ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo explore the differences existing in the auditory mismatch negativity （MMN） amplitude and latency between children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder （ADHD） and normal children， and to probe into the significance of MMN latency and amplitude for assessing the auditory perception and attention level in ADHD children and normal children. MethodsOn December 1， 2022， a systematic search was performed in PubMed， Embase， Cochrane Library， China National knowledge Infrastructure （CNKI）， Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform and VIP databases to identify all well qualified literature focusing on MMN of ADHD children， then the valid data relevant to MMN amplitude and latency were extracted. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale （NOS） was used to assess the quality of the included studies， and Stata 20.0 was employed for Meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 9 qualified studies comparing ADHD children （n=170） against healthy controls （n=159） were finally included. Among the included literature， there were 18 matched pairs of MMN amplitude data and 10 matched pairs of MMN latency data at different recording sites. Meta-analysis denoted that ADHD group resulted in potentials of slightly lower MMN amplitude （WMD=-0.334， 95% CI： -1.426~0.758， P=0.549） and notably longer MMN latency （WMD=14.768， 95% CI： 4.660~24.876， P=0.004） compared to control group， and the Bgger's funnel plot did not reveal any publication bias. ConclusionCompared with healthy controls， ADHD children have longer MMN latency， suggesting that the auditory perception and attention level of ADHD children may be reduced.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Speech perception abilities, which vary widely among cochlear implant (CI) users, are considered to be associated with the integrity of the central auditory pathways from the auditory nerve to the cortex. Therefore, auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) are used to evaluate central auditory processing, which is thought to contribute to speech perception in CI subjects. In AEPs, the P300 component reflects the cognitive ability of subjects to detect and respond to stimuli and has most frequently been used and investigated in CI subjects. Other studies have used mismatched negativity (MMN) to examine central auditory processing. It is important to compare MMN and P300 and examine the auditory processing mechanisms involved in these components. Our study therefore aimed to investigate the relationship between P300 and MMN using both active and passive hearing paradigms in CI and normal hearing (NH) subjects. METHODS: Our subjects consisted of 3 CI subjects and 3 NH subjects. An oddball paradigm was used to deliver the stimuli on both components. The frequent stimuli were 1,000-Hz tone bursts, whereas the rare stimuli were 1,500, 2,000, and 4,000-Hz. RESULTS: As the frequency contrasts increased, the P3 latencies increased in the CI subjects. However, the latency in NH subjects did not change significantly across the frequency contrast conditions. MMNs were identified for both the CI and NH subjects; the latencies in the CI subjects were longer than those in the NH subjects. However, there were no differences in the latencies of either the CI or NH subjects in the 3 frequency contrast tasks. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that different auditory processing pathways are involved in the active and passive hearing conditions based on the P300 and MMN data and that a combination of both responses plays an important role in the comprehension of auditory processing mechanisms in CI subjects.