ABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: A consulta pré-anestésica é de extrema importância para o médico anestesiologista no planejamento do manejo das vias aéreas de pacientes sob o efeito de anestesia geral com intubação orotraqueal (IOT). OBJETIVO: Avaliar a sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo/negativo (VPP/VPN) de testes de predição de IOT difícil (Escore de Wilson - EW, e Teste de Mallampati modificado - TMM), em pacientes submetidos à anestesia geral, em hospital filantrópico do interior de Minas Gerais. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Estudo descritivo transversal, por meio de fichas pré-anestésicas e transoperatórias, de pacientes submetidos à anestesia geral com IOT, entre os meses de janeiro (2019) e março (2020). RESULTADOS: Dos 440 pacientes, 56,1% necessitaram de IOT: média de idade de 49,9 anos (desvio padrão 18,6). A maioria foi classificada: TMM classe I e II; pontuação 0 a 2 no EW; distância esternomentoniana >12,5 cm, sugerindo IOT fácil. Apenas o TMM apresentou correlação com IOT difícil (p=0,045). Sensibilidade e especificidade dos testes respectivamente: TMM (54,6%;75,9%); EW (36,4% e 79,7%); baixo VPP (TMM: 9,5%; EW: 7,7%) e alto VPN (TMM: 97,3%; EW: 96,4%). Curva ROC: área sob a curva foi de TMM = 0,68; EW = 0,60. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar do TMM apresentar correlação significativa com a IOT difícil, não foi possível definir o melhor teste preditor. Ressaltamos que a sensibilidade e o VPP, de ambas as avaliações, ficaram abaixo daquilo que seria considerado adequado para um teste de rastreio e predição.
Introduction: A pre-anesthetic appointment is extremely important for the anesthesiologist when planning the management of the airways of patients under the effect of general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation (OTI). Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive/ negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) of difficult OTI prediction tests (Wilson risk-sum WRS, and Modified Mallampati Test - MMT) in patients undergoing general anesthesia in a philanthropic hospital in the countryside of the state of Minas Gerais. Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study using pre-anesthetic and transoperative records of patients submitted to general anesthesia with OTI between the months of January (2019) and March (2020). Results: Of the 440 patients, 56.1% required OTI: average age of 49.9 years (standard deviation 18.6). Most classified: MMT class I and II; score 0 to 2 on the WRS; sternomental distance greater than 12.5 cm, suggesting easy OTI. Only MMT showed statistical significance with difficult OTI (p=0.045). Sensitivity and specificity of the tests respectively: MMT (54.6%; 75.9%) WRS (36.4% and 79.7%) low PPV (MMT: 9.5%; WRS: 7.7%) and high NPV (MMT: 97.3%; WRS: 96.4%). ROC Curve: area under the curve was MMT = 0,68; WRS = 0,60. Conclusion: Although the MMT has a significant correlation with the difficult OTI, it was not possible to define the best predictor test. We emphasize that the sensitivity and PPV of both evaluations were below what would be considered adequate for a screening and prediction test.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Sensitivity and Specificity , Intubation, Intratracheal , Laryngoscopy/methods , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Anesthesia, General/methodsABSTRACT
Background: The aim of this study is to predict difficult airway on the basis of various airway assessment parameter in the paediatric population between 5-12 years age group. To assess the value of modified Mallampati test (MMT), upper-lip-bite test (ULBT), thyromental distance (TMD), ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) from which Cormack Lehane grade was derived to predict difficult airway i.e. difficult intubation in paediatric patients ranging from 5-12 years age. Material and Methods: 100 ASA grade I & II paediatric patients of either sex between the age group of 5-12 years posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were included in the study. Modified Mallampati test, upper lip bite test, thyromental distance and ratio of height to thyromental distance of the patients were measured and recorded. All the distances were measured with the help of a flexible measuring tape so as to measure the distances accurately. Results: Modified Mallampati test has the highest sensitivity (75%) and specificity (92.05%) among all the other screening tests. It also has high positive predictive value (56.25%), negative predictive value (96.43%) and diagnostic accuracy (90%). Upper Lip Bite test has high specificity (79.55%) and negative predictive value (93.33%) with high diagnostic accuracy (77%). It has a sensitivity of 58.33% which is similar to the sensitivity of thyromental distance and ratio of height to thyromental distance. Thyromental distance has high specificity (65.90%) with high negative predictive value (92.06%). Conclusion: Modified Mallampati test is a useful bedside screening test for predicting difficult intubation in patients between 5-12 years age group. The Upper Lip bite test and thyromental distance has high specificity with high negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy. The ratio of height to thyromental distance is least useful predictor of airway assessment.
ABSTRACT
Introduction : Airway management is of prime importance to the Anaesthesiologist for securing the airway, tracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy remains the method of choice in many cases. Difficult laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation still remains an important concern of anaesthesiologists. The incidence of difficult endotracheal intubation were reported to be between 1.5% to 13% among patients undergoing surgery. The present study was conducted with the primary aim to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of Upper Lip Bite Test and Modified Mallampati Classification to predict difficult intubation in patients undergoing any elective surgery under general anesthesia. Material & Methods : A single-blind, Prospective Observational (Analytical) study was conducted in Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hospital and Research Centre, Karad, Maharashtra after the approval from the institutional ethical committee. Asample size of 181 patients of both gender, between 20 and 50 years of age, belonging to ASAphysical Status I-II scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation were evaluated for both test before surgery after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A senior Anaesthesiologists having minimum five years of experience in clinical anaesthesia who unaware of preoperative airway assessment, performed laryngoscopy and grading as per Cormack and Lehane's classification. Senstivity, specificity,accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of Upper lip bite test and Modified Mallampati Classification were calculated. Results:We compared various accuracy parameters of both the methods (MMTand ULBT), we observed that MMT(88.23% Vs. 76.47%) has got higher sensitivity, higher specificity of (89.02% Vs. 87.19%), higher positive predictive value (45.45% Vs. 38.23%) and higher negative predictive value (98.64% Vs. 97.27%) as compared to ULBT. Conclusion : In comparison with ULBT, MMT has got better predictive ability for difficult endotracheal intubation. MMT and ULBT appear to be better predictors for easy intubations rather than difficult intubations (high negative predictive value). Combination of MMT and ULBT has got better diagnostic accuracy as compared to MMTor ULBTalone.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Preoperative diagnostic validity of airwayassessment help for prediction of difficult airway. Severalmodels were established for prediction of difficult intubation.In this study, we aim to predict difficult intubation in nonobese patients from various airway predictive indices suchas modified mallampati grade, neck movement (NM), neckcircumference (NC), thyrometal distance (TM), NC/TMD.Material and Methods: Total 121 patients with 18-72 yearsof age, ASA grade I or II, scheduled for elective surgerythat required general anaesthesia. Difficulty of intubationwas assessed using the IDS for each non-obese patient. Thestudy population was divided into two groups Easy (IDS <5)and Difficult intubation (IDS ≥5). Preoperative assessmentsincluded Mouth Opening (MO), modified mallampati grade,neck movement (NM), neck circumference (NC), thyrometaldistance (TM), NC/TMD. Multivariate analysis was usedto predict independent risk factors. Receiver OperatingCharacteristic Curve analysis (ROC analysis) was performedfor the airway assessment tests. The area under curve (AUC)was calculated.Results: The weight (59.74±7.76 kg and 65.00±5.92 kg)and BMI (21.51±1.79 and 23.8157±1.09) were significantlydifferent in between easy and difficult intubation. TheMouth Opening, NC, TMD, and NC/TMD were significantlyindependent risk factor for difficult intubation. NC/TMDwas showed higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictivevalue (PPV) and a negative predictive value (NPV) with thirdlarge area under the curve (AUC) on the ROC curve.Conclusions: This study shows that the NC/TMD ratio canbe considered as a better predictor of difficult intubation innon-obese patients.
ABSTRACT
@#Background: Existing techniques of predicting difficult laryngoscopy are inadequate requiring evaluation of Maxillopharyngeal Angle (MP-A) on lateral cervical radiograph described. Objectives: This study aimed to compare MP-A test with Modified Mallapati Test (MMT) in predicting their diagnostic values and Area Under Curve of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUCROCC) of both test. Methods: This is a double blinded interventional study of 93 patients. Each patient’s MMT score was assessed during preoperative assessment and subsequent MP-A test done by obtaining lateral cervical radiograph with the head in neutral position. Laryngeal view was assessed using Cormack-Lehane grade after induction of anesthesia, was used as reference standard to determine the diagnostic values of MMT and MP-A respectively. Results: The MP-Acompared to MMT in predicting difficult larngoscopy had higher sensitivity (77.78 vs 44.44) specificity (88.10 vs 67.86) and accuracy (87.10 vs 65.59) with higher Odd Ratio(26.12 vs 1.68). The AUCROCC was significantly higher in MP-A test 0.83(95%CI: 0.67, 0.99) (P = 0.001) vs MMT 0.56(95%CI: 0.36, 0.76) (P = 0.546) with LR+ of 6.53 vs 1.38. Conclusion: The Maxillopharyngeal Angle test was superior in predicting difficult laryngoscopy as compared to Modified Mallampati Test.difficult intubation
ABSTRACT
Background: Assessing the difficulty level of the airway for intubation is extremely important in anaesthetic practice to avoid delays in intubation and resulting adverse consequences. Multiple grading systems are used by anaesthesiologists across the globe to aid in classifying the airways, but the number of studies assessing the level of agreement between various methods is scarce. Hence, the current study was conducted with an objective of assessing the level of agreement of Modified Mallampatti score (MMS) with Cormack –Lehane scoring and POGO Scoring. Materials and methods: The study was a cross sectional study, conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu on adults aged between 18 to 65 years, belonging to ASA grade 1 and 2, scheduled for elective and emergency surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients with apparent restriction of mouth opening due to pain, with fresh facial injuries and dental abnormalities were excluded from the study. The airway of each subject was assessed by the trained anesthetist, in charge of the procedure. The agreement between the different methods of grading was assessed by kappa Statistic along with its standard error and P value. P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: A total of 236 subjects were included in the study. Among the study population, 74 (31.36%) had mallampatti grade I. The number of mallampatti grade II, III, and IV was 140 (59.32%), 21 (8.90%) and 1 (0.42%) respectively. Among the study population, 143 (60.59%) had Cormack Lehane grade I. The number of Cormack Lehane grade II, and III was 84 (35.59%), and 9 (3.81%) respectively. Among the study population, 170 (72.03%) had POGO grade 1. The number of POGO grade 2, 3 and 4 was 42 (17.80%), 15 (6.36%), and 9 (3.81%) respectively. The measure of agreement was very poor between Mallampatti grading with Cormack Lehane grading. (kappa statistics value - K. Murugesan, Arunachalam R, Rajarajan N. Correlative study between modified mallampati score with Cormack Lehane and POGO scoring. IAIM, 2018; 5(4): 119-125. Page 120 0.103, P value 0.032). The measure of agreement was also very poor between Mallampatti grading and POGO grade. (kappa statistics value was 0.105, P value 0.004). The measure of agreement was fair between Cormack Lehane grading and Mallampatti grading. (kappa statistics value was 0.327, P value <0.001). Conclusions: When compared to POGO score, Cormack Lehane grading had shown a better level of agreement with Mallampatti grading. But the level of agreement between any of the two methods was too low to rely on them interchangeably in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We wanted to evaluate whether the presence of nasal obstruction makes a change on the association between the modified Mallampati score and the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and the sleep quality. METHODS: Polysomnography (PSG), the modified Mallampati score (MMS), the body-mass index, and a questionnaire about nasal obstruction were acquired from 275 suspected SDB patients. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the presence of nasal obstruction. The clinical differences between the two groups were evaluated and the associations between the MMS and PSG variables in each group were also assessed. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between the MMS and many PSG variables, including the apnea-hypopnea index, the arousal index and the proportion of deep sleep, for the patients with nasal obstruction, although this was not valid for the total patients or the patients without nasal obstruction. CONCLUSION: The severity of SDB and the quality of sleep are well correlated with the MMS, and especially for the patients with nasal obstruction. The MMS can give more valuable information about the severity of SDB when combined with simple questions about nasal obstruction.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arousal , Mouth Breathing , Nasal Obstruction , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may exhibit difficult endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation because of anatomical abnormalities of their upper airway. Many anesthesiologists try to predict difficult endotracheal intubation using simple bedside screening tests. Among these tests, modified Mallampati test (MMT) is the most popular one, but a newer method, called upper lip bite test (ULBT) has been investigated. We compared the clinical accuracy of modified Mallampati test and upper lip bite test for patients with OSA. METHODS: 65 patients with OSA were included in the study. Preoperatively, anestheiologist not involved in endotracheal intubation evaluated patient's airway with MMT and ULBT. Another anesthesiologist assessed the direct laryngoscopic grade. Using Fisher's exact test, we analyzed the correlation of MMT and ULBT with direct laryngoscopic grade and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Furthermore, AUC of ROC (area under a receiver operating characteristic) curve were used to estimate the predictive accuracy of each tests. RESULTS: MMT grade III, IV and ULBT class III was significantly correlated with Cormack-Lehane grade III, IV (P < 0.05). The ULBT showed higher specificity and positive predictive value, but sensitivity and negative predictive value were higher in MMT. AUC of ROC curve was poor for MMT (0.656) and ULBT (0.617). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that MMT and ULBT has a poor diagnostic accuracy for predicting difficult intubation in OSA patients as a single bedside screening test.
Subject(s)
Humans , Area Under Curve , Intubation , Intubation, Intratracheal , Lip , Masks , Mass Screening , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , VentilationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The unexpected difficult endotracheal intubation is a significant contributor to mortality and morbidity in clinical practice. Although there are many methods to predict difficult intubation, modified Mallampati test (mMT) and airway score were popular tests. The authors wanted to compare upper lip bite test (ULBT) with those two tests and also explored the possibility that ULBT could be a good sole predictor for difficult intubation. METHODS: 322 patients who were ASA I or II, aged > 16yr were enrolled in this study. Three residents visited patients to obtain airway measurements such as 1) ULBT, 2) mMT, 3) airway score (inter-incisor gap, mMT, thyromental distance, head & neck movement, history of difficult intubation, buck teeth). They were not involved in the intubation of patients they evaluated. The accuracy, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated from the data of three tests, and three tests were compared with patient's laryngoscopic view grade according to Cormack & Lehane criteria by using Chi-square test. RESULTS: The incidence of Cormack & Lehane grade III, IV was 14.6% (not applied external laryngeal pressure). ULBT showed significantly higher specificity, positive predictive value than mMT, but sensitivity was lower than other tests. There were significant correlations between ULBT class III and Cormack & Lehane laryngoscopic grade III, IV (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ULBT is good for predicting difficult intubation as a simple, single test. But because of it's low sensitivity, it seems better to incorporate ULBT as a factor of airway score tests for more reliable prediction.