Results of Multilevel Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disorder of the Lumbar Spine / 대한척추외과학회지

PURPOSE: To investigate the causative factors of the complications and clinical results of 82 patients that underwent multilevel fusion due to degenerative lumbar disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study, between October 1994 and July 2001, of 101 patients that had undergone spinal fusion at more than 3 levels, due to degenerative lumbar disease, and excluding 19 patients, which included 8 revisions, 1 postop infection and 10 lost to follow-up. The average age of the 82 patients was 61, ranging from 49 to 81 years. There were 22 men and 60 women, with an average follow up of 35, ranging from 12 to 79 months. Inclusion in the study required a minimum of 1 year of radiographic follow-up, where the lumbar lordotic angle, lateral sagittal angle of the fusion segments, problems associated with instrumentation (screw loosening, breakage and rod breakage), nonunion, fusion level, extension to sacrum, medical comorbidities and their influences on the clinical results were evaluated. Evaluation of the clinical results were quantified using Kirkaldy-Willis'criteria. T-test, Chi-square test and Pearson correlation tests were performed to evaluate the statistical significance, using SPSS version 10.0. RESULTS: 12, 35, 20 and 15 of the 82 patients declared their outcomes to be excellent, good, fair and poor, respectively. The clinical results were statistically associated with the difference between the postoperative and final sagittal angle in the fusion segments (p<0.05). The more fusion segments involved, the more problems associated with the instrumentation occurred. The number of fusion levels affected the clinical results. CONCLUSION: It seems to be difficult to reach satisfactory results in the case of multilevel spinal fusion, which was mostly associated with problems of instrumentation and nonunion, which showed poorer clinical results. Maintenance of the sagittal angle in the fusion segments was challenging when the number of fusion levels was increased.

Outcome Analysis of the Patients with and without Anterior Plating in Multi-Level Degenerative Cervical Diseases

OBJECTIVES: The rates of pseudarthrosis for two- and three level fusion have been reported to be 17-63 and 50% without anterior cervical plating. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of anterior cervical plating in the treatment of multilevel degenerative cervical disease such mostly the additional risks associated with hardware implants and its benefits, fusion rate and radiographic results, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Forty-seven patients who underwent operations between 1993 and 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. The technique for operation was same for both groups(Smith Robinson with autologous iliac bone graft). Group I consisted of 35 consecutive patients treated with anterior cervical decompression and fusion with anterior cervical plate fixation. Group II consisted of 12 consecutive patients treated without plate fixation. We compared clinical outcomes by Prolo score, radiographic results in the rate of fusion, cervical lordosis by Gore angle, disc height by Farfan method, and surgical complications between two groups. RESULTS: The favorable clinical outcomes(excellent and good) by Prolo score were observed with the use of anterior cervical plate fixation(89% vs 75%). The successful fusion rate of multilevel cervical fusion was as seen with anterior cervical plate fixation(97% vs 75%). The overall graft complication rate in multilevel fusions was decreased, with anterior cervical plate fixation, and the hardware related complications were relatively minimal without serious consequences. CONCLUSION: Anterior cervical plate fixation in the treatment of multilevel cervical disorders is an effective stabilizing method which provides increased bony fusion rate, decreased graft complications, maintained cervical lordosis, early mobilization of the these patients without serious hardware related complications.