Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Rev. bras. entomol ; 64(3): e20200004, 2020. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1137753

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The structural morphology of mouthparts, the distribution of sensilla on the mouthparts, histology, and the morphology of the alimentary canal in adult Eusomus ovulum Germar, 1824 were examined under both light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The mouthparts are located at the tip of the short rostrum. The mandibles, the maxillae and the labial palpi comprise the moveable mouthparts. Also there are sensillae which act as chemoreceptors on the terminal segment of the snout. Alimentary canal of adult E. ovulum is divided into three main regions, foregut, midgut and hindgut. The first part of the gut is foregut, which is made up of a pharynx, esophagus, crop and proventriculus. The pharynx extends from the mouth, having muscle attachments radiating out from its surface and connecting with the head region. The esophagus is a narrow epithelial tube contiguous and posterior to the pharynx. The proventriculus consists of 8 sclerotized plates. The midgut, which is anteriorly bulbous with a tubular posterior half. Gastric caeca were found on the posterior region of the midgut. The midgut is surrounded by outer muscles and inner columnar epithelium. The hindgut has pylorus, ileum, colon, and rectum. There are three histological layers of the hindgut from lumen to hemocoel: intima, epithelium, muscles. The hindgut has a cryptonephridial attachment for the six Malpighian tubes anterior to the rectum. The aim of the present study is to contribute information on the morphology of mouthparts, and the morphology and histology of the alimentary tract of the insect.

2.
Rev. biol. trop ; 65(4): 1231-1244, Oct.-Dec. 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-897619

ABSTRACT

Resumen Los géneros Leptomea y Smicridea pertenecen a la familia Hidropsychidae y constituyen uno de los grupos más importantes en la dinámica de nutrientes en los ecosistemas acuáticos tropicales, cuya diversidad de microhabitats es aprovechada por las larvas de estos géneros. Sin embargo, se dispone de escasa información que describa y compare las piezas bucales entre ambos géneros y su posible relación con la dieta. El objetivo de este trabajo fue describir la morfología de las piezas bucales y los hábitos alimentarios de ambos géneros en la cuenca media del río Gaira (Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia). Las muestras se recolectaron mensualmente con una red Surber entre octubre y diciembre 2014 y mayo 2015. Se utilizó el Software Zen Blue© para las estimaciones morfométricas de las piezas cefálicas, utilizando 15 larvas por género. Las medidas se tomaron sobre fotografías obtenidas de una cámara AxioCam ERc5s ajustada a un estereoscopio Nikon SMZ 745T. Para la descripción detallada de las piezas cefálicas, se usó un microscopio-estereoscopio Leica M205A. Se evaluaron los hábitos alimentarios de 15 individuos en total, mediante el análisis de contenido estomacal.Se aplicó un análisis discriminante de Hotelling a las medidas morfométricas. Se encontraron diferencias significativas en el área de la cabeza (AC), el ancho de la cabeza (ANC3), largo de la cabeza (LC2) y largo de la mandíbula izquierda (LMI1). En la descripción morfológica se hallaron diferencias en: cabeza, labrum y submentón. Mediante el análisis del contenido estomacal se realizaron los perfiles dietarios para ambos géneros y se detectó que los ítems con mayor porcentaje para Leptonema fueron MOPG (38 %) y MOPF (32 %) y para Smicridea, MOPF (38 %) y MOPG (34 %), con diferencias significativas (F= 8.8298, p<0.05). Este estudio indica que los individuos evaluados consumen una amplia variedad de recursos y la diferencia entre la dieta de ambos géneros puede estar relacionada con las diferencias morfológicas detectadas.


Abstract The genera Leptonema and Smicridea belong to the family Hidropsychidae and constitute one of the most important groups in the nutrient dynamics in the tropical aquatic ecosystems, which diversity of microhabitats is exploited by their larvae. However, there is lack of information concerning the detailed and comparative descriptions of mouthparts between these two genera, and their possible relation with their diet. The aim of this paper was to describe the morphology of the mouthparts and the feeding habits of both genera, in the middle basin of the Gaira River (Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia). The samples were collected on a monthly basis, with a surber net, between October and December of 2014, and May of 2015. A total of 15 larvae per genus were taken and the Blue Zen Software was used to determine the morphometric measurements of the cephalic pieces. Measurements were taken on photographs obtained from an AxioCam ERc5s camera adapted to a Nikon SMZ 745T stereoscope. To describe the mouthparts a M205A microscope-stereoscope Leica was used. The dietary habits of 15 individuals in total were evaluated by means of the analysis of stomach contents. A discriminant analysis of Hotelling was applied to the morphometric measurements. There were significant differences in head area (HA), head width (HW3), head length (HL2) and left mandible length (LML). In the morphological descriptions were found differences in: head, labrum and submentum. Dietaries profiles were performed to the stomach contents for both genera and the items with highest percentage for Leptonema was MOPG and MOPF with 38 % and 32 %, respectively, and for Smicridea MOPF (38 %) and MOPG (34 %) with significant differences (F = 8.8298, p < 0.05). This study indicated that the evaluated individuals consume a wide variety of resources and the difference of the diet of both genera can be related to the detected morphological differences.

3.
Rev. bras. entomol ; 57(4): 377-391, Oct.-Dec. 2013. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-697973

ABSTRACT

New species of Dilobitarsus Latreille with tetra-tuberculated pronotum (Coleoptera, Elateridae, Agrypninae). Four species of Dilobitarsus Latreille, 1834, D. angulosus sp. nov. (Brazil: São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro), D. bellus sp. nov. (Peru), D. nigrus sp. nov. (Argentina) and D. thoraconstrictus sp. nov. (Bolivia) are described, and D. quadrituberculatus Candèze, 1857 is redescribed. Diagnostic characters of all studied species are illustrated and new records for D. quadrituberculatus are included. A key to Dilobitarsus species from the Neotropical Region is also presented.

4.
Int. j. morphol ; 26(4): 1035-1051, Dec. 2008. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-532939

ABSTRACT

This study compares the morphology of rostrum, pereipods 1,2,4 and mouthparts of juvenile Astacus leptodactylus with those oí Pacifastacus leniusculus. Differences in morphology were observed, in particular with regard to the mouthparts e.g. including setal armature and number of teeth on the mandible. In general, the shape of the rostra in the two species is similar in that both taper to a point with a pair of sharp spines distally. Laterally the rostrum of A. leptodactylus is bordered by a regular row of setae, which is not so well defined in P leniusculus. The observations also showed that in addition to an increase in size, changes in morphology in the feeding apparatus between the developmental stages of the two species were present. It was concluded that both species have similar rostra, but different setal patterns and there are differences between the two species in the armature of mouthparts as development progresses. Therefore, important differences in the morphology of mouthparts between P. leniusculus and A. leptodactylus and in the different stages of the species might cause a difference in the feeding behavior and food choice of the species.


Este estudio compara la morfología del rostro, pereiópodos 1,2,4 y piezas bucales de los Astacus leptodactylus jóvenes con los de Pacifastacus leniusculus. Se observaron las diferencias en la morfología, en particular, con respecto a las piezas bucales, por ejemplo incluyendo la armadura setal y el número de dientes en la mandíbula. En general, la forma del rostro en las dos especies es similar, tanto cónicas, como en punta, con un par de espinas distalmente. Lateralmente al rostro, A. leptodactylus está bordeada por un fila de setas, que no está tan bien definida en P leniusculus. Las observaciones también muestran que, además de un aumento en el tamaño, estaban presentes cambios en la morfología en el aparato masticatorio, entre las etapas de desarrollo de las dos especies. Se llegó a la conclusión que ambas especies tienen rostros similares, pero diferentes patrones setales y hay diferencias entre las dos especies en la armadura de piezas bucales como evolución del desarrollo. Por lo tanto, importantes diferencias en la morfología de piezas bucales entre P leniusculus y A. leptodactylus y en las distintas etapas de la especie podrían causar una diferencia en la conducta de alimentación y opciones de alimentación de la especie.


Subject(s)
Animals , Astacoidea/ultrastructure , Mouth/ultrastructure , Crustacea/ultrastructure , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL