ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical effect of micro-endoscopic resection of thyroid cancer and supply corresponding nursing measures through comparison of micro-endoscopic resection and conventional thyroidectomy.Methods 60 cases of thyroid cancer patients during May 2011 to March 2012 were selected.The experimental group (30 cases) underwent micro-endoscopic resection,while the control group was given conventional thyroidectomy.Items such as the operation time,bleeding volume in operation,complication,incision length,postoperative pain evaluation,postoperative resumption time of activity of neck were compared between the two groups.Results The total operation time was (105.4±28.7)min in the experimental group,and (98.1±22.4) min in the control group respectively.The bleeding volume was (22.4±11.6) ml in the experimental group,and (47.3±18.2) ml in the control group respectively.The postoperative resumption time of activity of neck was (22.3±7.7) h in the experimental group,(39.0±10.8) h in the control group.The above items had significant statistical difference between two groups.The incidence of complication had significant statistical difference between two groups.The incision length of the experimental group was (2.95±0.13) cm,(7.72±0.93) cm in the control group,there was significant statistical difference between two groups.Conclusions Compared with conventional surgery,micro-endoscopic technique in thyroid surgery has good efficacy.And assisting with essential nursing strategy,the effcacy of microendoscopic technique can be improved.