Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery ; : 224-229, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-112267

ABSTRACT

The maxillary posterior area is the most challenging site for the dental implant. Although the sinus graft is a predictable and successful technique for rehabilitation of atrophic and pneumatized posterior maxilla, when there is severe destruction of alveolar bone, a very long crown length remains challenging after successful dental implants installation with sinus graft. We performed vertical augmentation of the maxillary posterior alveolar ridge using the allogenic block bone graft with a simultaneous sinus graft using allogenic and heterogenic bone chips. After about six months, we installed the dental implant. After this procedure, we achieved a more favorable crown-implant fixture ratio and better results clinically and biomechanically. This is a preliminary report of vertical augmentation of maxillary posterior alveolar ridge using allogenic block bone graft and simultaneous maxillary sinus graft. Further research requires longer observation and more patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Alveolar Process , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Crowns , Dental Implants , Maxilla , Maxillary Sinus , Rehabilitation , Sinus Floor Augmentation , Transplants
2.
Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery ; : 107-111, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-79010

ABSTRACT

Lower midface concavity due to depressed nasal base and pyriform aperture may be aesthetically displeasing. A relative deficiency in lower midface projection may be congenital or acquired, particularly after cleft surgery and trauma. People with normal occlusion associated with lower midface concavity due to depressed nasal base and pyriform aperture can be corrected with an autologous bone graft or artificial implants. The authors performed paranasal augmentation with an alloplastic implants using a porous polyethylene implants(Medpor(R)) on 430 patients who had visited authors' hospital for aesthetic correction of lower midface contour from January 2000 to June 2009. 425 patients were satisfied with the outcome, which gave them a natural contour. Complications such as dislocation, displacement, infection and extrusion were not observed. Only five patients had their implants removed due to displeasing and foreign body sensations. Alloplastic augmentation in the paranasal area is a very easy procedure and can simulate the visual effect as that of maxillary advancement osteotomy. Paranasal augmentation using a porous polyethylene implants(Medpor(R)) in patients having lower midface concavity with normal occlusion can contribute to the enhancement of the lower midface contour.


Subject(s)
Humans , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Joint Dislocations , Displacement, Psychological , Foreign Bodies , Osteotomy , Polyethylene , Prostheses and Implants , Sensation , Transplants
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL