cushioning effect to the alveolar bone, resulting in increased marginal bone loss (MBL) and influence the heath of peri-implant tissue. Evaluate the available evidence on the effect implant superstructure and it consequences on patient satisfaction, MBL, bleeding on probing (BOP) and probing depth (PD). A protocol of electronic and hand research was performed for English based researches comparing implants inserted in the esthetic zone with all ceramic superstructure: "Will the use of different types of all ceramic superstructure show different esthetic patient satisfaction, marginal bone loss, bleeding on probing and probing depth? Thirteen publications from one thousand one hundred and sixteen research studies were included. This systematic review showed that all ceramic implant superstructure was a versatile treatment option with higher esthetic patient satisfaction and better color of peri-implant mucous especially in patients having thin biotype. On the other hand there wasn't significant difference in MBL, PD and BOP compared to other conventional implant superstructure. More randomized controlled clinical trials with bigger samples are needed to confirm our findings. All ceramic implant superstructure is versatile and highly esthetic treatment option for implant placed in the anterior esthetic zone.(AU)

A demanda do paciente por superestruturas de implante altamente estéticas na zona anterior aumentou nas últimas décadas. Além disso, a ausência de ligamento periodontal em próteses implantossuportadas faz com que as forças sejam transferidas para o osso alveolar sem amortecimento, resultando em aumento da perda óssea marginal (MBL) e influenciando na saúde do tecido peri-implantar. Avaliar as evidências disponíveis sobre o efeito da superestrutura do implante e suas consequências na satisfação do paciente, perda óssea marginal, sangramento à sondagem (SS) e profundidade de sondagem (PS). Um protocolo de pesquisa eletrônica e manual foi realizado para a análise de artigos em inglês comparando implantes com toda a superestrutura em cerâmica inseridos na zona estética: "O uso de diferentes tipos de superestrutura em cerâmica mostrará diferentes níveis de satisfação estética do paciente, perda óssea marginal, sangramento em profundidade de sondagem e sondagem?". Foram selecionadas 1116 publicações e apenas treze estudos foram incluídos na análise final. Esta revisão sistemática mostrou que toda superestrutura do implante em cerâmica foi uma opção de tratamento versátil, com maior satisfação estética do paciente e melhor coloração da mucosa peri-implantar, especialmente em pacientes com biótipo fino. Por outro lado, não houve diferença significativa em MBL, PS e SS em comparação com outras superestruturas de implantes convencionais. Porém, mais ensaios clínicos controlados randomizados com amostras maiores são necessários para confirmar nossos achados. Implicações clínicas: Toda superestrutura do implante em cerâmica é uma opção de tratamento versátil e altamente estética para implantes colocados na zona anterior (AU)

Clinical assessment of pterygoid and anterior implants in the atrophic edentulous maxilla: a retrospective study / 华西口腔医学杂志

OBJECTIVES@#This study aims to evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of anterior and pterygoid implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous maxilla with posterior atrophy.@*METHODS@#Given a minimum follow-up of 1 year, 25 patients with fixed maxillary rehabilitation over anterior and pterygoid implants were enrolled in this retrospective study. The implant survival rates, peri-implant soft tissue status (including probing depth, modified sulcus bleeding index, and plaque index), marginal bone loss, and patient satisfaction were measured.@*RESULTS@#The survival rates for anterior and pterygoid implants at 1-year follow-up were 96.5% and 97.8%, respectively (@*CONCLUSIONS@#For the edentulous maxilla with posterior atrophy, full-arch fixed prostheses supported by anterior and pterygoid implants has an acceptable short-term clinical outcome and excellent patient satisfaction. It may be considered as a predictable and feasible method for maxillary rehabilitation.

Clinical application and complications of short implants (≤6 mm) / 口腔疾病防治

@#Short implants can be used as an alternative in cases of insufficient vertical bone volume after dentition defect or absence of dentition to simplify or avoid bone augmentation procedures. Short implants (≤ 6 mm) are reported to have a mean survival rate of 96% after a period of 1-5 years in function and have been widely used in cases of dentition defects or absence of dentition. Compared with conventional implants (≥ 10 mm) combined with bone augmentation procedures, short implants have fewer surgery-related complications, less marginal bone loss, shortened treatment times and reduced costs, and are preferred by patients. Due to a lack of evidence, a high crown-implant ratio should not be an obstacle for the use of short implants. In addition, most of the current literature has not enough follow-up time, the long-term implant survival data of short implants remain unclear. To improve the clinical outcomes of short implants, attention should be paid to the implant site, bone quality, and occlusal force as well as to the presence of oral health maintenance, periodontal diseases and habits through a careful intraoral and radiographic examination. The choices of wider implant use and splint restoration are recommended, occlusal force should be paid attention during implant maintenance. Inappropriate stress on restorations should be avoided. Future studies should be focused on the long-term clinical outcomes of short implants.

Clinical observation of cement-retained and screw-retained implant-supported denture in edentulous patients / 口腔疾病防治

Objective@# To evaluate the clinical effects of full-arch cement-retained implant-supported combined crowns and screw-retained implant-supported bridge dentures in complete or half edentulous patients. @*Methods @#A total of 25 patients with complete or partial edentulous dentures followed up for 1, 3, and 5 years in our hospital from June 2013 to June 2018 and were treated with Straumann bone horizontal implantation, cobalt-chromium stenting and cobalt-chromium porcelain restoration with cement-retained and screw-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses to evaluate the accumulative implant survival rate, accumulative prosthesis survival rate, mechanical complications, and biological complications in both groups. @*Results @#There were 25 complete or half edentulous patients who received 165 Straumann implants and 28 implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in this study. There were 11 cases with 69 implants in the cement group and 17 cases with 96 implants in the screw group. The accumulative implant survival rate was 100% in the cement group and 96.9% in the screw group. The accumulative prosthesis survival rate was 100% in both groups. The cumulative peri-implant mucositis rate was 23.2% in the cement group and 29.2% in the screw group, and the peri-implantitis rate was 6.8% in the cement group and 7.3% in the screw group. There was 1 case of porcelain collapse (n=1/11) and no screw of abutment loosening in the cement group and 4 cases of porcelain collapse (n=4/17) and 1 case of screw loosening in the screw group. No fracture of abutment was observed in either group. There was no difference in bone loss between the two groups in the first year (P > 0.05), and a higher rate of bone loss was found in the screw group in the third and fifth years (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the sulcus bleeding index(mSBI) between the two groups in the first year and the third year (P > 0.05) and a higher modified mSBI value in the cement group in the fifth year (P < 0.05).@*Conclusion @#The survival rates of the implant and prosthesis for cement-retained or screw-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses were both high, but there were more mechanical and biological complications in the traditional cobalt-chromium alloy screw-retainer group. The removal of residual adhesives must be reasonably considered when choosing the cement retention method.

The Employment of CBCT in Assessing Bone Loss around Dental Implants in Patients Receiving Mandibular Implant Supported over dentures

The aim of this study is to evaluate bone loss around implants after delivery of implant supported over dentures using CBCT.This study was performed to evaluate Postoperative bone level around mandibular dental implants using cone beamcomputed tomography (CBCT). The study was conducted on 10 completely edentulous patients that were rehabilitated bycomplete overdentures Patients retained mandibular overdentures by two implants installed in the canine region andretained locator attachments. Standard clinical and laboratory techniques were followed for implant insertion and dentureconstruction for all patients. The implants were divided in two groups. Implants bearing locator attachment with blue nyloninsert (Group I) and implants bearing locator attachment with transparent nylon insert (Group II). The twenty insertedimplants were left undisturbed for three months to achieve osseointegration. The mesial, distal, buccal and lingual bonelevel around the dental implants was evaluated, using the CBCT i-CAT scan with Blue sky Plan® software. Bone level wasobtained at six and twelve months after loading. The CBCT measurements of bone level revealed that there was bone lossaround all aspects of the inserted twenty dental implants

One Abutment at One Time Concept for Platform-Switched Morse Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the peri-implant vertical bone loss of immediate loading of implant crowns using the one abutment at one time (AOT) protocol and implants with abutment removal (AR). This systematic review with meta-analysis was reported according to the PRISMA statement, with guidance from the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. A total of 103 publications were identified in the PubMed database and reference lists of examined articles. After the screening of titles and abstracts, the eligibility of eight full-text articles was assessed. Five studies published between 2010 and 2015 were included in the meta-analysis. There was less peri-implant vertical bone loss at implants using an AOT protocol than at implants using AR protocol (WMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.13; p<0.0001; random-effects model). In conclusion, the use of the AOT protocol with platform-switched Morse implants results in less bone loss than do AR procedures, but this effect may not be clinically relevant. The preservation of marginal bone level achieved with the AOT protocol may not enhance the aesthetics. These results should be interpreted with caution.

Resumo O objetivo desta revisão sistemática e meta-análise foi comparar a perda óssea vertical em implantes de carga imediata usando o protocolo de um pilar em um único momento (AOT) e implantes com remoção de pilar (AR). Esta revisão sistemática com meta-análise foi relatada de acordo com a declaração PRISMA, com orientação do Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Foram identificadas 103 publicações na base de dados PubMed e nas listas de referência dos artigos examinados. Após a triagem de títulos e resumos, avaliou-se a elegibilidade de oito artigos de texto completo. Cinco estudos publicados entre 2010 e 2015 foram incluídos na meta-análise. Houve menos perda óssea vertical peri-implante em implantes usando o protocolo AOT do que nos implantes usando o protocolo AR (WMD -0,19, 95% IC -0,26 a -0,13; p <0,0001, modelo de efeitos aleatórios). Em conclusão, o uso do protocolo AOT com implantes Cone Morse associados a pilares com plataforma switching resulta em menos perda óssea do que os procedimentos AR, mas esse efeito pode não ser clinicamente relevante. A preservação do nível ósseo marginal alcançado com o protocolo AOT pode não melhorar a estética. Estes resultados devem ser interpretados com cautela.

Clinical outcome of immediately and early loaded implants with laser treated surface: a 3-year retrospective study

PURPOSE: The marginal bone loss of implants with laser treated surface was investigated after six weeks of loading after implant installation to the mandible molar area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 23 implants were placed in the edentulous molar area of the mandible: 13 implants were immediately loaded and 10 implants were early loaded. The implants used were made of titanium grade 23, screw shaped, 4.2 mm in diameter, and 10 mm in length. Patients were evaluated with resonance frequency analysis at implant fixture installation and 1, 2 (final prosthesis installation), 3, 5, 8, and 14 months later. X-rays were taken at 2 months after fixture installation and 1, 2, 3 years after to measure the marginal bone loss. RESULTS: The mean ISQ value measured at the implant installation was over 70 at all-time points. The average of marginal bone loss was average 0.33 mm. CONCLUSION: Immediate implant loading for laser treated implants would be possible.

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio of short vs long implants on implant stability and marginal bone loss in the mandibular single molar implant

PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to determine whether implant length and the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio influence implant stability and peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 46 patients with single tooth missing in the posterior molar region of the mandible were included in this study. 19 implants (CMI IS-III active® long implant) of 5.0 mm diameter and 10 mm length were installed for the control group, while 27 implants (CMI IS-III active® short implant) of 5.5 mm diameter and 6.6, 7.3 or 8.5 mm length were placed for the experimental group. Each implant was inserted and immediately loaded using the digitally pre-fabricated surgical template and provisional restoration. The CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crown was fabricated at 3 months after the surgery as a definitive restoration. The ISQ value and the MBL was measured at 48 weeks after the surgery. The correlation between the C/I ratio, MBL, and secondary implant stability was analyzed. RESULTS: Successful results in terms of ISQ and MBL were achieved with both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of ISQ values and MBL at 48 weeks after the surgery (P > 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the C/I ratio and secondary stability as well as the C/I ratio and the MBL (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The influence of C/I ratio in both groups was not shown on the stability nor the marginal bone loss in implants supporting single crown of the mandible. Short implant could be a preferable alternative option in the reduced bone height mandible under the limited condition despite its higher C/I ratio.

Clinical application of platform switching implants in maxillary anterior region / 口腔疾病防治

Objective@#To evaluate the application effect of the platform switching implants in maxillary anterior region, to explore the effect of platform switching technology on the surrounding tissues. @*Methods@# 55 patients with 60 single maxillary anterior implants were divided into two groups: platform-switching implants group (Ankylos), 25 patients with 28 implants; butt-joint implants group (Nobel Replace), 30 patients with 32 implants. The patients received follow-up care more than 1 and 2 year after the final setting of the prosthesis, at which time periapical radiographs were taken. The marginal bone level around the implant and Pink Esthetic Score (PES) were measured for comparison. @* Results @#The average marginal bone changes of platform-switching implants after 1 year and 2 year were (-0.41 ± 0.36) mm and (-0.55 ± 0.33) mm respectively; and the ones of butt-joint implants were (-1.77 ± 0.54) mm and (-1.82 ± 0.61) mm. The average PES of platform- switched implants after 1 year and 2 year were 10.43 ± 1.37 and 10.32 ± 1.21 respectively; the ones of butt-joint implants were 9.21 ± 0.97 and 9.16 ± 0.95. There were significantly differences of marginal bone changes and PES between both groups (P < 0.05).@*Conclusion @#Platform switching implant in the maxillary aesthetics area is more effective in preserving the surrounding bone tissue and aesthetic effect.

A retrospective clinical study of immediate implantation and delayed implantation in molar area / 实用口腔医学杂志

Objective:To compare the changes of marginal bone resportion between immediate implantation and delayed implantation after 12 to 24 months of definitive prostheses finished.Methods:41 patients were recruited and divided into immediate implant placement group(n =20) and delayed implant placement group(n =21).All implants were evaluated via radiograph after surgery,6 months after implantion,1 year and 2 years after prostheses placement respectively,the height of marginal bone was measured 6 month after implation,1 year and 2 years after prostheses placement.Results:After 6 month,1 year and 2 year the mesial marginal bone attachement (MBA) of immediate implant placement group increased by (1.35 ± 1.12),(2.16 ± 1.73) and (2.53 ± 1.65) mm,the distal by (1.46 ± 1.17),(1.94 ± 1.16) and (2.32 ± 1.68) mm,respectively (among the 3 time points of examination,P ＜ 0.05).As for the delayed implantation group,in the mesial area MBA increased by (-0.52 ± 0.47),(-0.69 ± 0.58) and (-0.97 ± 0.78) mm,in the distal area by (-0.46 ± 0.44),(-0.60 ± 0.45) and (-0.72 ± 0.63) mm (among 3 time points,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion:Immediate implantation is superior to delayed implantation for marginal bone attachement of dental implant.

Assessment of Marginal Bone Loss around Platform-Matched and Platform-Switched Implants - A Prospective Study

Abstract The aim of the present study was to perform a software-assisted radiographic assessment of the effect of platform-switching on marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants. Forty patients requiring a dental implant in non-grafted partially edentulous mandibles were enrolled and categorized into implants receiving a platform-matched abutment (control group) or implants with a platform-switched abutment (test group). Standardized digital periapical radiographs were taken at the time of implant placement (T0), at implant loading (T1) and 1-year after functional loading (T2). Software-assisted radiographic assessment of the MBL horizontal, vertical and area changes was performed and compared between time intervals (T1-T0, T2-T1 and T2-T0). Mean radiographic horizontal MBL (hMBL) and vertical MBL (vMBL) from implant placement to 1-year after implant loading (T2-T0) were significantly increased around platform-matched when compared to platform-switched abutments (1.04 mm vs 0.84 mm, p<0.05) and (0.99 mm vs 0.82 mm, p<0.05), respectively. Additionally, bone loss area (BLa) was greater (0.77 mm2 vs 0.63 mm2; p<0.05) for platform-matched compared to platform-switched abutments. Platform-switching has a positive impact upon the amount of bone modeling after loading implants with internal hexagon connection.

Resumo O objetivo do presente estudo foi realizar uma avaliação radiográfica assistida por computador do efeito da plataforma reduzida sobre a perda óssea marginal (MBL) ao redor de implantes. Quarenta pacientes que necessitavam um implante em mandíbulas parcialmente edêntulas não enxertadas foram selecionados e divididos em implantes que receberam pilares de plataforma igualada (grupo controle) ou implantes com pilares de plataforma reduzida (grupo teste). Radiografias periapicais digitais padronizadas foram realizadas no momento da instalação do implante (T0), carregamento do implante (T1) e 1 ano após carregamento funcional (T2). Avaliação radiográfica assistida por computador da MBL horizontal, vertical e mudanças de área foi realizada e comparada entre os intervalos de tempo (T1-T0, T2-T1 e T2-T0). A média radiográfica da MBL horizontal (hMBL) e da MBL vertical (vMBL) do momento da instalação do implante até 1 ano após carregamento (T2-T0) foram significativamente aumentadas ao redor dos pilares de plataforma igualada quando comparado com os pilares de plataforma reduzida (1,04 mm vs 0,84 mm, p<0,05) e (0,99 mm vs 0,82,mm, p<0,05), respectivamente. Além disso, a área de perda óssea (BLa) foi maior (0,77 mm2 vs 0,63 mm2; p<0,05) para plataforma igualada comparada com pilares de plataforma reduzida. Plataforma reduzida tem um impacto positivo na remodelação óssea após carregamento de implantes com conexão interna hexagonal.

Retrospective clinical study of an implant with a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched surface and internal connection: analysis of short-term success rate and marginal bone loss / 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical utility of an implant with a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface and internal connection. METHODS: Six patients who received dental implants in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chonnam National University Dental Hospital, were analyzed by factors influencing the success rate and marginal bone loss. Factors included patient’s age, sex, implant installation site, whether bone graft was done, type of bone graft materials, approaching method if sinus lift was done, and the size of the fixture. In addition, the marginal bone loss was analyzed by using a radiograph. RESULTS: All implants were successful, and the cumulative survival rate was 100 %. Average marginal bone loss of 6 months after the installation was 0.52 mm and 20 months after the functional loading was 1.06 mm. Total marginal bone resorption was 1.58 mm on average. There was no statistically significant difference in mesial and distal marginal bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term clinical success rate of the implant with an SLA surface and internal connection was satisfactory. Moreover, the marginal bone loss was also consistent with the implant success criteria.

Retrospective study on marginal bone loss around maxillary anterior implants with or without bone graft / 대한치과보철학회지

PURPOSE: This study is to evaluate the clinical significance of implantation with simultaneous bone graft by comparing the marginal bone loss around maxillary anterior implants with or without bone graft MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with implant-retained restorations on maxillary anterior region at Implant Center, Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University between June 2011 and May 2014 were included in this study. Date of implant placement, implant diameter, implant length, implant-abutment connection type and whether the bone graft was done were investigated. The patient's periapical radiographs taken immediately after implantation and at the most recent visit were compared. Marginal bone loss was measured using Emago advanced v5.6 program (Oral diagnostic systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Statistical analysis was done in independent t-test by using SPSS 22.0 program. RESULTS: As a result of observing on 83 implants (without bone graft: 44, with bone graft: 39) of 52 patients for 6 - 45 months (average: 18.4 months), implants without bone graft showed 1.42 ± 0.42 mm, implants with bone graft showed 1.28 ± 0.45 mm of marginal bone loss. CONCLUSION: In limitations of this study, implants with simultaneous bone graft had significantly less marginal bone loss than implants without bone graft.

Flapless versus open flap techniques of implant placement: A 15‑month follow‑up study.

Aim: To evaluate and compare the effect of flapless and “open flap” techniques of implant placement on crestal bone height (CBH) around implants. Materials and Methods: This prospective study comprised of 32 implants placed in 16 subjects with a bilateral missing mandibular first molar. In each subject, one implant was placed with “flapless” and other using “open flap” technique. Radiographic assessment of CBH was carried out using standardized intraoral periapical radiograph of the site at baseline, 3 months, 9 months and 15 months after implant placement. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using STATA 11.0 statistical software. To determine the changes in CBH from baseline, at 3‑, 9‑, and 15‑month, repeated measures analysis of variance followed by post‑hoc Bonferroni was used for each of the two techniques for mesial and distal aspects separately. For both techniques, changes in CBH from baseline to 15 months were compared using an independent t‑test with a confidence interval of 95%. Results: For “flapless” technique, there was no statistically significant (P > 0.05) reduction of CBH in initial 9 months but was significant for the 9–15 months period while for “open flap” technique, statistically significant (P < 0.05) reduction was observed up to 15 months. Comparison of both techniques showed significantly lesser reduction with “flapless” than “open flap” technique. The overall average crestal bone loss was 0.046 ± 0.008 mm on mesial aspect, 0.043 ± 0.012 mm on distal aspect with “flapless” technique and 1.48 ± 0.085 mm on mesial aspect, 1.42 ± 0.077 on distal aspect “open flap” technique. Conclusions: Both techniques showed a reduction in CBH with time but the flapless technique showed a lesser reduction. Therefore, the flapless technique can be considered as a better treatment approach for placement of implants, especially where adequate width and height of available bone are present.

Influencia del Diseño Micro y Macroscópico de la Región Cervical del Implante en la Preservación de Hueso Marginal Perimplantario: Una Revisión Sistemática / Influence of the Micro and Macroscopic Implant Neck Design in the Preservation of Marginal Bone Level: A Systematic Review

El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue evaluar los distintos diseños en el cuello del implante (pulido o tratado, con o sin intercambio de plataforma, o con o sin microespiras) y su posible influencia en la pérdida del hueso marginal periimplantario. Se llevo a cabo una revisión sistemática siguiendo la metodología PICO del Centro de Medicina Basada en la Evidencia de la Universidad de Oxford. La pregunta dirigida a la consecución de los objetivos fue: ¿Es el diseño del cuello del implante un factor crítico en la conservación del hueso marginal periimplantario? Se emplearon MeSH keywords específicos en las bases de datos Pubmed y Cochrane. Tres revisores independientes se pusieron de acuerdo en los estudios finalmente incluidos, obteniendo un índice de concordancia kappa de 0,88. De estos, se realizó una evaluación crítica del nivel de evidencia y también del riesgo de sesgo de los RCT mediante la Herramienta Cochrane. Se consultaron 445 artículos por título, incluyendo finalmente un total de 16 artículos a texto completo. La heterogeneidad de estos estudios impidió realizar un meta-análisis. No se encontró evidencia de que una determinada configuración del cuello del implante sea mejor que otra en la conservación del hueso marginal periimplantario y sin embargo, parece que una posición apico-coronal yuxtaósea del cuello pulido del implante respecto a la cresta ósea receptora pudiera ser crítica a ese respecto. No se encontró suficiente evidencia sobre la efectividad de las diferentes configuraciones de la región cervical del implante en la preservación del hueso marginal periimplantario. Son necesarios estudios clínicos controlados y aleatorizados a largo plazo para valorar los efectos de dichas modificaciones.

The aim of this systematic review was to assess whether different implant neck designs (polished or coated, with or without platform switching, either with or without microthreads) influence marginal bone resorption. A systematic review was conducted following the PICO methodology of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine of Oxford University. The question to the achievement of objectives was: Is the design of the implant neck a critical factor in the preservation of marginal bone levels? Specific MeSH keywords were used in the Pubmed and Cochrane databases. Three independent reviewers agreed on the studies ultimately included finding a concordance kappa index of 0.86. Of these articles, acritical evaluation of the level of evidence was performed and also the risk of bias of the RCT using the Cochrane tool. Four hundred forty-five items were reviewed by title, eventually including a total of 16 full-text articles. Heterogeneity of these studies made impossible the performance of a meta-analysis. No evidence that a particular configuration of the implant neck was better than another in preserving the peri-implant marginal bone was found, and yet it seems that an apico-coronal position juxta-osseous of the smooth neck of the implant relative to the bone crest could be decisive. Not enough evidence was found on the effectiveness of different configurations of the cervical region of the implant in the periimplant marginal bone preservation. More randomized controlled trials are needed to assess long-term effects of such modifications.

Influence of platform switching versus platform matching on the marginal bone resorption around im-plant:A Meta-analysis / 实用口腔医学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the effects of platform switching and platform matching system on the marginal bone resorption a-round implant.Methods:Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)that compared marginal bone loss around platform-switched implants with platform matched prostheses were selected from PubMed,EMbase,CBM,CNKI and other electronic databases supplemented by hand search and retrospective collection of literature published or unpublished between 1 991 -201 4.The literature based on inclusion and exclusion criteria was screened by 2 revieweres independently,the quality of the included studies was evaluated,the data were extracted using RevMan 5.2 software for Meta-analysis.Results:1 4 studies with 1 331 implants were included.Meta-analysis showed that peri-implant bone resorption in the platform switching group was significantly less than that in the platform matching group[MD =-0.51 ,95% CI:(-0.72 -0.30),P 0.45 mm (unilateral)was more favorable to implant marginal bone preservation.Conclusion:The present data suggest that platform-switched technology is more conducive to implant bone preservation than platform-matched method.

Implant-supported overdentures with different bar designs: A retrospective evaluation after 5-19 years of clinical function

PURPOSE: This retrospective study evaluated the outcome of implant-retained overdentures (IODs) after 5-19 years of clinical function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient files was performed referring to 27 patients who received 36 IODs with 3 different bar designs (group A=prefabricated round bars, n=7; group B=one-piece anterior milled bars, n=20; and group C=two bilaterally placed milled bars, n=9) in the mandible (n=24) and/or in the maxilla (n=12). The analysis focused on the survival and success rates (according to Kaplan-Meier) of the implants and prostheses. Technical complication rates for each type of restoration were analyzed and compared via one-way ANOVA and the Chi-squared test. The prevalence of peri-implantitis (radiographic bone loss > or =3.5 mm) was evaluated by digital analysis of panoramic radiographs taken post-operative (baseline) and after 5-19 years of clinical function (follow-up). RESULTS: The mean observational time was 7.3 years. The survival rates of the prostheses and implants were 100% and 97.7%, respectively. Technical complications occurred more frequently in group A (mean: 3.5 during observational time) than in the other two groups (B: 0.8; C: 1.0). However, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.58). Peri-implantitis was diagnosed for 12.4% of the implants in 37% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Bar-retained IODs are an adequate treatment option for edentulous jaws. These restorations may exhibit high implant/prosthesis survival rates (>97%), and a limited incidence of technical complications after a mean observational period of >7 years. Nevertheless, peri-implantitis was identified as a frequent and serious biological complication for this type of reconstruction.

Marginal Bone Resorption Analysis of Dental Implant Patients by Applying Pattern Recognition Algorithm

Clinical outcomes of implant supported fixed-hybrid prostheses in the fully edentulous arches / 대한치과보철학회지

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of implant supported fixed-hybrid prostheses (FHP) in the fully edentulous arches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in this retrospective study were restored with fixed-hybrid prostheses supported by 4 to 6 implants and functioned more than 1 year of loading. Outcome measures were marginal bone change of implant related with sex, anatomical location (maxilla vs. mandible), opposing teeth, loading time of patients, tilting of posterior implant by Mann-Whitney U test and cantilever length of superstructure by regression analysis, and complication rates. Significance level was set P.05), and cantilever length was not significantly related with a marginal bone loss of implant next to cantilever (P>.05). Complication was shown in 11 patients and veneer fracture and dislodging of artificial teeth were most prevalent. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, although marginal bone loss of FHP was very little, complication rates were high. Irrespective of tilting of most posterior implants, marginal bone loss of most posterior implants next to cantilever was less than those of the other implants positioned anteriorly. Cantilever length (<17 mm) did not affect a marginal bone loss of most posterior implants.