Patient Repositioning during Hospitalization and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers: a Narrative Review / Reposicionamiento de pacientes en hospitalización y prevención de úlceras por presión: una revisión narrativa / Reposicionamento de pacientes na internação e prevenção de úlceras por pressão: uma revisão narrativa

Objective. This article presents a literature review to explore and analyze the current situation of pressure ulcers or lesions or decubitus ulcers, pathophysiological, epidemiological aspects, and risk factors. The progress in evidence of the effectiveness of preventive repositioning in the appearance of these lesions in vulnerable hospitalized patients is also evaluated. Methods. Databases were reviewed in non-systematic manner, including the Cochrane Wounds Specialized Register; Medline, Scopus, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE (Ovid); EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science, SciELO, and Lilacs. The general search terms included [pressure ulcers or pressure lesions or decubitus ulcers] and [prevention or preventive] and [repositioning or positioning or position changes or postural change] and [patient at risk or vulnerable] and [hospitalized or ICU or intensive care]. Systematic literature reviews, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, cost-effectiveness and qualitative studies in English or Spanish were included. Results. Although globally, the incidence, prevalence, and years of disability associated to these lesions has diminished between 1990 and 2019, the high impact on health persists. Evidence found on the effectiveness of repositioning in preventing pressure ulcers and health associated costs has been evaluated with certainty between low and very low, as a result of conducting research with serious methodological limitations that report results with high inaccuracy. Conclusion.The findings reported present that these lesions persist at hospital level and continue being a global social and health problem with high impact on health budgets. Likewise, there is a need to develop greater quality research on prevention strategies, such as repositioning, which validate their effectiveness, and justify their use.

Objetivo. Este artículo presenta una revisión de la literatura con el objetivo de explorar y analizar la situación actual de las úlceras o lesiones por presión o úlceras por decúbito, aspectos fisiopatológicos, epidemiológicos, y factores de riesgo. Se evalúa además el progreso en la evidencia de la eficacia del reposicionamiento preventivo en la aparición de estas lesiones en pacientes vulnerables hospitalizados. Métodos. Se revisaron bases de datos de forma no sistemática, incluyendo The Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; Medline, Scopus, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE (Ovid); EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science, Scielo, y Lilacs. Los términos de búsqueda generales incluyeron [úlceras por presión o lesiones por presión o úlceras por decúbito] y [prevención o preventivo] y [reposicionamiento o posicionamiento o cambios de posición o cambio postural] y [paciente en riesgo o vulnerable] y [hospitalizado o UCI o cuidados intensivos]. Se incluyeron revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura, ensayos clínicos aleatorizados, estudios observacionales, estudios de costo-efectividad y cualitativos en idioma inglés o español. Resultados. Aunque globalmente la incidencia, prevalencia y años de incapacidad asociado a estas lesiones ha disminuido entre 1990 y 2019, el impacto en salud persiste de forma elevada. La evidencia encontrada sobre la eficacia del reposicionamiento en prevención de úlceras por presión y costos asociados en salud ha sido evaluada con certeza entre baja y muy baja, como resultado de la realización de investigaciones con serias limitaciones metodológicas que reportan resultados con alta imprecisión. Conclusión.Los hallazgos reportados presentan que estas lesiones persisten a nivel hospitalario y continúan siendo un problema social y de salud mundial con alto impacto en los presupuestos en salud. Así mismo se presenta la necesidad de desarrollar mayor investigación de calidad en estrategias preventivas como el reposicionamiento, que validen su eficacia, y justifiquen su utilización.

Objetivo. Este artigo apresenta uma revisão da literatura com o objetivo de explorar e analisar a situação atual das úlceras por pressão ou úlceras de decúbito, os aspectos fisiopatológicos e epidemiológicos e os fatores de risco. Também avalia o progresso na evidência da eficácia do reposicionamento preventivo no desenvolvimento dessas lesões em pacientes hospitalizados vulneráveis. Métodos.Foram revisados bancos de dados não específicos do local, incluindo The Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; Medline, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE (Ovid); EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science, Scielo e Lilacs. Os termos gerais de pesquisa incluíram [úlceras de pressão ou lesões por pressão ou úlceras de pressão ou úlceras de decúbito] e [prevenção ou preventivo] e [reposicionamento ou posicionamento ou mudanças de posição ou mudança postural] e [paciente em risco ou vulnerável] e [hospitalizado ou UTI ou terapia intensiva]. Foram incluídas revisões sistemáticas da literatura, ensaios clínicos randomizados, estudos observacionais, estudos de custo-efetividade e qualitativos em inglês ou espanhol. Resultados. Embora, em geral, a incidência, a prevalência e os anos de incapacidade associados a essas lesões tenham diminuído entre 1990 e 2019, o impacto na saúde continua alto. As evidências encontradas sobre a eficácia do reposicionamento na prevenção de úlceras por pressão e os custos de saúde associados foram avaliadas com certeza baixa a muito baixa, como resultado de pesquisas com sérias limitações metodológicas que relataram resultados altamente imprecisos. Conclusão. Os resultados relatados mostram que essas lesões persistem em nível hospitalar e continuam a ser um problema social e de saúde global com alto impacto nos orçamentos de saúde. Também há necessidade de mais pesquisas de qualidade sobre estratégias preventivas, como o reposicionamento, para validar sua eficácia e justificar seu uso.

Valoración de las respuestas conductuales al dolor durante el cambio postural en pacientes sedados orointubados / Assessment of behavioral responses to pain during postural change in intubated sedated patients

Introducción: los pacientes críticos, bajo sedación y apoyo ventilatorio invasivo presentan dolor, la barrera más grande para su detección es la incapacidad de comunicarse; sin embargo, el hecho de que el paciente no pueda referir su dolor, no significa que no lo padezca. Objetivo: describir las respuestas conductuales al dolor durante el cambio postural en pacientes sedados oro intubados. Material y métodos: estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, observacional, longitudinal. Muestra n= 50 pacientes, se utilizó la escala BPS (Behavioral Pain Scale) como instrumento de valoración del dolor, se midió en tres momentos: 1 minuto antes, durante y 10 minutos después del cambio postural. Resultados: el cambio postural del paciente con sedación y ventilación mecánica provocó dolor en 56% de los pacientes; antes de realizar el cambio postural se identificó una media del dolor de 4.6, durante el cambio postural aumento a 6.5 y posterior al cambio disminuyo a una media de 4, siendo un factor protector. Conclusiones: la movilización del paciente sedado oro intubado requiere de la participación del equipo multidisciplinar, para el manejo de la ventilación mecánica, el cuidado de sondas y catéteres, cuidados de la piel, prevención de caídas y aplicación correcta de la técnica de movilización, la cual demanda experiencia clínica del personal que participa en la valoración y manejo de las respuestas conductuales al dolor.

Introduction: critical patients, under sedation and invasive ventilatory support present pain, the greatest barrier to its detection is the inability to communicate, however, the fact that the patient cannot report their pain does not mean that they do not suffer from it. Objective: to describe the behavioral responses to pain during postural change in sedated or intubated patients. Material and Methods: quantitative, descriptive, observational, longitudinal study. Sample n = 50 patients, the BPS scale (Behavioral Pain Scale) was used as an instrument for assessing pain, it was measured at three moments: 1 minute before, during and 10 minutes after the postural change. Results: the postural change of the patient with sedation and mechanical ventilation caused unacceptable pain in 56% of the patients; Before making the postural change, a mean pain of 4.6 was identified, during the postural change it increased to 6.5 and after the change it decreased to a mean of 4, being a protective factor. Conclusions: the mobilization of the sedated or intubated patient requires the participation of the multidisciplinary team, for the management of mechanical ventilation, care of tubes and catheters, skin care, prevention of falls and correct application of the mobilization technique, which It demands clinical experience from the personnel involved in the assessment and management of behavioral responses to pain.

Orientações sobre transferências na redução da intensidade da dor lombar crônica de cuidadores familiares em um ambulatório de cuidados paliativos: estudo piloto / Guidelines on transfers in the reduction of chronic low back pain intensity of family caregivers in a palliative care ambulatory: pilot study

Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia de uma estratégia de orientações verbal e escrita sobre transferências na redução da dor lombar em cuidador familiar de pacientes em cuidados paliativos; o impacto no desempenho das tarefas diárias do cuidador antes e após a intervenção e se a adesão às orientações resultou em melhora clínica significativa da dor e do desempenho nas atividades. Método: Trata-se de ensaio clínico piloto, realizado no ambulatório de cuidados paliativos do HCFMUSP. Foram avaliados 4 cuidadores familiares divididos em dois grupos. O grupo intervenção recebeu orientação verbal e escrita e o grupo controle apenas orientação verbal. A análise dos dados foi realizada através de medida de proporção e análise de significância estatística pelo teste exato de Fisher. A correlação entre as variáveis será realizada através de regressão logística. Resultados: Houve dificuldade no recrutamento com influência direta no tamanho reduzido da amostra. Os resultados preliminares sobre a eficácia da intervenção para redução de dor e aumento de desempenho em cuidadores familiares não demonstraram significância estatística. A análise descritiva de aderência às recomendações aponta para uma tendência promissora quanto à viabilidade da intervenção educativa. Conclusão: A relevância deste ensaio piloto deve-se a avaliação preliminar do tempo necessário para se recrutar um número adequado de participantes e a tendência de boa aderência à intervenção. A dificuldade de recrutamento de pacientes em final de vida é previsível devido ao tempo reduzido de sobrevida e a complexidade do cuidado. A eficácia da intervenção somente poderá ser demonstrada com o ajuste do tamanho da amostra.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of strategy of verbal and written guidance on transference in the reduction of low back pain in the family caregiver of patients in palliative care; the impact on the performance of the daily tasks of the caregiver before and after the intervention and whether adherence to the guidelines resulted in a significant clinical improvement of pain and performance in the activities. Method: This is a pilot clinical trial, performed at the HCFMUSP palliative care outpatient. Four family caregivers were divided into two groups. The intervention group received verbal and written guidance and the group controlled verbal guidance. The analysis of the data was performed by measurement of proportion and analysis of statistical significance by the Fisher exact test. The correlation between the variables will be performed through logistic regression. Results: Due to the small sample size, preliminary results on the efficacy of the intervention to reduce pain and increase performance in family caregivers did not demonstrate statistical significance. The descriptive analysis of adherence to the recommendations points to a promising tendency towards the feasibility of the educational intervention. Conclusion: The relevance of this pilot test is due to the preliminary evaluation of the time needed to recruit an adequate number of participants and the tendency of good adherence to the intervention. The difficulty of recruiting end-of-life patients is predictable due to reduced survival time and the complexity of care. The effectiveness of the intervention can only be demonstrated by adjusting the sample size.

The method to reduce the malposition rate via reposition of guidewire with ultrasound guidance in the central venous catheterization

OBJECTIVE: Malposition of central venous catheterization (CVC) may cause vascular related complications and catheter dysfunctions. The aim of this study was to reduce the malposition rate of CVC by repositioning the malposition after confirming the location of the guide-wire with ultrasound (US) guidance. METHODS: This research assessed the before study (group A) from January to December 2016 and after study (group B) from January to December 2017 in the emergency department. CVCs were performed using the anatomical landmark technique (group A) and US guided technique (group B). In group B, if the guided-wire was misplaced, it was drawn back and repositioned under US guidance. The final location of the catheter tip was confirmed by chest X-ray. The rate of malposition before and after repositioning of the two groups was compared. RESULTS: The subjects were group A (694 cases) and group B (619 cases) with a total of 1,313 patients. The rate of malposition before repositioning of the two groups were 16 cases (2.3%) and 13 cases (2.1%), respectively, and no statistically significant difference was observed (P>0.05). In group B, there were 10 cases (1.6%) of guidewire malposition that was identified and three cases (0.5%) of catheter malposition could not be identified under US examination. The malpositioned guidewires were all corrected by repositioning under ultrasound guidance. The rate of malposition after repositioning of the two groups were 2.3% (n=16) and 0.5% (n=3), respectively, and a statistically significant difference was observed (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: With US guidance, confirming the location and repositioning CVC guidewire can reduce the malposition rate in CVCs.

Prevalencia de trastornos músculo-esqueléticos en funcionarios de centros hospitalarios que realizan manejo de pacientes y caracterización de potenciales factores de riesgo / Prevalence of musculoskeletal diseases and potential risk factors among hospital personnel handling patients

El estudio tuvo como propósito identificar potenciales factores de riesgo de trastornos músculo-esqueléticos (TMEs) en procedimientos realizados por personal de seis cargos (n=78), que efectuaban manejo de pacientes en labores pre e intrahospitalarias. El diseño de la investigación es descriptivo transversal. Se determinó prevalencia de TMEs, condición física de los funcionarios, carga física, demandas biomecánicas y de organización del trabajo. La prevalencia de TMEs en los cargos estudiados se extendió entre 14,3 por ciento a 36,4 por ciento. La carga cardiovascular promedio de los grupos presentó un rango de 22,3 por ciento a 27,1 por ciento. Las fuerzas pick de compresión y corte, en las tareas de mayor demanda biomecánica, registraron rangos de 3,5 kN a 5,6 kNy de 0,35 kN a 0,81 kN, respectivamente. La presión por cantidad de trabajo fue el único aspecto de organización que presentó asociación estadística significativa con prevalencia de TMEs (r = 0,83). Los resultados del estudio confirman el carácter multifactorial de la generación de este tipo de trastornos. En las labores analizadas, los potenciales factores de riesgo de TMEs correspondieron a las demandas que derivan de variables biomecánicas, de organización del trabajo, equipamiento, infraestructura, así como también relacionadas con las características de las personas.

The purpose of the study was to identify potential risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in patient handling procedures carried out by personnel of six different positions (n=78) in both prehospital and intrahospital settings. A descriptive cross–sectional study was designed. Prevalence of MSDs, physical condition, physical workload, and biomechanical and work organization factors were determined. The prevalence of MSD ranged from 14.3 percent to 36.4 percent. The mean cardiovascular workload in the six groups was between 22.3 percent and 27.1 percent. In the tasks of greater biomechanical demand, percent peak compression and shear forces ranged between 3.5 kN to 5.6 kNand 0.35 kN to 0.81 kN, respectively. The perception of pressure at work was the only organizational aspect that showed significant statistical association with prevalence of MSD (r=0.83). Results confirm the multi-factor nature of the musculoskeletal diseases. In the activities analyzed, it was found that the potential MSD risk factors were related to biomechanical variables, organization at work, equipment, infrastructure and personal characteristics.