Comparison Of Motor Blockade And Complication Of Epidurally Administered Bupivacaine - Fentanyl Combination As Intermittent And Continuous Infusion In Patients With Rest Pain- Chronic Limb Ischemia

This study comparing the motor blockade and complication of intermittent doses and continuous infusion of 0.125% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl.The patients included in our study in both groups the intermittent bolus and the continuous infusion did not have motor blockade which enabled them to be ambulant and do their daily activities except one case had intrathecal catheter migration. Moreover the disposable continuous infusion pumps were handy enough to be carried. The wide swings in hemodynamics like blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate were not encountered in the continuous infusion group and stability was maintained throughout

Comparative Study between Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Plus Fentanyl for Spinal Anesthesia

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia is preferred over general anesthesia due to the ease of administration, minimal systemiceffects, and reduced post-operative morbidity. A number of anesthetic agents and adjuvants have been tried over the years, toachieve optimal effects. This study compares the efficacy of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine plus fentanyl as spinal anesthetics.Materials and Methods: This study was carried out on 100 American Society of Anaesthesiologists Grades I and II patients,having no comorbidities and scheduled for surgery of up to 200 min. They were randomly divided into two Groups: Group I(Ropivacaine) and Group II (Ropivacaine and Fentanyl). Intraoperative and post-operative vitals, analgesic parameters, andside effects were monitored.Results: The onset of both sensory and motor blockade was faster, and the duration of the blockade was longer with theaddition of fentanyl to ropivacaine. Ropivacaine is a safe drug in terms of cardiorespiratory stability and other side effects. Theaddition of fentanyl did not alter the beneficial side effect profile of ropivacaine.Conclusion: Ropivacaine is a safe anesthetic in terms of cardiorespiratory stability and side effects. The addition of fentanyl toropivacaine significantly potentiates the block, both sensory and motor, without altering the beneficial effects of cardiorespiratorystability and side effect profile.

Comparison of Two Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Femur Surgery.

Background: Duration of action of local anaesthetic is an important limiting factor in spinal anaesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, selective α 2- agonist has been recently used in addition to other adjuvants to prolong the duration of intrathecal local anaesthetics. Aim: To compare two different doses of dexmedetomidine added to heavy bupivacaine 0.5% intrathecally for femur surgeries. Methods: In this prospective double blind trial, one hundred and twenty patients were randomly allocated into two groups, D1 and D2. Group D1 received 12.5 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 μg dexmedetomidine. Group D2 received 12.5 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 10 μg dexmedetomidine. Results: Sensory and motor block were comparable in both groups in terms of characteristics like the highest level of sensory block achieved, time to achieve maximum sensory block and time of two segment regression, time to achieve maximal motor block and duration of regression to Bromage scale 0. However time of first analgesic request and total analgesic requirement were significantly reduced by increasing intrathecal dose of dexmedetomidine to 10 μg without any undesirable effects. Conclusion: Intrathecal dose of 10 μg dexmedetomidine provided an increased duration of sensory compared to 5μg dosing, with no significant increase in duration of motor blockade or the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia and any other undesirable side-effects.

A randomized prospective comparative study of nerve stimulator and ultrasonogram in popliteal sciatic nerve block for ankle and foot surgeries.

Background: Regional blocks in the field of anaesthesia were done traditionally with paraesthesia technique. To overcome the demerits with paraesthesia technique, nerve locator was applied for nerve blocks. Later, the application of ultrasonogram for regional blocks got the real time imaging of the nerves and drug administration. This resulted in publications of numerous studies with variable results. Therefore we planned to compare ultrasonogram and nerve locator in popliteal sciatic nerve block in our population. Methods: A prospective, randomized, observer blinded study was planned to compare the nerve stimulator (Group N) and ultrasound (Group U) on duration of „block technique‟, number of needle reinsertions in popliteal sciatic nerve block for ankle and foot surgeries. We included all consented patients aged ≥18 years of both genders belonging to ASA I to III and excluded pregnant mothers, diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, chronic opioid use, positioning difficulty, coagulopathy, nerve block contraindications, local anaesthetic allergic patients. Results: The duration of block technique in Group U = 262.00 ± 108.36 Seconds and Group N = 715.16 ± 234.66 Seconds with statistically significant P value = 0.0001. The average number of needle reinsertions in Group N = 6.05 ± 2.31 and Group U = 2.46 ± 1.11 with statistically significant p value of 0.0001. Therefore the time taken to perform the block and the number of needle reinsertions in Group U is shorter than the Group N. Conclusion: The duration of block technique and number of needle reinsertions are better with ultrasound. Though the onset of motor and sensory blockade were better with ultrasound success rate is not significantly different.

Ropivacaína isolada e associada ao fentanil ou ao tramadol administrados pela via peridural em cães / Ropivacaine individually and in combination with fentanyl or tramadol, administered by peridural via in dogs

A anestesia peridural é amplamente difundida no meio veterinário, utilizando-se o anestésico local isolado ou associado aos opióides, capazes de promover aumento do efeito analgésico. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a função cardiorrespiratória e analgésica da ropivacaína isolada ou associada ao fentanil ou tramadol. Para tanto, oito cães foram tranqüilizados com acepromazina, submetidos à anestesia peridural com um dos seguintes protocolos: GR (ropivacaína), GRF (ropivacaína + fentanil), GRT (ropivacaína + tramadol), em volume total de 0,25ml kg-1, e foram avaliados os parâmetros: freqüência cardíaca e respiratória, temperatura retal, pressão arterial sistólica, e gasometria do sangue arterial, os bloqueios sensitivo e motor, o grau de sedação e a ocorrência de possíveis efeitos indesejáveis. A diminuição da freqüência cardíaca nos grupos GRF e GRT foi mais intensa e ocorreu hipotermia significativa no GRF. Foi evidenciada sedação severa em GRF e GRT. O período de recuperação foi mais curto nos animais de GRT. O GRT foi o grupo que apresentou bloqueio mais cranial. Foram observadas bradicardia, hipotermia e síndrome de Shiff-Sherrington no período trans-anestésico em animais de todos os grupos. Nas 24 horas de período pós-anestésico, não foram evidenciados efeitos indesejáveis nos grupos. O GRF apresentou maior duração de anestesia e analgesia, enquanto que o GRT apresentou a menor duração de anestesia com analgesia intermediária e o GR apresentou duração intermediária, com menor analgesia. Não foram encontradas alterações respiratórias e hemogasométricas, porém, bradicardia, hipotermia e síndrome de Schiff-Sherrington, alterações trans-anestésicas comuns na anestesia peridural foram encontradas.

Peridural anesthesia is broadly applied in the Veterinary field, using the isolated local anesthetic or in combination with opiates capable to increase the analgesic effect. This research compared analgesia and cardiorespiratory effects of epidural anaesthesia produced by ropivacaine alone or combined with fentanyl or tramadol in eight mixed breed adult dogs after sedation with acepromazina. Drugs were administered on the following protocols: GR (ropivacaine), GRF (ropivacaine + fentanyl), GRT (ropivacaine + tramadol), in 0.25ml kg-1 of total volume. Heart and respiratory rate, rectal temperature, blood pressure and, gasometry of atrial blood were mensured, as well the sensory and motor blockade (latency and period of action), degree of sedation and side effects. The most important decrease of the heart rate occurred in GRF and GRT. Also significant hypothermia in GRF. Intense degree of sedation was observed in GRF and GRT. The period of recovery was shorter in GRT. The most cranial region of blockade occurred in GRT. Bradicardia, hypothermia and Shiff-Sherrington syndrom were observed in the transanesthetic period in animal from all of the groups. During 24 hours after the anaesthesia no side effects were observed. The GRF had the longer period of anesthesia and analgesia, GRT presented the shorter period of anesthesia with intermediate analgesia and, GR presented intermediate period of anesthesia with lower degree of analgesia. Respiratory and hemogasometrics change were not found, but hipotermy, bradicardy and Schiff-Sherrington syndrome, side effects usually seen in peridural anesthesia, were observed in this study.