ABSTRACT
Esophageal cancer is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system in China. Currently, surgical resection is the main treatment for localized and resectable esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer has the advantages of small trauma, neat incision, less pain, quick postoperative recovery, low postoperative complication incidence and mortality, and the treatment effect is comparable to traditional open surgery. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer has gradually become the mainstream choice for esophageal surgery. Various minimally invasive treatment approaches for esophageal cancer have correspon-dingly different indications, advantages and disadvantages. With the continuous development of minimally invasive technology, the shortcomings of various minimally invasive surgical approaches have been continuously overcome, which has brought about the diversification of minimally invasive treatment options. The authors comb the latest research progress at home and abroad, discuss and summarize the current application of minimally invasive techniques in esophageal surgery, hoping to provide references for the clinical minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer.
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the recent progress in foot and ankle surgery, including the diagnosis of disease, treatment protocols, outcomes, and evaluation tools as well as other innovations. New and accurate diagnostic modalities and measurements have undergone a breakthrough. Diagnostic modalities tend to be simpler and less expensive. Measurement tools also change to simpler and more accurate. The accuracy and efficacy of surgery and the minimally invasive method have become more popular and important. New treatments and basic research have also made breakthroughs.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the application value of minimally invasive surgery techniques in orthopedic trauma.Methods: From January 2012 and January 2015, 100 cases of orthopedic trauma patients were selected according to surgical methods, and were divided into traditional surgery group with 49 cases and minimally invasive surgery group with 51 cases, comparing two groups with incision, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative1 week incision pain score, the incidence of postoperative complications and treatment satisfaction.Results: The minimally invasive surgical incision length, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, pain score, incision healing time and hospital stay in the minimally invasive surgery group were better than that in the traditional surgery group (t=5.452,t=11.358,t=28.560, t=9.210,t=6.820;P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative concurrent with minimally invasive surgery group was 9.8%, traditional surgical complication rate was 18.4%, and the incidence of postoperative concurrent with minimally invasive surgery group was significantly lower than traditional surgical group (x2=12.325,P<0.05). Minimally invasive surgical patients’ satisfaction was 96.08%, traditional surgical operation patients’ satisfaction was 83.67%, the minimally invasive surgery group’s satisfaction was higher than traditional surgery group (H=16.465,P<0.05).Conclusion: Clinical curative effect of minimally invasive technique is better, and easy to be accepted by the patients. It is more popular in clinical application.