The Usefulness of Endoscopic Ultrasonoraphy for Discriminating Gastric Mucosal Cancer from Submucosal Invasion / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been used to discriminate gastric mucosal cancer (T1m) from submucosal invasion (T1sm). Thus the aims of this study are 1) to determine the accuracy of EUS for diagnosing tumor depth, 2) to compare the accuracy of EUS with the endoscopic impressions of variously experienced endoscopists and 3) to compare the accuracy of performing EUS by one doctor according to the experience. METHODS: The EUS and pathologic reports of early gastric cancer patients were analyzed. The same endoscopic images were reviewed again by 3 endoscopists, who had one-, three- and five-years experience, respectively. The accuracies of EUS and conventional endoscopy were analyzed. RESULTS: 77 patients were included from November 2003 to October 2005. The kappa of the EUS for actual examiner and conventional endoscopy for reviewer 1, reviewer 2 and reviewer 3 were 0.421, 0.134, 0.359 and 0.307, respectively and accuracies were 68.8%, 45.5%, 67.5% and 62.3%, respectively. Of the 52 T1m patients, 23 (44.2%) were overstaged as T1sm with performing EUS. But of 25 T1sm patients, only 1 (4.0%) was understaged as T1m with performing EUS. The accuracy and kappa of the EUS for one doctor during the first-year experience were 60.6% and 0.316, respectively, and they were 75.0% and 0.508, respectively during the second-year experience. CONCLUSIONS: EUS is useful for complementing the conventional endoscopic discrimination of gastric mucosal cancer from submucosal invasion. Yet physician should keep in mind the relatively common overstaging.

A Case of Differentiated Mucosal Gastric Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis Presented as an Intra-abdominal Mass / 대한소화기내시경학회지

In early gastric cancer, the most important prognostic factor is the presence or absence of a lymph node metastasis that is associated with the tumor size, histopathological differentiation, depth of tumor invasion and lympho-vascular invasion. A small sized differentiated mucosal cancer without a lympho-vascular invasion or histological ulceration rarely metastasizes to the lymph node. Herein, we report a case of a lymph node metastasis that is presented as an intra-abdominal mass in a 2.5 cm-sized differentiated mucosal cancer without ulceration or lympho-vascular invasion.

Comparison of Clinicopathologic Findings between Colorectal Adenoma with High Grade Dysplasia and Colorectal Carcinoma with Mucosal Invasion / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The precancerous lesion of colorectal cancer is adenoma. Adenoma with high grade dysplasia has been known as the lesion having high malignant potentials. The cancer with invasion to mucosa is limted to the mucosa, and it is difficult to pathologically differentiate the adenoma with high grade dysplasia. METHODS: Fifty three adenomas with high grade dysplasia (type I group) and 40 cancers with invasion to mucosa (type II group) for 4 years, were analyzed for the colonoscopic findings and pathological findings before and after EMR. RESULTS: Mean ages were 57.0 years old for type I group and 60.4 for type II group. Chief complaint for colonoscopy was rectal bleeding (21.0%) for type I group, and rectal bleeding (35.0%) for type II group. Mean sizes of the lesions were 1.18 cm for type I group, and 1.71 cm for type II group. Locations of the lesion were rectum 43.4%, sigmoid colon 32.1%, proximal colon 24.5% for type I group, and rectum 45.7%, sigmoid colon 42.9%, proximal colon 11.4% for type II group. Shapes of the lesions were Is 46.9%, Ip 30.6%, Isp 18.4%, LST 4.1% for type I group, and Isp 34.2%, Ip 31.6%, Is 18.4%, LST 5%, IIa depression 5%, Is+IIc 5% for type II group. Methods for therapy were EMR 60.4%, operation 1.9%, electrocoagulation 11.3%, observation 26.4% for type I group, and EMR 85.0%, operation 15.0% for type II group. Pathological agreement before and after EMR was 57.1% for type I group and 31.3% for type II group. CONCLUSIONS: Type II group had more rectal bleeding, larger, more Isp type, more EMR therapy, more pathological disagreement ratio before and after EMR, than type I group.