ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minor endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST)with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation(EPLBD)for common bile duct stones(CBDS)in elderly patients and to study the influence of the periampullary diverticula on efficacy. Methods Data of 209 patients with CBD stones(more than 1. 0 cm)over the age of 70 were retrospectively analyzed. The pa-tients were divided into EST group(103 cases)and the EST with EPLBD group(106 cases),which was further divided into two subgroups with and without periampullary diverticula.Operation time,complete stone removal rate in the first session,mechanical lithotripsy usage rate and complications were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with EST group,the EST with EPLBD group had shorter operation time [(25. 65±8. 76)min VS(35±6. 67)min,P= 0. 000],a higher success rate of the complete stone removal in the first session( 90. 57% VS 83. 50%,P = 0. 030),lower rate of mechanical lithotripsy( 8. 50% VS 55. 34%,P= 0. 000),but with a higher incidence of hyperamylemia(18/ 106 VS 7/ 103,P = 0. 044).The o-verall stone removal rates showed no difference(96. 23% VS 95. 14%,P= 0. 700).In the EPLBD group,di-verticulum had no effects on the results and complications of ERCP( P> 0. 05). Conclusion EST with EPLBD is a safe and effective method for CBDS in elderly patients. Periampullary diverticula does not affect the therapeutic effects of this method.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have reported the potentials of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) with minor endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for the complete removal of common bile duct (CBD) stone in the high risk groups. However, there have been no reports about the recurrence of the CBD stone after EPLBD with minor EST. The aim of this study was to evlauate the recurrence of CBD stone after EPLBD with minor EST. METHODS: A total of 1,036 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment due to CBD stones at Pusan University Hospital were enrolled. The patients were classified into two groups: those who underwent EPLBD with minor EST (group 1) and those who underwent EST treatment (group 2). We investigated clinical factors and recurrence rate between two groups. RESULTS: The recurrence of CBD stone occurred in total of 74 patients (7%), and the recurrence rates of CBD stone were 21/321 (6.5%) in Group 1 and 53/715 (7.4%) in Group 2. There were no difference in the presence of diverticulum and the number and size of recurrent CBD stone between the two groups. In case of diverticulum existence, recurrence rates were 12/158 (7.6%) in Group 1 and 21/101 (20.8%) in Group 2. When compared to the case of no diverticulum existence (Group 1: 9/163 [5.5%], Group 2: 32/614 [5.2%]), the recurrence rate of CBD stone was significantly lower if treated after EPLBD with minor EST (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CBD stone that recurs after going through EPLBD with minor EST can be successfully removed with an endoscopic treatment. The recurrence of CBD stone was especially lower in cases with periampullary diverticulum and treated with EPLBD with minor EST. Our results will be helpful in endoscopic retreatment and preventing the recurrence of CBD stone.