Molecular systematics of the Dichopetala genus group (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae)

Introducción: El grupo de géneros Dichopetala se propuso recientemente después de una revisión del género Dichopetala Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878. Actualmente, el grupo consta de ocho géneros y 44 especies distribuidas desde el sur de los Estados Unidos hasta el sur de México. Este acuerdo genérico, se basó únicamente en evidencia morfológica y se acompañó por discusiones sobre nuevos géneros erigidos, para los cuales no se probó su monofilia. Objetivo: Evaluar las relaciones filogenéticas entre especies representativas de los ocho géneros del grupo Dichopetala. Métodos: Generamos secuencias de ADN para un gen mitocondrial (Citocromo oxidasa I: COI) y dos marcadores de genes nucleares (28S, Histona III: H3), e incluimos especies de otros géneros de Phaneropterinae para probar la monofilia del grupo en estudio. Utilizamos modelos evolutivos bayesianos y de máxima verosimilitud. Resultados: Se respalda la monofilia del grupo Dichopetala y la monofilia de los géneros Dichopetala, Obolopteryx, Planipollex, Mactruchus y Rhabdocerca. Además, los géneros Acanthorintes y Pterodichopetala como parafiléticos. Los marcadores mitocondriales también sugieren que los géneros Rhabdocerca y Acanthorintes ampliamente distribuidos, pueden en realidad contener varias especies no vistas previamente. Conclusión: Se proporciona la primera contribución a la filogenia del grupo de Dichopetala y una definición filogenética y morfológica más robusta de algunos de los géneros involucrados.

Introduction: The Dichopetala genus group was proposed recently after revision of the genus Dichopetala Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878. Currently, the group consists of eight genera and 44 species distributed from Southern United States to Southern Mexico. This generic arrangement was based solely on morphological evidence, and was accompanied by discussions on new erected genera, for which their monophyly was not tested. Objective: To assess the phylogenetic relationships among representative species of the eight genera of the Dichopetala group. Methods: We generated DNA sequences for one mitochondrial (Cytochrome oxidase I: COI) and two nuclear (28S, Histone III: H3) gene markers, and included species of other Phaneropterinae genera to test the monophyly of the ingroup; Bayesian and maximum likelihood evolutionary models were used. Results: The monophyly of the Dichopetala group and the monophyly of genera Dichopetala, Obolopteryx, Planipollex, Mactruchus and Rhabdocerca is supported. In addition, Acanthorintes and Pterodichopetala were recovered as paraphyletic. The mitochondrial markers also suggest that the widely distributed genera Rhabdocerca and Acanthorintes may actually contain various overlooked species. Conclusions: The first contribution on the Phylogeny of the Dichopetala group, and a more robust phylogenetic and morphological definition of some of the genera involved are provided.

Variation in male reproductive system characters in Corydoradinae (Loricarioidei: Callichthyidae) reflects the occurrence of different lineages in this subfamily

Callichthyidae comprises a well-corroborated monophyletic group divided into two subfamilies: Corydoradinae and Callichthyinae. A recent proposal, based on molecular data, suggests that Corydoradinae is composed by nine monophyletic lineages, possibly genera. The species pertaining to those lineages have extensive modification in the size of genome, including diploid, tetraploid and octoploid species. Considering the occurrence of these monophyletic lineages and that the variations in DNA content may imply in significant alterations on the structure of spermatozoa, this study analyzed the morphology of the male reproductive system and the morphometry of the head of the spermatozoa of representatives of the nine lineages of Corydoradinae, seeking for particular characteristics of each lineage. Morphological data revealed a high intra-lineage variation, larger than that observed among species of different lineages. In contrast, morphometric data obtained for eight out of the nine lineages, revealed large congruency with the hypothesis that Corydoradinae is composed by different lineages. These results demonstrate that there is a correlation among variations in DNA content and the size of the spermatozoon head, thus providing additional subsides for the definition of the Corydoradinae lineages.(AU)

A família Callichthyidae compreende um grupo monofilético bem corroborado, dividida em duas subfamílias: Corydoradinae e Callichthyinae. Uma proposta recente, baseada em dados moleculares, sugeriu que a subfamília Corydoradinae é composta por nove linhagens, possivelmente gêneros. As espécies pertencentes a cada uma destas linhagens possuem extensivas modificações no tamanho do genoma, incluindo espécies diplóides, tetraplóides e octaplóides. Considerando a ocorrência dessas diferentes linhagens e que as extremas variações em conteúdo de DNA podem implicar em alterações significativas na estrutura dos espermatozoides, o presente estudo analisou a morfologia do sistema reprodutor masculino e a morfometria da cabeça dos espermatozoides de representantes das nove linhagens de Corydoradinae, procurando características particulares em cada uma. Os dados morfológicos revelaram a ocorrência de grande variação dentro das linhagens, maior que aquela observada entre espécies de diferentes linhagens. Diferentemente, os dados morfométricos obtidos para oito das nove linhagens revelaram grande congruência com a atual proposta para Corydoradinae. Estes resultados demonstram que há correlação entre as variações em conteúdo de DNA e o tamanho da cabeça dos espermatozoides, fornecendo, assim, subsídio adicional para a definição das nove linhagens de Corydoradinae.(AU)

Response paper: morphometric article by Mejía et al. 2015 alluding genera Herichthys and Nosferatu displays serious inconsistencies

In the present response paper, the article entitled "Morphometric variation of the Herichthys bartoni (Bean, 1892) species group (Teleostei: Cichlidae): How many species comprise H. labridens (Pellegrin, 1903)?" by Mejía et al . 2015 is critically reviewed. The current review pinpoints some of the more conspicuous conceptual inconsistencies and fundamental errors found in the study by Mejía et al . (2015), It is contended that the authors fail to provide any new insights into the complex biogeography and evolutionary history of the Nosferatu and Herichthys genus groups, and that while results of their Cox1 molecular analysis are comparable to those by De la Maza-Benignos et al . (2015), the conclusions of the two studies are not comparable. In addition, it is contested that, whereas the designation of genus Nosferatu by De la Maza-Benignos et al . (2015) was found on the principles of the biological and phylogenetic species concepts, the rejection of the genus by Mejía et al . (2015) is solely based "on the presence of (overlapping) morphometric characters" between genera. The assumption by Mejía et al . (2015),that because their geometric morphometrics analysis failed to provide separation of species, then Nosferatu genus does not correspond to a valid taxon; and their suggesting geometric morphometrics "as useful tool to discriminate species, because it allows to propose diagnostic characters" were not supported by their results. While Mejía et al . present some interesting thoughts on the systematics of Nosferatu , they unfortunately fail to provide any data that can be objectively assessed as relevant to motivate any changes in the current taxonomy.

El presente documento de respuesta analiza críticamente el artículo titulado "Morphometric variation of the Herichthys bartoni (Bean, 1892) species group (Teleostei: Cichlidae): How many species comprise H. labridens (Pellegrin, 1903)?" por Mejía et al. (2015), así como también evidencia algunas de las contradicciones conceptuales y errores fundamentales encontrados en dicho documento. Se arguye que el artículo no proporciona ningún aspecto nuevo acerca de la compleja biogeografía, ni de la historia evolutiva de los géneros Nosferatu y Herichthys , y que mientras que los resultados del análisis molecular utilizando el gen Cox1 son similares a los de la Maza-Benignos et al. (2015), las conclusiones de ambos estudios no son compatibles. Se contiende además que mientras que la designación del género Nosferatu por De la Maza-Benignos et al. (2015) se fundamentó en principios asociados a los conceptos biológico y filogenético de especie, el rechazo del género por Mejía et al. ,(2015) únicamente se basa "en la existencia de caracteres morfométricos (superpuestos)" entre géneros. La inferencia por parte de Mejía et al . de que debido a que el análisis de morfometría geométrica no logró separar a las especies, y que por lo tanto el género Nosferatu no corresponde a un taxón válido; así como la observación de que la morfometría geométrica corresponde a "una herramienta útil para diferenciar especies, porque permite proponer caracteres de diagnóstico" no están sustentadas por los resultados de su análisis, y mientras que Mejía et al. ,presentan algunas ideas interesantes sobre la sistemática de Nosferatu , lamentablemente no proporcionan ningún dato relevante que pueda ser evaluado objetivamente como para motivar cambios en la taxonomía actual.

Filogenia intraespecífica y variabilidad genética de Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) con los genes mitocondriales ND5 y COI / Intraspecific phylogeny and genetic variability of Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) with mitochondrial genes ND5 and COI

Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera; Culicidae) es un mosquito perteneciente al complejo Pipiens con distribución amplia en el mundo y en Venezuela tanto en zonas urbanas como rurales; es acentuadamente antropofílico y vector de varios virus y parásitos mantenidos en la naturaleza en un ciclo enzoótico ave-mosquito-ave. Dicha distribución y ocupación de hábitats larvales de origen antropogénico podría sugerir la presencia de subpoblaciones geográficas que pudieran participar en forma diferencial en la transmisión de patógenos. Los análisis filogenéticos y redes de haplotipos de éste trabajo, con secuencias de los genes mitocondriales (Subunidad I del Citocromo oxidasa y Subunidad 5 de la NADH deshidrogenasa) de poblaciones de Cx. quinquefasciatus colectadas en nueve localidades (cementerios) de Venezuela sugieren alta homogeneidad genética inter-poblacional y una sola entidad filogenética (monofilia). Se demostró que el fragmento del gen COI tiene mayor resolución en la definición de la filogenia de especies cercanas y a nivel de géneros y ajustado con la clasificación actual. El gen ND5 con alta variación es más útil para estudios poblacionales, sin embargo muestra parafilia entre Cx. corniger y Cx. quinquefasciatus, que representa una evidencia de posible homogenización por entrecruzamiento, introgresión o infección por Wolbachia. Las redes de haplotipos sugieren poblaciones en expansión con alta variabilidad haplotípica y heterogeneidad genética intra poblacional y homogeneidad inter poblacional, con implicaciones evolutivas en la dispersión de sus poblaciones y el éxito en áreas urbanas, así como evidencia de posible cuello de botella en poblaciones producto de marcadas campañas de aplicación de insecticidas, información útil en la planificación de futuras estrategias de control sanitario.

Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera, Culicidae) is a mosquito belonging to the Pipiens complex with wide distribution in the world and in Venezuela, both urban and rural. Besides, it is a markedly anthropophilic vector of several viruses and parasites maintained in nature in a cycle enzootic bird-mosquito-bird. The wide distribution and occupation of larval habitats of anthropogenic origin may suggest the presence of geographical subpopulations, which may differentially participate in the transmission of pathogens. Phylogenetic analysis and haplotype networks with sequences of mitochondrial genes (cytochrome oxidase subunit I and subunit 5 of NADH dehydrogenase) of populations collected in nine locations (cemeteries) of Venezuela showed high interpopulation genetic homogeneity and a single phylogenetic entity (monophyly). It demostrated that the COI gene fragment had a higher resolution in the definition of the phylogeny of closely related species and genera level and correlated with the current classification. The ND5 gene variation is highly useful for population studies. However, this gene showed paraphyly between Cx. corniger and Cx. quinquefasciatus as an evidence of possible homogenization by inbreeding, introgression or infection with Wolbachia. The haplotype networks suggest expanding populations with high haplotype variability and genetic heterogeneity occurred within populations. Moreover, the analysis, showed homogeneity among populations with evolutionary implications in the dispersion of their populations and successful occupation in urban areas, as well as evidence of possible population bottleneck as consequence of insecticide control campaigns.

Molecular phylogeny of penaeid shrimps inferred from two mitochondrial markers

Penaeid shrimps are an important resource in crustacean fisheries, representing more than the half of the gross production of shrimp worldwide. In the present study, we used a sample of wide-ranging diversity (41 shrimp species) and two mitochondrial markers (758 bp) to clarify the evolutionary relationships among Penaeidae genera. Three different methodologies of tree reconstruction were employed in the study: maximum likelihood, neighbor joining and Bayesian analysis. Our results suggest that the old Penaeus genus is monophyletic and that the inclusion of the Solenocera genus within the Penaeidae family remains uncertain. With respect to Metapenaeopsis monophyly, species of this genus appeared clustered, but with a nonsignificant bootstrap value. These results elucidate some features of the unclear evolution of Penaeidae and may contribute to the taxonomic characterization of this family.