Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Tumor ; (12): 116-125, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-848281

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) in protecting ovarian function of premenopausal breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: The randomized controlled trials of GnRHa protecting ovarian function of premenopausal breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy were collected from PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Databases, and the date range was from the establishment of the databases to March 2018. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literatures about amenorrhea rate, premature ovarian failure (POF) rate, menstrual recurrence rate, pregnancy rate, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in premenopausal breast cancer patients after chemotherapy combined with GnRHa or chemotherapy alone were screened out. The outcome measurements were odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 17 randomized controlled trials involving 1 590 patients were included in this Metaanalysis. As compared with chemotherapy alone, the chemotherapy combined with GnRHa increased the amenorrhea rate during chemotherapy (OR = 11.14, 95% CI: 4.83-25.72, P < 0.000 01), reduced the POF rate (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25-0.50, P < 0.000 01), while improved the menstrual recurrence rate (OR = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.88-4.49, P < 0.000 01) and pregnancy rate (OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.08-3.02, P = 0.02). Moreover, three studies showed that the levels of FSH and LH in chemotherapy combined with GnRHa group were lower than those in chemotherapy alone group, and there were significant differences in two studies (both P < 0.01). Conclusion: Chemotherapy combined with GnRHa can increase the menstrual recurrence rate and pregnancy rate of premenopausal breast cancer patients after chemotherapy, suggesting that GnRHa has a protective effect on ovarian function of those patients.

2.
Ginecol. obstet. Méx ; 86(6): 383-388, feb. 2018.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-984448

ABSTRACT

Resumen OBJETIVO Evaluar los resultados en ciclos de FIV-ICSI de dos protocolos de estimulación ovárica en mujeres mayores de 35 años e investigar si agregar hormona luteinizante recombinante a FSH-r en un protocolo de estimulación mejora la respuesta ovárica y, en consecuencia, las tasas de embarazo en este grupo poblacional. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS Estudio longitudinal, observacional y retrospectivo efectuado en pacientes de la Clínica de Reproducción Hisparep del Hospital Español con diagnóstico de infertilidad, mayores de 35 años, que recibieron un ciclo de hiperestimulación ovárica controlada con FIV-ICSI durante el periodo 2014-2016. El análisis estadístico se efectuó con la prueba de t de Student para muestras independientes. Los estudios se analizaron con el paquete estadístico SPSS IBM, versión 22. RESULTADOS Se analizaron 201 mujeres con infertilidad, mayores de 35 años. El grupo 1 (n = 101) de FIV-ICSI recibió estimulación con hormona folículo estimulante recombinante y hormona luteinizante recombinante 2:1 con menotropinas (Pergoveris® y Merapur®) a partir del segundo día del ciclo. El grupo 2 (n = 100) recibió hormona folículo estimulante recombinante y menotropinas (Gonal F® y Merapur®); en ambos esquemas se utilizó antagonista de GnRH a partir del día 7 del ciclo. La media de ovocitos aspirados fue de 7.5 en el grupo 1 y 9.1 en el grupo 2 (p = 0.058). La media de ovocitos maduros fue 6.2 en el Grupo 1 vs 7.4 en el grupo 2 (p = 0.085). La tasa de fecundación en el grupo 1 fue de 57 vs 67% en el grupo 2 (p = 0.045). En el grupo 1 la tasa de implantación por embrión transferido en fresco fue 24.1 vs 10.3% en el Grupo 2 (p = 0.40), la tasa de recién nacido vivo fue de 30% en el Grupo 1 vs 20.6% en el Grupo 2. La media de embriones vitrificados en el Grupo 1 fue 1.47 vs 1.38 en el Grupo 2. CONCLUSIONES La probable ventaja de la complementación con hormona folículo estimulante recombinante durante la estimulación ovárica en mujeres mayores de 35 años es de interés y se requiere su evaluación en estudios posteriores.


Abstract OBJECTIVE To evaluate the reproductive effects when recombinant luteinizing hormone is added and to compare two stimulation schemes by number of aspirated oocytes, mature oocytes, fertilization and implantation rates, live newborn and number of vitrified embryos. MATERIALS AND METHODS Longitudinal, observational and retrospective study carried out in patients of the Hisparep Reproduction Clinic of the Spanish Hospital with diagnosis of infertility, over 35 years old, who received a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle with IVF-ICSI during the period 2014-2016. The statistical analysis was carried out with the Student t test for independent samples. The studies were analyzed with the IBM SPSS statistical package, version 22. RESULTS We analyzed 201 women with infertility, over 35 years of age. Group 1 (n = 101) of IVF-ICSI received stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone 2: 1 with menotropins (Pergoveris® and Merapur®) from the second day of the cycle. Group 2 (n = 100) received recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and menotropins (Gonal F® and Merapur®); in both schemes, GnRH antagonist was used from day 7 of the cycle. The average number of aspirated oocytes was 7.5 in Group 1 and 9.1 in Group 2 (p = 0.058). Mean mature oocytes were 6.2 in Group 1 vs 7.4 in Group 2 (p = 0.085). The fertilization rate in group 1 was 57 vs. 67% in Group 2 (p = 0.045). In Group 1 the implantation rate per embryo transferred fresh was 24.1 vs 10.3% in Group 2 (p = 0.40), the live newborn rate was 30% in Group 1 vs 20.6% in Group 2. The mean number of vitrified embryos in Group 1 was 1.47 vs 1.38 in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS The probable advantage of supplementation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone during ovarian stimulation in women over 35 years of age is of interest and its evaluation is required in subsequent studies.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL