ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by Meta-analysis.Methods:PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang Data were searched from their establishment to January 2021 for all the studies on UBE and MED in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The data extracted were authors, year of publication, study design, subject characteristics, sample size, surgical protocol, age, sex ratio, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, complications, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The Meta-analysis was conducted with software Revman 5.3 to analyze the operation time, hospital stay, complication rate, waist and lower extremity VAS scores and ODI scores at preoperation, early postoperation and the last follow-up. The quality of the case-control studies included was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) while the methodological quality and risk of bias of the randomized controlled studies (RCT) included were evaluated using the Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool.Results:Finally, 7 studies were included, 6 in English and one in Chinese. There were 2 RCTs and 5 case-control studies. There were 251 patients in the UBE group and 224 patients in the MED group. Compared with the MED group, the UBE group had a significantly shorter hospital stay ( MD=-2.28, 95% CI: -3.42 to -1.14, P<0.001), and a significantly lower VAS score for early postoperative low back pain ( MD=-0.80, 95% CI:-1.44 to -0.16, P=0.01). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in operation time, complication rate, waist VAS scores at preoperation or the last follow-up, lower extremity VAS or ODI scores at preoperation, early postoperation or the last follow-up, or dural dilatation area ( P>0.05). Conclusions:In the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, compared with MED, UBE is superior in early relief of low back pain and hospital stay after operation, but shows no significant difference in long-term efficacy or safety.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Herniated cervical intervertebral disc volume measurement is an important parameter for quantitative evaluation of cervical disc degeneration, but it faces a lot of problems such as different measurement standards and the undefined measurement error range. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of PACS software in measuring cervical disc volume, provide reliable measurement methods and accurate data support for clinical observation and research on cervical disc volume change and degeneration. METHODS: The error rate was obtained by repeated measurements of the normal saline with a known volume of 5.0 mL by means of PACS software. With reference to this error rate, volume changes of cervical disc herniation before and after cervical microendoscopic laminoplasty were “monitored” and analyzed in 30 cases. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (approval No. 2019-KY-274) on September 26, 2019. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) For the measurement of normal saline with known volume, it was found that the error rate of measurement by PACS software was ±5%, suggesting that the measurement of cervical disc volume by PACS software is a simple and accurate method. (2) After cervical microendoscopic laminoplasty, there were 70 patients with reduced cervical disc volume reduction absorption rate of 5%-100%, and the absorption ratio was 76.1% (70/92). The volume increased by 11, but the increase was not more than 5% in the patients with cervical disc herniation after treatment. (3) The spontaneous disappearance or reduction of the herniated cervical disc after cervical microendoscopic laminoplasty was as early as 7 days, and the longest was 76 months. (4) The effects were excellent in 11 cases, good in 15 cases, and fair in 4 cases. The excellent and good rate was 86.7%.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: At present, there are many surgical methods for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, and the therapeutic effects have their own advantages. Although there are many meta-analyses to compare the therapeutic effects of the two surgical methods, there is no comparison of the therapeutic effects of several surgical methods. OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences of different surgical methods in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation by network meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid and CNKI were searched, and randomized controlled trials or retrospective studies on different surgical methods for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation were collected. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established in advance, the quality of included randomized controlled trials was evaluated, and the data were analyzed by STATA 15.0 software. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 42 studies, 5 156 patients and 9 surgical treatments were included. Surgical treatments contain total disc replacement, lumbar disc fusion, standard open discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, microdiscectomy, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, chemonucleolysis, automatic percutaneous lumbar discectomy and percutaneous laser disc decompression. The results of network meta-analysis showed that(from best to worst):(1) There was no significant difference in leg pain relief, and the rank probability was percutaneous laser disc decompression > microendoscopic discectomy > percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy > standard open discectomy > microdiscectomy > lumbar disc fusion > total disc replacement.(2) There was no significant difference in low back pain relief, and the rank probability was total disc replacement > lumbar disc fusion > microendoscopic discectomy > percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy > microdiscectomy > percutaneous laser disc decompression > standard open discectomy.(3) There was no significant difference in Oswestry disability index scores, and the rank probability was microendoscopic discectomy > percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy > standard open discectomy > microdiscectomy > total disc replacement > lumbar disc fusion.(4) There were some statistical differences in the success rate, and the rank probability was total disc replacement > lumbar disc fusion > microendoscopic discectomy > percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy > standard open discectomy > percutaneous laser disc decompression > microdiscectomy > chemonucleolysis > automatic percutaneous lumbar discectomy.(5) There was no significant difference in reoperation rate, and the rank probability was total disc replacement > lumbar disc fusion > microdiscectomy > microendoscopic discectomy > standard open discectomy > percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy > percutaneous laser disc decompression > chemonucleolysis > automatic percutaneous lumbar discectomy.(6) There were some statistical differences in incidence of complications, and the rank probability was percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy > automatic percutaneous lumbar discectomy > standard open discectomy > microdiscectomy > percutaneous laser disc decompression > microendoscopic discectomy > total disc replacement > lumbar disc fusion > chemonucleolysis. Results suggested that microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy are effective in all aspects. Disc replacement and lumbar disc fusion are the best in success rate of operation. Chemonucleolysis is poor in success rate of operation, reoperation rate and complications rate. Percutaneous automatic discectomy is poor in success rate of operation and reoperation rate.
ABSTRACT
Background: The prevalence of back pain has been reported between 49% and 80%. Except for cases that require immediatesurgical intervention, the first-line treatment involves medical choices. 90% of attacks of sciatica respond to conservativemanagement. Surgical intervention when indicated involves discectomy and various operative methods include laminectomydiscectomy, microlumbar discectomy, and microendoscopic discectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate theadvantages and disadvantages and outcome of the above-mentioned surgical operations for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) andthen, specifically, the outcomes for each of them using Odom’s criteria.Materials and Methods: A prospective study was carried out between April 2015 and April 2017 to compare the advantages/disadvantages and outcome of various surgical interventions in LDH, namely laminectomy discectomy (Group A), microlumbardiscectomy (Group B), and microendoscopic discectomy (Group C) with each group consisting of 30 patients. All patients wereadmitted as per inclusion criteria.Results: In each group of our study, the mean age and sex distribution were comparable and statistically not significant. Ourstudy showed the post-operative hospital stay and the need for post-operative analgesia was low for microendoscopic surgery,but on long-term evaluation with Odom’s criteria, laminectomy achieved better outcomes than other methods.Conclusion: Our study showed that microlumbar discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy have a better short-term outcomeas compared to laminectomy discectomy. However, long-term results are comparable.
ABSTRACT
Objectives:To compare the early curative effect of visualization of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(VPTED) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:49 patients with single segmental lumbar spinal stenosis combined with lumbar disc herniation(LDH) were treated in our hospital from March 2016 to March 2017.Among them,21 cases accepted VPTED,and 28 cases underwent MED.The length of incision,amount of bleeding during operation,operation time,length of hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization were recorded in the both groups.Visual analogue scale(VAS) was used to evaluate the effect of surgery,Oswestry disability index(ODI) was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy.The modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the efficacy of the patients at final follow-up.Results:There were no statistical differences among the age,the ratio of male to female,follow-up time,low back pain,weakness,sensory disturbance,general reflexes and prominent segments(P＞0.05).There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in preoperative and postoperative VAS and ODI scores(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS or ODI score between groups at the same time (P＞0.05).The length of incision(0.78±0.06cm vs 1.95±0.12cm),the amount of intraoperative perspective(15.86± 2.66 vs 2.18±0.38) and the operation time(87.51±30.46min vs 47.53±13.61min) had significant difference between VPTED and MED group(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in hospitalization time or hospitalization expenses between the two groups(P＞0.05).At final follow-up,based on the MacNab standard,it was excellent in 17 cases,good in 3 cases,fair in 1 case in VPTED group;it was excellent in 22 cases,good in 4 cases,fair in 2 cases in MED group.Excellent rate of the VPTED group was 95.24％,and that was 92.86％ in the MED group,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusions:Visualization of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (VPTED) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis have good short-term curative effect,it iproves that VPTED is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected outcome data. PURPOSE: To compare 5-year outcomes following decompression with fusion (FU) and microendoscopic decompression (MED) in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and to define surgical indication limitations regarding the use of MED for this condition. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There have been no comparative studies on mid- or long-term outcomes following FU and MED for patients with DLS. METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients with DLS were surgically treated. Sixteen patients first underwent FU (FU group), and 25 then underwent MED (MED group). The 5-year clinical outcomes following the two surgical methods were compared using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. RESULTS: The degree of improvement (DOI) for social life function was significantly greater in the MED group than in the FU group. Although not statistically significant, DOIs for the other four functional scores were also greater in the MED group than in the FU group. However, patients with a large percentage of slippage in the neutral position might experience limited improvement in low back pain, those with a large percentage of slippage at maximal extension might experience limited improvement in three functional scores, and those with a small intervertebral angle at maximal flexion might have limited improvement in three functional scores after MED for DLS. Therefore, we statistically compared the DOIs between the FU and MED groups regarding the preoperative percentage of slippage in the neutral position among patients with greater than 20% slippage, the preoperative percentage of slippage at maximal extension among patients with greater than 15% slippage, and the intervertebral angle at flexion among patients with angles lesser than −5°; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: MED is a useful minimally invasive surgical procedure that possibly offers better clinical outcomes than FU for DLS.
Subject(s)
Humans , Asian People , Back Pain , Decompression , Low Back Pain , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Stenosis , SpondylolisthesisABSTRACT
Objective To compare the curative effect of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in lumbar disc herniation.Methods A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI. Two authors reviewed all articles individually. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the quality of retrospective studies was evaluated by the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The data was extracted by the Review Manager 5.30.Results A total of 19 articles were brought into this Meta-analysis. The outcomes were divided into primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. Excerpt for the short-term VAS score was lower in PELD group (P = 0.010), other index, including long-term VAS score (P = 0.120), ODI score (P = 0.260), complication (P = 0.100) and recurrence (P = 0.100), didn't had significant difference in two groups. The blood loss (P = 0.000), hospital stay (P = 0.000) and the length of incision (P = 0.000) were all superiority in PELD group. Whereas the operative time was shorter in MED group (P = 0.001).Conclusion PELD was a more minimally invasive and secure technique in lumbar disc herniation.
ABSTRACT
Objective To provide a minimally invasive surgical treatment using mobile microendoscopy (mobile MED) for limited cervical spine canal stenosis. Methods Eleven patients were collected from February 2015 to February 2016 in Tianjin Hospital, including 6 males and 5 females, aged 51- 77 years, mean (67.4 ± 7.6) years. Clinical treatment was performed on 11 patients of limited cervical spinal stenosis. The levels of stenosis included C3-5 in 5 cases, C4-6 in 4 cases, C5-7 in 2 cases. The working channel of mobile MED (MMED) can be tilted according to the need of operation. The design of surgical methods:the levels of stenosis were located with fluroscopy, through a posterior median 2.5 cm incision, the nachal ligaments was separated and the spinous process was reached. After a little dissection of paraspinal mascle, the working canal was inserted along the spinous process, and the target lamina was exposed. With MMED, the partial laminectomy was performed along the junction groove of lamina and articular process with high-speed burr, and flavum was exposed and resected with ultra-thin Kerisson, and the dural sac was well exposed. Then the working canal was inserted on the contralateral side along the spinous process, and the decompression was performed with the same method. After bilateral direct decompression, the spinous process and posterior ligament complex shift posteriorly with enlargement of spinal canal. The operation time and blood loss were recorded and the efficacy was followed-up. Results There was no serious complications such as neurological injury. The operation time ranged 80-120 min, with an average of (100 ± 18) min. The intraoperative blood loss ranged (50-120) mL, with an average of (80 ± 20) mL. Postoperative CT showed sufficient decompression and enlargement of the canal with the posterior shift of the spinous process and posterior ligament complex. The patients were followed up for 6-18 months. The alignment of cervical spine was well preserved on X-ray. The ODI decreased from 42.2 ± 16.3 preoperatively to 6.2 ± 4.3. The JOA score improved from 8.2 ± 3.3 preoperatively to 15.1 ± 4.2 at the last follow-up. According to the improvement rate [(JOA-preoperative JOA)/(17-preoperative JOA)], the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 5 cases, and effective in 1 case. Conclusion The cervical canal enlargement with mobile microendoscopic discectomy technique preserving posterior ligament composite provides a minimally invasive procedure for limited cervical stenosis with adequate decompression.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) on treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLDH). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients with FLDH underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy from June 2014 to September 2015, age from 41 to 64, average 52.3. The average operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay were collected. The lumbocrural pain perception of patients before and after surgery was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and postoperative lumbar functional recovery after surgery by modified MacNab criteria. Results Average operation time was 69 min (58~109 min), intraoperative blood loss was 18 ml (11~40 ml), and length of stay was 5.0 d (3.0 ~ 10.0 d). VAS score from (8.12 ± 1.25) preoperatively improved to (2.80 ± 1.12) at the 3rd d after operation, (1.59 ± 1.06) at 3 months after operation, and (1.31 ± 0.89) at the last follow-up after operation; There was a statistical difference between preoperative scores and postoperative scores (P < 0.05). Modified MacNab criteria was a ratio of 88.9%. Conclusions PELD on the treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation have small area of trauma, faster postoperative recovering and several other advantages,which is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MED-TLIF) with mobile microendoscopic discectomy (MMED) technique. Methods The MMED includes outer working canal and inner operating canal. Large working canals and endoscopic chisel were fabricated for MMED-TLIF,which was designed as follow:the pedicles and index level were located with fluoroscopy, and a 2.5 cm incision was made between pedicle punctures sites on the symptomatic side. Working canal was inserted, and the facet was exposed,the inferior articular process and medial part of superior articular process were resected. The disc and cartilage endplates were curettage, and the intervertebral space was released and tested. The inner operating canal was removed and the interbody space was grafted and supported with suitable cage. Percutaneous pedicles screws were inserted and the residual displacement was evaluated under fluoroscopy, followed by the install of connecting rods for reduction and fixation. Fifty-six patients with lumbar stenosis including 32 cases of instability and spondylolisthesis (1 degree in 15 cases and 2 degree in 9 cases) were treated with this technique. The ODI index and VAS score were compared in patients before and after surgery. The efficacy was evaluated by Macnab standard. Results Surgery was successful in all patients, with no nerve injury or conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was (120±30) min (range, 90–180 min),with a mean blood loss of (120±50) mL (range,50–200 mL). The post-operative X-ray and CT scans showed improvement of spinal alignment with mean reduction ratio of 72%. Patients were followed up for 6 to 36 months. The ODI score decreased from 50.1±11.2 to 5.8±5.6. The VAS score of lumbar decreased from 7.1±4.2 to 1.2±1.0 and VAS score of leg decreased from 4.1±2.5 to 1.1±0.9 at final follow-up. The clinical results were excellent in 36 cases,good in 20 according to the Macnab scale. Conclusion MED-TLIF can easily perform with MMED technique,with sufficient decompression and reduction, and providing satisfactory results with less invasive procedure.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare clinical efficacy between microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and open discectomy (OD) in the treatment of patients with lumber intervertebral disc herniation (LIDH).Methods 116 cases of LIDH who were given surgical treatment were selected as research subjects to retrospectively analyze their clinical data.Then,these cases were divided into MED group (n=54) and OD group (n=62) according to operation type.The curative efficacy,operation situation and incidence of complications were compared.Results All patients' operations were successful.After the one-year follow-up,the MED group had an excellent and good rate of 96.3％,which was statistically same with that of 93.5％ in the OD group (P ＞0.05) In comparison with the OD group,MED group had a statistically shorter operation time,less bleeding volume in the operation,shorter length of incision and shorter rest time on bed after operation (all P＜0.05).After operation,there's no case of severe complication,and the incidence of complications between the two groups was statistically same (P＞0.05) Conclusions MED and OD are both effective operations for LIDH,which have high excellent and good rate.But in comparison with OD,MED has advantages of less damage and faster recovery.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To conduct a meta analysis of studies comparing theapeutic effect and safety of microendoscopic discectomy to conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in China.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A systematic literature retrieval was conducted in the Chinese Bio medicine Database, CNKI database, Chongqin VIP database and Wangfang database. The statistical analysis was performed using a RevMan 4.2 software. The comparison included excellent rate, operation times, blood loss, periods of bed rest and resuming daily activities, hospital stay or hospital stay after surgery, and complications of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The search yielded 20 reports, which included 2 957 cases treated by microendoscopic discectomy and 2 130 cases treated by conventional open discectomy. There were 12, 11, 7, 5, 4 and 4 reports which had comparison of operation times, blood loss, period of bed rest, periods of resuming daily activities, hospital stay and hospital stay after surgery respectively. Complications were mentioned in 10 reports. Compared to patients treated by open discectomy, patients treated by microendoscopic discectomy had a higher excellent rates [OR=1.29, 95%CI (1.03, 1.62)], less blood loss[OR=-63.67, 95%CI (-86.78, -40.55)], less period of bed rest[OR=-15.33, 95%CI (-17.76, -12.90)], less period of resumption of daily activities [OR=-24.41, 95%CI (-36.86, -11.96)], less hospital stay [OR=-5.00, 95%CI (-6.94, -3.06)] or hospital stay after surgery [OR=-7.47, 95%CI (-9.17, -5.77) respectively. However, incidence of complications and operation times were proved no significant different between microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Microendoscopic discectomy and conventional open discectomy in treatment of lumbar disc herniation are both safe, effective; incidence of complications are nearly. Patients with lumbar disc herniation treated by microendoscopic discectomy have fewer blood loss, shorter periods of bed rest and hospital stay, and resume daily activities faster. Techniques are selected according to indications, microendoscopic discectomy should be carried out when conjunct indications occur.</p>
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To explore the microendoscopic discectomy technique and inclusion criteria for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and to supply feasible criteria and technical notes to avoid complications and to increase the therapeutic effect. METHODS: A consecutive series of 25 patients who underwent posterior microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation were included. The inclusion criteria were as follows: no severe pain in the lumbar region, no lumbar instability observed by flexion-extension radiography and no intervertebral discitis or endplate damage observed by magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were diagnosed by clinical manifestations and imaging examinations. RESULTS: Follow-up visits were carried out in all cases. Complications, such as nerve injuries, were not observed. The follow-up outcomes were graded using the MacNab criteria. A grade of excellent was given to 12 patients, good to 12 patients and fair to 1 patient. A grade of excellent or good occurred in 96% of cases. One patient relapsed 3 months after surgery and then underwent lumbar interbody fusion and inner fixation. The numerical rating scale of preoperative leg pain was 7.4± 1.5, whereas it decreased to 2.1±0.8 at 7 days after surgery. The preoperative Oswestry disability index of lumbar function was 57.5±10.0, whereas it was 26.0±8.5 at 7 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: In these cases, microendoscopic discectomy was able to achieve satisfactory clinical results. Furthermore, it has advantages over other methods because of its smaller incision, reduced bleeding and more efficient recovery. .
Subject(s)
Humans , Centrifugation/methods , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/metabolism , Transfection/methods , Cell Survival/physiology , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/cytology , RNA Interference/physiology , RNA, Small Interfering/geneticsABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the learning curve of microendoscopic lumbar discectomy (MED) and summarize the operative experience. Methods From July 2010 to March 2012, the first 100 patients with single level lumbar disc herniation managed with MED were divided into chronological groups (A, B, C and D), 30 patients in group A, B, C and 10 patients in group D. The comparsons were conducted in terms of operative time , estimated blood loss , number of cases with transition from MED to open surgey or for reoperation , rate of complications and postoperative efficacy. Results The mean operative time and the mean estimated blood loss in each group was valuated respectively. In group A , the operative time and estimated blood loss were significantly decreased as compared with those in group B, C and D respectively (P 0.05). There were 6 complications in group A, 1 complication in group B and C respectively and no complication in group D. The leg pain visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index at the first month and the twelfth month postoperatively were all improved respectively as compared with those preoperatively (P < 0.01). Conclusion The learning curve of microendoscopic lumbar discectomy generally may reach the plateau when about 30 cases are operated on. The key procedure to pass over the learning curve includes puncture and location , flavectomy , anatomy mark identification, and precaution of damage in dural sac.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical effect of micro-endoscopic resection of thyroid cancer and supply corresponding nursing measures through comparison of micro-endoscopic resection and conventional thyroidectomy.Methods 60 cases of thyroid cancer patients during May 2011 to March 2012 were selected.The experimental group (30 cases) underwent micro-endoscopic resection,while the control group was given conventional thyroidectomy.Items such as the operation time,bleeding volume in operation,complication,incision length,postoperative pain evaluation,postoperative resumption time of activity of neck were compared between the two groups.Results The total operation time was (105.4±28.7)min in the experimental group,and (98.1±22.4) min in the control group respectively.The bleeding volume was (22.4±11.6) ml in the experimental group,and (47.3±18.2) ml in the control group respectively.The postoperative resumption time of activity of neck was (22.3±7.7) h in the experimental group,(39.0±10.8) h in the control group.The above items had significant statistical difference between two groups.The incidence of complication had significant statistical difference between two groups.The incision length of the experimental group was (2.95±0.13) cm,(7.72±0.93) cm in the control group,there was significant statistical difference between two groups.Conclusions Compared with conventional surgery,micro-endoscopic technique in thyroid surgery has good efficacy.And assisting with essential nursing strategy,the effcacy of microendoscopic technique can be improved.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Mostrar el manejo endoscópico transoral del divertículo de Zenker. Casos clínicos: Cuatro pacientes con divertículo de Zenker fueron sometidos a cirugía microendoscópica transoral, dos con grapeo y dos con resección láser. Resultados: Todos los pacientes fueron tratados exitosamente, ninguno presentó complicaciones, la estancia hospitalaria fue menor a 24 horas. Los pacientes con grapeo reiniciaron la vía oral a las ocho horas, los pacientes con resección láser a los cinco días y requirieron sonda nasoyeyunal. Conclusiones: El tratamiento actual del divertículo de Zenker debe ser transoral, la selección de la técnica (láser o engrapado) depende de la experiencia y la disposición tecnológica. Ambas tienen ventajas importantes sobre la técnica abierta: bajo costo hospitalario, disminución en la estancia hospitalaria, morbilidad y complicaciones). La cirugía abierta está reservada para cuando no sea posible el abordaje transoral por motivos técnicos o médicos.
OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to report on transoral endoscopic management of Zenker's diverticulum. METHODS: Four patients with Zenker's diverticulum were treated by transoral microendoscopic surgery, two by stapler and two by laser resection. RESULTS: All patients were successfully treated, and no complications were noted. Hospital stay was <24 h in all cases. Patients treated by stapler resumed oral feeding 8 h after surgery and those treated by laser required nasogastric tube feeding. Normal oral intake was achieved 5 days later. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, treatment for Zenker's diverticulum must be done by transoral approach. Technique selection (laser or stapler) depends on surgeon's experience and their access to technology. Both techniques have important advantages when compared to classic open surgery (shorter hospital stay, lower cost, low morbidity and low rate of complications). Open surgery is indicated only when transoral technique is impossible for medical reasons or technical challenges, such as when technological support is not available.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Zenker Diverticulum/surgery , Laser Therapy , Surgical StaplingABSTRACT
Posterior cervical foraminotomy is an effective surgical technique for the treatment of radicular pain caused by foraminal stenosis or posterolateral herniated discs. The present study was performed to compare the clinical parameters and surgical outcomes of open foraminotomy/discectomy (OF/OFD) and tubular retractor assisted foraminotomy/discectomy (TAF/TAFD) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. A total of 41 patients were divided into two groups: 19 patients in Group 1 underwent OF/OFD and 22 patients in Group 2 underwent TAF/TAFD. Among the various clinical parameters, skin incision size, length of hospital stay, analgesic using time, and postoperative neck pain (for the first 4 weeks after the operation) were favorable in Group 2. Surgical outcomes were not different between the two groups. In conclusion, TAF/TAFD should increase patient's compliance and is as clinically effective as much as the OF/OFD.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy , Length of Stay , Pain Measurement , Radiculopathy/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study OBJECTIVES: To compare the surgical results of microendoscopic discectomy using a tubular retractor with those of a conventional discectomy for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Minimally invasive approaches to the lumbar spine have been attempted with success over the past 25 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study examined 36 cases who underwent lumbar discectomy using a tubular retractor and microendoscopy (Group A) and 30 cases who underwent a conventional discectomy (Group B). The operating time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay were recorded. The clinical results were assessed using the Korea Version Oswestry Disability Index (KODI), and the radiological results were evaluated from changes in disc height. RESULTS: The patients in Group A had a longer operation time(mean, 95.56+/-23.57 minutes vs 81.17+/-35.30 minutes, p=0.062), less intraoperative blood loss (mean, 58.61+/-97.08 cc vs 161.00+/-88.64 cc, p=0.001) and a shorter hospitalization stay (mean, 8.22 +/-4.99 days vs 17.33+/-10.98 days, p=0.001) than group B. There was significant improvement in the mean KODI score for Group A; 6.36+/-7.18 and Group B; 5.97+/-5.14. However, there was no significant difference in the pain improvement (mean, 1.14 +/-1.15 vs 1.30+/-1.06, p=0.559) and walking index (mean, 0.25+/-0.44 vs 0.30+/-0.47, p=0.656). In terms of social life, Group A had better results (mean, 0.20+/-0.48 vs 0.67+/-1.01, p=0.018). The disc height according to radiography decreased from 8.44+/-1.98 mm to 7.40+/-1.59 mm in Group A and 9.07+/-1.93 mm to 7.67+/-1.90 mm in Group B, but there were no statistical differences in the changes in disc height between the two groups (p=0.143). CONCLUSION: Microendoscopic discectomy is an effective procedure with good outcomes in treating lumbar disc herniation that allows less tissue trauma, compared with conventional open discectomy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Diskectomy , Hospitalization , Korea , Length of Stay , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Retrospective Studies , Spine , WalkingABSTRACT
Lumbar disc herniation is one of the most common disorders and its current surgical standard is a microsurgical discectomy. The microendoscopic discectomy (MED) was initially developed in 1997 by Foley and Smith and it is a minimally invasive surgical technique. This article discusses the technique, outcome and complications of this procedure. MED is performed by a muscle splitting approach using a series of tubular dilators with consecutively increasing diameters. The original endoscopic procedure is modified with microscope which has led to the development of the Microscopic Endoscopic Tubular Retractor System (METRX, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN). A tubular retractor is inserted over the final dilator, and then the microscope is placed inside the tubular retractor instead of the endoscope. And then microdiscectomy is performed in the usual fashion via tubular retractor. Clinical outcomes by modified MacNab criteria were revealed excellent to good results in up to 95% of the patients. Average return to work period was within 1 month. Complications included nerve root injury, dural tear, and recurrent disc herniations. MED is at least as effective as microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations with regard to long-term outcomes. MED can be performed safely and effectively with a smaller incision, resulting in a shortened hospital stay and faster return to work.
Subject(s)
Humans , Diskectomy , Endoscopes , Length of Stay , Muscles , Return to WorkABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study OBJECTIVES: To evaluate postoperative muscle damage after microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and open discectomy (OD), using analysis of serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Paravertebral muscle damage after retraction during posterior lumbar surgery can cause postoperative back pain. Serum CPK level is elevated in these patients and may indicate postoperative muscle damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 35 cases with MED (group 1) and 11 cases with OD (group 2). Serum CPK levels were checked preoperatively and postoperatively at day 1 and day 3. We analyzed intra-group and inter-group differences in CPK levels according to sex, age, and operation time. Surgical outcomes were evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: CPK levels at postoperative 1 day were increased significantly and decreased significantly at postoperative 3 day in both groups (p<0.05), with levels in group 1 significantly lower than in group 2 (p<0.05). There were no differences in CPK levels according to sex, age, or operation time, except between the 3rd and 5th decades of age at postoperative 1 day in group 2. VAS was significantly different in intra-group analysis (p<0.05) with no significant differences in intergroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: MED induced a lower increase in serum CPK than OD with similar VAS outcomes. MED results in less postoperative muscle damage than OD, with similar surgical outcomes.